UNIVERSITE DE SHERBROOKE Mecanisme moleculaire du transport du cholesterol par la Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein (StAR) ALIREZA ROOSTAEE Departement de Biochimie Memoire presente a la Faculte de Medecine de 1'Universite de Sherbrooke en vue de l'obtention du grade de Maitre es sciences (M.Sc.) en biochimie Le jury est compose de Dr Jean-Guy LeHoux, Dr Pierre Lavigne, Dr Martin Bisaillon et Dr Michel Grandbois Sherbrooke,Quebec,Canada,Janvier 2008 i 1*1 Library and Archives Canada Bibliotheque et Archives Canada Published Heritage Branch Direction du Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-43014-9 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-43014-9 NOTICE: The author has granted a nonexclusive license allowing Library and Archives Canada to reproduce, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, communicate to the public by telecommunication or on the Internet, loan, distribute and sell theses worldwide, for commercial or noncommercial purposes, in microform, paper, electronic and/or any other formats. AVIS: L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, prefer, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou autres formats. The author retains copyright ownership and moral rights in this thesis. Neither the thesis nor substantial extracts from it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the author's permission. L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement reproduits sans son autorisation. In compliance with the Canadian Privacy Act some supporting forms may have been removed from this thesis. Conformement a la loi canadienne sur la protection de la vie privee, quelques formulaires secondaires ont ete enleves de cette these. While these forms may be included in the document page count, their removal does not represent any loss of content from the thesis. Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans la pagination, il n'y aura aucun contenu manquant. •*• Canada UNIVERSITE DE SHERBROOKE Insights into the mechanism of cholesterol transport by the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein (StAR) ALIREZA ROOSTAEE Departement de Biochimie Memoire presente a la Faculte de Medecine de l'Universite de Sherbrooke en vue de l'obtention du grade de Maitre es sciences (M.Sc.) en biochimie Le jury est compose de Dr Jean-Guy LeHoux, Dr Pierre Lavigne, Dr Martin Bisaillon et Dr Michel Grandbois Sherbrooke,Quebec,Canada,Janvier 2008 11 I would like to dedicate this thesis to my parents, for their never-ending support, for their unconditional love and the sense of security they have given when I wanted it most. I also dedicate this thesis to my brother, Amir and to my sister, Zahra for their ongoing support and encouragement. iii Table of contents Table of contents iv List of figures ix List of tables xi List of abbreviations xii Summary xiv 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Endocrine System 1 1.2 Hypothalamic-Pituitary unit 2 1.3 The hormone adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) 4 1.4 Adrenal gland 4 1.5 Hormones of the Adrenal Cortex 7 1.6 Adrenal steroids 7 1.6.1 Mineralocorticoids 7 1.6.2 Glucocorticoids 8 1.6.3 Androgens 8 1.7 Organization of the pituitary-adrenal-axis (PAA) 10 1.8 Adrenal insufficiencies 12 1.9 Assessement of testicular function 14 1.10 Leydig cell function 14 1.11 Abnormalities of androgen metabolism 16 1.11.1 Gynecomastia 16 iv 1.12 Steroid hormone metabolism (Steroidogenesis) 16 1.13 Cholesterol 17 1.14 Cholesterol structure and metabolism 18 1.15 Cholesterol trafficking in the body 22 1.16 Intracellular cholesterol transport 24 1.17 Sterol transport proteins 24 1.17.1 Transmembrane proteins 25 1.17.2 Intracellular cholesterol transporters 26 1.18 Cholesterol and steroidogenesis 29 1.18.1 START domain proteins 31 1.19 Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) as acute regulator 32 1.20 StAR abnormality: lipoid congenital adrenal hyperplasia (LCAH) 33 1.21 Transcriptional regulation of the StAR gene 36 1.21.1 Positive regulation 36 1.21.2 Steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1) 36 1.21.3 Spl 37 1.21.4 GATA-binding protein 4 (GATA-4) 37 1.21.5 Steroid regulatory element binding protein (SREBP) 37 1.21.6 Other factors 38 1.22 Negative regulation of the StAR gene 38 1.22.1 DAX-1 38 1.23 Posttranslational Modifications of StAR 39 1.24 StAR protein structure/function relationships 39 v 1.24.1 Functional domains 39 1.24.2 The StAR homolog MLN64 40 1.24.3 Structure of StAR-START 41 1.24.4 Mechanism of StAR's action 43 1.24.5 Contact sites 43 1.24.6 Desorption model 44 1.24.7 PBR, a potential mitochondrial receptor for StAR 44 1.24.8 Theory of Molten Globular state 45 1.24.9 Our proposed model for the StAR action 48 Research objectives 50 2. Materials and Methods 52 2.1 Description of MA-10 and Y-l steroidogenic cell lines 52 2.2 Description of the vectors for expression of 6His-Tag recombinant N-62 StAR 53 2.3 Preparation of competent bacteria, bacterial transformation and plasmid purification 56 2.4 Preparation of the N-terminal 6His tag N-62 StAR sequence motif 56 2.4.1 Cloning of the N-N62 StAR 57 2.5 Preparation of the recombinant proteins 58 2.5.1 N-62 StAR expression 58 2.6 Purification of the recombinant proteins 58 2.7 Analysis of the purified proteins 59 2.7.1 Separation on SDS-PAGE 59 2.8 Staining of the SDS-PAGE 60 vi 2.9 Evaluation of the Steroidogenic Activity of N-62 StAR in the presence of Isolated Mitochondria 60 2.9.1 Mitochondria purification 60 2.10 The steroidogenic in vitro assay 61 2.11 Radioimmunoassay (RIA) 64 2.11.1 Descriptions of radiolabled pregnenolone and anti-pregnenolone 64 2.11.2 Assay conditions 65 2.11.3 Separation and measurement of bound pregnenolone 65 2.12 StAR Radiolabled Cholesterol-Binding Assay 71 2.13 Structural characterization of AN62 StAR 71 2.13.1 Determination of the secondary structure of proteins by Circular Dichroism 72 2.13.2 Far-UV spectra of the AN62 StAR 75 2.13.3 Thermal unfolding studies 75 2.13.4 Determination of stoichiometry and binding affinity of the StAR-cholesterol complex 78 3. RESULTS (Part I: In vitro activity of the recombinant N-62 StAR) 80 3.1 Expression and purification of functional tagged StAR and evaluation of steroidogenic activity 80 3.2 Binding of StAR to cholesterol is best characterized at physiological pH 86 3.3 pH-induced cholesterol dissociation 89 4. RESULTS (Part II: Structural characterization of the StAR in complex with cholesterol) 93 4.1 Circular dichroism spectroscopy of StAR at different pH 93 vii 4.2 Cholesterol-induced conformational changes of StAR 95 4.3 Time dependent changes of secondary structure of N-62 StAR following the addition of cholesterol 101 4.4 Stoichiometry and dissociation constant of StAR/cholesterol complex 103 4.5 Stability of the folded conformation of StAR 106 5. RESULTS (Part III: Energetics of the pereferential binding of cholesterol to StAR.. 107 5.1 Physiological pH increases the stability of N-62 StAR against heat denaturation....l07 5.2 Binding of cholesterol improves the conformational stability of StAR Ill 6. Discussion 122 6.1 In vitro activity of the N-62 StAR 123 6.2 pH-induced binding and release of cholesterol from StAR 125 6.3 Cholesterol-induced conformational stability of StAR 126 6.4 Contribution of cholesterol to the conformational stability of StAR 127 6.5 Proposed models, conclusion and remarks 132 viii List of figures Figure 1. The Hypothalamic-Pituitary Axis 3 Figure 2. Adrenal glands 6 Figure 3. Three main types of hormones that are produced by the adrenal cortex 9 Figure 4. Organization of the pituitary-adrenal-axis (PAA) 11 Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis 15 Figure 6. Cholesterol synthesis in the cytoplasm 20 Figure 7. Structure and classification of steroid hormones 21 Figure 8. Schematic overview of the major routes of cholesterol in human body 23 Figure 9. Key proteins governing cellular cholesterol distribution and flow 27 Figure 10. Model of Congenital Lipoid Adrenal Hyperplasia in an Adrenal Cell 34 Figure 11. Ribbon diagram of StAR model 42 Figure 12. Molecular mechanism of cholesterol binding to StAR 49 Figure 13. The pET Vectors 54 Figure 14. Determination of the optimal mitochondrial quantity 63 Figure 15. Illustration of the Radioimmunoassay 67 Figure 16. Radiodilution curve obtained by charcoal immunoassay 70 Figure 17. Circular dichroism spectra of "pure" secondary structures 73 Figure 18. Purification of recombinant human N-62 StAR protein 81 Figure 19. Validation of the performed in vitro steroidogenesis system 82 Figure 20. Steroidogenic capacity of the N- and C-terminaly 6His- tagged N-62 StAR...85 Figure 21. Measurement of StAR binding to cholesterol across a broad pH range 87 Figure 22. Competitive binding of cholesterol at different pH values 88 ix Figure 23. Measurement of cholesterol dissociation from StAR across a broad pH range. 91 Figure 24. Irreversible dissociation of cholesterol from the StAR at acidic pH 92 Figure 25. Effect of pH on protein conformation 94 Figure 26. Effect of cholesterol binding on circular dichroic spectra of N-62 StAR protein at neutral pH 96 Figure 27. Effect of cholesterol binding on circular dichroic spectra of N-62 StAR protein at acidic pH 98 Figure 28. Schematic representation of cholesterol-induced helical changes in StAR protein 102 Figure 29. Circular dichroism-monitored cholesterol titration of the N-62 StAR 105 Figure 30.Temperature-induced denaturations monitored by the change in molar ellipticity at 222 nm (0222) 109 Figure 31. Stability curve of StAR at pH 7.4 114 Figure 32. Populations of the native, intermediate, and unfolded states of N-62 StAR and StAR/cholesterol complex 117 Figure 33. Determination of AH°uand AS°U from Van't Hoff plot 119 Figure 34. Graph of AHU versus T for StAR and StAR/Cholesterol complex 120 Figure 35. Plot of ASU versus T for StAR and StAR/Cholesterol complex 121 Figure 36. Molecular mechanism of cholesterol binding in StAR 136 Figure 37. Proposed model of the cholesterol transport by StAR 137 Figure 38. Comparison of the structures of of NBD-Cholesterol and cholesterol 138 x List of tables Table 1. Adrenocortical diseases 13 Table 2.Tube contents for Assay of Standard and Unknown samples 69 Table 3. Comparison of the cholesterol-induced helical changes of N-62 StAR 99 Table 4. Thermodynamic parameters obtained from thermal unfolding profiles 116 Table 5. Thermodynamic parameters measured from the simulations of the temperatureinduced denaturation of N-62 StAR and N-62 StAR/Cholesterol complex at 37°C (yalues in kcal/mol) 117 xi List of abbreviations N-62 StAR (AN62-StAR) StAR protein lacking the mitochondrial targeting sequence eHis Sequence of 6 histidines a.a. Amino acid ACTH Adrenocorticotropin hormone BSA Bovine Serum Albumin CD Circular Dichroism cDNA Complementary DNA DNA Deoxyribonucleic acid dNTP Deoxyribonucleic acid triphosphate DTT Dithiothreitol EDTA Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid EtBr Ethidium bromide FSH Follicle-stimulating hormone GH Growth hormone Gu.HCL Guanidium-HCl HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1 -piperazineethanesulfonic acid) IMAC Immobilized Metal ion Affinity Chromatography IMM Inner mitochondrial membrane IPTG Isopropyl P-D-1 -thiogalactopyranoside kb Kilobase xii kDa KiloDalton KOAc Potassium acetate LB Luria bertoni broth LCAH Lipoid congenital adrenal hyperplasia LH Luteinizing hormone ME PMercapto-2-ethanol MG Molten Globule NaN3 Sodium azide Ni-NTA Nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid resin nt Nucleotide OD Optical density OMM Outer mitochondrial membrane PBS Phosphate-buffered saline PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction PMSF Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride RIA Radioimmunoassay SDS-PAGE Sodium dodecyl sulphat Polyacrylamide Gel Electerophoresis StAR Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory protein START StAR-related lipid transfer domain TCEP Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride TLC Thin Layer Chromatography TSH Thyroid - stimulating hormone xiii Summary The rate-limiting step in steroidogenesis is the delivery of cholesterol to the mitochondrial inner membrane by the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR). A number of developmental and reproductive abnormalities in humans are related to the misregulation of StAR expression and/or to a nonfunctioning StAR gene. For example, lipoid congenital adrenal hyperplasia, a potentially lethal autosomal recessive disease that manifests as cholesterol accumulation in steroidogenic cells of newborn, is a consequence of StAR deficiency. The exact mechanism of cholesterol transfer by StAR is still under debate. On one hand, a molten globular state of StAR observed under acidic conditions, namely pH 3.5, has been suggested to bind and transfer cholesterol. On the other hand, we have proposed that the state of StAR that binds cholesterol has a well-defined tertiary structure. Therefore, the purpose of this project was to investigate the biological and structural features involved in binding of StAR to cholesterol and its steroidogenic activity. There were three specific aims to achieve this goal: the first was to determine the steroidogenic activity of StAR and also to find the environment in which it could bind to cholesterol to promote steroidogenesis, using a quantitative in vitro activity and binding assays. The second was to inquire the various conformational changes of the StAR in the presence of cholesterol through circular dichroism (CD) and the third, to measure the binding affinity of StAR/cholesterol complex. To construct biologically active recombinant StAR and study its activity on isolated mitochondria we elected to produce human StAR proteins lacking the mitochondrial import sequence in bacteria, and to incorporate a 6His-N-62 StAR to facilitate their purification. Using these constructs, we could examine the action of StAR independent of the protein import process. Here we show that the 6His-tag StAR is biologically active and binding of protein to free cholesterol is necessary to trigger steroidogenesis. As a prerequisite for clarifying the mechanism of StAR action, it was first decided to determine the mechanism by which StAR bound to cholesterol. The mechanism of xiv binding was evaluated under acidic and physiological pH to compare molten globule theory with our proposed model. Thermal denaturation monitored by CD at physiological pH revealed that StAR had a well- defined tertiary structure as depicted by an increase in cooperative denaturation transition. However, the denaturation profile of StAR at pH 3.5 was non-cooperative, as expected for a molten globule. The cooperativity, thermal unfolding transition and an increase in secondary structure content of StAR were observed upon addition of cholesterol. This was a clear indication of the formation of a stable StAR/choleterol complex at physiological pH. In addition, a CD-monitored time course study showed that binding of StAR to cholesterol requires secondary structural changes (unfolding-refolding) that eventually resulted in a more folded protein. Titration of StAR with cholesterol monitored by CD allowed us to determine the stoichiometry of 1:1 and a Kd ~1 x 10"6 M. Binding assays at lower pHs demonstrated that the interaction of StAR with cholesterol was pH sensitive and diminished as the pH was lowered. Furthermore, a decrease of pH resulted in the dissociation of the protein-ligand complex. Taken together, the results presented herein suggest that a native partially unfolded StAR binds to cholesterol at physiological pH while release of cholesterol may coincide with a transition of StAR to a molten globule state, which is yet to be proven. xv 1. Introduction 1.1 Endocrine System The human endocrine system is made up of glands that produce and secrete hormones. These hormones regulate the body's growth, metabolism (the physical and chemical processes of the body), and sexual development and function. Hormones travel throughout the body, either in the blood stream or in the fluid around cells, interacting with target cells. Once hormones find a target cell, they bind with specific protein receptors inside or on the surface of the cell and specifically change the cell's activities. The protein receptor reads the hormone's message and carries out the instructions by either influencing gene expression or altering cellular protein activity. These actions produce a variety of rapid responses and long-term effects. Based on their chemical structure, hormones are categorized into three classes: 1-Steroid hormones are fat-soluble molecules derived from cholesterol. Among these are the three major sex hormones groups: estrogens, androgens, and progesterone. Males and females make all three, just in different amounts. Steroids pass into a cell's nucleus, bind to specific receptors and genes and trigger the cell to synthesize proteins (Kumar, etal., 2005). 2-Amino acid derivatives, such as epinephrine, are water-soluble molecules. These hormones are stored in endocrine cells until needed. They act by binding to protein receptors on the outer surface of the cell (Vaidehi, et al, 2002). The binding alerts a second messenger molecule inside the cell that activates enzymes and other cellular proteins or influences gene expression. 1 3-Insulin, growth hormone, prolactin and other water-soluble polypeptide hormones consist of long chains of amino acids, from several to 200 amino acids length. They are stored in endocrine cells until needed to regulate such processes as metabolism, lactation, growth and reproduction (Posner, et al, 1974). The major glands of the endocrine system are the hypothalamus, pituitary, thyroid, parathyroids, adrenals, pineal body, and the reproductive organs. The pancreas is also part of this system; it has a role in hormone production as well as in digestion. 1.2 Hypothalamic-Pituitary unit The hypothalamus is one of the most evolutionary conserved and essential region of the mammalian brain. Indeed, the hypothalamus is the ultimate brain structure that allows mammals to maintain homeostasis, and destruction of the hypothalamus is not compatible with life (Bean, et al, 1955; Makridis, et al, 1990). The pituitary gland, also known as the hypophysis, is a roundish organ that lies immediately beneath the hypothalamus, resting in a depression of the base of the skull called the sella turcica ("Turkish saddle").The pituitary gland is often considered the "master gland" because it regulates most of the body's hormonal balance (Zee, et al, 2003). The pituitary is composed of anterior and posterior portions. The anterior pituitary is formed of a range of cells producing several hormones such as ACTH, TSH, LH, FSH, GH, and prolactin. Indeed, secretion of hormones from the anterior pituitary is under strict control by hypothalamic hormones (Figure 1). It would be difficult to overstate the influence of hypothalamic and pituitary hormones over physiological processes. 2 Inflowing blood — Portal blood vessels Secretory cells / Anterior pituitary erve endings secrete neurohormones Blood picks up neurohormones Pituitary stalk Posterior pituitary / \ Anterior pituitary hormones leave gland in the blood Neurohormones from the hypothalamus stimulate or inhibit the release of anterior pituitary hormones Figure 1. The Hypothalamic-Pituitary Axis The hypothalamus is connected to the posterior pituitary, and sends nerve impulses which stimulate the release of hormones, and to the anterior pituitary by the hypothalamicpituitary portal system (http://www.emc.maricopa.edu). 3 The target cells for most of the hormones produced in these tissues are themselves endocrine cells and a seemingly small initial signal is thus amplified to cause widespread effects on many cells and tissues. Pituitary trophoic hormones, the predominant regulators of steroid hormone biosynthesis, stimulate steroidogenesis in two temporal phases. The acute phase, which occurs within seconds to minutes, involves enhanced mobilization and delivery of cholesterol to the steroidogenic complex, whereas the chronic phase, which requires hours to days predominantly involves increased transcription of the genes involved in steroidogenesis (Ishii, et al, 2002; Simpson and Waterman, 1988). The focus here is to emphasize on importance of acute pituitary trophic hormone regulation of steroidogenesis in the adrenal gland and gonads. 1.3 The hormone adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) ACTH regulates steroid synthesis by the adrenal cortex thereby stimulating the secretion of Cortisol from the adrenal glands (Ray, et al, 1980). Cortisol and other glucocorticoids increase glucose production, inhibit protein synthetis and increase protein breakdown, stimulate lipolysis, and affect immunological and inflammatory responses (Manary, et al., 2006). 1.4 Adrenal gland The adrenal, or suprarenal, gland is paired with one gland located near the upper portion of each kidney (Figure 2, top). Each gland is divided into an outer cortex and an inner medulla (Figure 2, bottom). The cortex and medulla of the adrenal gland, like the 4 anterior and posterior lobes of the pituitary, develop from different embryonic tissues and secrete different hormones (Mulrow, 1972). The adrenal cortex is essential to life (Arlt and Stewart, 2005), but the medulla may be removed with no life-threatening effects. The hypothalamus of the brain influences both portions of the adrenal gland but by different mechanisms. The adrenal cortex is regulated by negative feedback involving the hypothalamus and adrenocorticotropic hormone (Syed and Weaver, 2005) whereas the medulla is regulated by nerve impulses from the hypothalamus (Wojcik-Gladysz, et al, 2006). 5 Adrenal glands Figure 2. Adrenal glands Top, in mammals, the adrenal glands (also known as suprarenal glands) are the triangleshaped endocrine glands that are located in the thoracic abdomen situated atop the kidneys; their name indicates that position {ad-, "near" or "at" + -renes, "kidneys"). Bottom (inset), when observed at low magnification (left) the capsule, cortex, and medulla are visible. At higher magnifications (right) the divisions of the cortex are visible: the zona glomerulosa with cells in small clusters which secrete aldosterone, the zona fasciculata with cells arranged in columns or strips which secrete Cortisol and the zona reticularis with cells that are somewhat unorganized which secretes sex steroids and may also secrete Cortisol. The medulla is the site of epinephrine and norepinephrine production (http://www.medicalook.com/human_anatomy/organs/Adrenal_glands.html). 6 1.5 Hormones of the Adrenal Cortex Using cholesterol as the starting material, the cells of the adrenal cortex secrete a variety of steroid hormones. The adrenal cortex consists of three different regions, with each region producing a different group or type of hormones. Chemically, all the cortical hormones are steroid. The secretion of ACTH from the anterior lobe of the pituitary triggers the production of all hormones. 1.6 Adrenal steroids Three main types of hormones are produced by the adrenal cortex: Glucocorticoids (Cortisol, corticosterone), mineralocorticoids (aldosterone, deoxycorticosterone [DOC]), and sex steroids (mainly androgens). 1.6.1 Mineralocorticoids Mineralocorticoids are secreted by the outermost region of the adrenal cortex. The mineralocorticoids get their name from their effect on mineral metabolism. The principal mineralocorticoid is aldosterone, which acts to conserve sodium ions and water in the body. Aldosterone also acts on sweat glands to reduce the loss of sodium in perspiration and increases the sensitivity of the taste buds to sources of sodium (for review see (Verrey, 1998). The secretion of aldosterone is stimulated by a drop in the level of sodium ions and/or a rise in the level of potassium ions in the blood (Salemi, et al, 2000), angiotensin 11 (Shelat, et al, 1999) and ACTH (as is that of Cortisol) (Zager, et al, 1979). 