of valid load and 3.4 V which indicates either no load or invalid load (see Fig. 4, black signal). A short time interval
was chosen for the evaluation of the circuit to clearly identify its two operation modes. The timer and flip-flop are
also programmed to test every 1.8 ms for valid loading conditions when the transmitting coil is switched off. This
value could be changed by the user and depending on the velocity of the receiver. The green lines of fig. 4 represent
the output voltage for the inverter’s driver. It is clear that if Vcoil > Vref so the output voltage Vout = 0 V and if Vcoil <
Vref so the output voltage Vout = 1 V. The choice of the value of Vout is only to check the good operation of the circuit.
It could be changed to another value chosen by the user. The main advantages of the designed circuit that it requires
no communication link between the sending and receiving sides and its high detection height which equals to 5 cm.
Fig. 4. Simulation results of the implemented detection circuit
4. Conclusion
In this paper, a detection circuit for movable receiver of a multi-coil inductive system is designed. It consists of the
measurement of AC current peak of every sending coils, converts it into DC voltage value and then compare it to a
threshold limit. The coil current threshold is predicted by finite element simulation. Both simulation and experimental
results show that the designed circuit fulfils the detection requirements. It presents an efficient, low cost detection
technique which is also suitable for high distances. Additionally, it doesn’t require any communication link between
the sending and receiving sides.
References
[1] E. K. F. Lee, A discrete controlled fully integrated class E coil driver with power efficient ASK modulation for powering biomedical implants,
IEEE Trans.Circuits Syst. I: Reg. Papers 62 (2015) 1678–1687.
[2] X.T. García, J. Vázquez, P.R Sánchez, Design, implementation issues and performance of an inductive power transfer system for electric vehicle
chargers with series–series compensation, IET Power Electron. 8 (2015) 1920–1930.
[3] B. Kallel, T. Keutel, O. Kanoun, MISO configuration efficiency in inductive power transmission for supplying wireless sensors, IEEE 11th Int.
Multi-Conf. on Systems, Signals & Devices (2014) 1–5.
[4] H.H. Wu, G.A. Covic, J.T. Boys, D.J. Robertson, A Series-tuned inductive-power-transfer pickup with a controllable AC-voltage output, IEEE
Trans. Power Electron. 26 (2011) 98–109.
[5] B. Kallel, O. Kanoun, H. Trabelsi, Large air gap misalignment tolerable multi-coil inductive power transfer for wireless sensors, IET Power
Electron. (2016) DOI: 10.1049/iet-pel.2015.0800.
[6] D. Ahn, S. Hong, Effect of coupling between multiple transmitters or multiple receivers on wireless power transfer, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
60 (2013) 2602–2613.
[7] W.X. Zhong, X. Liu, S.Y.R. Hui, A novel single-layer winding array and receiver coil structure for contactless battery charging systems with
free-positioning and localized charging features, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 58 (2011) 4136–4144.
[8] Z. N. Low, J. J. Casanova, P. H. Maier, J. A. Taylor, R. A. Chinga et al., Method of load/fault detection for loosely coupled planar wireless
power transfer system with power delivery tracking, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 57 (2010) 1478-1486.
[9] E. Waffenschmidt, T. Staring, Limitation of inductive power transfer for consumer applications, in Proc. 13th Eur. Conf. Power Electron. Appl.
(2010) 1-10.
[10] C. L. W. Sonntag, J. L. Duarte, A. J. M. Pemen, Load position detection and validation on variable-phase contactless energy transfer desktops,
IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (2009) 15-27.