Itinéraire: Deux Jours à Paris Use the internet to create a travel brochure for a Fabulous Trip to Paris. You will want your brochure to look good enough that customers will use your (fictional) travel agency instead of your classmates’. Directions: Use the Internet and your notes to research info about the monuments you will see in Paris. Sites to use for this project can be found on Mme. K’s website at www.mrsklingback.weebly.com Requirements: Vous allez préparez un itinéraire pour deux jours a Paris. Vous créerez une brochure / une annonce pour votre itinéraire. Incluez: Les sites / monuments qu'on visitera (en ordre!) pendant les deux jours. Combien de temps qu'on passera à chaque monument. Les instructions pour prendre le métro à et de chaque monument, si c'est nécessaire pour aller aux monuments. (les arrêtes, les correspondances, etc.) Créez une brochure pour faire de la publicité pour votre itinéraire. Donc, si c'est une publicité, vous avez besoin de le coulerez et faire attention aux détails! Les instructions à manger à Paris. Les clients, est-ce qu'ils vont manger au restaurant? Au café? Au bistro? Prendre un crêpe en marchant au prochain monument? Le prix. Combien d'argent est-ce qu'on a besoin de pour cet itinéraire et pour visiter les monuments? Finalement, amusez-vous bien! Nous aurons une compétition pour décider qui a fait l'itinéraire que nous voulons prendre le plus. Visuals: Pictures and visual aids make a brochure appealing. Include travel photos. Find the flag of the country and include a picture of it. Be creative!! PRESENT: Your brochure to the class: Grading: Your brochure will be graded according to the following rubric: Brochure Task Rubric: Appearance: Format and Pride in Your Work 4 3 2 1 Looks like a travel brochure/pamphlet with a cover, a back cover, and at least two pages of information. Looks like a travel brochure/pamphlet with a cover, a back cover, and at least two pages of information. The cover and/or back cover are present, but may look rushed or unprofessional. Each section is clearly labeled. Complete and colorful but may look rushed. Looks like a travel brochure/pamphlet. Has a cover, but may not have a back cover. At least two pages of information. Does not like a travel brochure/pamphlet. Brochure is presented in sections with each section clearly labeled. Exceptionally well-done and professional looking. At least 5 pictures total. They are well-placed and look crisp and clear. All pictures have a wellworded and interesting caption. Quality of Research and Presentation of Information Brochure neatly put together and is easy to read. You have included accurate metro info that is easy to read and properly presented. Information about monuments is very interesting and accurate. You have convinced me to visit Paris and use your itinerary. At least 4 pictures total. Pictures may occasionally interfere with reading of text but are all crisp and clear. All pictures have a caption but may be vague. Brochure neatly put together and is easy to read. You have included accurate metro info that is easy to read and properly presented. Information about monuments is mostly interesting and accurate. It is mostly convincing. Each section is clearly labeled. May be missing one element and looks rushed and/or unprofessional. At least 3 pictures total. Pictures may occasionally interfere with reading of text. Most pictures have a caption. Cover(s) may be present but are sloppy and unappealing. May only have one page of additional information. Sections of information are not labeled. Overall looks sloppy and rushed. At least 2 pictures total. Pictures may occasionally interfere with reading of text and are blurry/vague. Less than half the pictures have captions. Brochure more disorganized. You have included metro info, but it is hard to follow and is inaccurate at times. Brochure very haphazard. Metro info is either missing or completely disorganized/inaccurate. Information about monuments is accurate but uninteresting. You’ve only selected the first piece of info that you found. It is complete, but unconvincing. Information about monuments is not accurate and/or vague. It is incomplete and unconvincing. Written French Rubric Control of complex syntax and good use of verbs, although a few errors may occur. Evidence of complex syntax and appropriate use of Some control of structures and common verb tenses. verbs, although more than a few grammatical errors may occur. Generally correct elementary structure. Lack of attention to details. Some repetition Variety of Vocabulary and Idiomatic Instructions Considerable breadth and appropriate use of vocabulary Vocabulary appropriate but limited. Occasional second language interference Limited vocabulary. Significant second language interference Insufficient vocabulary. Frequent second language Treatment of Topic and Organization Exceptional development of topic. Clear organization of ideas Responds creatively. Relevant and thorough treatment of topic. Logical organization Limited treatment of topic. Organization may be difficult to follow. Relies on repetition of ideas Minimal relevance to the topic. Disorganized. Overly repetitive. Restatement of topic with little development. 4 3 2 1 Use of Grammar and Structure Numerous grammatical errors. Overly repetitive use of structures Content / Overall Response Oral French Rubric Expansive; correctly uses most challenging words/phrases. Highly creative response using current and prior material. Attempts to use challenging words/phrases. Demonstrates competence and clearly creative response. Uses basic vocabulary correctly. Suggests competence and preparedness but may be missing key details. Demonstrates incompetence. It is clear the student did not prepare Grammar and Syntax Virtualy free of errors, pushing the limits of studied patterns. Verbs agree w/ subjects in all cases. Few errors of syntax which do not significantly hinder comprehension. Most verbs agree w/ subjects. Some parts comprehensible, Others have serious lapses in syntax. Some verbs used correctly. Complete lack of syntactical control or no response to one or more questions. Pronunciation Good effort to simulate native intonation and pronunciation. Consistently pronounces vowels and consonants correctly. Correct intonation for questions & statements. Pronunciation and intonation do not interfere with comprehension. Generally pronounces vowels and consonants correctly. May pause and repeat for clarity. Attempt at correct pronunciation. Mostly comprehensible. Some parts may not be understood. Pronounces vowels & consonants incorrectly, little voice variation. No attempt at proper pronunciation at all. Communication Communication is clear, no hesitation, smooth delivery, appropriate speed. Communication is clear in most places, some hesitation, some parts of delivery are choppy. Communication is unclear, seemed hesitant about what comes next, rough delivery No response to one or more questions. (Fluency) 4 3 2 1