As this 10-year iniave passes its halfway
point, it is clear that much work remains to
be done.
In many countries, it is an unfortunate truth
that policy eorts alone are insucient to
stem the de of this epidemic and meet
the goal of the WHO’s iniave. It is there-
fore imperave that healthcare providers
ulize their unique resources to improve
road safety for their paents. Physicians are
well-posioned to not only save their own
paents’ lives, but also promote country-
wide road safety advancement. This paper
aims to outline the importance of road safety
in central Africa, discuss two unique case
studies of road safety policies, and highlight
opportunies for healthcare providers to im-
prove road safety.
Road Safety in Central Africa
Many African countries present a unique
set of opportunies and challenges in re-
gards to road safety. As countries have ex-
perienced growing economies, increased
resources, and booming populaon sizes,
road transportaon has experienced explo-
sive growth in recent years. This change has
occurred so quickly that in many countries,
safety structures have been unable to keep
pace. Public health educaon, road safety
policies, healthcare capacity for traumac
injuries, the availability of adequate safety
equipment, and other essenal components
of a safe transportaon sector have all been
unable to meet the ever-growing safety
needs in many African countries.
The results of this unfortunate combinaon
are dire. One study found that the risk of
dying as a result of an RTA in Africa was 24.1
deaths per 100,000 people, the highest of
any of the global regions studied6. In addi-
on, these RTAs aected far more than just
motor vehicle users- pedestrians accounted
for a full 37% of fatalies6. Not only do RTAs
cause so many deaths and injuries, they also
cause enough strain on developing econo-
mies to have signicant economic eects.
Road safety problems are esmated to cost
African governments between 0.8% and 9%
of their total GDPs3. This can be a devas-
tang loss for growing economies, and can
also divert investment away from other im-
portant sectors such as healthcare and edu-
caon.
The government response to the problem of
RTAs has varied greatly across countries. In
spite of the fact that the African Union set
a goal of reducing RTA fatalies by 50% by
2020, many countries have failed to create
policies that address the growing problem of
road safety6. A poignant and visible example
of the eects of high-quality road safety poli-
cies is the dierence in road safety between
Uganda and Rwanda.
Road Safety in Uganda and Rwanda
Although Uganda and Rwanda have expe-
rienced similar economic and populaon
growth rates during the past twenty years,
the safety of their roads have become vast-
ly dierent. Indeed, a trip to their capital
cies today reveals starkly dierent trac
condions. In the late 1990s, Uganda and
Rwanda both had similarly lethal roads and
a lack of safety infrastructure. In response,
both countries created several iniaves to
reduce RTAs. Their governments created
helmet laws for motorcycle users, enacted
speed limit laws, and made eorts to elimi-
nate police corrupon and increase enforce-
ment of trac laws7,8.
In Uganda, the complexity of road safety
proved to be too problemac, and many
of the government’s policies were not suc-
cessful. Bribery connued, enforcement of
many of the new laws lacked commitment,
and insucient eort was placed into educa-
ng the public about the importance of road
safety8. The Ugandan government con-
nued enacng new policies in subsequent
years to combat RTAs, but in spite of these
laudable eorts, the goal of creang safer
roads remained elusive. In fact, without ef-
fecve road safety policies, the number of
RTAs in Uganda has skyrocketed. From 1991
to 2007, Ugandans experienced an almost
four-fold increase in the number of road traf-
c deaths annually8. In 2010, almost 10,000
people died in Uganda as a result of RTAs,
which constutes a fatality rate of 28.9 per
100,000 populaon9.
This increased rate of RTAs has placed an
immense burden on physicians and hospi-
tals across the country. One hospital in Kam-
pala, Mulago Hospital, was even forced to
create an enre new ward to deal with the
overwhelming number of new trauma cases
from RTAs, parcularly those involving mo-
torcycle taxis10.
The story of road safety iniaves in Rwan-
da could not be more dierent. The go-
vernment of Rwanda implemented speed
limit laws, mandatory vehicle inspecon
laws, and motorcycle helmet laws in 20017.
These laws were similar in content to those
in Uganda. Unlike in Uganda, however, in-
creased funding was given for trac police,
who began strictly enforcing the new laws7.
An an-corrupon campaign within its po-
lice force was created, which resulted in the
ring of over 100 police ocers7. Also, in
2003, a naonal public awareness campaign
was conducted to increase educaon around
road safety issues7. As road trac deaths
were skyrockeng in Uganda during the ear-
ly 2000s, a decrease in road trac deaths of
30% was seen in Rwanda7. This change was
so dramac that it gained internaonal ac-
claim and was heralded as a successful exa-
mple for other countries to follow.
The story of the transformaon of Rwandan
roads highlights two key lessons. First, it re-
veals that it is not only possible, but very fea-
sible for a country to dramacally improve its
road safety. It is no longer acceptable to as-
sume that road safety is too big a problem to
solve; it has been done in Rwanda, and it can
be done elsewhere. Second, this example
highlights the importance of dedicaon and
commitment in improving road safety. The
government of Rwanda displayed an ad-
mirable level of willpower in achieving this
transformaon. The example of Uganda, on
the other hand, shows that simply creang
policies and laws without a high degree of
commitment may not improve roads. It re-
quires persistence and hard work over the
course of many years in order to see results.
Many countries lack the polical willpower
of the Rwandan government. That is, in
countries like Uganda, the Democrac Re-
public of the Congo, or the Central African
Republic, it can be much more dicult and
slow-going for governments to create po-
licies, pass laws, and provide funding. In
these countries, government iniave is not
enough. In order to achieve safer roads, it is
imperave that physicians join in this bale
and ght for the safety of their paents.
The Role of Physicians in Creang Safer
Roads
Although a physician’s primary responsibility
is to the treatment of disease in individual
paents, physicians are uniquely posioned
to help prevent injury and death not only in
their own paents, but in society as a whole.
Indeed, beer prevenon is oen the most
eecve means of improving the health of
individual paents. Physicians have the op-
portunity to improve road safety by acvely
engaging in three key acvies: polical ad-
vocacy, public health educaon, and road
safety research.
The history of road safety in Rwanda shows
that dramac improvement of road safety is
possible if enough polical interest exists.
Physicians have an opportunity to use their
posion to put pressure on policians to
strive to make roads safer. This advocacy
could create the polical will necessary to
properly nance and implement eecve
road safety policies. Physicians can write
and call their local policians encouraging
them to take road safety seriously, and ex-
plaining the benets of eecve road safety
projects. They can also write leers to local
newspapers pushing for more acon on road
safety.
Revue Médicale des Grands Lacs Vol6, No4, Déc 2015
3