7 1.6.2 Glucocorticoids Glucocorticoids are secreted by the middle region of the adrenal cortex (Mukai, et al, 2003). The glucocorticoids get their name from their effect of raising the level of blood sugar (glucose). One way they do this is by stimulating gluconeogenesis in the liver: the conversion of fat and protein into intermediate metabolites that are ultimately converted into glucose (Tappy, 1999). The most abundant glucocorticoid is Cortisol (also called hydrocortisone). Cortisol and the other glucocorticoids also have a potent anti-inflammatory effect on the body. They depress the immune response, especially cell-mediated immune responses (Buttgereit, etal., 2005). 1.6.3 Androgens The third group of steroids secreted by the adrenal cortex is the gonadocorticoid, or sex hormones (androgens). These are secreted by the innermost region. Male hormones, androgens, and female hormones, estrogens, are secreted in minimal amounts in both sexes by the adrenal cortex (Leo, et al, 2004). In sexually-mature males, this source is so much lower than that of the testes that it is probably of little physiological significance. However, excessive production of adrenal androgens can cause premature puberty in young boys. In females, the adrenal cortex is a major source of androgens. Their hypersecretion may produce a masculine pattern of body hair and cessation of menstruation (Hunter and Carek, 2003). 8 Cortisol Aldosterone Androsterone Figure 3. Three main types of hormones that are produced by the adrenal cortex Glucocorticoids (androsteron). (Cortisol), mineralocorticoids (aldosterone) and sex steroids 9 1.7 Organization of the pituitary-adrenal-axis (PAA) Stressful environmental stimuli trigger the release of corticotrophin releasing factor (CRF) from nerve cells in the hypothalamus into a blood system that travels to the anterior pituitary. In response to CRF, the anterior pituitary releases adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) into the blood system and this one is transported to the remotely located adrenal gland. ACTH stimulates the production of Cortisol in the adrenal cortex and Cortisol is released into the blood stream and affects the body's reaction to stress. The pituitary-adrenal-axis is a complex feedback mechanism. In fact, Cortisol feeds back to the hypothalamus to control release of CRF (Figure 4). 10 The Pituitary-Adrenal-Axis Cortisol exerts a negative feedback effect on the hypothalamus that inhibits future release of CRF hypothalamus *" T CRF (corticotropin releasing factor) anterior pituitary T ACTH (adrenocorticotropic hormone) adrenal cortex! Cortisol increases: blood glucose blood pressure Amino acids 1 -*• Cortisol Figure 4. Organization of the pituitary-adrenal-axis (PAA) The pituitary-adrenal-axis is a complex feedback mechanism. Cortisol feeds back to the hypothalamus to control release of CRF. High levels of Cortisol in the blood tend to inhibit the release of CRF by the hypothalamus. Therefore less ACTH is released by the anterior pituitary. Consequently, the amount of Cortisol circulating in the blood stream is reduced. This is called a negative feedback system 11 1.8 Adrenal insufficiencies The adrenal glands can have congenital defects and can be damaged by infections and destructive tumors. Adrenocortical disease are relatively rare, but their importance lies in their morbidity and mortality if untreated coupled with the relative ease of diagnosis and availability of effective therapy. The diseases are most readily classified on the basis of hormone excess or deficiency (Table 1) (Endocrinology. William). For instance, Congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia (CLAH) is known as the severest form of congenital adrenal hyperplasia, which is characterized by the lack of biosynthesis of all steroid hormones and its metabolites due to the failure in converting cholesterol to pregnenolone. The genetic etiology has been identified; trafficking defect of cholesterol to mitochondria due to defect of StAR gene, and conversion fault of cholesterol to pregnenolone at the mitochondrial membrane due to the deficiency of CYP11A, cholesterol side chain cleavage enzyme (Horikawa, 2004). More details about LCAH would be explained in next sections. 12 Table 1. Adrenocortical diseases Glucocorticoid Excess Cushing's disease Pseudo-Cushing's syndromes Glucocorticoid Resistance Glucocorticoid deficiency Primary hypoadrenalism Secondary hypoadrenalism Post-chorionic corticosteroid replacement therapy Congelital Adrenal Hyperplasia 21-hydroxylase, 3p-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, 17a-hydroxylase, 11 (3-hydroxylase, and StAR deficiencies Mineralocorticoid Excess Mineralocorticoid deficiency Defect in aldosterone synthetis Defects in aldosterone action Hyporeninemic hypoaldosteronism Adrenal Incidentalomas, and Carcinomas 1.9 Assessement of testicular function Sperm production is entirely hormonally driven. Both the brain and the testis are responsible for hormone secretion, and the male genitalia are responsible for semen production and delivery. Within the brain, the hypothalamus and anterior pituitary are concerned with hormone delivery and control of spermatogenesis. The hypothalamus secretes the gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH), which acts on the anterior pituitary gland, stimulating it to release the follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and leutinizing hormone (LH). FSH and LH are released into the bloodstream and act only on the testes to encourage spermatogenesis within seminiferous tubules (action of FSH) and testosterone production by neighboring Leydig cells (action of LH) between the seminiferous tubules. This hormone axis is illustrated in Figure 5. The testis is functionally compartmentalized into seminiferous tubules and endocrine compartments where spermatogenesis and testosterone biosynthesis take place, respectively. Seminiferous tubules are lined by layers of germ cells in various stages of development (spermatogonia, spermatocytes, spermatids, spermatozoa) and supporting Sertoli cells. The interstitium consists of loose connective tissue, blood and lymphatic vessels, and various cell types, including Leydig cells, fibroblasts, macrophages and leukocytes (Akingbemi, 2005). 1.10 Leydig cell function The endocrine compartment of testis is the testicular interstitium, which contains Leydig cells, the site of testosterone biosynthesis. Intratesticular testosterone is mainly bound to androgen binding protein and secreted into the seminiferous tubules. 14 Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis Representation of an expanded view of testis tissue with neural systems that regulate GnRH secretion and feedback of gonadal steroid hormones at the level of the hypothalamus and pituitary (adjusted from (Ankley and Johnson, 2004)). 15 Inside the Sertoli cells, testosterone is selectively bound to the androgen receptor and activation of the receptor will result in initiation and maintenance of the spermatogenic process and inhibition of germ cell apoptosis (Dohle, et al, 2003), Leydig cell dysfunction usually results in defective spermatogenesis, and men with the clinical features of Leydig cell dysfunction are usually infertile. Indeed, Leydig cells have been widely used for endocrine studies, specially in steroidogenesis, as an endocrine compartment with hormone-dependent steroidogenic activity (Calikoglu, 2003). 1.11 Abnormalities of androgen metabolism 1.11.1 Gynecomastia Administration of large amounts of estrogen to men, as for carcinoma of the prostate or in preparation for sex change surgery, causes a variety of side effects, including fluid retention and congestive heart failure, hypertension, and electrocardiographic changes (De Voogt, et al, 1986). At lower levels, as can occur with estrogen-secreting testicular tumors, estrogen excess suppresses gonadotropin secretion, secondarily impairs testosterone production, and inhibits spermatogenesis. However, the most common manifestation of estrogen excess in men is gynicomastia (breast enlargement). (Williams Text Book of Endocrinology, 10th ed, 2003). 1.12 Steroid hormone metabolism (Steroidogenesis) As explained in the preceding chapters, steroids are lipophilic, low-molecular weight compounds derived from cholesterol that play a number of important 16 physiological roles. The steroid hormones are synthesized mainly by endocrine glands such as the gonads (testis and ovary), the adrenals (during gestation) (Mastorakos and Ilias, 2003), and are then released into the blood circulation. They act both on peripheral target tissues and the central nervous system (CNS) (Baulieu, 1997). Steroid hormones manage different physiological and behavioural responses for specific biological purposes, e.g. reproduction. Therefore, gonadal steroids influence the sexual differentiation of the genitalia and of the brain, determine the development of both primary and secondary sexual characteristics after the initial fetal stage where the presence or absence of the Y-chromosome determines development, contributes to the maintenance of their functional state in adulthood and controls or modulates sexual behaviour. In addition to the endocrine glands, the CNS is also able to form a number of biologically active steroids directly from cholesterol (the so-called "neurosteroids"). These neurosteroids, however, are more likely to have "autocrine" or "paracrine" functions rather than true endocrine effects (Ko, et al, 2005). 1.13 Cholesterol The precursor from which all steroids are derived is cholesterol. Cholesterol is the most important sterol in mammals. It is an integral part of plasma and organel membranes as well as a precursor of important molecules like bile salts and steroid hormones. During embryogenesis, cholesterol is involved in pattern formation in the developing animals. In cell membranes it is situated in parallel to the fatty acid chains of phospholipids, with the polar hydroxyl group close to phospholipids head group. Indeed, membrane fluidity is largly dependent upon the concentration of sterols present due to their rigid structure. 17 Defects in cholesterol synthesis or intracellular routing have devastating consequences for the individual. In humans, the Smith-Lemi-Optiz syndrome, desmosterolosis, Niemann-Pick CI disease and Lipoid Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia, as described bellow, are the examples for inherited disease caused by mutations of genes involved in cholesterol metabolism or 'traffiking'. 1.14 Cholesterol structure and metabolism Slightly less than half of the cholesterol in the body derives from biosynthesis de novo, in the cytoplasm and microsomes of intestines and liver tissues, from the twocarbon acetate group of acetyl-CoA. As summarized in Figure 6, three molecules of acetate are condenced to form 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA), which is then converted to mevalonic acid by the enzyme HMG-CoA reductase. Through a series of steps, mevalonic acid is converted to cholesterol. (Bloch, 1965; Goldstein and Brown, 1990; Knopp, 1999; Scallen and Sanghvi, 1983) Cholesterol is composed of three hexagonal carbon rings (A,B,C) and a pentagonal carbon ring (D) to which a side-chain (carbons 20-27) is attached (at position 17 of the polycyclic hydrocarbon), (Figure 7, top) Two angular methyl groups are also found at position 18 and 19. Removal of part of the side-chain gives rise to C21compounds of the pregnane series (progestins and corticosteroids), like pregnenolone. Total removal produces C19-steroids of the androstane series (including the androgens), whereas loss of the 19-methyl group (usually after conversion of the A-ring to a phenolic structure, hence the term "aromatization") yields the estrone series, to which estrogens belong (Figure 7, bottom). Individual compounds are characterised by the presence or absence of specific functional groups (mainly hydroxy, keto(oxo) and aldehyde functions 18 for the naturally occurring steroids) at certain positions of the carbon skeleton (particularly at positions 3,5,11,17,18,20 and 21), (Hanson, 2006). 3 CH3 COO - Acetate v HO ^| -0* CH 2 —C — SCOA Vf! u HMC-CaA © CHi I "OOC—CH2—C—CHa—CH2-—OH OH CH3 Mevaionate ®i 1 O O I 1 C H 2 = C ~ C H 2 - - - C H 2 —•©—P—O—P—<0~ L ^ __^__1 | 1 isoprene O" O"* Activated isoprene Squalene HO Cholesterol Figure 6. Cholesterol synthesis in the cytoplasm Cholesterol synthesis in the cytoplasm occurs in the cytoplasm and microsomes two carbon acetate group of acetyl-CoA. Pregnane (C21) Androstane (C19) Estrane (C18) Figure 7. Structure and classification of steroid hormones Top: Structure of cholesterol, with numbering of carbons (1 to 27) and identification of cycles (A to D). Bottom: The three main classes of steroids ("parents compounds") derived from cholesterol, with number of carbons in brackets (C21 to CI8). Pregnanes (C21) form the basic structure of progestins and corticosteroids, Androstanes (CI9) of androgens and Estranes (CI 8) of estrogens (with of phenolic A- ring). 21 1.15 Cholesterol trafficking in the body Cholesterol and other fats cannot dissolve in the bloodstream. They have to be transported to and from the cells by special carriers called lipoproteins. There are severaltypes, but the ones to be most concerned about are low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). The liver plays a central role in distribution of cholesterol and several distinct pathways can be distinguished (Figure 8): Flux from the liver to periphery; flux from the periphery to the liver; flux from the intestine to the liver and hepatobiliary excretion (Rudel and Shelness, 2000; Tall, 1998). 22 Figure 8. Schematic overview of the major routes of cholesterol in human body Ch, cholesterol; HDL, high Density lipoprotein; IDL, intermediate-density-lipoprotein; LDL, low-density-lipoprotein, VLDL, very-low-density-lipoprotein. (Adopted from Nature Medicine 7, 1282 -1284 (2001)) 23 1.16 Intracellular cholesterol transport Mammalian cells obtain cholesterol by internalization of low density lipoproteins (LDL) or by de novo synthesis in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Deposition of excess cellular cholesterol in the form of cholesteryl esters, which are then stored in lipid droplets and accessed for cellular needs by activation of cholesterol esterase (hormonesensitive lipase, HSH), is catalyzed by acyl CoAxholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT), a resident ER enzyme (Bruscalupi, et al, 1985). Once cholesterol is liberated as the free form, the challenge for the cell is to transport this highly insoluble molecule to target compartments such as various cellular membranes. Steroidogenic cells face the additional requirement to deliver large amounts of cholesterol to the cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme, which lies on the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM); this enzyme activity is the first and rate-limiting in steroidogenesis, converting insoluble cholesterol to soluble pregnenolone (Miller, 2006). Owing to high hydrophobicity, intracellular traveling of cholesterol requires its incorporation into vesicle membranes (lysosomes, endosomes, peroxisomes) which can combine with other membranes, thus transporting cholesterol between intracellular membranes (Soccio and Breslow, 2004). Nevertheless, most of the cholesterol transport among intracellular membranes being done in complex with carrier proteins, which solubilize cholesterol in aqueous cytoplasm. 1.17 Sterol transport proteins Because cholesterol is essentially insoluble, a variety of sterol transporters are involved in cholesterol trafficking (Figure 9). Essentially, non-vesicular transport of 24 lipids within cells requires that the lipids are extracted from the cytoplasmic face of intracellular membranes and transported by lipid transfer proteins (LTPs). Next sections give a summary of function and specificity of the proteins involved in cholesterol internalization and subsequent distribution within intracellular compartment. 1.17.1 Transmembrane proteins A number of transmembrane proteins have been shown to play an important role in facilitating cholesterol transport, however, the exact mechanisms by which these proteins facilitate transport remain obscure. The best studied of these are members of the ABC (ATP-binding cassette) super-family of transporters, which facilitate the transfer of sterol to acceptors, mainly HDLs and their major associated apolipoprotein, ApoA-I (Oram and Heinecke, 2005; Zannis, et al, 2006). Defects in one of these proteins, ABCA1, are responsible for Tangier disease, a rare autosomal recessive disorder that is characterized by a severe deficiency in HDL and reduced efflux of cholesterol, especially from macrophages (Stefkova, et al., 2004). In cell culture studies it has been shown that ABCA1 promotes the transfer of cholesterol and phospholipids to lipid-poor forms of ApoA-I, which bind to ABCA1 (Oram and Heinecke, 2005).There is evidence that ABCA1 may function both at the PM and in endosomes (Alpy, et al, 2001). ABCG1 also promotes cholesterol efflux to HDL particles (Maxfield and Menon, 2006; Wang, et al, 2006). Free cholesterol exits from lysosomes and is transported to sites of operation. Mobilization of lysosomal free sterol is mediated by the Niemann-Pick type CI protein (NPC-1), encoded by a gene which when mutated produces a lysosomal storage disease 25 (Watari, et al, 2000). Recently, a protein related to NPC1, NPC1L1, has been shown to play an important role in the absorption of cholesterol from the intestines (Altmann, et al, 2004). This protein has been shown to be the target for ezetimibe, a drug that blocks the uptake of dietary cholesterol and is in clinical use (Garcia-Calvo, et al, 2005). The real mechanisms by which NPC1 and NPC1L1 facilitate sterol delivery into the cytosol remain uncertain. It was recently shown that NPC1 can facilitate the transbilayer movement of some nonpolar molecules (Sturley, et al., 2004), but it is unclear how this relates to movement of cholesterol, which can spontaneously flip between the leaflets of a membrane bilayer. One possibility is that the flipping of another molecule helps to present sterol in the cytoplasmic leaflet in a way that promotes its delivery to cytoplasmic acceptors. Another possibility is that the NPC1 proteins bind other proteins that facilitate sterol transport into the cytosol (Maxfield and Menon, 2006). 1.17.2 Intracellular cholesterol transporters Non-vesicular sterol transport between intracellular compartments is presumably mediated by LTPs (lipid transfer proteins). An LTP that mediates inter-organelle sterol transport in vivo has yet to be identified although various proteins, including caveolin and non-specific lipid transfer protein (SCP-2), have been proposed — but not proven — to perform this function (Liscum and Munn, 1999; Maxfield and Menon, 2006). 26 Figure 9. Key proteins governing cellular cholesterol distribution and flow Major (continuous lines) and minor (discontinuous lines) routes of cholesterol trafficking are indicated by arrows. Endogenously synthesized cholesterol as well as cholesterol precursors reach the plasma membrane mostly via Golgi bypass route(s). Lipoprotein cholesterol is internalized via receptor-mediated uptake and reaches the endocytic circuits from where it is redistributed to the plasma membrane, Golgi complex, and ER. ARH, autosomal reccesive hypercholesterolemia, functioning in the endocytic routing of LDL receptors, and several Rab proteins regulating membrane trafficking are involved in endosomal cholesterol movement. Some of the cholesterol interacting proteins, such as NPC1, NPC2, and MLN64, localize mostly to late endocytic compartments while caveolin localizes to plasma membrane caveolae and lipid droplets, as well as the Golgi 27 complex and caveosomes. Several ABC transporters synergize to mediate cholesterol efflux. StAR protein with mediation of PBR (peripheral-type receptor)(Liu, et ah, 2006), transports cholesterol across the benzodiazepine mitochondrial membrane.(Modified from (Ikonen, 2006)). 28 1.18 Cholesterol and steroidogenesis The acute response to steroidogenic stimuli (e.g. ACTH) is initiated by the mobilization and delivery of the substrate for all steroid hormone biosynthesis, cholesterol, from the outer to the inner mitochondrial membrane where it is metabolized to pregnenolone by the cytochrome P450 cholesterol side chain cleavage enzyme (P450scc) (Miller, 1988). In fact, the level of steroidogenic capacity of a cell is determined by the net conversion of cholesterol to pregnenolone by the cholesterol sidechain cleavage enzyme, P450scc which is located on the matrix side of the inner mitochondrial membrane (Farkash, et al, 1986). This mitochondrial enzyme catalyzes three distinct reactions, 22a-hydroxylation, 22-hydroxylation and scission of the 20,22 carbon-carbon bond, to convert cholesterol to pregnenolone. Each of these reactions requires donation of a separate pair of electrons from NADPH to P450scc via the intermediary of two electron-transfer proteins, ferrodoxin reductase and ferrodoxin [reviewed in (Miller, 1988, 2006)]. For many years, it was believed that the rate limiting step in steroidogenesis is the function of P450scc in conversion of cholesterol to pregnenolone. It can indeed be the rate limiting, if free sources of cholesterol are readily available for the enzyme. However, due to high insolubility, cholesterol cannot bypass the aqueous mitochondrial intramembrane. While the cholesterol pools accessible for P450scc in the matrix are not sufficient for the acute response to stimuli to trigger steroidogenesis, necessity of a specific mediator to provide adequate cholesterol for rapid synthesis of new steroids seems essential. 29 Therefore, the presence of transporter protein(s) was proposed. Early studies indicated that steroidogenesis coincides with expression of new proteins (Davis and Garren, 1968; Ferguson, 1963; Garren, et al, 1965). Nonetheless, in a short time it became clear that the inhibition of protein synthesis had no effect on the delivery of cellular cholesterol to the outer mitochondrial membrane, but that the delivery of this substrate from the outer membrane to the inner mitochondrial membrane was completely inhibited (Ohno, et al, 1983; Privalle, et al, 1983). These observations led to characterizing the action of a putative regulator protein for mediating the transfer of cholesterol from the outer mitochondrial membrane, through the aqueous intermembrane space, to the inner membrane. A number of candidate protein have been proposed for this role, and a listing of these proteins and the data supporting their candidacies have been discussed in a number of previous reviews (Cherradi, et al, 1998; Clark and Stocco, 1997; Miller, 1997; Stocco, 1997a, b, 1998, 2000; Stocco and Clark, 1996, 1997; Wang and Wang, 2006). A likely candidate for the suggested corticosteroid stimulatory protein was identified by Krueger and Orme-Johnson (Krueger and Orme-Johnson, 1983) who reported the discovery of a protein produced during acute ACTH stimulation in isolated rat adrenal cells (Lehoux, et al, 2003). Subsequently, it was found that a family of 28-32 kDa phosphoproteins in various steroidogenic tissues fulfills the requirements of the hypothesized labile steroidogenic stimulatory protein. It was further shown that these proteins all originated from a common 37 kDa precursor that was rapidly phosphorylated in response to cAMP (detailed in the next section), and cleaved during its import into mitochondria (Lehoux et al, 2003). Finally it was proposed that this phosphoprotein 30 could transport cholesterol inside mitochondria during its trafficking process (Epstein and Orme-Johnson, 1991b). 