
annual increase. However, there are infinite numbers of sustainable harvests along
the natural growth curve, each corresponding to a different population size. So,
which one of this infinite number of choices is most desirable, can be addressed
either by a purely bio-physical viewpoint or the bio-economic perspective.
From the bio-physical viewpoint, the most desirable choice of population would
be the one that maximizes the biomass that can be harvested on a sustainable
basis or as it is called Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) i.e. maintaining the
populationsize consistent with the maximum level ofsustainable harvest. Though
it takes full consideration of the relevant biophysical factors affecting the natural
growth function of the resource in question (here fishery), no considerations are
made about either the cost of harvesting the amount of fish biomass or the total
social benefit (as measured by the market value) to be derived from this level of
harvest. If suppose the society can obtain a net benefit (total benefit-total cost)
that is greater than at the maximum sustainable yield harvest level with harvesting
less than the MSY, then the MSY in this case may not represent an economic
optimum (where net benefit is the maximum). In fact, there is onlyone situation
in which a maximum sustainable resource management will certainlybe expected
to yield a result consistent with an economic optimum. This occurs only if, the cost
of labour, capital and other materials used for harvest is assumed to be zero which
is rather an unrealistic situation.
Hence, an alternative approach, the bio-economic perspective, suggests that the
choice of the most desirable sustainable harvest shoulddependupon the interaction
of three key variables: the nature of the underlying natural growth function; the
specific size of the fish population; and the amount of economic resources used
for harvesting. In fisheryeconomics, the phrase fishing effort is used to describe
a composite economic factor (such as labour, capital, energy and other raw
material) used in fish harvesting activities. It is an index of factor inputs with
significant measurementdifficulties.
The production function of a fisherythat shows the relationships among the levels
of catch, effort and population size can be defined as follows:
Where H is the fish catch or harvest due to human exploitation, E is the level of
fishing effort, and B is the stock or fish biomass or simply the fish population. In
general, this production function speaks that for a given population size, the higher
the level of effort, the larger will be the harvest or catch; and given the level of
effort, the larger the population size, the larger will be the catch.
However, the above interrelationships among the levels of harvest, effort and
population size do not address the issue of whether the harvest under anygiven
condition is sustainable or not. For this, we need to take into consideration, the
natural growth rate of the renewable resource in question that is fish. It is important
to note here that there is a one to one correspondence between effort and
equilibrium population size (where natural growth equals the biomass that can be
harvested on a sustainable basis). That is for a given level of effort, a unique
equilibrium population size will result, yielding a sustainable harvest. This occurs
because harvest is replaced by a natural growth rate. This is referred to as
steady-state bio-economic equilibrium.Algebraically, this equilibrium condition is
attained when the following condition is met: