data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8bac/f8bac726aa9dde4b3b84b7328333022b5af485bc" alt=""
4
Abstract: Pain is generally undertreated in the United States, owing to a number of barriers including geographic distance
from specialty treatment providers; functional disability that limits mobility; treatment-related stigma; economic limitations;
and educational barriers. Pain undertreatment exacerbates pain chronicity and emotional disruption that can significantly
erode a pain patient's quality of life, and there is widespread agreement that pain care must evolve to address this
significant problem. The growing field of telehealth (defined for the purposes of this paper as technology that allows for
distance interaction between providers and/or patients) offers a novel opportunity to expand pain assessment,
consultation, and treatment services beyond the walls of the specialty pain clinic, but there is limited availability of
resources describing how to best use this technology to improve access to care. A recent literature review (September
2011) using universally endorsed MeSH search criteria revealed only 32 MEDLINE references focusing on telehealth for
pain. This is surprising in light of the very large number of references covering telehealth (14,164
references) and pain (104,564 references), respectively. Of the studies available, there are very few randomized trials of
telehealth pain care and only one general overview of e-health and chronic pain, which dedicates just a few paragraphs to
telehealth. This manuscript represents one of the first comprehensive reviews of the current state of telehealth and pain
management research and practice. The goals are to provide a rationale for the potential benefit of telehealth-based pain
management services; describe the various applications of telehealth technology for pain management; orient the reader
to cost models for telehealth; present examples of services in place; and offer recommendations for future research based
on the current state of knowledge.
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2011672904&site=ehost-live
Record 1
Economic cost of home-telemonitoring care for BiPAP-assisted ALS individuals
Lopes De Almeida J.P., Pinto A., Pinto S., Ohana B. and De Carvalho M.
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis 2012 13:6 (533-537)
Our objective was to measure direct (hospital and NHS) and indirect (patient/caregiver) costs of following up in-home
compliance to non-invasive ventilation via wireless modem. We constructed a prospective controlled trial of 40
consecutive ALS home-ventilated patients, randomly assigned according to their residence area to G1 (nearby hospital,
office-based follow-up) and G2 (outside hospital area, telemetry device-based follow-up). Total NHS direct cost
encompassed costs related to outpatients' visits (office and emergency room) and hospitalizations. Hospital direct costs
included transportation to/from hospital, office visit per hour cost and equipment maintenance. Non-medical costs
considered days of wages lost due to absenteeism. G1 included 20 patients aged 60±10 years and G2 included 19
patients aged 62±13 years. Results showed that no differences were found regarding clinical/demographic characteristics
at admission. NHS costs showed a 55% reduction in average total costs with a statistically significant decrease of 81% in
annual costs per patient in G2. Hospital costs were found to be significantly higher in G2 with regard to total costs (64%
average increase) but not annual costs (7%). No statistical difference was found with regard to expenses from
absenteeism. In conclusion, at the cost of an initial financial constraint to the hospital per year (non-significant),
telemonitoring is cost-effective, representing major cost savings to the NHS in the order of 700 euros/patient/year. © 2012
Informa Healthcare.
Record 2
A feasibility study to investigate the acceptability and potential effectiveness of a telecare service for older
people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Chau J.P.C., Lee D.T.F., Yu D.S.F., Chow A.Y.M., Yu W.-C., Chair S.-Y., Lai A.S.F. and Chick Y.-L.
International Journal of Medical Informatics 2012 81:10 (674-682)
Aims: To investigate the feasibility, acceptance and potential effectiveness of delivering a telecare service on the health
outcomes and hospital service utilization of community-dwelling patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Methods: Eligible participants were older people, with moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and
who had been admitted to hospital at least once for exacerbation during the previous year. The participants were
randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Participants in the intervention group received a telecare device kit
and they were asked to monitor their oxygen saturation, pulse rate and respiration rate using the device and to transmit
the data to an online network platform. A medication and purse-lip breathing reminder with a feedback function is also
provided in the device kit. A community nurse monitors changes in the physiological parameters and takes immediate
action to address the patients' needs. Participants in the control group received no other extra care. Study outcomes
include user satisfaction, health-related quality of life, pulmonary function, hospital re-admission and use of emergency
room services. Results: Twenty-two participants in the intervention group and 18 in the control group were included in the
analysis. The mean age of all 40 participants was 72.93. years. Overall, the participants in the intervention group
expressed satisfaction with the telecare service. Some patients reported difficulty in reading the screen of the mobile