1.18.1 START domain proteins The best evidence for LTP-mediated lipid transport in vivo comes from studies of proteins containing the lipid-binding START (steroidogenic acute regulatory-related lipid transfer) domains (Reviewed in next sections). Recently it was shown that members of START domain proteins such as StARD4, 5, and 6 contribute to the intracellular transport of cholesterol (Soccio and Breslow, 2003). Overexpression of STARD4 or STARD5 stimulates steroidogenesis by P450scc and liver X receptor reporter gene activity, thus indicating that both proteins function in cholesterol metabolism and might be cholesterol or sterol-specific binding proteins (Soccio, et al., 2005). Crystal structure of the START domains in StARD4 and MLN64 (closest homolog to StARDl-START) does not exhibit any specific subcellular targeting sequence, suggesting that these are cytoplasmic proteins which bind to insoluble cholesterol thereby facilitating its transportation across aqueous cytosol. Actually, the current view of steroidogenesis process is that StARD4 or a related protein is probably responsible for delivering cholesterol to the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) from elsewhere in the cell (lipid droplets, endoplasmic reticulume), whereas StAR itself is responsible for delivery from the OMM to the IMM (Miller, 2006) (see below). The similarities in the sequence and activity of START domain proteins led to investigations of computational databases, categorizing comparable domains in many other proteins found in a broad spectrum of eukaryotic organisms, including plants and invertebrates (Iyer, et al., 2001; Ponting and Aravind, 1999). 31 1.19 Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) as acute regulator The discovery of StAR protein can be traced back to the description of a group of 30 kDa phosphoprotein induced in rodent adrenal cells by ACTH and in rat luteal cells and murine Leydig cells by LH by Orme-Johnson and collegues (Alberta, et al, 1989; Epstein and Orme-Johnson, 1991a; Krueger and Orme-Johnson, 1983; Pon and OrmeJohnson, 1988). A direct relationship was found between the appearance of a specific 30 kDa protein and steroid secretion. The induction of the 30 kDa protein was prevented by the protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide, in conjunction with inhibition of steroidogenesis. Identical proteins were also found in dibutiryl-cAMP-stimulated MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells by Stocco and colleagues (Stocco and Ascoli, 1993; Stocco and Chen, 1991; Stocco and Kilgore, 1988). The 30 kDa proteins were localized to mitochondria and were shown to be derived from a 37 kDa precursor (Epstein and OrmeJohnson, 1991a, b; Krueger and Orme-Johnson, 1983; Pon, et al, 1986; Stocco and Clark, 1996; Stocco and Sodeman, 1991). In 1994, the 30 kDa proteins from MA-10 Leydig cells (see last section) were purified, cloned, and expressed and it was established that expression of these proteins in transfected MA-10 cells in the absence of hormonal stimulation was sufficient to induce steroid production (Clark, et al, 1994). In addition to the 30-kDa proteins, steroidogenic activity of 37-kDa precursor forms of these proteins containing N-terminal mitochondrial signal sequences were also examined (Epstein and Orme-Johnson, 1991b) (Stocco and Sodeman, 1991); a direct cause-and-effect role for the 37- and 30-kDa proteins in hormone-regulated steroid production was identified (Stocco, 2001b). 32 1.20 StAR abnormality: lipoid congenital adrenal hyperplasia (LCAH) The observation that provided the strongest evidence for the essential requirement for StAR in steroidogenesis came with the finding that mutations in the StAR gene were the cause of the potentially lethal condition known as congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia (lipoid CAH) (Lin, et ah, 1995). Lipoid CAH (Figure 10) is the most severe form of congenital adrenal hyperplasia, which is characterized by deficiency in steroid hormone biosynthesis that disrupts the synthesis of all adrenal and gonadal steroids and leads to the accumulation of cholesterol and cholesterol esters in new born (Bose, et ah, 1996). The clinical phenotype of this disease is manifested as considerable adrenocortical insufficiency shortly after birth, hyperpigmentation reflecting increased production of proopiomelanocortin, elevated plasma renin activity as a consequence of reduced aldosterone synthesis, and male pseudohermaphroditism resulting from deficient fetal testicular testosterone synthesis (Hauffa, et ah, 1985; Miller and Strauss, 1999). Analysis of the StAR gene revealed more than 30 different mutations in patients with congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia (Bose, et ah, 2000a; Bose et ah, 1996; Fujieda, et ah, 1997; Lin et ah, 1995;Nakae, et ah, 1997; Okuyama, etah, 1997; Tee, etah, 1995). 33 Figure 10. Model of Congenital Lipoid Adrenal Hyperplasia in an Adrenal Cell In the normal cell (Panel A), cholesterol is derived by endogenous synthesis from acetylcoenzyme A in the endoplasmic reticulum, from cholesterol esters stored in lipid droplets, and from low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, which after receptor-mediated endocytosis, is processed in lysosomes before it is used or stored in lipid droplets. Cholesterol is transported to the outer mitochondrial membrane by ill-defined processes involving the cytoskeleton. The rate-limiting step in steroidogenesis is the movement of cholesterol from the outer to the inner mitochondrial membrane; this can be promoted by steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR), but may also be mediated by mechanisms independent of this protein. Thus, the net synthesis of steroid is due to mechanisms dependent on, as well as independent of, the protein. In Panel B, in the absence of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, as in early congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia or in a placental cell, mechanisms independent of the protein can still move some cholesterol into the mitochondria, resulting in a low level of steroidogenesis. In patients 34 with affected adrenal cells this results in increased corticotropin secretion, stimulating further production of cholesterol and its accumulation as cholesterol esters in lipid droplets. In Panel C, as lipid droplets accumulate they engorge the cell, damaging its cytoarchitecture through both physical displacement and the chemical action of cholesterol auto-oxidation products. Steroidogenic capacity is destroyed, and consequently tropic stimulation continues. In the ovary, follicular cells remain unstimulated and, hence, undamaged until they are recruited at the beginning of each menstrual cycle. Small amounts of estradiol are produced, as shown in Panel B, effecting phenotypic feminization and vaginal bleeding, but the cycles are anovulatory, resulting in infertility and progressive hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. cAMP denotes cyclic AMP. Adopted from (Bose et al. (1996). N. Engl. J. Med). 35 1.21 Transcriptional regulation of the StAR gene Different regulatory and transctiption factors are involved in positive or negative regulation of the StAR gene (Stocco, 2001b). The following sections will summarize elements which contribute to the StAR gene transcription and regulation. 1.21.1 Positive regulation Early studies demonstrated that hormone-stimulated steroid synthesis was accompanied by a rapid increase in StAR mRNA levels (Clark, et al, 1995). It was later found that trophic hormone-dependent increase in cAMP levels resulted in a rapid and positive regulation of the StAR gene (Caron, et al, 1997; Sandhoff et al, 1998; Sugawara, et al, 1997; Sugawara, et al, 1995b). Most studies revealed that the cAMPresponsive site was located within the first 254 nucleotides downstream of transcription start site (Caron et al, 1997; Sandhoff et al, 1998; Sugawara, et al, 1996; Sugawara et al, 1997), and this region has been the focus of studies to identify promoter elements and their cognate-binding proteins that mediate the cAMP response. However, the StAR promoter lacks a consensus full cAMP response element, raising the possibility that the cAMP response element binding protein might not act directly on sequences found in the StAR promoter (Stocco, 2001b). Therefore, the presence of other factors was proposed. 1.21.2 Steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1) SF-l, a member of the steroid hormone receptor family of nuclear transcription factors identified in adrenocortical cells (Ikeda, et al, 1993), was the first transcription factor to be studied as a potential regulator of the StAR gene (Stocco, 2001b). SF-1 can efficiently transactivate the StAR promoter in transient transfection assays in numerous 36 cell types (Caron et al, 1997; Sugawara et al, 1996; Sugawara et al, 1997). It is also required for protein-DNA interactions and maximal transactivation of StAR promoter in the region of the StAR promoter flanked by positions -105 and -60 (Wooton-Kee and Clark, 2000). 1.21.3 Spl Spl is a member of the zinc finger family of transcription factors (Berg, 1992). Spl is involved in the expression of multiple steroidogenic genes including CYP11A (P450scc) (Ahlgren, et al, 1990; Venepally and Waterman, 1995), CYP21B (P450c21) (Kagawa and Waterman, 1991), and CYP17 (P450cl7p) (Borroni, et al, 1997). Spl may contribute to the regulation of StAR gene thereby interacting with a number of transcription factors such as GATA-4 (Lee, et al, 1997; Rodenburg, et al, 1997; Sun, et al, 1998). 1.21.4 GATA-binding protein 4 (GATA-4) Functional assays on FSH-induced primary granulosa cells (Silverman, et al, 1999) led to the identification of two trans-acting proteins, C/EBPP and GATA-4, which were required for the transcriptional activation of the StAR promoter. GATA-4 has been suggested to play a regulatory role in the acute rate of StAR transcription (Sugawara et al, 1997). 1.21.5 Steroid regulatory element binding protein (SREBP) A recent study defined a conditional response of the human StAR gene promoter to sterol regulatory element binding protein-la (SREBP) (Christenson, et al, 2001). 37 Concomitantly, other laboratories demonstrated the presence of a potential sterol regulatory element binding site in the rat StAR promoter (Shea-Eaton, et al, 2001). "These studies found that SREBP is capable of transactivating the StAR promoter. It was further indicated that other transcription factors such as SF-1, nuclear factor-Y, yin yang 1 and Sp-1 may also be involved in the action of SREBP on the StAR promoter (Stocco, 2001b). Based on these results, it is possible to conclude that StAR may be cooperatively regulated by SREBP along with other mentioned factors. 1.21.6 Other factors In addition to the mentioned factors, other less known positive regulators have been also proposed to be involved in StAR gene expression, such as arachidonic acid metabolites (Wang, et al, 1999), arylhydrocarbon receptor (AhR) (Sugawara, et al, 2001) and Cyclic AMP response element binding protein (CREB) (Stocco, et al, 2001). 1.22 Negative regulation of the StAR gene 1.22.1 DAX-1 Besides the discussed positive regulatory factors, the StAR promoter may also port elements involved in repression of its transcription; overexpression of DAX-1 (dosage-sensitive sex reversal, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, critical region on the X, gene 1) in Y-l cells blocks expression of the StAR gene, probably through binding to a hairpin structure in the 5' flanking region of the StAR promoter (Zazopoulos, et al, 1997). 38 1.23 Posttranslational Modifications of StAR Post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation and specific proteolysis affect the (StAR) activity (Fleury, et ah, 2004; LeHoux, et ah, 2004). Three putative phosphorylation sites have been reported to be required for the (Bu^-cAMP-stimulated activity of full length hamster StAR in transfected COS-1 cells. In effect, cyclic AMP is a known activator of PKA, qualifying these sites as potential candidates for modulation of StAR activity via PKA-mediated phosphorylation. Prior to that, it had been shown that alkaline phosphatase treatment of human StAR expressing COS-1 cells lysates had resulted in loss of two acidic species noted by two dimensional gel electrophoresis (Arakane, et ah, 1997). Consistent results obtained by other laboratories confirmed that StAR phosphorylation is one of the regulatory steps in hormone-stimulated steroid formation. 1.24 StAR protein structure/function relationships 1.24.1 Functional domains In humans, StAR is expressed in adrenal gland, gonads, and brain, and consists of 285 amino acids (Sugawara, et ah, 1995a) separated into two functional domains: (1) mitochondrial import sequence responsible for its translocation in mitochondria, and (2) the StAR lipid transfer (START) domain (Ponting and Aravind, 1999; Ponting, et ah, 1999) responsible for the transfer of cholesterol to the mitochondrial inner membrane (IMM). StAR is targeted to the mitochondria by its N-terminal presequence that allows mitochondrial import of the protein, but it is rapidly degraded after entering the mitochondria (Granot, et ah, 2002). However, studies revealed that deletion of first N- 39 terminal 46 amino acid residues of the hamster StAR expressed in COS-1 cells did not have any significant effect on steroidogenic activity of the mutant (Fleury et al., 2002). This report was in agreement with observation that human StAR retained full activity even in the absence of complete targeting sequence (Arakane, et al, 1998). These findings demonstrated that in vitro, only the segment of StAR including START domain (AN62-StAR) is enough to support cholesterol transfer across the mitochondrial membrane. 1.24.2 The StAR homolog MLN64 After the experiments determined StAR sequence (Clark et al, 1994), it was speculated to represent a new, unique class of proteins. However, concomitant studies of metastatic breast carcinoma led to the cloning of MLN64 (metastatic lymph node, clone 64), whose START domain displayed -37% identity and 50%< similarity to that of the StAR protein (Moog-Lutz, et al, 1997). When this StAR-like domain (N-218 MLN64) was either expressed in transfected COS-1 cells (in vivo) or purified and added to mitochondria in vitro, it exhibited about half of the ability of StAR to promote steroidogenesis (Bose, et al, 2000b; Watari, et al, 1997). The similarity in the sequence and activities of StAR and MLN64 led to characterization of the START domain of StAR (referred to hereafter as StAT-START) through standard homology modeling based on the MLN64 structure (Mathieu, et al, 2002a). 40 1.24.3 Structure of StAR-START A complete understanding of the StAR's molecular structure and mechanism is essential to understand LCAH and explain experimental results at the molecular level. To date, the StAR structure has not been defined directly, but X-ray crystal structures for two closely-related proteins N-216 MLN64 (Tsujishita and Hurley, 2000) and StARD4 (Romanowski, et al, 2002) have been determined. Based on these data, computational modeling of StAR-START with Mathieu et.al. (2002) provided new insights into the mechanism of StAR function. The StAR structure was modeled in our laboratory through standard homology modeling procedures based on the MLN64 crystal structure (Mathieu et al, 2002a). As shown in (Figure 11), the cholesterol binding site composed of a Ushaped unclosed P-barrel topped by the parallel C-terminal a-helix. The structure is of the a/p type, consisting of nine-stranded twisted anti parallel p-sheet with strand order of 123987654, and 4 a-helices. Two Q-loops are inserted between P5P6 and P7P8. The most important feature of cholesterol binding domain of StAR is a hydrophobic pocket matching the size and structure of cholesterol, extending nearly the entire length of the protein. The hydrophobic cavity of StAR-START can be predicted as the driving force allowing StAR to open, exposing the binding site to incoming cholesterol molecules More details about structural changes of the StAR-START upon binding to cholesterol and our proposed mechanistic model will be discussed in the next sections. 41 Figure 11. Ribbon diagram of StAR model Helices in red, strands in blue, and loops in yellow. There is 'fog' in the image for depth perception. All structural elements have been labled according to the human MLN64 crystal structure. (Mathieu et al, J. mol. Endo (2002) 29, 327-345). 42 1.24.4 Mechanism of StAR's action The regulation of StAR at the level of transcription and second messenger pathway have been previously characterized (Lehoux, et al, 1998; Stocco, et al, 2005). However, the exact biochemical mechanism of StAR's action has been remained obscure up to now. It has been well established that StAR facilitates the cholesterol movement from the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) to the IMM. In this regard, four models of StAR's action are to be discussed: contact sites; desorption; mediation of mitochondrial receptors; and molten globular state. 1.24.5 Contact sites As discussed in section 1.19, early studies (Clark et al, 1994; Epstein and OrmeJohnson, 1991b; Krueger and Orme-Johnson, 1983; Pon et al, 1986; Stocco and Sodeman, 1991) described the StAR as a cytoplasmic 37kDa precursor phosphoprotein which is rapidly directed into mitochondria through its targeting sequence to be cleaved to produce mature long-lived 30kDa protein. It has been suggested that during or after translocation, StAR desorbs one cholesterol molecule and load onto the P450scc. Taking into consideration the model in that other investigators had shown the existence of contact sites at loci where proteins were imported into mitochondria (Schwaiger, et al., 1987), it was hypothesized that formation of lipid bridges during import of StAR facilitates cholesterol flow into the cholesterol depleted inner mitochondrial membrane (Stocco and Clark, 1996). This model was censured when it was found StAR protein lacking the N-terminal 62 amino acids (targeting sequence) supported steroid synthesis to the same extent as 43 wild-type StAR either in transfected COS-1 (Arakane, et al, 1996) cells or with isolated mitochondria (Arakane et al, 1998), yet never imported into mitochondria. 1.24.6 Desorption model Studies with bacterially-expressed N-62 StAR showed that the protein could stimulate cholesterol transfer from synthetic liposomes to trypsin-pretreated mitochondria as well as microsomal membranes (Kallen, et al, 1998). Given that StAR alone is sufficient to support cholesterol transfer to acceptor membranes, it was suggested that a mitochondrial StAR receptor is not required to mediate the transportation process. The notion that sterol transfer does not involve fusion of liposomes with mitochondrial membrane (acceptor) is suggestive of a stimulatory role of StAR to promote desorption of cholesterol from the donor vesicle. This hypothesis is relevant to the situation in steroidogenic mitochondria because the outer mitochondrial membrane is cholesterol rich, whereas the inner membrane is relatively devoid of cholesterol (Stocco, 2001a). 1.24.7 PBR, a potential mitochondrial receptor for StAR Some studies propose the peripheral type benzodiazepine receptors (PBRs) as indispensable factors which maintain the cholesterol translocation process (Amri, et al, 1996; Papadopoulos, 1993). In situ and in vitro experiments by these groups indicated that in steroidogenic cells the StAR-induced cholesterol import into mitochondria was mediated by the outer mitochondrial membrane PBR. This theory is based on the involvement of three essential factors in acute stimulation of cholesterol transport into mitochondria: cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), peripheral-type benzodiazepine 44 receptor (PBR), and the steroidogenesis acute regulatory (StAR) proteins (Hauet, et al, 2002). Recently evidence was provided that formation of a mitochondrial signaling complex composed of outer mitochondrial membrane translocation protein (TSPO) and PAP7 (TSPO-associated protein), which binds and bridges to mitochondria the regulatory subunit RIa of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKARIcc); and the horomone induced PKA substrate, StAR (Liu et al, 2006). This model could be interpreted as placing StAR upstream from signaling multifaceted and raise the possibility that StAR is a ligand for this mitochondrial complex (Miller and Strauss, 1999). However, it was previously (Arakane et al, 1998) shown that N-62 StAR is not selectively accumulated by mitochondria, indicative of the low affinity of mitochondrial receptors for the C-terminus of StAR. Conclusively, more effort should be taken to provide further evidences to clarify the nature of interaction between StAR and the outer mitochondrial membrane. 1.24.8 Theory of Molten Globular state Globular proteins can be denatured by changing pH and ionic strength (Stigter, et al, 1991). Recent evidence has led to the conclusion that there are two acid-denatured states: one highly unfolded and the other more compact, sometimes called the "molten globule" (Stigter et al, 1991). A molten globule (MG) is a stable, partially folded protein state found in mildly denaturing conditions such as low pH. MGs are collapsed and generally have some native-like secondary structure but a dynamic tertiary structure as seen by far and near circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, respectively. In this context, Miller and colleagues provided evidence that when StAR is subjected to limited 45 proteolysis at different pH values, the molecule behaves differently as the pH decreases (Bose, et al, 1999). That is, StAR unfolding at pH values in the 3.5-4 range, giving rise to a biologically active molten globular state. However, an acidic microenvironment in close proximity of mitochondrial membrane still needed to be proven. Therefore, they proposed that the acidic pH is provided by the expulsion of protons from the mitochondrial matrix by the proton pump (Allen, et al., 2006) and/or by the presence of the negatively charged head groups of the phospholipids (Tamm, 1986) in the outer mitochondrial membrane. This theory further proposed that transition to a MG, stimulates the opening of folded protein, exposing a hydrophobic region to the cholesterol, or it may prolong lifetime of the StAR, thereby increasing the transfer of cholesterol during this phase. Laboratory evidence for transition of StAR to a molten globule included changes in spectroscopic behavior (changes in circular dichroism (CD) spectra) and increase in sensitivity to proteolysis. A previous study (Song, et al, 2001) on a recombinant protein lacking both the signaling sequence and a substantial part of the c-terminal (including ahelix 4), namely 63-193 StAR, asserted that the N-terminal domain of StAR is a molten globule state. They also suggested that transition to this molten globule state facilitates the interaction of StAR with the negatively charged membranes. The extent to which this model can be applied to a biological system will be discussed in the DISCUSSION section. Despite considerable advances, there are questions concerning the ability of MG protein to deliver cholesterol to P450scc in the matrix side of mitochondrial inner membrane. Moreover, the model does not explain the acid-induced protonation of amino acids located in the interior of hydrophobic pocket, leading to loss of StAR integrity and 46 even ability of binding to cholesterol. Of these, this theory is strongly based on the pH of the microenvironment close to the mitochondria being much lower than the rest of the cytosol, a condition has not yet been demonstrated. 