
J Radiol 2006;87
M Morel et al.
Imagerie Ostéo-articulaire
871
orienter le codage de la fréquence dans le
sens de l’axe de la prothèse, augmenter la
bande passante à 62,5 KHz, préférer le fast
spin écho (FSE) et le STIR à la Fat Sat. En-
fin il faut diminuer la taille du Voxel et
augmenter le nombre de pixels dans le sens
du codage de la fréquence (75, 78).
Références
1. Boles CA, D’Alessio TL, Wile GE, El-
Khoury GY. High Resolution 3.0T MR
Elbow: A Fresh Look at Anatomy. RS-
NA 2005;1218BP-e:782.
2. Boles CA, Lee J, El-Khoury GY. High Re-
solution 3.0T MR Wrist: Anatomy on Rou-
tine Images. RSNA 2005;1218BP-e:781.
3. Lee KS, Craig JG, van Holsbeeck MT.
3 Tesla MR Imaging of the Ankle Using
a Surface Coil: Normal Anatomy and
Selected Abnormal Cases. RSNA 2005;
2341CE-e:790.
4. Yao L, Pitts JT, Thomasson D. Compre-
hensive MRI of the Ankle at 3.0 Tesla: Iso-
tropic 3D Proton Density-weighted Fast
Spin Echo. RSNA 2005;SSE20-01:310.
5. Thedens D, Stolpen AH, Baer TE, Saltz-
man CL, Brown TD, El-Khoury GY.
Improved Visualization of Ankle Car-
tilage with Three-dimensional MRI at
3 Tesla Using Noninvasive Distraction.
RSNA 2005;SSA21-06:221.
6. Magee T, Shapiro MD, Williams DS,
Ramnath RR. Sensitivity and Specificity
in Detection of Supraspinatus Tendon
Tears with 3.0 Tesla MR Imaging of the
Shoulder. RSNA 2005;SSC19-05:274.
7. Eshed I, Althoff CE, Scheel AK, Bac-
khaus M, Hamm KA. Low-Field MRI
for Assessing Synovitis in Patients with
Rheumatoid Arthritis: Impact of Gd-
DTPA Dose on Synovitis Scoring? RS-
NA 2005;SSA22-04:223.
8. Kamishima T. Effect of Treatment with
Infliximab on Patients with Rheumatoid
Arthritis Evaluated by Contrast-enhanced
MR Imaging. RSNA 2005;SSA22-05:223.
9. Suga T, Watanabe Y, Amoh Y, Saegusa J,
Nagayama M, Okumura A. Early Dia-
gnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Mi-
croscopic MR Imaging of the Fingers.
RSNA 2005;SSA22-02:222.
10. Cerezal LF, Abascal F, del Pinal F, Can-
ga A. MR imaging of athletic injuries of
the wrist and hand. RSNA 2005;1213BP-
e:781.
11. Peterson JJ, Kransdorf MJ, Bancroft LW,
Berquist TH, Murray P, Ruzek KA.
Evaluation of collateral ligament injuries
of the mcp joints with magnetic resonance
imaging and magnetic resonance arthro-
graphy. RSNA 2005;1212BP-e:781.
12. Fujii M, Iwama Y, Kawamitsu H,
Ohno Y, Kaji Y, Sugimura K. High-
resolution MR imaging of the finger trau-
ma with a microscopic coil. RSNA 2005:
1210BP-e:781.
13. Hitachi S, Majima K, Tabata S, Sato A,
Higano S, Takahashi S. The impact of hi-
gh-resolution MR imaging of the rotator
cuff with a microscopic coil: correlation
with histopathologic and arthroscopic
findings. RSNA 2005;1254BP-e:785.
14. Johnston CJ, Ford SM, Duke DM, Eusta-
ce SJ. Whole body MRI in the evaluation
of marrow disease employing intra-
venous super paramagnetic iron oxide
agent: comparison of T2-weighted and
STIR TSE sequences. RSNA 2005;SSM22-
03:486.
15. Tsuda N, Tsuji T, Kato N, Fukuda Y,
Ando K, Ishikura R. Differential uptake
of superparamagnetic iron oxide between
tumor and inflammation in rabbit bone
marrow. RSNA 2005;LPH08-04-p:662.
16. Sugawara Y, Kajihara M, Kikuchi K, Miki
H, Mochizuki T, Murase K. Tumor blood
flow measurement by dynamic contrast-en-
hanced MRI in musculoskeletal tumors:
comparison with Thallium-201 scintigra-
phy. RSNA 2005;LPH08-02-p:661.
17. Ohgiya Y, Hashimoto T, Gokan T, Oka M,
Ekholm S, Westesson PA. Peripheral
vascular malformations and hemangio-
mas: value of dynamic MR imaging for
diagnosis. RSNA 2005;LPH08-05-p:662.
