BioCentury, THE BERNSTEIN REPORT ON BIOBUSINESS AUGUST 27 , 2012 PAGE A8 OF 18
Strategy,
from previous page
clinical trial setting, Piela said.
While doctors said they were assuaged
by Sanofi and Genzyme’s plan to provide
the drug under the patient access pro-
grams, some physicians are concerned
that the additional work could deter use of
Campath.
“Restricted access is always concern-
ing and the addition of more paperwork can create a lag time,”
said Javier Pinilla-Ibarz, a hematologic oncologist at H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute. Nevertheless,
he said, “I don’t think lag times will prevent its use among the
majority of clinicians.”
Matthew Davids, an instructor and attending physician in the
lymphoma group at Dana-Farber Cancer Center, noted that
larger research institutes have more experience in dealing with
special access programs like the one Sanofi and Genzyme are
proposing and may be more immune to any potential obstacles.
Nonetheless, he also believes most doctors will still use the
drug.
“I don’t think the paperwork burden will be huge. It is an
important drug for those patients in which it works, so motiva-
tion is on the clinician’s side to get patients the drug,” Davids
said.
However, Thomas Elter, a physician in the department of
Hematology and Oncology at the University of Cologne,
hasn’t yet used MabCampath since the program started in
Europe.
Elter said Genzyme told him it should take no more than two
weeks to receive the drug, although Piela told BioCentury it
should take no more five days from when a request is submitted
to when the drug is shipped to the physician.
In any case, Elter estimated it takes physicians about 30
minutes to fill out the paperwork, which is too long for him.
“Before, it took just seconds between when I would prescribe
the drug and could have access to it. But now it will take just a
half hour to fill out the paper work. I don’t have a half an hour,
so to save my time I will look for an alternative,” he said.
According to Elter, other options could include enrolling CLL
patients with the 17p deletion in a clinical trial.
Piela said that Genzyme is “hoping to implement online forms
in the future.”
On Friday, the Arzneimittelkommission der deutschen
Arzteschaft (AkdA) released a statement calling Genzyme
and Sanofi’s decision purely commercial and said the volun-
tary withdrawal unnecessarily complicates cancer treatment.
AkdA is the Drug Commission of the
Bundesarztekammer, the German
Medical Association.
Off label, off limits
While most MS doctors contacted by
BioCentury haven’t used Campath off la-
bel, they believe the decision to withdraw
was a good one and could prevent poten-
tial safety issues from arising while the
drug is under review.
Steven Krieger, assistant professor of See next page
neurology at Mount Sinai Medical Cen-
ter, wasn’t surprised by Genzyme’s deci-
sion.
“I wasn’t surprised that they took it off
the market. It is being relaunched in a
different context, a different patient popu-
lation and a different dose,” he said.
Edward Fox, a neurologist at Central
Texas Neurology Consultants and a
PI in the Phase II trials for alemtuzumab for
MS, believes that once the Phase III results
are published in scientific journals, off-label use could have been
expected to increase.
“I think once data is published that spells out how alemtuzumab
can be given in MS, the chance of off-label use goes up
dramatically. The concern is that the company and FDA have not
instituted any sort of risk management system,” he said.
Krieger agreed.
“I think now that the Phase III trials and data are public and
as publications come out detailing the data, there will surely be
an interest. But with the drug under FDA review that is not the
best time to experiment with it,” he said.
Krieger added: “This is the time to expectantly wait to see
what FDA rules and if they approve it, how the drug should be
monitored and how to achieve the best benefit to risk profile.”
Genzyme would not disclose whether the company has
submitted or FDA has requested a REMS for Lemtrada. The
company submitted its sBLA in June.
Even if data are published, Til Menge, a neurologist at
University Hospital Dusseldorf, believes doctors will re-
main hesitant to use alemtuzumab off label because of the mAb’s
safety.
“Given the known safety profile of alemtuzumab, I think MS
doctors will be reluctant to use it off label,” he said.
In the Phase III CARES-MS trial of 840 patients with relapsing-
remitting MS (RRMS) who relapsed while receiving beta inter-
feron or Copaxone glatiramer acetate, about 16% of Lemtrada
patients developed an autoimmune thyroid-related adverse event
and about 1% developed immune thrombocytopenia.
The rates of immune AEs were not reported for the active
control arm of Rebif interferon beta-1a.
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. markets Copaxone.
Merck Serono S.A., a division of Merck KGaA, markets Rebif
with Pfizer Inc.
Covering the CVR
Campath is distributed in a 1-mL vial of 30 mg/mL. The
recommended dose for CLL is 30 mg/day three times per week
for 12 weeks.
According to Genzyme, the annual
treatment cost for Campath is about
$60,000 per patient. Assuming one 12-
week course per year, the per dose price
of Campath is about $1,666.67.
In the Phase III trials for Lemtrada, the
mAb was dosed at 12 mg per day on the
first five days of the trial. The patients
were dosed again a year later with 12 mg
per day for three days for a total of 8
doses.
MS doctors using Campath off label
“Given the known safety
profile of alemtuzumab,
I think MS doctors will be
reluctant to use it off label.”
Til Menge, University Hospital
Dusseldorf
“It is an important drug for
those patients in which it
works, so motivation is on
the clinician’s side to get
patients the drug.”
Matthew Davids,
Dana-Farber Cancer Center