47 1.24.9 Our proposed model for the StAR action Following the observations that (1) the C-terminal region of StAR is important for proper StAR activity (Lin et al. 1995, Bose et al. 1996), (2) the C-terminal region is suggested to transiently change conformation for cholesterol binding (Tsujishita & Hurley 2000), (3) the loss of StAR helical structure is obtained upon the binding of a cholesterol analog (Petrescu et al. 2001), (4) molten globular states of StAR are possible (Bose et al. 1999, Christensen et al. 2001), and (5) the C-terminal a-helix in MLN64 entirely covers the putative cholesterol binding site, Mathieu et al (2002) in our laboratory investigated the possible implication of various conformational states of this C-terminal a-helix in the binding of cholesterol to StAR through molecular modeling. They hypothesized that in the absence of cholesterol StAR population is in equilibrium between the native and partially unfolded state. The hydrophobic cavity of StAR was proposed to be the driving force for the unfolding of the C-terminal a-helix revealing the cholesterol binding site. In fact, According to this model, binding of cholesterol occurs preferentially to a partially unfolded state of StAR. The refolding of C-terminal a-helix on top of the cholesterol binding site can bring about a complete sequestration of cholesterol from solvent, thereby forming a stable StAR/cholesterol complex. This theory suggests a rapid unfolding StAR mechanism for the transfer of cholesterol from the outer to the inner mitochondrial membranes, driven by the transmembrane cholesterol gradient. In addition, refolding of c-terminal domain guarantees the inaccessibility of cholesterol to the aqueous environment and leads to formation of an active hydrophobic protein/ligand complex (Figure 12). 48 '^^IJuLlA* > #1 '#mv D ^^ ^f m # ^ \ Figure 12. Molecular mechanism of cholesterol binding to StAR The cholesterol binding site of StAR is opened through two movements of the C-terminal a-helix (dark gray) from the original folded conformation (A): step #1 opened (B) completely removed from the cholesterol binding site, and step #2 partially unfolded (C) - all of the a-helical structure of the C-terminal a-helix is lost. Once open, cholesterol can bind to StAR (D) as indicated in step #3; a theoretical Kd in micromolar range was calculated with STC (structure-based thermodynamics calculation). StAR is represented as a ribbons diagram while cholesterol is depicted as van der Waals surface. StAR is white with the C-terminal a-helix black, and cholesterol dark gray. 49 Research objectives The mechanism and site(s) of StAR action are controversial. Indeed, it has not yet been clearly established whether StAR binds to free cholesterol in the cytosol or desorbs it from the outer mitochondrial membrane (Christenson and Strauss, 2000). However, there is a consensus that StAR acts outside of mitochondria to promote cholesterol transfer across its membrane. In addition, the molecular mechanism of transport is still under debate. On one hand, evidence suggests that the binding and release of cholesterol is dependent on the existence of a molten globular state of StAR that is promoted near the mitochondrial membrane where the pH is supposedly acidic. On the other hand, we have proposed that the cholesterol binding site is a well ordered hydrophobic cavity which contains a salt bridge important for the specify of the interaction and that the entry of cholesterol into this cavity coincides with the reversible unfolding of the C-terminal ahelix on top of the binding site (Mathieu et al, 2002a). The sizeable cavity is predicted to provide the driving force for the reversible unfolding. This implies that in absence of cholesterol, the fully folded state of StAR is in equilibrium with a partially folded state that allows for the entry (and exit) of cholesterol. Binding of cholesterol to the cavity is hypothesized to stabilize the fully folded state and the C-terminal helix. To shed light on the mechanism by which StAR transports cholesterol across the mitochondrial membrane, we sought to clarify the exact mechanism by which StAR binds to cholesterol, assuming that this is the first step in the mechanism. To achieve this goal, we would express, purify and confirm the steroidogenic activity of StAR lacking first 62 amino acids at the N-terminus (N-62 StAR). To determine the effect of 50 environmental pH on the binding capacity of StAR to cholesterol classical in vitro binding assays would be performed. This would give a global idea about the effect of pH on the formation of StAR/cholesterol complex. To characterize the molecular mechanisms involved in the activity of StAR to bind to cholesterol, circular dichroism (CD) studies will be done to determine the effect of cholesterol binding on the secondary structure of StAR as a function of pH at different temperatures. This would enable us to characterize the structural changes and thermodynamic elements which contribute to the binding process. In addition to that, kinetic studies would be carried out to clarify the binding mechanism as a function of time. Based on the cholesterol-induced secondary structural modifications of StAR, this study will also develop a methodology for determining the stoichiometry and dissociation constant (Kn) of the protein/ligand complex. Eventually, we will combine our results with the current models of StAR function to signify new insights into the mechanism of cholesterol transport by StAR protein. 51 2. Materials and Methods 2.1 Description of MA-10 and Y - l steroidogenic cell lines About 20 years ago, a report was published on the establishment of a mouse Leydig tumor cell line (designated MA-10) that retained many of the properties of normal Leydig cells, including potent steroidogenic mitochondria produce steroids in responses to trophic hormone stimulation (Ascoli, 1981). The MA-10 mouse leydig tumor cell line used in the current study was kindly provided by Dr. M. Ascoli (Dep. Of Pharmacology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City). The cells were grown in Waymouth's MB752/1 media including 20mM HEPES and 15% horse serum with the pH of 7.7 in a humidified incubator containing 5% C02. Mouse Y-l adrenal cell lines were also used. These cell lines have proven to be of considerable value in studying the molecular and biochemical mechanisms controlling adrenal steroidogenesis. Y-l cells were obtained from American Tissue Culture Co. and grown in Ham's F10 medium with 2mM L-glutamine adjusted to contain 1.5 g/L sodium bicarbonate (82.5%), 15% horse serum, 2.5% fetal bovine serum. Both cell lines were maintained and propagated using standard techniques. 52 2.2 Description of the vectors for expression of 6His-Tag recombinant N-62 StAR A pET vector is a bacterial plasmid designed to enable the quick production of a large quantity of any desired protein when activated. This plasmid (pictured below) contains several important elements - a lad gene which codes for the lac repressor protein, a T7 promoter which is specific to only T7 RNA polymerase (not bacterial RNA polymerase) and also does not occur anywhere in the prokaryotic genome, a lac operator which can block transcription, a polylinker, an f1 origin of replication (so that a singlestranded plasmid can be produced when co-infected with Ml3 helper phage), an ampicillin resistance gene, and a ColEl origin of replication (Figure 13). The pET-3a vector (Novagen Inc. Madison, WI, U.S.A.), used for cloning of Cterminal 6xHis tag AN62-StAR, is a 4640bp plasmid which carry an N-terminal T7-Tag sequence and cloning sites including BamHl and Ndel. The pET-21b vector (Novagen Inc. Madison, WI, U.S.A.), used for cloning of Nterminal 6xHis tag AN62-StAR, is a 5443 bp plasmid. 53 Figure 13. The pET Vectors These plasmids contain a drug resistant marker for ampicillin resistance, the lad gene, the T7 transcription promoter, the lac operator region 3' to the T7 promoter, and a polylinker region. Also, there are two origins of replication - one is the f1 origin which enables the production of a single stranded vector under appropriate conditions, and the other is the conventional origin of replication. A) Map of pET-3a vector; B) Map of the pET-21b vector. 54 ECOR 1(4638) , A p o 1(4638) j , C l a 1(24! . , „ 1 { H i n d 111(29) A a t 11(4567). >< | S s p i(J449!_;s _J U [_/ ^^ L /. / yJ^.^'''^ Sea 3(4125) v , - B p u l l 0 2 1(458) ,«BamH 1(510) / / _,. Ncte 1(550) ^ ^ B ^ ' ^ ' . . . - X b a 1(588) ^ ^ • ^ , P s t 1(3890) v Bgl 11(646) ^ ^ \ ///& S g r A 1(687) >v .,_• S p h 1(843) \ / / „- ECON 1(303) V Sol 1(928) \~- P s h A 1(993) j pET-3a \ (4S40bp) { H g i E 11(3338) \ L - E a g 1(1216) V f - N m I{l25l) i - A p a B 1(1329) A B s p M 1(1331) \ A l w N !(316B) -< «k / *•*- B s m 1(1636) X \ x - A v a 1(1702) ^MSC 1(1723) \ N B p u l O 1(1858) ^ B s c G 1(1912) ,/ B s p L U V ! 1(2752) .,--f-,, v Af! 111(2752)'' y-S a p 1(2636) •' ~T'{ ~ . ~ r Bst 1107 1 ( 2 8 2 3 ) / / / / B s a A 1(2504) •'/ I j T t h l H 1(2437) I I I B s m B 1(2393)!' / Pvu 11(2343) I - B " 1 - N h e 1(231) ;.,.- N d e 1(238) X b a 1(276) Bgl 11(342) S g r A 1(383) S p h 1(539) " \ . _ . . . — E c o N 1(599) Dra 111(5201), ="Z> -543 v :^ '<*# *' Sea 1(4538) Pvu 1(4428) ~J/ X X " ~ ~ ~ p f l M '< 646 ) \ f \ - - A p a 8 1(748) ^ \ \ w M l u 1(1064) f , \ \ V - B c l 1(1078) Jin Pst 1(4303) JI , A v a 1(158) X h O 1(158) N o t 1(166) E a g 1(166) H i n d 111(173) S a l 1(179) S a c 1(190) ECOR 1(192) B a m H 1(198) If I 8 s a 1(4119V- . ^ pET-21b(+) t B s t E 11(1245) , ' l - B m g 1(1273) | j F'Apa 1(1275) Eam1105 1(4058)4 (5443bp) A l w N 1(3581) ^ F/BssHII(1475) / E c o R V(1514) "*Hpa 1(1570) \ / \ p s h / /•\.PpM B s p L U 1 1 1(3165) / /'"--,-, S a p 1(3049) ' // B s t 1 1 0 7 1(2936) 1 j 1(2171) 11(2171) ^ ,~-\ \ B p\uP1s0p 51(2271) ~ I B s p G 1(2691) T t h 1 1 1 1(2910)' 55 2.3 Preparation of competent bacteria, bacterial transformation and plasmid purification Competent E. coli XLl-Blue (Statagene, La Jolla,CA) were prepared using CaC^ method (Ausubel et al., 1995) and were stored at -80°C for further use. The pET-3a constructs containing C-terminal 6His N-62 StAR (referred to hereafter as C-N62 StAR) were transformed into E. coli XLl-Blue as was described previously (Hanahan, et al, 1991). The transformed bacteria were streaked on Petri-dishes of 100X15mm (Baxter, Pointe-Claire, QC) that had been pre-filled with autoclaved Luria-Bertani (LB; (Sambrooke et al., 1989)) containing 1.5% agar and 50 ug/ml ampicilin, followed by 16h incubation at 37°C. Colonies were picked and transferred into the liquid culture media (LB + lOOug/ml ampicillin) followed by incubating in a shaking incubator at 37°C at 225 rpm overnight (-16 h). Plasmid DNA was purified using a QIAGEN Plasmid Maxi Kit (Qiagen Inc., Mississauga, ON) according to the manufacturer's protocol. 2.4 Preparation of the N-terminal 6His tag N-62 StAR sequence motif To produce NL^-terminal 6His-tag StAR proteins lacking the mitochondrial import sequence including first 62 amino acids (referred to hereafter as N-N62 StAR), pET-3a plasmids containing DNA encoding for human StAR sequence from amino acid 63-285 were amplified using the following PCR conditions: hot start of 5 min at 94°C (polymerase was added just 30 seconds befor the end of the cycle), completed by 30 cycles of 94°C/58°C/72°C and a final elongation of 72°C forlO min; using primers 5'[TTCGCGGATCCTGATCAGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGACACCTGGCTTCAGAGG C]-3' and 5'-[GGAATTCCATATGCTGGAGAGATTT CAGTGACC]-3'. Then the PCR 56 products were separated through 1% agarose gel electrophoresis (Southern 1979) at 100 V for at least 45 minutes in TAE buffer (40mM Tris-acetate, ImM EDTA), stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized by UV illumination. DNA bands corresponding to desired fragments were excised and purified using QIAEX11 Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen Inc., Mississauga, ON) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. DNA was eluted in 50ul water and repurified by a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen Inc., Mississauga, ON). 2.4.1 Cloning of the N-N62 StAR pET-21b vectors were digested with BamHl and Nhel restriction enzymes (NEW ENGLAND Bio labs Inc) using 5 ug of plasmid DNA with 30 U of enzyme in the appropriate reaction buffer giving a total volume of 50 ul. The mixture was incubated for 2 h and depleted from salts and proteins by passing it through QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen Inc., Mississauga, ON) column, following by dephosphorylation to prevent selfligation or DNA concatemer formation (Spinella, et al, 1999). The PCR products were digested accordingly and were washed using a QIAquick Nucleotide removal Kit (Qiagen Inc., Mississauga, ON). The recovered DNA was ligated into pET-21b and the constructs were transformed into competent E.coli BL21(DE3) bacteria. Colonies were grown and transferred into liquid LB medium as described above. Plasmids were purified as above and sent for sequencing and corresponding bacteria were frozen in 20% glycerol at 80°C. 57 2.5 Preparation of the recombinant proteins 2.5.1 N - 6 2 StAR expression A few microliters of the bacteria were incubated in LB medium containing 50 ug/ml ampicillin for 16h at 37°C with shaking at 225 rpm overnight. Cultures were diluted 1:50 into fresh LB medium and were grown at 37°C to an OD600 of approximately 0.4 to 0.6. At this point, expression of the N-N62 StAR was induced by 0.5 mM-1 mM IPTG (Promega, Madison, WI). 2.6 Purification of the recombinant proteins After at least 4h induction, bacteria were spun at 6000 rpm for 10 min and pellets were stored at -20°C. For native purification , bacterial pellets were lysed in 300mM NaCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM NaH 2 P0 4 , 1 mM PMSF and 1 mM Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP), 1 mg/ml lyzozyme followed by drawing-expelling of the lysates through a 21 gauge needle and were spun for 45 min at 15000 rpm. Native purification of protein from supernatant was carried out using the nitrilotriacetic acid-chelate resin (Qiagen Inc., Mississauga, ON) according to manufacturer's recommendations. For refolding purification, inclusion bodies were solubilized in 8 M urea or 6 M GuHCI and proteins were recovered from a gradually decreasing of the denaturant concentration as has been described elsewhere (Li, et al., 2004). The proteins were eluted in a buffer containing 25 mM NaH 2 P0 4 , 125 mM NaCI, pH 7.4, 300 mM imidazole, 1 mM TCEP and were subjected to three consecutive centrifugation steps in millipore ultracentrifugation filter device (Amicon) at 3000 rpm for 30,60,45 min respectively. To remove the residual imidazol, in the last two spins proteins were washed and 58 concentrated through physiological buffer (Godt and Maughan, 1988) gradient. Protein concentration was estimated at A280 , considering 1A[280] corresponds to 0.96 mg/ml calculated from the amino acid sequence using the Vector NTI program (Invitrogen). 2.7 Analysis of the purified proteins 2.7.1 Separation on SDS-PAGE Separation of the proteins was carried out through SDS-PAGE (Laemmli, 1970) using two sequential gels; The composition of the top gel, called the stacking gel, is slightly acidic (pH 6.8) and has a low (5.5%) acrylamide concentration to make a porous gel. Under these conditions proteins separate poorly but form thin, sharply defined bands. The lower gel, called the separating, or resolving gel, was more basic (pH 8.8), and has a higher polyacrylamide content (in our case, 12%), which causes the gel to have narrower channels or pores. The proteins were denatured in IX SDS (50mM Tris pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 10%o glycerol, 5% ME) followed by boiling for 5 min. One dimensional SDS gel electrophoresis was performed at 200 V for 45 min in electrophoresis buffer containing 1% SDS, 25 mM Tris, 0.25 M glycine. AN62-StAR bands (-25.750 kDa) were determined on the basis a molecular weight marker « Prestained SDS-PAGE Low Range Standard» (Bio-Rad). 59 2.8 Staining of the SDS-PAGE A commonly used stain for detecting proteins in polyacrylamide gels is Coomassie blue (Towbin, et ah, 1979). Gel staining was done in staining solution (0.2% Coomassie Blue R250 [Sigma-Aldrich Canada Ltd., Oakville, ON], 45% methanol and 10% glacial acetic acid) with moderate shaking (120 rpm). As a result, acidified methanol precipitates the proteins and the agitation circulates the dye, facilitating penetration, and helps ensure uniformity of staining. The gel was distained in decolorant solution (15% ethanol, 5% glacial acetic acid) for lh at 25°C with gentle shaking. 2.9 Evaluation of the Steroidogenic Activity of N-62 StAR in the presence of Isolated Mitochondria As previously mentioned, StAR lacking mitochondrial targeting sequence displays the same activity as wild type protein. To evaluate the steroidogenic activity of our recombinant proteins, an in vitro assay was performed by incubating isolated steroidogenic mitochondria and the purified recombinant N-62 StAR following by measurement of pregnenolone produced per assay. 2.9.1 Mitochondria purification Mitochondria were isolated from both MA-10 and Y-l cells similar to protocols that have been described elsewhere (Della-Cioppa, et ah, 1986; Krueger and Papadopoulos, 1990). Cells were grown in T75 Tissue Culture Flasks (SARSTEDT) until ~90% confluence was reached. The medium was then removed and cells were washed with PBS (5 ml), scraped from the flasks and centrifuged at 4°C at 1000 rpm for 10 min. 60 Cells were resuspended in the same buffer and pelleted as before and homogenized in a cold isotonic buffer containing 250 mM sucrose, 10 mM Tris, pH7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM Tris (2-carboxyethyl) phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP), 0.1 mM PMSF, a protease inhibitor cocktail tablet (Roche, Germany), and 10 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA) with a tight fitting pestle in a Potter-Elvehjem homogenizer. Therefore, cells were sheared between a close-fitting rotating plunger and the thick walls of a glass vessel, providing a cell extract (homogenate) which contains large and small molecules from the cytosol, such as enzymes, ribosomes and metabolites as well as all the membranebounded organelles. Homogenate was centrifuged at 2900 rpm for 10 min and the recovered supernatant was spun again at 2900 rpm to isolate nuclei and cellular debris. The combined supernatant layers were retrieved and centrifuged at 9600 rpm for 10 min to pellet mitochondria and the resulting pellets were resuspended in homogenizing buffer and were spun at 9600 rpm for an additional 10 min to yield an enriched mitochondrial fraction. Mitochondrial pellets were resuspended in homogenization buffer containing lmg/ml BSA and were used directly or stored at -80°C (Dickinson, et al, 1970; Fleischer, 1979). 2.10 The steroidogenic in vitro assay Isolated mitochondria and purified StAR were subjected to an in vitro assay system (Arakane et al, 1998) with a modified incubation buffer. Purified N-62 StAR was incubated at a concentration of 10 uM in 125 mM KC1, 5 mM MgCl2 , 10 mM KH 2 P0 4 , 25 mM HEPES, 1 uM 3p-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase inhibitor epostane, 100 uM GTP, 10 mM isocitrate, 5 mM sodium succinate, 200 uM cholesterol in 40 ul incubation reaction. Most efficient concentration for mitochondria was determined from titration 61 curves to be 1 ug protein per 1 ul of assay reaction (Figure 14). Incubations were carried out at 37°C and pH 7.4 for 90 min. As for the controls, 22R-hydroxycholesterol was used as a positive and mitochondria incubated with cholesterol were served as the negative controls. Some assays were performed in the absence of exogenous cholesterol. After 90 min, reactions were terminated by flash-freezing in liquid nitrogen, centrifuged at 15000 rpm for 10 min and the supernatants were recovered. The amount of pregnenolone produced per assay was quantitated by radioimmunoassay (RIA). 62 10 15 20 25 30 Mitochondrial proteins (ng) Figure 14. Determination of the optimal mitochondrial quantity A 10 uM of the purified N-62 StAR was incubated with different mitochondrial quantities. Data are expressed as the pregnenolone produced per assay, relative to the respective mitochondrial concentrations. The most efficient and cost effective amount of mitochondria was determined as 1 |ig per 1 ul assay. 63 2.11 Radioimmunoassay (RIA) A highly sensitive and specific assay method that uses the competition between radiolabeled and unlabeled substances in an antigen-antibody reaction to determine the concentration of the unlabeled substance; it can be used to determine antibody concentrations or to determine the concentration of any substance against which specific antibody can be produced. In (RIA), a fixed concentration of labeled tracer antigen is incubated with a constant amount of antiserum such that the concentration of antigen binding sites on the antibody is limiting. If unlabeled antigen is added to this system, there is competition between labeled tracer and unlabeled (cold) antigen for the limited and constant number of binding sites on the antibody, and thus the amount of tracer bound to antibody will decrease as the concentration of unlabeled antigen increases (Figure 14). This can be measured after separating antibody-bound from free tracer and counting either the bound fraction, the free fraction or both. A calibration or standard curve is set up with increasing amounts of known antigen, and from this curve the amount of antigen in the unknown samples can be calculate. Thus, the four basic necessities for a radioimmunoassay system are an antiserum to the compound to be measured, the availability of a radioactively labeled form of the compound, a method whereby antibody-bound tracer can be separated from unbound tracer, and a standard unlabeled material. 2.11.1 Descriptions of radiolabled pregnenolone and anti-pregnenolone [ H]Pregnenolone was used as radioactive labeled antigen tracer in our lab. It emits a very low energy beta particle. This particle only travels about 1/2 centimeter in 64 air. So, we count these low-energy beta particles using a liquid scintillation counter. The 3 H sample was suspended in a cocktail which absorbs beta energy and produces flashes of blue light (approximately 1 - 3 flashes per keV for H ). This blue light was detected and measured by photomultiplier as 'counts per minute' (CPM's), in a Beckman LS8000 CE Scintillation Counter (Beckman Coulter). Anti-Pregnenolone was purchased from MP Biomedicals, LLC, and used as [1/115 x 10"6] per 500 ml of each RIA assay tube. 2.11.2 Assay conditions Table II summarizes the preparation of standard and unknown samples. Disposable glass tubes, 12 x 75 mm, were used. Standards were prepared by incubating constant amounts of Ab with serial dilutions of 'cold' pregnenolone, in a buffer containing 0.1 M PBS (50 mM NaT^PCUHaO, 70 mM Na 2 HP04, 150 mM Nacl, 15 mM NaN30.1% gelatin) plus constant quantity of H-pregnenolone (6000 cpm/tube). As for the unknown (recovered pregnenolone from in vitro assay), samples were diluted 1/50 and 10 (j.1 was added to assay buffers. All tubes were incubated at 4°C for 24 hours. 