18. Wang X, Dou Y, Xu Y, Jiang X. Diffu-
sion-weighted whole body imaging in the
evaluation of bone metastasis of prostate
cancer: comparison with bone scintigra-
phy. RSNA 2005;LPH08-03-p:662.
19. Wang X, He J, Li F, Xu Y, Jiang X. Eva-
luation of enbocrine therapy on bone me-
tastasis of prostate cancer with MRI and
DWI. RSNA 2005;SSA21-07:221.
20. Ma L, Meng Q. The Value of Apparent
diffusion coefficients (ADCs) in the dia-
gnosis of malignant bone neoplasms. RS-
NA 2005;SSE19-01:309.
21. Ma L, Meng Q, Jiang B, Chen Y. Accuracy
of ADC maps derived from the SSEPI-
DWI for estimating the intramedullary
extent of malignant bone neoplasms. RS-
NA 2005;SSE19-02:309.
22. Wang S, Fang M, Sun M, Zhang L. Eva-
luation of MR perfusion-weighted ima-
ging in vertebral disease. RSNA 2005;
LPH08-01-p:661.
23. Gold GE, Fuller SE, Shimakawa A,
Yu H, Johnson JW, Beaulieu CF. MR
imaging of the ankle: comparison of FS-
FSE with IDEAL-FSE. RSNA 2005;
SSE20-04:311.
24. Fukuda Y, Ishikura R, Ando K, Aoya-
ma N, Nakao N. Balanced turbo field
echo (B-TFE) for evaluation of synovial
thickening in the knee joint. RSNA 2005;
LPR05-03-p:665.
25. Hong HP, Chung HW, Choi S, Yoon YC,
Park JY, Lee MH. Diagnostic value of
MR arthrography for evaluation of rota-
tor cuffs and biceps tendons. RSNA
2005;SSC19-07:274.
26. Venkatesan AM, Fritz B, Kassarjian A,
Palmer WE. Correlation between the size
of rotator cuff tear and the degree of ten-
don retraction. RSNA 2005;SSC19-04:274.
27. Probyn LJ, White LM, Salonen DC,
Tomlinson G, Boynton E, Powell T. Di-
rect MR arthrographic assessment of
recurrent symptoms post shoulder insta-
bility repair: correlation with second look
surgical evaluation (in 40 patients). RS-
NA 2005;SSC19-01:273.
28. Choi J, Kang HS, Hong SH, Jun WS,
Moon SG, Choi J. Optimization of the
mixture ratio of iodinated contrast and
gadolinium for simultaneous direct MR
and CT arthrography. RSNA 2005;SSA21-
05:221.
29. Sasaki T, Yodono H, Shinohara A, Matsuo
K, Ishibashi Y, Sato H. MR arthrography of
shoulders: double versus conventional MR
imaging. RSNA 2005;SSC19-02: 273.
30. Anderson MW, Barr MS, Gaskin C, Al-
ford BA. Posterior GLAD lesions of the
shoulder. RSNA 2005;SSC19-03:273.
31. Dijkshoom ML, Van Dijke C, Ginai AZ,
Bessems JH, Krestin GP. Metal implants:
a CT radiographer’s worst nightmare!
which materials to use and how to optimize
scan protocols. RSNA 2005;1260BP-e:785.
32. Kim H, Shin MJ, Kim SM, Lee SH,
Hong HJ. The role of MDCT in the eva-
luation of postoperative findings in long
bone fracture. RSNA 2005;1261BP-e:785.
33. Safdar NM, Nguyen K, Siddiqui KM,
Mulligan ME, Moffitt R, Filigenzi J.
Comparison of ultra low-dose computed
tomography and digital radiography for
the detection of thoracic spine fractures.
RSNA 2005;LPB07-09-p:659.
34. Fanucci E, Schillaci O, Nisini A, Di Cos-
tanzo G, Leporace M, Simonetti G. Conven-
tional radiography, 64-row detector MSC
T,
MRI, and PET/CT in staging of multiple
myeloma. RSNA 2005;1227BP-e:783.
35. Bohy P, De Maertelaer V, Tack DM,
Roquigny A, Keyzer C, Genevois PA.
Comparison of standard-dose and simu-
lated low-dose MDCT in patients suspec-
ted of lumbar disc herniation. RSNA
2005; SSG22-02:362.
36. Haisong C, Cheng L, Chen Q, Wang D,
Zhen J, He J. The value of multi-direc-
tion adjusted MPR using 64-slice CT in
diagnosing long bone diseases. RSNA
2005;LPB07-01-p:658.
37. Silbermann-Hoffman O, Feydy A, Mau-
lat I, Clarencon F, Drapé JL, Schouman-
Claeys E. Shoulder CT arthrography in
ABER position in rotator cuff tear. RS-
NA 2005;SSC19-09:275.