CONJ • RCSIO Spring/Printemps 2014 61
I see there are two signifi-
cant notions running through
the last editorials I wrote:
“new” and “change”. And this
editorial is going to follow
suit.
I trust that, by the time
you read this piece, you will be experiencing
the very welcome (especially after this win-
ter) seasonal change of spring with its new
beginnings and promise of warmer tempera-
tures. And to mark the event, we have some
new changes for the journal in this issue.
The reality of living through change and
experiencing something new is not always
easy or embraced quickly. Despite the
adage, “the one constant in life is change”,
we never seem to be entirely ready for the
impact change may have on us, as individ-
uals. I expect the same will be the case with
changes made to the journal.
As I write this, I am reminded of a situa-
tion that happened to me when I went to the
symphony concert last week. When I sub-
scribe to the Toronto Symphony each year,
I am able to select my own concerts and
combine my personal choices into a unique
concert series. I always have such fun pick-
ing the specific concerts from the array on
offer. So, as I sat down in the concert hall, I
opened my program with great anticipation
to see what I had selected many months
ago. To my utter surprise, I was about to
hear three new, modern compositions. I was
dumbfounded. Why would I have picked
this concert? I am a lover of the old mas-
ters—Bach, Mozart, Brahms, Tchaikovsky,
Rachmaninoff. Whatever possessed me? I
could not recall why I had made this choice.
What was I thinking? I consoled myself with
the comment, “I can always leave at the
intermission.”
I settled into my seat and awaited the
start of the first half of the concert. Just
before the opening selection was played,
the composer came on stage and provided a
brief commentary describing his inspiration
for the piece and what he had tried to do
with his writing of it. He also talked about
how long it had taken him to craft the final
version. I was a little intrigued at that point,
having heard his story. It provided a bit of
a guide to what I might hear. So I thought I
would listen attentively and give it a chance.
Can you guess what happened? Yes, I
was drawn into the music. I could imag-
ine the images the composer had spoken
about. I actually began to hear sections
I liked. I was drawn in by the brilliance of
the sounds, and overwhelmed with feelings
of admiration for how the musicians were
playing and wonderment at how a composer
could write such music.
And I stayed for the whole concert.
Granted, it helped that the composers for
the other two selections also spoke about
their work and provided a bit of a guide
for listening. And the guest artists were
masters of their art. I left the concert, as I
often do with the symphony, feeling I had
been truly entertained. But I also had been
pushed out of my comfort zone and, in
doing so, learned to “listen with a new ear”.
And why did I share this story?
The situation reminded me of the jour-
nal and how the editorial board and I have
been discussing its future and what changes
might be needed, as we move ahead. I expect
some readers will welcome the changes and
others will be caught by surprise (much like
I was at the start of the concert). So, I am
going to tell you a bit about the changes,
hoping this will be a guide to you and help
you be open to, at least, giving the changes a
try and understanding what we had in mind.
I would invite you to read the new features
and give me feedback about them.
We are going to introduce the changes
gradually, starting with this issue.
Ultimately, we want to encourage you to
engage in the dialogue or discourse about
oncology nursing and cancer care in this
country. We want to give you the opportu-
nity to participate and contribute, realiz-
ing that individuals will do that in different
ways and from different perspectives.
The first new feature we are intro-
ducing in this issue is an International
Perspectives article. We want this feature
to expose you to perspectives about can-
cer nursing from beyond our borders. We
hope that colleagues from other parts of the
world will write about their experiences in
caring for patients, or engaging in educa-
tional or research projects. We have such
a rich diversity of cultures in Canada and I
think the learning from abroad cannot help
but contribute to our ability to care for our
patients here at home.
The second new feature is the Brief
Communication article. This feature will
provide an opportunity for authors to write
shorter pieces about pilot work, feasibil-
ity projects, quality improvement projects,
or practice changes. We hope this will be a
good vehicle to share foundational work or
creative ideas that you have implemented in
your setting to improve patient experiences
or processes of care.
The third new feature is one we are call-
ing Resource Review. This feature pro-
vides an opportunity to profile resources
or tools that individuals have found help-
ful in their practice settings. The resource
featured in this issue contains criteria to
help you decide if your project requires an
ethical review. With the growing emphasis
on quality improvement and producing evi-
dence for practice, it is challenging at times
to know if a project needs to be reviewed
by the ethics board. I think the tool profiled
in this issue will be an excellent resource
for you.
I hope you will see the three new fea-
tures as opportunities to enlarge the con-
tributions to the journal, engage new
authors, and enhance the sharing of knowl-
edge across the country. Maybe they will
push you out of your comfort zone at first,
either as a reader or an author. However, I
do hope you will engage with them (stay for
the whole concert, so to speak). I hope the
new features will motivate you to “take pen
in hand” (figuratively speaking, as I realize
you will likely be sitting at a computer key-
board) and share what has been happening,
in your practice or in your clinical setting,
that could be of interest to oncology nurses
across Canada.
Margaret I. Fitch, RN, PhD
Editor in Chief
Editorial