2.11.3 Separation and measurement of bound pregnenolone Bound samples were separated with dextran-coated charcoal procedure of Herbert et al (Herbert, et al, 1965). Briefly, a five percent suspension of neutral charcoal was prepared in PBS and a 1% solution of Dextran T70 (Uppsala, Sweden) was prepared with the same buffer. Equal volumes of the charcoal suspension and dextran solution were mixed overnight at 4°C. Next morning, aliquots of 200 ul from this mixture were added to RIA samples in a total volume of 700 ml. Samples were shaked for 20sec and incubated at 4°C for 20 min, followed by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. 65 Supematants were transferred into scintillation vials containing 10ml scintillation fluid and radioactivity of the samples were measured with a Beckman LS8000 CE Scintillation Counter (Beckman Coulter). Backgrounds were subtracted from the total counts. Eventually, pregnenolone was quantitated using standard curve and data were expressed as ng pregnenolone produced per |j,g of mitochondrial proteins. 66 Figure 15. Illustration of the Radioimmunoassay (A) Unlabeled pregnenolone is present. Labeled pregnenolone ( H-pre) was incubated with a quantity of pregnenolone antibody (AB) so that, at equilibrium, 50% of the labeled insulin was bound to the antibody and 50% was free. (B) Unlabeled or 'cold' pregnenolone is present Unlabeled pregnenolone competed with 3H-pre for the limited amount of antibody. At equilibrium, the amount of H-pre bound to antibody was inversely proportional to the amount of cold pregnenolone in the system. 4 + 4 4 3 H B m "P 4Bt 4 = + 4 50% 3H-pre BOUND re ^ 4 4 4 « B 44 4< 44 ^ 3 H-pre ^ Pre 25%.3H-pre BOUND 68 Unlabeled Pregnenolone Standard ng / 0.5 ml in Buffer 0.000 0.0125 0.05 0.1 0.25 0.5 1 Total count Background Maximum binding tubes (Bo) Unknown sample No. of APAa Tubes 1:16,000 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 — — 0.1 0.1 H-pregnenolone 60000 cpm / 1 ml l Anti-Pregnenolone Antiserum Table 2.Tube contents for Assay of Standard and Unknown samples Serial standard dilutions with the increasing amounts of pregnenolone (ng), ranging from zero to one ng pregnenolone were used as calibrators. Total counts are tubes that represent the total amount of radioactivity added in an RIA tube. These tubes were not subjected to separation step. Backgrounds (nonspecific binding tubes) are tubes that contain labeled antigen and assay buffer, but not any antibody. B0, 100%, or Maximum binding tubes are tubes that contain labeled antigen, antibody and assay buffer but do not have any unlabeled antigen such as unknown samples or standards (except zero standard). After separating the free from the bound fraction, these tubes will have the highest CPM's, other than the total count tubes. Therefore, all samples, except total counts and background tubes, contained 100 ul 3H-pregnenolone and 100 |il Ab in a totall volume of 700 (il. Numbers represent the volumes in ml. 69 1.2 •0.0592 y = 2.7241 e c a> c o 0.8 o 0.6 c a> S.0.4 O. 0.2 0 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 Binding of Ag-Ab(%) Figure 16. Radiodilution curve obtained by charcoal immunoassay The bound to free ratio of H-pregnenolone is plotted against the added cold pregnenolone. From the binding amount of Ab to 3H-pregnenolone, the quantity of displaced pregnenolone could be directly measured, (direction of the arrow). 70 2.12 StAR Radiolabled Cholesterol-Binding Assay Binding assays on purified N-62 StAR were performed using [3H] cholesterol as radioligand (Sigma-Aldrich). A 2.5 (ag/ml purified protein was incubated with 0.25 pmol [3H]cholesterol in the presence or absence of 5 uM cold cholesterol for 45 min in 50 ul PBS (100 mM NaH2P04, 50 mM Na 2 HP0 4 , 150 mM Nacl ) at the indicated pHs. After the incubation time the total volume was increased to 500 ul with 0.1 M PBS buffer containing 0.1% gelatin (Murphy and Marvin, 1974). To examine the stability of binding under condition of varying pH, incubations were initiated in 10 mM PBS (pH 7.4) and after the equilibrium time were diluted 1:20 in buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 100 mM PBS and 0.3% gelatin at pH 3.5 for maintaining the ionic strength, stability of the StAR/Cholesterol complex and acidic pH. To examine the effect of dilution on StARcholesterol dissociation, some binding experiments were performed directly in the total volume of the standard buffer. Bound and free cholesterol were separated using RIA (Herbert et al, 1965). Prior to centrifugation of the RIA mixture, 0.01% triton X-100 was added to reduce binding of StAR to the spin tubes or local aggregations. Radioactivity of the bound [3H]cholesterol were measured with a Beckman LS8000 CE Scintillation Counter (Beckman Coulter). Backgrounds were subtracted from the total counts and data were analyzed using the program SigmaPlot. 2.13 Structural characterization of AN62 StAR In order to evaluate the structural origins of the pH modulation of cholesterol binding and to characterize the presence of a stable folded protein the overall secon the 71 prethe Far-UV CD spectra of StAR were recorded at pH 7.4 and 3.5 in the absence of cholesterol. 2.13.1 Determination of the secondary structure of proteins by Circular Dichroism Circular dichroism (CD) is a powerful tool for determining several features of protein secondary structure in solution. It is defined as the difference between absorption of left or right handed circularly polarized light, measured as a function of wavelength. Chiral or asymmetric molecules produce a CD spectrum because they absorb left and right handed polarized light to different extents and thus are considered to be "optically active" molecules. One of the most successful applications of the CD, the structural characrerization of proteins, depends upon the remarkable sensitivity of the far-UV CD (180 to 250nm) to the backbone conformation of proteins which reflects the secondary structure content of the proteins. In fact, different types of protein secondary structures (helices, sheets, turns and coils) give rise to different CD spectra. Because the spectrum of a protein is directly related to its secondary structure content, the spectrum will be a linear combination of each of these "reference" spectra, weighted by the fraction of the type of secondary structure (Figure 17). 72 Figure 17._Circular dichroism spectra of "pure" secondary structures (A) Circular dichroism is the difference in absorption of left and right circularly polarized light by an asymmetric or chiral molecule. (B) In proteins the amide chromophore absorbs in the 'far-UV region (160-240 nm) and chirality arises from the asymmetry of secondary structure where the peptide bonds are formed. (C) In a folded protein the amide is in a continuous array. For example, the FarUV CD spectra of poly-L-lysine in an a-helix, p-sheet, and unordered (random coil) differ due to long-range order in the amide chromophore.Contributions of the different secondary structural content of proteins in CD spectra are as follow: random coils (RCs) produce a positive peak at 212 nm (TC—>7t*) and a negative one at 196nm (n—> 7t*); (3-sheets give two peaks of negative at 216 nm (n—>n*) and positive at 196 nm (n—• TC*); in a-helix, exciton coupling of the (n—»7T*) transitions lead to a positive peak (TC—* 7i*)Perpendicuiar at 192 and a negative (7t—>7T*)Paraiiei at 208 nm and a red shifted (n—> 7t*) at 222nm. Parentheses represent transitions (Greenfield and Fasman, 1969). 73 208 216 222 250 Wavelength (nm) 74 2.13.2 Far-UV spectra of the AN62 StAR Circular dichroism (CD) measurements were carried out on a JASCO J-810 spectropolarimeter, equipped with a Peletier-type temperature controller, and a thermostated cell holder with a thermostatic bath. Spectra were recorded in 0.1-cm path length quartz cells at a protein concentration of 1.55 mg/ml (6 uM) in 25 mM phosphate buffer at pH values of 7.4 and 3.5 at 25°C. Cholesterol-induced changes in the secondary structure were evaluated with monitoring the spectra in different time intervals within 90 min of cholesterol addition. Five consecutive scans in the far-UV (190-250) were accumulated and the average spectra were stored. 2.13.3 Thermal unfolding studies One important application of CD is to determine the protein's secondary and tertiary structure stability as a function of temperature. Thermal denaturation curves were determined for the StAR in the absence or presence of cholesterol at two pH values of 3.5 and 7.4 by monitoring the CD values at 222 nm, with increasing temperature from 5 to 90°C. In the experiments including cholesterol, StAR was preincubated for 45 min with the substrate .The temperature induced denaturation curves monitored by CD were acquired as described elsewhere (Lavigne, et ah, 1995). The temperature dependence of mean residue ellipticity (0) at 222nm was fitted, using an in-house non-linear least square fitting program. Midpoint of thermal unfolding curves, Tm, and thermodynamic parameters were determined according to the method of Lavigne et al. (Lavigne, et ah, 1998). 75 Data analysis In thermal unfolding experiments, the thermodynamic properties of StAR were calculated assuming a two-state unfolding mechanism, TV (native) *ss U (unfolded) (Pace, 1986; Privalov, 1979), in which Pp + Pu = 1, where PF and Pu represent the fraction of protein in the folded and unfolded states, respectively, with a negligible intermediate (I) state. The observed value of 6 at any point is 6 - 6?P¥ + 6\jPv, where #F and 6\j are the values of 6 in the folded and unfolded states, respectively. The Tm of each temperature induced denaturation curve was determined by fitting the temperature dependence of molar ellipticity (6) using an in-house non-linear least-squares program to fit the pre- and post-transition baselines, according to the following equation: 0(7) = (1-PU(7))-0N(7)+PU(7>0 u(7) (Eq. 1) where ®N(7) and 0u(7) were the observed temperature-dependent molar ellipticities for the native and unfolded states, respectively, assuming following linear equations: 0 N (7) = ©N(0) - d0N(7)/dP- T (Eq. 2) 0u(7) = 0u(O) - d®v(T)/dT-T (Eq. 3) where ©N(0) and ©u(0) are the mean residue ellipticities at 0°C for the folded and unfolded states, respectively; likewise d&^(T)/dT and d®u(T)/dT are the constant slopes of ©N(P) and &\j(T).Pu(T), the population of the unfolded state, is given by: p (T) = exp(-AG°»//tr) wV ' \ + exp(-AG°u/RT) (E 4) 76 The apparent equilibrium constant of unfolding {K^appj) and the corresponding free energy change (AG u) at temperature, T can be calculated using Equations 5 and 6 AGU°= RTlnKu (Eq.5) (Ku) = Pu/(\-Pu) (Eq.6) where R is the gas constant, T is the absolute temperature. The change in enthalpy (AHU) and entropy (ASU) accompanying unfolding at T are related to AGU by Equation 6 AGU° = RTlnKu = AHU - TASU (Eq. 7) The temperature dependence of AHU and AS*U assuming that the heat capacity change (ACP;U) between the native (N) and unfolded (U) state of the system is relatively independent of the temperature in the range of measurements (Freire, 1995; Privalov and Makhatadze, 1990), are as shown in Equations 5 and 6: o AHU=AHU + ACP(T-Tm) (Eq. 8) ASU = ASU + ACpln(T/Tm) (Eq. 9) o where AHa and ASU are the enthalpy and entropy changes respectively at the midpoint transition, /. e. when T = T°. Therefore, at T°, AGU = 0 according to Equation 9 AGU(T) = AH°(l - 1 U AC P , U (T-T°)-Th(^\ ^ A 0 ^ > where 7° is the melting temperature, AHU° is the apparent enthalpy of unfolding at T and AC PJU is the temperature-independent heat capacity of unfolding. 77 The van't Hoff plot ln{K.T(app)) against \IT was linearly fitted to Equation 11 2.13.4 Determination of stoichiometry and binding affinity of the StARcholesterol complex In this section, a procedure is described for determining the stoichiometry and dissociation constant (Ku) of cholesterol binding to StAR-START using circular dichroism. To determine the StAR binding affinity for cholesterol at 25 C, titration of the protein with cholesterol was monitored with a Jasco J-810 spectropolarimeter (Japan Spectroscopic Co., Tokyo, Japan). The 3.6-ul aliquots from N-N62 StAR protein stock solution (12.9 mg/ml in 25 mM phosphate buffer and 125 mM NaCI) were diluted to 300ul of 25 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 or 3.5. For the stoichiometric and affinity analysis, titration was carried out using the increasing amounts of cholesterol from 0 to 200% relative to the total protein concentration (6 uM). After at least 45min equilibrium time, samples were loaded into quartz cells with a path-length of 1.0 mm. Wavelength spectra were recorded at 25 C from 195 nm to 250nm by averaging five scans at 0.1 min intervals. The values are shown as mean residue molar ellipticity (mdegcm dmol ). The CD values were also recorded at 222 nm as a time course experiment. Time points were accumulated over three scans of 30 seconds for each sample and the average between the 3 scans is reported. Apparent Ku was obtained by fitting the following equation (Naud, et al, 2005): 78 P (M)+C(M) ACD222 = ACD222MAX» + P KA) (M) +C {M) +" KA "(4«(/|M)»C{J (Eq. 12) 2»C,(M) Where P(M) = total protein concentration in M, QM) = total cholesterol concentration in M and KB(1/KA) is the dissociation constant (Jean-Francois, et al, 2003). The binding curves were simulated using Kaliedagraph (Synergy Software, Reading PA). All titration experiment were repeated three to five times and the mean CD signal changes were plotted against the concentration of total cholesterol in solution. The a-helical contents of the AN62 StAR were also calculated from titration experiments using the method of Alder et al (Adler, et al, 1973) and Zagrovic et al (Zagrovic, et al, 2005), which was based on far-UV data at 208 and 222 nm at 37°C. 79 3. RESULTS (Part I: In vitro activity of the recombinant N-62 StAR) 3.1 Expression and purification of functional tagged StAR and evaluation of steroidogenic activity Recombinant human StAR with a 6His tag at both NH2- and C-terminal were expressed in bacteria and purified using the 6His.Bind metal chelation resin to nearly homogeneity. The purity of the purified protein was determined by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining (Figure 18). Previous studies showed that addition of His tag to the either NH2- or C-terminal of the StAR protein does not affect its steroidogenic activity (Arakam etal., 1998). To test the steroidogenic activity of the bacterially expressed AN62-StAR we performed an in vitro assay using mitochondria isolated from steroidogenicY-l and Leydig MA-10 cells, purified recombinant StAR and measured the production of pregnenolone from the endogenous cholesterol presented in the mitochondrial outer membrane or free cholesterol exogenously added to the assay. This in vitro system was similar to those which have been already described elsewhere (Arakane et al, 1998; Bose et al, 2000b). The system was first validated by testing 22(R)hydroxycholesterol, a cholesterol analog displaying a direct passage through mitochondrial membrane, resulted in 40-fold increase of the pregnenolone production over control (Figure 19). 80 Figure 18. Purification of recombinant human N-62 StAR protein SDS polyacrylamide gel. Lane 1, total extraction after induction with IPTG ; lane 2 and 3 are the material eluted from Ni-NTA column. Lane 2, flow through of total protein; lane 3, after elution with 300mM imidazole, and lane 4 represents molecular weight marker. The symbols n and c signify the position of 6His.tag in NH2- or C-terminal of the N-62 StAR, respectively. 81 • Y-1 3.5 n • MA-10 3 2.5 c o 1.5 c c O) <u 1 0.5 Mitochondria Mitochondria +Ch Mitochondria +22R-(OH) Figure 19. Validation of the performed in vitro steroidogenesis system. A luM of 22-(R)-hydroxycholesterol was incubated with 50ug mitochondria for 90 min. Results are expressed as the pregnenolone produced per each assay. Two other controls are mitochondria, with or without cholesterol. Addition of this soluble oxysterol increases the pregnenolone formation up to 40-fold. 82 As shown in Figure 20, both C- and N-6His-tag StAR recombinants stimulated the pregnenolone production. In four separate experiments, 10 uM C- and N-His-tag StAR increase the production of pregnenolone in Y-l mitochondria to 6.86 ± 0.81- and 7.35 ± 0.55-fold (mean ± S.E.), respectively, over that of the controls. Correspondingly, the level of pregnenolone production increased up to 14.36 ± 0.94 and 15.86- ± 0.78-fold (mean ± S.E.) in MA-10 mitochondria. In the absence of exogenous cholesterol Y-l mitochondria display 6.57 ± 0.44- and 5.76 ± 0.66-fold decrease of pregnenolone when incubated with the C-and N-terminally tagged proteins, respectively. In the same way, 5.85 ± 0.35- and 7.23 ± 0.52-fold diminution in pregnenolone production is observed in MA-10 mitochondria, indicating that the presence of exogenous sources of cholesterol is necessary for StAR activity and for promoting pregnenolone production. As depicted in Figure 20, the steroidogenic activity of refolded proteins is higher than that of the controls; 2.87 ± 0.78- and 3.43 ± 0.66-fold increase of pregnenolone production in Y-l and MA-10 mitochondria, respectively, but lower than that of the native proteins. This could be due to lower activity of those proteins that had not been properly recovered from refolding purification. Nevertheless, new methods of protein recovery from inclusion bodies, including denaturing/refolding, have been developed in our laboratory (Barbar et al., unpublished results), which have enabled us to produce high quantities of soluble StAR protein with full steroidogenic activity. In the absence of exogenous cholesterol, synthesis of pregnenolone decreased near to the control levels (Figure 20). This is normal, because pregnenolone production in isolated steroidogenic mitochondria is ultimately limited by the pools of available cholesterol in the outer mitochondrial membrane. Given that precence of exogenous 83 cholesterol is essential for steroidogenesis, in the next section we would determine the binding properties of StAR to free cholesterol. 84 BY-1 • MMO 2.50 n ^rifirt I 22(R)-ch Mito R-StAR + Mito C-StAR + Mito N-StAR + Mito R-StAR + mito + ch C-StAR + mito +Ch N-StAR +mito +ch Figure 20. Steroidogenic capacity of the N- and C-terminaly 6His- tagged N-62 StAR The steroidogenic activities of native and refolded N-62 StAR is assessed by its capacity to promote cholesterol transfer into mitochondria isolated from mouse Leydig MA-10 (black columns) or Y-l (grey columns) cells. A 10 uM protein was added to mitochondria (lug/ul) preincubated with 200 uM cholesterol, incubated for 90 min at pH 7.4, 37°C, and pregnenolone produced from exogenous and endogenous mitochondrial cholesterol were measured by immunoassay. The added StAR proteins are indicated; N and C represent the location of His6. Data are expressed as the mean pregnenolone produced per microgram of mitochondria (ng/ug protein) from three experiments 85 3.2 Binding of StAR to cholesterol is best characterized at physiological pH The N-62-6His.StAR contains 31 acidic amino acids (Asp and Glu) and 28 basic amino acids (Lys, Arg, His). In addition to the involvement of these pH sensitive amino acids in maintaining the tertiary structure of StAR protein, presumably, they also participate in formation of a salt bridge, which plays an important role in binding of StAR to cholesterol (Mathieu et ah, 2002a). However, according to Miller et ah (Bose et ah, 1999), the acidic pH near the OMM leads StAR to adopt a molten globule state. In this context, we have examined the in vitro effect of pH on the ability of N-62 StAR to bind cholesterol. In this assay, [ H]-cholesterol is added to N-62 StAR and the bound radioactivity is separated from the free radioactivity after incubation as described in materials and method. In Figure 21, we report the amount of bound radioactivity as a function of pH. As seen, there is a dramatic reduction of cholesterol binding starting from pH 6.5. Furthermore, the binding capacity was decreased to only 10% at pH 2.5. This indicates that physiological pH is required for maximal binding of StAR to the cholesterol. To determine extent of the binding specificity of cholesterol to StAR, competitive/displacement binding assays were performed with unlabeled cholesterol as competitor(Figure 22). Addition of unlabeled cholesterol to StAR/[ Hjcholesterol complex resulted in a 0.136 ± 0.035 pmol displacement (p<0.005) equal to >50% of the total amount of bound [3H]cholesterol. This is indicative of the specificity of binding. However, only a non-significant displacement 0.036 ± 0.004 pmol of [3H]cholesterol at pH 3.5 clearly indicates the absence of specific binding at this pH. 86 9000 Q 8000 ¥ E 7000 •o 6000 a. o c 3 o QQ 5000 O fl)4000 M a> 3000 o £ •»!» o X 2000 1000 A 7.5 * » i * pH vs StAR-Ch binding (cpm) — • • — pH vs control • • • O • • • pH vs StAR-Ch binding (relative percentage) 6.5 5.5 4.5 3.5 2.5 Binding pH Figure 21. Measurement of StAR binding to cholesterol across a broad pH range Purified N-62 StAR proteins (25ug/ml) were incubated with 1 pmol [3H]cholesterol in phosphate buffers , spanning the range from pH 2.5 to 7.5. Data are expressed as the mean cholesterol binding (cpm, left Y-axis) relative to the respective control values from three independent experiments. Right Y-axis represents the corresponding percentage of cholesterol binding at different pH. Solid line (filled circles) and dotted line (empty circles) represent the binding in terms of cpm and relative percentage, respectively. Dashed line (filled circles) corresponds to the binding capacity of BSA in the same experiment. 87 9 0 0 0 -i 8000 H (Ul 7000 - Q. O 6000 - •D C 3 O 5000 - m 1 4000 - (A 0) O 3000 - +J £ o X 2000 - e> 1000 0 -L StAR Ch* Ch + + + + + pH 7.4 + + + + + + + + + pH 3.5 Figure 22. Competitive binding of cholesterol at different pH values Purified N-62 StAR (2.5ug/ml) was incubated with [3H]cholesterol in PBS (pH 7.4 or 3.5) at 25°C. For the radioligand binding measurement, aliquots were removed at the time indicated and centrifuged to separate free and bound cholesterol, and bound counts were measured. Binding after pre-incubation for 45 min at pH 7.4 and 3.5 was 0.132 ± 0.015 pmol and 0.036 ± 0.004 pmol of [3H]cholesterol, respectively.(p = 0.03 in a twotailed, paired t test). 