Journal of Applied Computer Science & Mathematics, Issue 2/2019, vol.13, No. 28, Suceava
51
Clearly, the right side of (5) correspond to (2) if ==
= 1
and the left side of (5) equal to zero. The later displays the
below conservation law
()+ 3()
+()+()
+ 6()
+ 4()= 0
In [8], the author shows that there exists many different
types of Nonlinearities. In the Geometric Nonlinearity, we
consider the total strain energy of the deformable elastic body,
which is in the form of extensional or stretching energy and
the bending energy. The extensional strain energy involves
higher order nonlinear terms than quadratic in the normal
displacement component, whereas the bending strain energy
remains quadratic in the displacement components. Thus,
when these energy expressions are used to derive the equations
of motion, they will turn out to be a set of nonlinear governing
differential equations.
Now, let make the conjecture that we prefer
nonlinearities ,
rather than
and which
have stronger nonlinearities.
That implies that we choose such as
()+ 3()
= 0 (6)
But in the present situation, let say that the nonlinearity is
also due to boundary conditions during the transformation.
We solve (6) by establishing = ±
with respect to .
So we see that if solve (1), then
= ±
“Hopf-Cole transformation”
Solve this Initial boundary Value Problem for the linearized
form of the Boussinesq-type equation, so called: the static
beam-type equation
+ = 0 ×]0, [
= ±
×{= 0} (7)
C) Theorem
Let be a solution of (7).
If we define
+ = (8)
Then = 0 (9)
Thus, we prove that (8) and (9) are equivalent to (7).
Proof
=(+ )(+ )
= +
= + +
As solve (7), then
+= 0 since =.
(8) and (9) are heat-type equations with a complex heat
coefficient of distribution. Which are close to the linear part of
the Ginsburg-Landau mathematical physical theory used to
describe superconductivity. This theory can also be given a
general geometric setting, placing it in the context of
Riemannian geometry, where in many cases exact solutions
can be given. In string theory, it is conventional to study the
Ginzburg–Landau functional for the manifold being a
Riemann surface, and taking n=1, i.e. a line bundle.
III. SOLITON-TYPE SOLUTION
Considering the following transformation
=
(7) becomes + = 0
Whose trail solution has the form
(,)=1+exp (++)
Where , and are arbitrary constants, with and
satisfying the following relation [9]:
0, 0 and += 0
Therefore,
(,)=
1 + exp(±
A
+
C
)
1 + exp±++
Simultaneously,(6) and (7) are automatically satisfied with
the substitution of the above (,), which is thus a special
solution for both equations.
As we had ()+ 3()
= 0
Finally, the set of exact solutions of the general form of (1)
are clearly (,)=+ 3
(,)=sech1
2(± +)
sech1
2±++
Which are the solitary waves having the sech profiles
[7]. and are parameters specifying the amplitude and the
speed of the wave.
CONCLUSIONS
The main aim of this paper keened on the linearization of
the Boussinesq-type equation to obtain the static beam
equation by the mean of the Hopf-Cole transformation. We
were able to prove that the soliton-type solutions is the
profile that better describe the Boussinesq-type solutions.
The originality of this works rely on the ability to juggle
between fluid mechanics and the theory of elasticity. Further
research will consist in use of the Ginsburg-Landau theory
with main aim to develop other characteristics of (8).