88 3.3 pH-induced cholesterol dissociation The results of preceding section indicated that lowering of the pH resulted in a decrease in binding capacity of StAR to cholesterol. The question we then addressed was whether the microenvironmental pH change would result in an alteration in binding specificity of StAR to cholesterol. For that reason, in a complementary set of experiments, we studied the impact of a pH transition on the binding of StAR to cholesterol. N-62 StAR was preincubated with radiolabeled cholesterol at pH 7.4, followed by a dilution to a lower pH. Interestingly, decrease of pH resulted in a significant dissociation of cholesterol at lower pH (Figure 23). This behavior is onset at pH 5.5 (88% ± 3.29% binding) and reaches a minimum at pH 2.5 (13% ± 1.4% binding), which is in agreement with the minimal binding observed when StAR is directly incubated with cholesterol at pH 2.5 (Figure 23). Furthermore, the loss of binding was found to be irreversible. For instance, samples diluted from the pH 3.5 to 7.4 did not recover their binding capacity (Figure 24). Based on these results and regarding the theory of molten globule proposing an active conformation for StAR protein in the acidic pH, namely 3.5 (Bose et al, 1999), we elected pH 7.4 and pH 3.5 as the two extreme pH values where StAR exhibits maximal and minimal binding, as well as minimal and near-maximal dissociation, respectively. Those two pH values will be the focus of the rest of this study. It has been known that START-domain-containing proteins completely sequestrate their ligands from solutions (Im, et al, 2005). In the bound conformation of StAR the sterol ligand within the complex is inaccessible from the outside (Murcia, et al., 2006), indicative of a well folded protein-ligand complex. This is in agreement with our 89 finding that after dilution, complexes remained stable at neutral pH while a drastic dissociation at acidic pH occurred (Figure 24), presumably, due to collapse of tertiary structure of protein as a general consequence of acidification (Morar, et al, 2001). The biochemical mechanisms involved in ligand uncoupling are not completely understood, but clearly involved a significant reduction in affinity of the StAR for cholesterol as a consequence of the pH decreases. 90 9000 C r 100 "•'••••.~ft "-"--^T -75 '""•a. 6000 - 5000 - X 'f> - 33 4000 I 14 3000 - Percentage Bound (%) 7000 - 2000 - 2 J H-Cholesterol Bound (cpm) -88 ¥•••... 8000 « 1000 - n 75 ^ — • — • — • ••<>••• pH vs StAR-Ch binding (cpm) pH vs control pH vs StAR-Ch binding (relative percentage) i 6.5 5.5 4.5 3.5 2.5 Dissociation pH Figure 23. Measurement of cholesterol dissociation from StAR across a broad pH range Purified N-62-StAR proteins (25^g/ml) were incubated with 1 pmol [ H]cholesterol in phosphate buffer at pH 7.4 and 25°C. After 45 min samples were diluted 1/20 at the same buffers containing 0.3% gelatin with decreasing pH range from 7.4 to 3.5. Data are expressed on the left axis as the mean cholesterol binding (cpm) relative to the respective control values from three independent experiments. Right Y axis represents the corresponding data as the percentage binding between cholesterol and StAR, assuming a maximum (100%) binding at pH 7.4. Solid line (filled circles) and dotted line (empty circles) represent the binding in terms of cpm and relative percentage, respectively. Dashed line (filled circles) corresponds to the binding capacity of BSA in the same experiment. 91 10000 •p- 8000 3 O 6000 m <u "S> 4000 - 2000 7.4->7.4 7.4->3.5 3.5->3.5 3.5->7.4 Figure 24. Irreversible dissociation of cholesterol from StAR at acidic pH [3H] cholesterol was allowed to bind to N62-StAR under the standard buffer conditions and after 45 min incubation, the pH was lowered to 3.5. samples were diluted 1:20 into lOOmM PBS, pH 3.5 (filled columns) and were incubated for an additional 45 min. Binding after acidification of the samples pre-incubated at pH 7.4 and 3.5 (marked within parentheses) was 0.076 ± 0.005 pool of [3H]cholesterol and 0.041 ± 0.004 pool [ H]cholesterol, respectively (p<0.05 in a two-tailed, paired t test; all data represent mean ± S.E., n=3). Notably, dilution from pH 7.4 to the same buffer, contained 0.3% gelatin), did not have a significant effect on binding. By contrast, more than 50% dissociation was recorded after acidification. 92 4. RESULTS (Part II: Structural characterization of the StAR in complex with cholesterol) 4.1 Circular dichroism spectroscopy of StAR at different pH In order to evaluate the structural origins of the pH modulation of cholesterol binding, the Far-UV CD spectra of N-62 StAR were recorded at pH 7.4 and 3.5 in the absence of cholesterol. The CD spectrum of N-62 StAR recorded at pH 7.4 is shown in Figure 25 (empty circles). The spectrum depicts shallow double minima at 208 and 222nm and a maximum at -193 nm as expected for proteins composed of a-helical and Psheet secondary structures. In accordance with this result and based on the molecular model of N-62 StAR (Mathieu et al, 2002a; Murcia et al, 2006), the secondary structure content can be estimated to -35% a-helices and -43% p-strands. In contrast, the Far-UV CD spectra of N-62 StAR recorded at pH 3.5 (Figure 25. filled circles) shows a slight blue-shift of the 208 nm minimum coupled to a decrease in the intensity of the maximum at 193 nm. This is indicative of a significant random coil content. The double minima at 222 nm and at 218 nm representative of 21.1 ± 1.1% and 24.0 ± 1.3% helical structure, respectively, are of the same magnitude as at pH 7.4 (20.7 ± 0.8% and 22.8 ± 0.9% helicity at 222nm and 208nm, respectively), suggesting a similar content in P-sheet and a-helix at pH 3.5. However and as suggested by others (Baker, et al, 2005), under acidic pH StAR exists as a molten globule, which by definition retains native secondary structure but lacks a defined tertiary structure. 93 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 Wavelenght (nm) Figure 25. Effect of pH on protein conformation Unsmoothed far-UV CD spectra of N-62 StAR protein, recorded between 190 and 250 nm and equilibrated at the pH 7.4 (empty circles) and pH 3.5 (filled circles). CD intensity is expressed in terms of molar ellipticity ([0], expressed in degrees cm2mol~1) according to the following equation, © = (©'observed * molecular mass) I (10 x / X c) where 0O\,S is the observed ellipticity in millidegrees, / is the cell path length in cm; and C is the molar concentration of the protein. 94 4.2 Cholesterol-induced conformational changes of StAR In the last section it was shown that interaction with cholesterol modulated the secondary structure content (mostly the helical structure) of the StAR protein. To study these structural changes in more details we proceeded with a time course experiment by CD. Figure 26 shows the CD spectra of StAR recorded in the presence of an equimolar concentration of cholesterol. Addition of cholesterol at pH 7.4 resulted in a transient decrease in the CD signal at both 222nm and 208nm, followed by increase in helicity that reaches an equilibrium plateau value within 45 to 90 min. As for the acidic pH (Figure 27), addition of cholesterol showed only a minor decrease (2.1 ± 0.4)% in the proportion of secondary structure (helix plus sheet). Furthermore, contrary to the physiological pH, exposure of StAR to cholesterol did not cause any significant increase in the observed ellipticity at the acidic pH (Figure 27), except for a slight increase at 208 nm after the approximate equilibrium time. The results summarized in terms of percentage helicity in Table 3, clearly show a direct effect of cholesterol on loss and gain of the helical structure of StAR in a time-dependent fashion at physiological pH. Supporting evidence for helical changes upon cholesterol binding to StAR is a sharp isodichroic point near 203 nm (Lu, et ah, 1991) in the interception of CD spectra of StAR/cholesterol complex, taken from different time intervals. 95 Figure 26. Effect of cholesterol binding on circular dichroic spectra of N-62 StAR protein at neutral pH Circular dichroic spectra of StAR (8uM) in the absence (Blue) and in the presence of cholesterol (8 uM) were obtained as described under experimental procedures. Spectra were taken at different time intervals from 0 to 90 min; Four spectra were selected and shown: To= Before addition of cholesterol. Ti = Immediately after addition of cholesterol. T2 = 45 min after addition of cholesterol. T3 = 90 min after addition of cholesterol. An isodichroic point (black arrow) occurs at 204 nm, indicating that cholesterol induces mainly coil to helix transition at both 222nm and 208 nm (Defossez, et al, 1997). 96 30 n 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 Wavelength (nm) 97 30 -i 1 min (T.,) 20 H 0 min (T0) 45 min (T2) 10 60 min (T3) •D X .5] -10 -20 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 Wavelength (nm) Figure 27 Effect of cholesterol binding on circular dichroic spectra of N-62 StAR protein at acidic pH A 8uM cholesterol was added to the protein preincubated at pH 3.5, and spectra were recorded as for the neutral pH. All assays were done in 25 mM phosphate buffer at 25°C. 98 Table 3. Comparison of the cholesterol-induced helical changes of N-62 StAR. Assuming that only helical structures contribute to the CD spectra at 222 and 208 nm, percentage helicity of the StAR was calculated using following approximations (Material and methods): 1- a-helix% [9]222 222 = 2. a-hehx%[e] 208 = [6] 222 ———" 40,030 [9] 08 " 4000 — — 2^ 33,000 - 4000 99 Cholesterol %helicity (222nm) (n—* 7i*) (71^71*) To — 21.1 ± 1.1 24.0 ± 1.3 Ti + 19.0 ± 0.7 22.8 ±1.2 T2 + 22.7 ± 1.0 25.1 ± 0.9 T3 + 22.6 ± 0.8 25.8 ±1.5 pH3.5 pH7.4 Cholesterol %helicity (222nm) %helicity (208nm) %helicity(208nm) To — 20.7 ± 0.8 22.8 ± 0.9 Ti + 14.9 ± 2.2 14.3 ±1.9 T2 + 28.7 ± 1.5 31.2 ± 1.1 T3 + 33.9 ± 2.3 40.8 ±2.1 4.3 Time dependent changes of secondary structure of N-62 StAR following the addition of cholesterol The CD technique was further used to assess the evolution of secondary structures during the course of cholesterol binding, thereby monitoring cholesterol-induced helical variations of N-62 StAR at 222nm. As illustrated in Figure 28, addition of cholesterol to the protein favors the equilibrium of the population of StAR to the partially unfolded state (Figure 28. state A). A recent paper reported the same conformational changes upon binding of cholesterol to StAR-D4, a member of START domain proteins, with approximately 25% sequence identity with StAR (Rodriguez-Agudo, et al, 2005). However, through time-dependent transitions a substantial increase in [©I222, which mainly represented the helical content of the protein, was recorded (Figure 28. state B). This step is energetically active (Mathieu et al., 2002a) and involves the movement of a pair of loops adjacent to the a-helix 4. The steady state (Figure 28. state C) is achieved when preferential refolding of a-helix 4 further improves the conformational stability of StAR/cholesterol complex. This suggests that cholesterol is completely sequestrated from solvent and trapped in a maximally folded protein (Mathieu et al., 2002a). 101 -10 -11 -\ "o E 3 -12 CM E u d> » -13 -14 -15 -16 20 40 60 80 100 Time (min) Figure 28. Schematic representation of cholesterol-induced helical changes in StAR protein Profile of the changes in ellipticity at 222nm as a function of time. (A) Addition of cholesterol results in a transient decrease of [®]222nm- (B) Transition between partially unfolded and steady state with significant gain of helicity. (C) Steady state. 102 4.4 Stoichiometry and dissociation constant of StAR/cholesterol complex Cholesterol is insoluble in aqueous solutions, making equilibrium binding analysis in solution impossible. To date no data have been reported on direct binding of cholesterol to START domain proteins. In this study, it is shown that circular dichroism can be successfully applied to determine binding characteristics of StAR-START like stoichiometry and dissociation constant. Thus, the measurable conformational changes observed upon cholesterol binding were recruited to develop a quantitative binding assay based on cholesterol-induced modification of StAR's secondary structure, monitored by CD at 222nm. Titration of 6uM protein solution resulted in a stoichiometric binding behavior, as almost every added cholesterol molecule was bound by one of the protein molecules . As every single StAR molecule changed its conformation upon binding of cholesterol, the CD signal [®222nm], which represented the peak of a-helix content, was increased (Figure 29). When a molar equivalent of 5.85 moles cholesterol per 6 moles protein had been added, the CD signal did not change anymore (Figure 29. intercept of dashed lines). The saturable binding at approximately unit stoichiometry suggested that binding occurred at a specific site, and is not the result of nonspecific aggregation of protein and cholesterol. This suggests that StAR-START has only one specific binding site for cholesterol. The theoretically predicted saturation of 6.00 was not achieved, probably due to minor inaccuracies in the determination of StAR and/or cholesterol concentrations. Another parameter that defines the quality of protein-ligand interactions is the dissociation constant Ko. The literature value of K^for the StAR/cholesterol complex has been 32nM, in vitro (Petrescu, et ah, 2001). However, simulation of the saturation curve 103 (Figure 29) with best fit of saturation points into Equation 11 showed a Kv ~ 1 x 10"6 M, which was more likely to happen in vivo due to the fast steroidogenic response to stimuli. 14 n [Cholesterol] |xM Figure 29. Circular dichroism-monitored cholesterol titration of the N-62 StAR Titration of the AN62 StAR with cholesterol was carried out at a protein concentration of 6 uM. Saturation occured at Ctotai ch = 5.85 uM (dotted lines). The saturation curve obtained by curve fitting was overlaid (solid line) and a corresponding ^ D ~ 1 x 10" M was calculated using Equation 12. Dashed line perpendicular to the X-axis represents the saturation point and error bars represent standard deviations from 4 different experiments. 105 4.5 Stability of the folded conformation of StAR The folded conformation of proteins are only marginally stable under the best of conditions and can often be disrupted by an environmental change, such as a rise in temperature, variation of pH, increase in pressure, or the addition of a variety of denaturants. Among these, pH variations may naturally occur in microenvironment of human cells, i.e., acidic pH (3.5 - 4) near phospholipid head groups of lipid bilayers, which suggested being necessary for the function of some proteins (Banuelos and Muga, 1995; Qi and Grabowski, 2001). In this regard, it was proposed that the acidic pH close to the mitochondrial membrane was a driving force, which enabled StAR to bind and transfer cholesterol in the course of a global conformational shift toward a molten globule state. This was not, however, in agreement with the finding that StAR did not bind to cholesterol at high acidic pH (section 3.2). To further study the nature of StAR/cholesterol binding, it was decided to characterize the stability of the complexes as a function of pH and temperature. In the next sections, thermal unfolding of the StAR/cholesterol complexes will be determined at different pH; thermodynamic parameters from corresponding profiles will be analyzed and compared with those of native proteins. 106 5. RESULTS (Part III: Energetics of the pereferential binding of cholesterol to StAR The binding of ligands to proteins usually leads to an increase in protein thermal stability with modifications in the midpoint denaturation temperature (Tm), enthalpy of unfolding (AHU) and unfolding entropy (A,SU). These modifications are due to the coupling of unfolding with binding equilibrium and changes in protein structure and conformational flexibility induced by ligand interaction (Fukada, et al, 1983; Shrake and Ross, 1990). The nature of these structural changes varies according to conformational diversity of proteins and chemical characters of corresponding ligands. Therefore, the understanding of molecular recognition processes of small ligands and biological macromolecules requires a complete characterization of the binding energetics and correlation of thermodynamic data with interacting structures involved. In view of that, the binding properties of StAR/cholesterol complex were investigated with thermal denaturation studies using CD spectroscopy, 5.1 Physiological pH increases the stability of N-62 StAR against heat denaturation The stability of N-62 StAR against heat denaturation was characterized in CD over temperature range of 10°C to 90°C in 25 mM phosphate buffer by monitoring [®]222nm since at this wavelength the changes in ellipticity are significant upon protein denaturation. Unfolding profile of the StAR at physiological pH was associated with cooperativity that obeyed two-state unfolding model, N (native) <-> U (unfolded), suggesting that at physiological pH the transition N++U occurred over a narrow range of 107 changing temperature. The cooperativity of unfolding was the hallmark of the two-state unfolding model (Bolen and Santoro, 1988) and indicated that at physiological pH the transition N*-+U occurred over a narrow range of changing temperature. In addition, a single transition between native and denatured state demonstrated that the unfolding did not involve any intermediary state (Figure 30A). The temperature denaturation of acidic samples, including StAR plus cholesterol, did not depict any cooperativity and displayed a melting profile similar to that of the samples with no cholesterol (Figure 3OB). This finding provided further evidence that at acidic conditions, StAR is an ensemble of solvent accessible peptide chains with a high content of secondary structure lacking a stable tertiary structure to maintain the binding state. Therefore, it was hypothesized that at strong acidic conditions StAR population might consist of a large number of short-lived and very unstable intermediates, which did not contribute to the energetic parameters of the folding/unfolding reaction, even in the presence of cholesterol. 108 Figure 30.Temperature-induced denaturations monitored by the change in molar ellipticity at 222 nm (©222) Thermal unfolding profiles obtained from temperature-induced denaturation of the N62StAR (blue dots) and StAR/cholesterol complex (red dots) recorded in 50 mM potassium phosphate at pH 7.4,(A), and at pH 3.5 (B). 109 i I -10 & -14 -16 Temperature ( C) B -8 - "5 E | ci) <u t •«A<tf9^ -10- • n - 12 * ^ •5 - - ^I^JK •"I & * * cflcJW^ • 20 40 60 80 Temperature (°C) 110 Using an in-house non-linear least-squares fitting program, cooperative unfolding curve was simulated according to Equation 1, and expressed as the population of unfolding (Pu) relative to temperature values (Figure 31). Thermodynamic parameters AHU, Tm, ASU° (AHU°/Tm), and AGU° for thermal unfolding were obtained from fit to the stability curves. The results are discussed in next sections. 5.2 Binding of cholesterol improves the conformational stability of StAR Regulatory ligands can be employed to enhance or repress the activity of functional proteins. The presence of a ligand at the binding site typically changes the difference in free energy between 'active' and "inactive' states of the protein, thereby switching the protein on or off (Graham and Duke, 2005). In this context, the difference, if any, in stability between apo and cholesterol-bound StAR protein, would lead to better understanding the nature of this type of sterol-protein binding. Therefore, experiments were performed to investigate the global effect of cholesterol on thermal stability of StAR. As depicted in Figure 31, binding of cholesterol to native StAR at physiological pH increases the Tm of denaturation. To increase the consistency in measurments, temperature-dependent [0]222nm values obtained from thermal unfolding curves were fitted to Equation 1 to get f (Tm), AH(f), AS(f) and eventually AG(f). All the thermodynamic parameters were assessed from the equations represented in Data analysis, assuming ACP = 1 kcal/mol.K. Consistent with the primary denaturation profiles (Figure 30), the Tm was increased from 42.3 C (Tml) in the absence of cholesterol to 45.9 C (Tm2) at cholesterol saturation, (Figure 31. bottom, filled circles). The corresponding thermodynamic parameters at Tm are presented in Table 4. As expected, at 111 Tm the equilibrium between native and unfolded states distincts a AG°U = 0 in both apo and cholesterol-bound states. However, at 37°C the free energy of unfolding of the bound state has a higher magnitude (AGU (37 C) = 2.43 ± 0.07 kcal/mol) when compared with that of the apo state (AGU° (37°C) = 1.35 ± 0.08 kcal/mol), with a AAGU° = 1.08 ± 0.01 kcal/mol (Table 5). The increase in free energy of unfolding clearly indicates the favorable interactions between StAR and cholesterol, giving rise to a more stable conformation of the protein. This is consistent with the finding that stabilization of the bound state by cholesterol is accompanied by a decrease in the population of the unfolded state (Pu) (Figure 32). As one can see, at physiological temperature (37°C), the Pu (37) of StAR in absence of cholesterol is approx. 8% (Figure 32, top). In presence of equimolar concentration of cholesterol, this population is decreased to approx. 2 %. (Figure 32, bottom). From eqs 6 and 11, a van't Hoff plot of lnKu versus 1/T allowed for the measurement of AHU° values at Tm (Figure 33) The observed increase of the Tm and AG u upon cholesterol binding is due to the additive enthalpic and entropic factors that probably contribute to promote the stability of StAR/cholesterol complexes. Therefore, to obtain a better understanding of the nature of interactions between StAR and cholesterol, variations in enthalpy and entropy of unfolding were determined as a function of temperature (Figures 35,36). As summarized in Table 5, the AHU° for StAR and StAR/cholesterol complex are 87.55 ±0.15 and 79.80 ± 0.15, respectively, with a AAHU (37 C) = -7.75 kcal/mol. Knowing the corresponding AAGU (37 C), the variation in entropy of unfolding (-TAASU (37 C)) was measured from the empirical formula of -TAASU° = AAGU - AAHU = 8.83 kcal/mol. Indeed, a higher decrease in entropy of water upon unfolding of StAR/cholesterol complex (TASta> lAS"^) 112 clearly demonstrating the more favorable contribution of entropic forces to the overall stability of the protein. Given the above results, it is reasonable to conclude that most of the interactions between cholesterol and StAR are more favorable energetically, in entropy and free energy, than the corresponding interactions of the StAR with itself and with water, when cholesterol is absent. 113 Figure 31. Stability curves of StAR and StAR/cholesterol complex at pH 7.4 (A) The stability curves for StAR (dotted line) and StAR/cholesterol complexes (continuous line) obtained from a non-linear least squares fitting using Equation 10, as described in Material and Methods. (B) Temperature dependence of the population of unfolded state (Pu) was obtained by Equation 4. The thermodynamic parameters obtained for the AN62 StAR and StAR/cholesterol are summarized in Tables 4,5. Open and filled circles represent the variation of unfolded population (Pu) for StAR and complex, respectively.The denaturation curve of protein and complexes at pH 3.5 was not fitted due to the absence of an apparent cooperative transition. 114 StAR StAR + Ch • ° StAR + Ch StAR 70 Temperature ( C) 115 Table 4. Thermodynamic parameters obtained from thermal unfolding profiles of N-62 StAR and N-62 StAR/Cholesterol complex at the melting temperature (values in kcal/mol) [Protein] (6(iM) [Ch] (uM) N-62 StAR N-62 StAR 6 Tm (°C ) 42.3 45.8 A/f(r m ) 90.05 ±2.1 83.80 ±1.5 TAS(Tm) 90.03 ± 0.87 83.77 ±0.55 Table 5. Thermodynamic parameters measured from the simulations of the temperature-induced denaturation of N-62 StAR and N-62 StAR/Cholesterol complex at 37 C (values in kcal/mol) [Protein] (6uM) [Ch] (uM) N-62 StAR N-62 StAR 6 A//U"(37°C) 87.55 ±0.15 79.80 ±0.15 7ASUU(37°C) 86.17 ±0.20 77.37 ±0.28 AGU"( 37°C) 1.35 ±0.08 2.43 ± 0.07 116 Figure 32. Populations of the native, intermediate, and unfolded states of N-62 StAR and StAR/cholesterol complex Population of unfolded (Pu •), native (PN * ), and intermediate (Pi -) states are plotted as a function of temperature. Data from Figure 31, are expressed as the population of folded (blue), intermediates (gray), and unfolded (red) states at any given temperature between 10°C to 90°C. At the midpoint of transition temperature (Tm) depicted by green arrow, KJJ = l,[F] = [U], PU = PF = 0.5 and AGU°= 0. 117 Populations • • l ^ \ S StAR 0.8 0.6 r Tm = 42.3 C 0.4 0.2 p Pu- i - >v PN • f ^ StAR+Ch 0.8 0.6 A* i m - 4ZD.O L, 0.4 0.2 1 35 Temperature °C 65 95 118 25 0.0028 0.0030 0.0032 0.0034 1/T (K 1 ) Figure 33. Determination ofAHu and AS„ from Van't Hoff plot The temperature dependence of the equilibrium constant was used to determine AHU°. A plot of ln^u against 1/T(K) produced a straight line with a slope equal to -AHU° I R. The blue and red lines correspond to StAR and StAR/Cholesterol Van't Hoff plots, respectively. 119 120 60 J 1 20 —, 40 1 r- 60 80 Temperature (°C) Figure 34. Graph of AHU° versus T for StAR and StAR/Cholesterol complex The corresponding enthalpies (A//u° (37°C)) obtained for the StAR (blue line) and StAR/Cholesterol (red line) are listed in table 5. Temperature (°C) Figure 35. Plot of A£u versus T for StAR and StAR/Cholesterol complex Difference between entropy of two samples at 37°C, obtained from the extrapolation of dashed lines over StAR (blue solid line) and StAR/cholesterol (red solid line) plots and Y-axis, is depicted as &T/±SU°. 121 6. Discussion A number of developmental and reproductive abnormalities in humans are related to the misregulation of StAR expression and/or to a nonfunctioning StAR gene (Baker, et al, 2006). For example, more than 34 different congenital mutants are known to produce nonfunctional StAR proteins, which lead to a potentially lethal autosomal recessive disease known as congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia (LCAH). The defect in steroid synthesis in lipoid CAH is caused by the failure of affected individuals to transport cholesterol to the inner mitochondria membrane, thus proving the essential role of StAR in cholesterol transport (Lin et al, 1995; Stocco, 2002). As of now, the exact mechanism of StAR activity is a matter of debate. There are suggestions that StAR undergoes a conformational change to a molten globular state upon interaction with the outer mitochondrial membrane were the pH is presumably more acidic. It is proposed that this molten globule state of StAR acts as an on/off switch for cholesterol entry into the mitochondria (Bose et al, 1999). However, based on molecular modeling, we have proposed that at neutral pH, StAR is in a dynamic equilibrium between its native and partially folded states with the c-terminal a-helix undergoing a folding/unfolding transition in absence of cholesterol. The unfolding of the C-terminal helix is hypothesized to allow access of cholesterol to its binding site on StAR. Once loaded with one cholesterol molecule, the refolding of the c-terminal helix stabilizes the complex (Figure 36) and allows for transport from the site of binding to the mitochondria. Further unfolding of the c-terminal helix is assumed to allow for the dissociation of cholesterol to the mitochondria directly either to the membrane or a transporter (Figure 37), (Mathieu et al, 2002a). This theory was recently supported by 122 the molecular dynamics (MD) simulation- of the uptake and release of cholesterol by StAR-START (Murcia et al, 2006), showing that uptake and release could occur via conformational changes localized at the entrance of the binding site while preserving the native conformation of the protein. 6.1 In vitro activity of the N-62 StAR Cholesterol transport by StAR-START has been directly demonstrated in vivo (Kallen et al, 1998) and in vitro (Kallen et al, 1998; Lin et al, 1995; Sugawara et al, 1995a). To pursue functional studies of the role of StAR on cholesterol transport, we purified the bacterially expressed N-62 StAR to examine the protein activity independent of its mitochondrial import. Consistent with previously published results (Arakane et al, 1998), our data confirmed the steroidogenic activity of StAR without being imported into mitochondria. In our assay conditions, recombinant proteins increased delivery of added cholesterol to the P450scc as detected by an increase in pregnenolone production up to 20-fold. However, the level of pregnenolone remained roughly unchanged in the samples lacking the exogenous cholesterol. Although cholesterol is a normal component of OMM and other membranes, it is known that the cholesterol in steroidogenic mitochondria behaves as two kinetically distinct pools: a stable pool, presumably the structural cholesterol, and a minor labile pool, which is imported and becomes a substrate for steroidogenesis (Stevens, et al, 1992). This may suggest that cholesterol pools in outer mitochondrial membrane may not provide enough substrate for the StAR during acute regulation of steroidogenesis. In other words, steroidogenesis in mitochondria is eventually limited by the pools of available cholesterol in the OMM. Alternatively, cAMP-dependent mobilization of intracellular cholesterol reservoirs to the mitochondrial 123 membrane induces a maximal rate of cholesterol transport to IMM by StAR (Jefcoate, 2002; Liu et al, 2006).Therefore, we propose that StAR is both a cytoplasmic cholesterol transporter and a stimulator for rapid burst of steroidogenesis. We recently provided evidence that phosphorylation of StAR at serine residue 195 by PKA is necessary for maximal steroidogenic activity (LeHoux et al, 2004), consistent with earlier studies representing StAR as a phosphoprotein (Epstein and OrmeJohnson, 1991b; Hartigan, et al, 1995). The bacterially expressed proteins used in this study were not phosphorylated. However, treatment with protein kinase A catalytic subunit and ATP did not increase the steroidogenic activity of recombinant protein (Strauss, et al, 1999). The finding that removal of first 62 amino acids from NH2terminal of StAR overcomes the off-putting impact of SI95A mutation (Arakane et al, 1998), suggesting that phosphorylation either increases the activity of wild-type by retarding mitochondrial import or conquers a negative influence of NH2 terminus. We have successfully refolded recombinant N-62 StAR from bacterial inclusion bodies into active forms. One source of difference between our results and nonfunctional refolded proteins reported by Arakane et al. (Arakane et al, 1998), may come from carrying out the refolding through dialysis, which is often associated with loss or aggregation of protein on membrane; in our experiments, we relied on Millipore centrifugal concentrators as alternative to the dialysis. The results presented herein clearly indicate that refolded proteins, although less than native ones, show significant steroidogenic activity (Figure 20). Presumably, loss of StAR activity was mostly due to improper refolding conditions (Swietnicki, 2006), as a high standard deviation obtained 124 from the activity of triplicate samples indicated considerable variation in the efficiency of performed refolding method. 6.2 pH-induced binding and release of cholesterol from StAR The notion that free cholesterol is essential to trigger steroidogenesis (Figure 20), led to hypothesize that binding of StAR to accessible cholesterol is essential to promote StAR activity and subsequent cholesterol transfer across the mitochondrial membrane. Given that StAR-cholesterol association is the first step in the mechanism, we attempted to characterize the in vitro cholesterol-binding properties of StAR. Competition / displacement binding assays demonstrate that cholesterol binds to StAR specifically at physiological pH, as the presence of unlabeled cholesterol competes with [ H]cholesterol for binding to StAR (Figure 22). Decrease of the binding capacity at acidic pH (Figure 21) provides evidence that a well-folded protein is essential to promote StAR/cholesterol complex formation. Furthermore, our results provide direct experimental observation of acid-induced release of cholesterol from StAR. A substantial dissociation of StAR/cholesterol complex below pH 4.5 (Figure 23), where the ionizable amino acids at the proposed acidic pH are protonated, suggests a mechanism for cholesterol release and confirms the possible contribution of the essential amino acid residues to the uptake and release of cholesterol (Mathieu et al, 2002a; Murcia et al, 2006). The exact biochemical mechanisms involved in cholesterol uncoupling are not completely understood, but clearly involve a significant reduction in affinity of StAR for cholesterol as a consequence of the pH change. The results of this work provide evidence that cholesterol release from the StAR can be promoted by changes in the composition and properties of the medium with respect to water. By lowering pH of aqueous 125 solutions, cholesterol dissociation does occur but only in concomitance with the transition of the protein to a denatured state, which exhibits features characteristic of a molten globule. One explanation for this phenomenon is that structural changes in the carrier protein may be induced by interaction with the target membrane. Consequently, the ligand is released concomitantly with conformational changes in the protein (Forker and Luxon, 1983; Rudenko and Deisenhofer, 2003; Weisiger, et al, 1981). 6.3 Cholesterol-induced conformational stability of StAR The loss of stability of protein/ligand complex is known to reflect major changes in the tertiary or secondary structure of the protein. To investigate this issue, we further characterized a set of structural variations upon cholesterol binding to StAR. This study confirms that at physiological pH upon binding of cholesterol, StAR undergoes structural changes which are readily detected with far-UV CD. A previous study reported that cholesterol binding to StAR altered the secondary structure of StAR to dramatically reduce the proportion of a-helix (Petrescu et al, 2001). However, our measurements revealed a transient loss of <10% a-helical structure upon cholesterol binding (Table 3). The CD signals recorded in that study represented conformational characters corresponding to a protein possessing two binding sites, whereas our binding experiments clearly show a 1:1 binding stoichiometry for StAR/cholesterol complex. The decrease of <10% in the amount of helical content is in accord with the theoretical value of 15%> contribution of a-helix 4 to the overall structure of N-62 StAR. Thus, the observed decrease of helical structure is reversible and cholesterol can further induce helical conformation of the protein (Figure 26). This finding is in a good 126 agreement with the proposed docking models of StAR / cholesterol complex (Mathieu et al, 2002a; Mathieu, etal, 2002b). At the acidic pH, however, addition of the cholesterol to StAR does not induce a significant modification of helical structure (Figure 27), indicating that the binding is weak or absent. This finding in association with binding experiments propose a probable lack of active tertiary structure of StAR at highly acidic conditions and that the transition from water-soluble to the membrane associated state (Bose, et al., 2002) and subsequent cholesterol release involve the tertiary structural changes (Cramer, et al, 1990; Muga, et al, 1991). 6.4 Contribution of cholesterol to the conformational stability of StAR The results from previous sections indicated that cholesterol binding is an obligate prerequisite for the steroidogenic activity of StAR. The understanding of molecular recognition processes of StAR-cholesterol complex requires a complete characterization of the binding energetics and correlation of thermodynamic data with interacting structures involved. In this study, for the first time, we have investigated the effect of cholesterol on thermal stability of StAR at different pH values. Our results demonstrate that although at low pH (3.5) secondary structure of StAR remains intact, a major loss of tertiary structure diminishes the affinity of protein for binding to cholesterol. This is not unexpected, because analysis of thermal unfolding profiles at acidic pH does not represent a cooperative process owing to the transition of protein to a molten globular state. The contribution of cholesterol to protein stability was expressed as the changes in protein thermal stability with modifications in the midpoint denaturation temperature, 127 and AGU° (Figure 31). The magnitude of changes in both the M/ u and TASU upon cholesterol uptake along with time course study of complex formation, provided further information about the structural modifications upon cholesterol binding in terms of (i) the StAR-cholesterol binding dynamics and (ii) the nature of interactions between ligand and protein, such as hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions. Our results suggest that unfolding of cholesterol-bound proteins is dominated by higher unfolding entropy TASU (37°C) change (from 86.17 ± 0.20 to 77.37 ± 0.28 kcal/mol/K for the native and cholesterol-bound N-62 StAR, respectively) as compared with a weaker decrease in corresponding unfolding enthalpy (from 87.55 ± 0.15 to 79.80 ±0.15 kcal/mol for the native and cholesterol-bound N-62 StAR, respectively). This indicates that the StARcholesterol association is an entropy-driven interaction. Given that these interactions are O 0 0 associated with a relatively small AHU (compared with AGU) and a higher A5U (Konig and Dandekar, 2001; Ross and Subramanian, 1981), it might be concluded that the hydrophobic interactions between the binding site (Mathieu et al., 2002a) of StAR and cholesterol, force the complex formation (Scheraga, et al, 1962). In addition to that, the enthalpy of denaturation in the presence of cholesterol (e.g. hydrogen bonds), contributes to a small proportion of the complex stability, as molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have shown that favorable electrostatic contributions resulted from the formation of hydrogen bonds between the hydroxyl group of cholesterol and polar amino acids inside the hydrophobic core of StAR (Murcia et al., 2006). Of these, cholesterol binding can itself increase tight packing of StAR conformation, thereby maximizing van der Waals interactions and, by efficiently excluding solvent, contributes to the hydrophobic stabilization. 128 Cholesterol-induced helical modification of StAR at neutral pH allowed us to determine a 1:1 stoichiometry and affinity constant KD ~ lxl0" 6 M for StAR/cholesterol complex. This is contradictory to the previous work reporting a KD of 32 x 10" M and two sites for binding of NBD-cholesterol to StAR (Petrescu et at, 2001), but in agreement with recent models of StAR characterizing the cholesterol binding site as a hydrophobic pocket which can incorporate only one cholesterol molecule (Mathieu et at, 2002a; Murcia et at, 2006). Therefore, the second 'cholesterol' binding site may be an artifact from the intrinsic polar properties of NBD-cholesterol chromophoric side-chain (Figure 38). Although strong association of cholesterol to StAR could explain the dissociation of cholesterol from the outer mitochondrial membrane (Petrescu et at, 2001) it does not account for the mechanism of release to the IMM. Furthermore, such strong interactions are against a rapid cholesterol transfer, as they would slow down StAR efficiency. For that reason, a KD in micromolar range would support a rapid release of cholesterol by StAR (Mathieu et at, 2002a). Recent experiments show that stoichiometric rate of cholesterol transfer between phospholipid vesicles in acidic pH is about 2 molecules of cholesterol per molecule of StAR per minute (Tuckey, et at, 2002). This does not appear to satisfy the requirement of steroidogenic cells for producing high amounts of steroids in a short period of time, as Jefcoate et al. (Artemenko, et at, 2001) recently reported high activity of cholesterol transport (over 400 molecules of cholesterol/StAR/min) in bromo-cAMP activated steroidogenic mitochondria. It is therefore logical to assume that such a steroidogenic cell must spend a lot of energy for a fast response to stimuli. We show that in vitro, lowering of the pH compensates for the energetically nonfavorable release of cholesterol. Conceivably, an acidic environment 129 near the region of phospholipids head groups and outer hydrocarbon region of the bilayer (Frey and Tamm, 1990) may facilitate cholesterol release and its subsequent transport to the cholesterol-depleted IMM. 6.5 Active StAR is not a molten globule It is well established that a proper protein fold is required for protein activity. In this paradigm, protein activity is directly dependant on the tertiary structure. In contrast, molten globular (MG) states possess secondary but not a tertiary structure, are less likely to be active, especially in the case of ligand recognition. An important feature of the MG states is their position in the energy landscape (Onuchic, et al, 1996). According to the energy landscape theory, protein folding undergoes four states driven by entropy, where it starts with fast secondary structure formation, followed by MG states, then a transient intermediates ensemble where these accumulate before reaching the final native state. The MG states are characterized by a considerable conformational mobility and can be observed under mildly denaturing conditions, such as moderate concentrations of detergents, strong denaturants (guanidium hydrochloride, urea), and alkaline or acidic pH, where the latter is a particularly more effective method. For instance, at low pH, alactalbumin, equine lysozyme, RNase HI from Escherichia coli, and (3-lactoglobulin form molten globules(Arai and Kuwajima, 2000). Under mildly denaturing conditions, other MG states of typical globular proteins have also been studied, including Ca2+-binding milk lysozyme, apomyoglobin, staphyococcal nuclease, carbonic anhydrase and (3lactamase (Arai and Kuwajima, 2000). Also, NMR methods have not yet been able to identify long-range tertiary interactions that may exist in a MG state. This lack of fixed 130 tertiary interactions in many MG's results in a fluctuating ensemble of structures, which inter-convert on a millisecond to microsecond time scale (Redfield, 2004). Physiologically, extremely low pH in the range of 2-4 does not exist in the cell or in the plasma, and is merely used as a tool to study the folding pathways of proteins. pH measurements of the mitochondrial intermembrane space (pH 6.9),mitochondrial matrix (pH 7.8) and cytosol (pH7.6) (Porcelli, et al, 2005) are remote to the only known acidic lOcompartments in the cell including the lysosome (pH 5.0), late endosome (pH 5.3), early endosome(pH 6.2), secretory granules (pH 5.4) and Golgi (pH 6.4) (Grabe and Oster, 2001). It was suggested that the acidic phospholipids composing the mitochondrial membrane may generate an acidic microenvironment that induces the MG states of StAR (Bose et al, 1999). Nevertheless, experimental data show that the negatively charged phospholipids at the membranes attract positive counter ions (Garcia-Manyes, et al, 2005) such as sodium and more strongly divalent ions like calcium (Pedersen, et al, 2006), thus creating an electric bilayer around the membrane that neutralize such microenvironments. In the case of StAR, we show in this study that a transition to an acidic pH of 3.5 generates an artificial MG state, as previously described (Bose et al, 1999), but abolishes the tertiary structure and, most importantly, the subsequent holesterol binding. Moreover, shifting the pH back to 7.4 failed to regenerate the native state and the ligand binding. This shows that here, the MG states are irreversible and nonfunctional, and may not account for the high activity of StAR or a KD in the micromolar range as we determined. 131 6.6 Proposed models, conclusion and remarks A general consequence of cholesterol (Ch) binding is that StAR is stabilized against unfolding and is less flexible. This is a result of the ligand binding more tightly to the native partially unfolded conformation (PN) than to the fully unfolded state (U) and any extreme distorted forms (e.g. molten globule state). As demonstrated in thermodynamic studies, binding of cholesterol to the partially unfolded state resulted in an increase in the secondary structure content of the StAR protein. The fully folded state (N) might have resulted from the refolding of c-terminal helix on top of the cholesterol binding site. This can be illustrated for the case of StAR unfolding when cholesterol (Ch) binds solely to the native partially unfolded state (PN): Ch PN-Ch f +4N^U KD Ku where K-Q ~ 1 x 10"6 M is the dissociation constant of complex formation and K\j is equilibrium constant of protein unfolding. This approximation yields two distinct mechanisms for ligand binding and release. First, cholesterol essentially binds to the native state of StAR. In fact, trapping of the water molecules in the hydrophobic cavity of StAR and particularly the disruption of electrostatic interactions stabilizing the arrangement of the C-terminal helix, such as the Aspl06-Arg272 ion pair in StAR, would lead to changes in the protein fold and the exposure of the binding site to the lipid phase (Baker et al, 2005; Yaworsky, et al, 2005). This is partly in agreement with the acid-induced molten globular state theory proposing that cholesterol binding entails changes in the secondary and possibly tertiary 132 structure of the protein (Bose, et al, 2000a).This notion originates from the fact that circular dichroism and fluorescence spectra are altered under low pH conditions, either in solution (Bose et al, 2000a; Bose et al, 1999; Bose et al, 2000b; Strauss, et al, 2003) or in the presence of zwitterionic synthetic membranes (Christensen, et al, 2001; Murcia et al, 2006; Song et al, 2001). However, as mentioned in the Introduction, structural modulation of a part of StAR (63-193 StAR) could not be accounted for the overall structure of the protein. For example, their NMR signals at pH 7.4 were broad without the dispersion that is the characteristic of a folded protein, whereas our NMR experiments on the complete structure of N-62 StAR (unpublished data) strongly suggest the presence of a protein with a well-defined tertiary structure at pH 7.4. Of that, crystallographic data and the structural and functional similarity of StART domains with other lipid binding proteins suggest that the uptake of cholesterol may simply involve the transient opening of its narrow entrance without a significant perturbation of the overall fold of the domain (Mathieu et al, 2002a; Murcia et al, 2006; Roderick, et al, 2002; Tsujishita and Hurley, 2000). Thus, the present study is in agreement with the view that uptake of cholesterol could take place via conformational changes localized at the entrance of the binding cavity (Mathieu et al, 2002b) while preserving the secondary structure and overall fold of the protein. Secondly, since the unfolding and ligand dissociation are chronological, exchange from the bound conformation must occur through a local fluctuation or partial unfolding mechanism. The biochemical mechanisms involved in ligand uncoupling are not completely understood, but clearly involve a significant reduction in affinity of StAR for cholesterol as a consequence of pH change. Based on our results, the most likely 133 explanation for cholesterol release is that interaction of StAR with an acidic environment, e.g. an anionic membrane interface (Davies, et al, 1999), induces a rapid conformational change, thereby releasing the bound cholesterol. Despite the satisfying attractiveness of the model, the extent to which the results of this study can be extrapolated to the intact cell remains unclear. Considering the over 10-fold difference in StAR activity observed in vivo (Artemenko et al, 2001) and in vitro in isolated mitochondria (Bose et al, 2002), one could question whether the in vitro system reliably recapitulates the in vivo situation or that other protein components of the pathway are missing, or whether StAR in vitro can not achieve the optimal conformation responsible for its maximal biological activity (Papadopoulos, et al, 2007). Moreover, in vitro irreversible dissociation of cholesterol at the acidic pH (Figure 24) criticizes the model and therefore alternative models should be considered. There are growing evidence showing that StAR interacts with membrane proteins (e.g., PBR) and that these interactions are important for cholesterol transport inside the mitochondria (Hauet, et al, 2005). Based on our results and the recent theory of cholesterol transport (Liu et al, 2006), we re-review possible mechanisms involved in cholesterol transfer by StAR (Figure 37). Upon stimulation with cAMP (Fleury, et al, 1996; Fleury et al, 2004; Lehoux et al, 2003) StAR is targeted to the cholesterol pools in the vicinity of outer mitochondrial membrane translocator protein (TSPO) complex (Hauet et al, 2005). Opening of the a-helix 4 (Mathieu et al, 2002a) and affinity of the cholesterol binding site (Murcia et al., 2006) favor the sequestration of cholesterol from aqueous cytosol and subsequent transport to the OMM signaling complex (Papadopoulos et al., 2007). During the transport process, StAR/cholesterol complexes remain intact due 134 to the favorable hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions between ligand and protein. The activated complex is then represented to an outer mitochondrial membrane signaling complex composed of the outer mitochondrial membrane translocator protein (TSPO), the TSPO-associated protein PAP7, in association with the voltage-dependent anion channel protein (VDAC) (Papadopoulos et al, 2007), and cholesterol is released either through the interaction of StAR with the OMM complex or through an acidinduced transition of the protein to a molten globular state. Overall, our finding that binding of StAR to cholesterol is essential to trigger protein activity can count for either of in vivo or in vitro models of StAR action. A more detailed understanding of the StAR's molecular structure and mechanism of action is under investigation in our laboratory. 135 B LZ Figure 36. Molecular mechanism of cholesterol binding in StAR. (A) Ribbon diagram of the StAR model. In the absence of cholesterol StAR is in equilibrium between to the native (right) and partially unfolded state (left). (B) Binding of cholesterol (green) to the native partially unfolded state (left), induces the refolding of C-terminal ahelix 4 (right) on top of the cholesterol binding site. 136 Figure 37. Proposed model of the cholesterol transport by StAR. (A) Acid-induce cholesterol release from StAR in OMM. (B) Schematic representation of the identified mitochondrial signaling complex that mediates and amplifies the hormone and cAMP signals to mitochondrial cholesterol transport and subsequent steroid biosynthesis. Ch, cholesterol; IMM, inner mitochondrial membrane; LDs, lipid droplets; OMM, outer mitochondrial membrane; P, pregnenolone; PAP7, PKARIa-anchoring protein; TSPO, outermitochondrial membrane translocator protein; VDAC, voltage-dependent anion channel. 137 oo H3C - NN; P o- CH3I .rXX^ o CH 3 < CH 3 HO Cholesterol NBD-cholesterol Figure 38. Comparison of the structures of of NBD-Cholesterol and cholesterol. Left, structure of NBD-Cholesterol (25-[N-[(7-nitro-2-l,3-benzoxadiazol-4- yl)methyl]amino]-27-norcholesterol) and right, cholesterol. 138 References Adler AJ, Greenfield NJ & Fasman GD (1973) Circular dichroism and optical rotatory dispersion of proteins and polypeptides. Methods Enzymol 27 675-735. Ahlgren R, Simpson ER, Waterman MR & Lund J (1990) Characterization of the promoter/regulatory region of the bovine CYP11A (P-450scc) gene. Basal and cAMPdependent expression. J Biol Chem 265 3313-3319. Akingbemi BT (2005) Estrogen regulation of testicular function. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 351. Alberta JA, Epstein LF, Pon LA & Orme-Johnson NR (1989) Mitochondrial localization of a phosphoprotein that rapidly accumulates in adrenal cortex cells exposed to adrenocorticotropic hormone or to cAMP. J Biol Chem 264 2368-2372. Allen JA, Shankara T, Janus P, Buck S, Diemer T, Hales KH & Hales DB (2006) Energized, polarized, and actively respiring mitochondria are required for acute Leydig cell steroidogenesis. Endocrinology 147 3924-3935. Alpy F, Stoeckel ME, Dierich A, Escola JM, Wendling C, Chenard MP, Vanier MT, Gruenberg J, Tomasetto C & Rio MC (2001) The steroidogenic acute regulatory protein homo log MLN64, a late endosomal cholesterol-binding protein. J Biol Chem 276 42614269. Altmann SW, Davis HR, Jr., Zhu LJ, Yao X, Hoos LM, Tetzloff G, Iyer SP, Maguire M, Golovko A, Zeng M, et al. (2004) Niemann-Pick CI Like 1 protein is critical for intestinal cholesterol absorption. Science 303 1201-1204. Amri H, Ogwuegbu SO, Boujrad N, Drieu K & Papadopoulos V (1996) In vivo regulation of peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor and glucocorticoid synthesis by Ginkgo biloba extract EGb 761 and isolated ginkgolides. Endocrinology 137 5707-5718. Ankley GT & Johnson RD (2004) Small fish models for identifying and assessing the effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals. liar J 45 469-483. Arai M & Kuwajima K (2000) Role of the molten globule state in protein folding. Adv Protein Chem 53 209-282. Arakane F, Kallen CB, Watari H, Foster JA, Sepuri NB, Pain D, Stayrook SE, Lewis M, Gerton GL & Strauss JF, 3rd (1998) The mechanism of action of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR). StAR acts on the outside of mitochondria to stimulate steroidogenesis. J Biol Chem 273 16339-16345. 139 Arakane F, King SR, Du Y, Kallen CB, Walsh LP, Watari H, Stocco DM & Strauss JF, 3rd (1997) Phosphorylation of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) modulates its steroidogenic activity. J Biol Chem 272 32656-32662. Arakane F, Sugawara T, Nishino H, Liu Z, Holt JA, Pain D, Stocco DM, Miller WL & Strauss JF, 3rd (1996) Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) retains activity in the absence of its mitochondrial import sequence: implications for the mechanism of StAR action. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93 13731-13736. Arlt W & Stewart PM (2005) Adrenal corticosteroid biosynthesis, metabolism, and action. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 34 293-313, viii. Artemenko IP, Zhao D, Hales DB, Hales KH & Jefcoate CR (2001) Mitochondrial processing of newly synthesized steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR), but not total StAR, mediates cholesterol transfer to cytochrome P450 side chain cleavage enzyme in adrenal cells. J Biol Chem 276 46583-46596. Ascoli M (1981) Characterization of several clonal lines of cultured Leydig tumor cells: gonadotropin receptors and steroidogenic responses. Endocrinology 108 88-95. Baker BY, Lin L, Kim CJ, Raza J, Smith CP, Miller WL & Achermann JC (2006) Nonclassic congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia: a new disorder of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein with very late presentation and normal male genitalia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91 4781-4785. Baker BY, Yaworsky DC & Miller WL (2005) A pH-dependent molten globule transition is required for activity of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, StAR. J Biol Chem 280 41753-41760. Banuelos S & Muga A (1995) Binding of molten globule-like conformations to lipid bilayers. Structure of native and partially folded alpha-lactalbumin bound to model membranes. J Biol Chem 270 29910-29915. Baulieu EE (1997) Neurosteroids: of the nervous system, by the nervous system, for the nervous system. Recent Prog Horm Res 52 1-32. Bean WB, Olch D & Weinberg HB (1955) The syndrome of carcinoid and acquired valve lesions of the right side of the heart. Circulation 12 1-6. Berg JM (1992) Spl and the subfamily of zinc finger proteins with guanine-rich binding sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89 11109-11110. Bloch K (1965) The biological synthesis of cholesterol. Science 150 19-28. 140 Bolen DW & Santoro MM (1988) Unfolding free energy changes determined by the linear extrapolation method. 2. Incorporation of delta G degrees N-U values in a thermodynamic cycle. Biochemistry 27 8069-8074. Borroni R, Liu Z, Simpson ER & Hinshelwood MM (1997) A putative binding site for Spl is involved in transcriptional regulation of CYP17 gene expression in bovine ovary. Endocrinology 138 2011-2020. Bose H, Lingappa VR & Miller WL (2002) Rapid regulation of steroidogenesis by mitochondrial protein import. Nature All 87-91. Bose HS, Baldwin MA & Miller WL (2000a) Evidence that StAR and MLN64 act on the outer mitochondrial membrane as molten globules. Endocr Res 26 629-637. Bose HS, Sato S, Aisenberg J, Shalev SA, Matsuo N & Miller WL (2000a) Mutations in the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) in six patients with congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85 3636-3639. Bose HS, Sugawara T, Strauss JF, 3rd & Miller WL (1996) The pathophysiology and genetics of congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia. International Congenital Lipoid Adrenal Hyperplasia Consortium. N EnglJ Med 335 1870-1878. Bose HS, Whittal RM, Baldwin MA & Miller WL (1999) The active form of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, StAR, appears to be a molten globule. Proc Natl AcadSci USA96 7250-7255. Bose HS, Whittal RM, Huang MC, Baldwin MA & Miller WL (2000b) N-218 MLN64, a protein with StAR-like steroidogenic activity, is folded and cleaved similarly to StAR. Biochemistry 39 11722-11731. Bruscalupi G, Leoni S, Mangiantini MT, Piemonte F, Spagnuolo S & Trentalance A (1985) Short term regulation of acyl CoA: cholesterol acyl transferase (ACAT) activity in the regenerating and perinatal liver. Biosci Rep 5 237-242. Buttgereit F, Burmester GR & Lipworth BJ (2005) Optimised glucocorticoid therapy: the sharpening of an old spear. Lancet 365 801-803. Calikoglu AS (2003) Adrenocorticotropic hormone, a new player in the control of testicular steroidogenesis. Endocrinology 144 3277-3278. Caron KM, Ikeda Y, Soo SC, Stocco DM, Parker KL & Clark BJ (1997) Characterization of the promoter region of the mouse gene encoding the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein. Mol Endocrinol 11 138-147. 141 Cherradi N, Brandenburger Y & Capponi AM (1998) Mitochondrial regulation of mineralocorticoid biosynthesis by calcium and the StAR protein. Eur J Endocrinol 139 249-256. Christensen K, Bose HS, Harris FM, Miller WL & Bell JD (2001) Binding of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein to synthetic membranes suggests an active molten globule. J Biol Chem 276 17044-17051. Christenson LK, Osborne TF, McAllister JM & Strauss JF, 3rd (2001) Conditional response of the human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene promoter to sterol regulatory element binding protein-la. Endocrinology 142 28-36. Christenson LK & Strauss JF, 3rd (2000) Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) and the intramitochondrial translocation of cholesterol. Biochim Biophys Acta 1529 175187. Clark BJ, Soo SC, Caron KM, Ikeda Y, Parker KL & Stocco DM (1995) Hormonal and developmental regulation of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein. Mol Endocrinol 9 1346-1355. Clark BJ & Stocco DM (1997) Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein: the StAR still shines brightly. Mol Cell Endocrinol 134 1-8. Clark BJ, Wells J, King SR & Stocco DM (1994) The purification, cloning, and expression of a novel luteinizing hormone-induced mitochondrial protein in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells. Characterization of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR). J Biol Chem 269 28314-28322. Cramer WA, Cohen FS, Merrill AR & Song HY (1990) Structure and dynamics of the colicin El channel. Mol Microbiol 4 519-526. Davies JK, Thumser AE & Wilton DC (1999) Binding of recombinant rat liver fatty acidbinding protein to small anionic phospholipid vesicles results in ligand release: a model for interfacial binding and fatty acid targeting. Biochemistry 38 16932-16940. Davis WW & Garren LD (1968) On the mechanism of action of adrenocorticotropic hormone. The inhibitory site of cycloheximide in the pathway of steroid biosynthesis. J Biol Chem 243 5153-5157. De Voogt HJ, Smith PH, Pavone-Macaluso M, De Pauw M & Suciu S (1986) Cardiovascular side effects of diethylstilbestrol, cyproterone acetate, medroxyprogesterone acetate and estramustine phosphate used for the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer: results from European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer trials 30761 and 30762. J Urol 135 303-307. 142 Defossez PA, Baert JL, Monnot M & de Launoit Y (1997) The ETS family member ERM contains an alpha-helical acidic activation domain that contacts TAFII60. Nucleic Acids Res 25 4455-4463. Della-Cioppa G, Muffly KE, Yanagibashi K & Hall PF (1986) Preparation and characterization of submitochondrial fractions from adrenal cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 48 111-120. Dickinson DB, Misch MJ & Drury RE (1970) Freezing Damage to Isolated Tomato Fruit Mitochondria as Modified by Cryoprotective Agents and Storage Temperature. Plant Physiol 46 200-203. Dohle GR, Smit M & Weber RF (2003) Androgens and male fertility. World J Urol 21 341-345. Epstein LF & Orme-Johnson NR (1991a) Acute action of luteinizing hormone on mouse Leydig cells: accumulation of mitochondrial phosphoproteins and stimulation of testosterone synthesis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 81 113-126. Epstein LF & Orme-Johnson NR (1991b) Regulation of steroid hormone biosynthesis. Identification of precursors of a phosphoprotein targeted to the mitochondrion in stimulated rat adrenal cortex cells. J Biol Chem 266 19739-19745. Farkash Y, Timberg R & Orly J (1986) Preparation of antiserum to rat cytochrome P-450 cholesterol side chain cleavage, and its use for ultrastructural localization of the immunoreactive enzyme by protein A-gold technique. Endocrinology 118 1353-1365. Ferguson JJ, Jr. (1963) Protein Synthesis and Adrenocorticotropin Responsiveness. J Biol Chem 238 2754-2759. Fleischer S (1979) Long-term storage of mitochondria to preserve energy-linked functions. Methods Enzymol 55 28-32. Fleury A, Cloutier M, Ducharme L, Lefebvre A, LeHoux J & LeHoux JG (1996) Adrenocorticotropin regulates the level of the steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein mRNA in hamster adrenals. Endocr Res 22 515-520. Fleury A, Mathieu AP, Ducharme L, Hales DB & LeHoux JG (2004) Phosphorylation and function of the hamster adrenal steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR). J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 91 259-271. Forker EL & Luxon BA (1983) Albumin-mediated transport of rose bengal by perfused rat liver. Kinetics of the reaction at the cell surface. J Clin Invest 72 1764-1771. Freire E (1995) Thermal denaturation methods in the study of protein folding. Methods Enzymol 259 144-168. 143 Frey S & Tamm LK (1990) Membrane insertion and lateral diffusion of fluorescencelabelled cytochrome c oxidase subunit IV signal peptide in charged and uncharged phospholipid bilayers. Biochem J272 713-719. Fujieda K, Tajima T, Nakae J, Sageshima S, Tachibana K, Suwa S, Sugawara T & Strauss JF, 3rd (1997) Spontaneous puberty in 46,XX subjects with congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia. Ovarian steroidogenesis is spared to some extent despite inactivating mutations in the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) gene. J Clin Invest 99 1265-1271. Fukada H, Sturtevant JM & Quiocho FA (1983) Thermodynamics of the binding of Larabinose and of D-galactose to the L-arabinose-binding protein of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 258 13193-13198. Garcia-Calvo M, Lisnock J, Bull HG, Hawes BE, Burnett DA, Braun MP, Crona JH, Davis HR, Jr., Dean DC, Detmers PA, et al. (2005) The target of ezetimibe is NiemannPickCl-Like 1 (NPC1L1). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 8132-8137. Garcia-Manyes S, Oncins G & Sanz F (2005) Effect of ion-binding and chemical phospholipid structure on the nanomechanics of lipid bilayers studied by force spectroscopy. Biophys J 89 1812-1826. Garren LD, Ney RL & Davis WW (1965) Studies on the role of protein synthesis in the regulation of corticosterone production by adrenocorticotropic hormone in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 53 1443-1450. Godt RE & Maughan DW (1988) On the composition of the cytosol of relaxed skeletal muscle of the frog. Am J Physiol 254 C591-604. Goldstein JL & Brown MS (1990) Regulation of the mevalonate pathway. Nature 343 425-430. Grabe M & Oster G (2001) Regulation of organelle acidity. J Gen Physiol 117 329-344. Graham I & Duke T (2005) The logical repertoire of ligand-binding proteins. Phys Biol 2 159-165. Granot Z, Silverman E, Friedlander R, Melamed-Book N, Eimerl S, Timberg R, Hales KH, Hales DB, Stocco DM & Orly J (2002) The life cycle of the steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein: from transcription through proteolysis. Endocr Res 28 375386. Greenfield N & Fasman GD (1969) Computed circular dichroism spectra for the evaluation of protein conformation. Biochemistry 8 4108-4116. Hanahan D, Jessee J & Bloom FR (1991) Plasmid transformation of Escherichia coli and other bacteria. Methods Enzymol 204 63-113. 144 Hanson JR (2006) Steroids: partial synthesis in medicinal chemistry. Nat Prod Rep 23 886-892. Hartigan JA, Green EG, Mortensen RM, Menachery A, Williams GH & Orme-Johnson NR (1995) Comparison of protein phosphorylation patterns produced in adrenal cells by activation of c AMP-dependent protein kinase and Ca-dependent protein kinase. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 53 95-101. Hauet T, Liu J, Li H, Gazouli M, Culty M & Papadopoulos V (2002) PBR, StAR, and PKA: partners in cholesterol transport in steroidogenic cells. Endocr Res 28 395-401. Hauet T, Yao ZX, Bose HS, Wall CT, Han Z, Li W, Hales DB, Miller WL, Culty M & Papadopoulos V (2005) Peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor-mediated action of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein on cholesterol entry into leydig cell mitochondria. Mol Endocrinol 19 540-554. Hauffa BP, Miller WL, Grumbach MM, Conte FA & Kaplan SL (1985) Congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to deficient cholesterol side-chain cleavage activity (20, 22desmolase) in a patient treated for 18 years. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 23 481-493. Herbert V, Lau KS, Gottlieb CW & Bleicher SJ (1965) Coated charcoal immunoassay of insulin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 25 1375-1384. Horikawa R (2004) [Congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia]. Nippon Rinsho 62 351-356. Hunter MH & Carek PJ (2003) Evaluation and treatment of women with hirsutism. Am Fam Physician 67 2565-2572. Ikeda Y, Lala DS, Luo X, Kim E, Moisan MP & Parker KL (1993) Characterization of the mouse FTZ-F1 gene, which encodes a key regulator of steroid hydroxylase gene expression. Mol Endocrinol 7 852-860. Ikonen E (2006) Mechanisms for cellular cholesterol transport: defects and human disease. Physiol Rev 86 1237-1261. Im YJ, Raychaudhuri S, Prinz WA & Hurley JH (2005) Structural mechanism for sterol sensing and transport by OSBP-related proteins. Nature 437 154-158. Ishii T, Hasegawa T, Pai CI, Yvgi-Ohana N, Timberg R, Zhao L, Majdic G, Chung BC, Orly J & Parker KL (2002) The roles of circulating high-density lipoproteins and trophic hormones in the phenotype of knockout mice lacking the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein. Mol Endocrinol 16 2297-2309. Iyer LM, Koonin EV & Aravind L (2001) Adaptations of the helix-grip fold for ligand binding and catalysis in the START domain superfamily. Proteins 43 134-144. 145 Jean-Francois N, Frederic G, Raymund W, Benoit C & Lavigne P (2003) Improving the thermodynamic stability of the leucine zipper of max increases the stability of its b-HLHLZ:E-box complex. J Mol Biol 326 1577-1595. Jefcoate C (2002) High-flux mitochondrial cholesterol trafficking, a specialized function of the adrenal cortex. J Clin Invest 110 881-890. Kagawa N & Waterman MR (1991) Evidence that an adrenal-specific nuclear protein regulates the cAMP responsiveness of the human CYP21B (P450C21) gene. J Biol Chem 266 11199-11204. Kallen CB, Billheimer JT, Summers SA, Stayrook SE, Lewis M & Strauss JF, 3rd (1998) Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) is a sterol transfer protein. J Biol Chem 273 26285-26288. Knopp RH (1999) Drug treatment of lipid disorders. N EnglJ Med 341 498-511. Ko DC, Milenkovic L, Beier SM, Manuel H, Buchanan J & Scott MP (2005) Cellautonomous death of cerebellar purkinje neurons with autophagy in Niemann-Pick type C disease. PLoS Genet 1 81-95. Konig R & Dandekar T (2001) Solvent entropy-driven searching for protein modeling examined and tested in simplified models. Protein Eng 14 329-335. Krueger KE & Papadopoulos V (1990) Peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptors mediate translocation of cholesterol from outer to inner mitochondrial membranes in adrenocortical cells. J Biol Chem 265 15015-15022. Krueger RJ & Orme-Johnson NR (1983) Acute adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation of adrenal corticosteroidogenesis. Discovery of a rapidly induced protein. J Biol Chem 258 10159-10167. Kumar R, Gururaj AE, Vadlamudi RK & Rayala SK (2005) The clinical relevance of steroid hormone receptor corepressors. Clin Cancer Res 11 2822-2831. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227 680-685. Lavigne P, Crump MP, Gagne SM, Hodges RS, Kay CM & Sykes BD (1998) Insights into the mechanism of heterodimerization from the 1H-NMR solution structure of the cMyc-Max heterodimeric leucine zipper. J Mol Biol 281 165-181. Lavigne P, Kondejewski LH, Houston ME, Jr., Sonnichsen FD, Lix B, Skyes BD, Hodges RS & Kay CM (1995) Preferential heterodimeric parallel coiled-coil formation by synthetic Max and c-Myc leucine zippers: a description of putative electrostatic interactions responsible for the specificity of heterodimerization. J Mol Biol 254 505-520. 146 Lee YH, Williams SC, Baer M, Sterneck E, Gonzalez FJ & Johnson PF (1997) The ability of C/EBP beta but not C/EBP alpha to synergize with an Spl protein is specified by the leucine zipper and activation domain. Mol Cell Biol 17 2038-2047. Lehoux JG, Fleury A & Ducharme L (1998) The acute and chronic effects of adrenocorticotropin on the levels of messenger ribonucleic acid and protein of steroidogenic enzymes in rat adrenal in vivo. Endocrinology 139 3913-3922. LeHoux JG, Fleury A, Ducharme L & Hales DB (2004) Phosphorylation of the hamster adrenal steroidogenic acute regulatory protein as analyzed by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoreses. Mol Cell Endocrinol 215 127-134. Lehoux JG, Mathieu A, Lavigne P & Fleury A (2003) Adrenocorticotropin regulation of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein. Microsc Res Tech 61 288-299. Leo JC, Guo C, Woon CT, Aw SE & Lin VC (2004) Glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid cross-talk with progesterone receptor to induce focal adhesion and growth inhibition in breast cancer cells. Endocrinology 145 1314-1321. Li M, Su ZG & Janson JC (2004) In vitro protein refolding by chromatographic procedures. Protein Expr Purif'33 1-10. Lin D, Sugawara T, Strauss JF, 3rd, Clark BJ, Stocco DM, Saenger P, Rogol A & Miller WL (1995) Role of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein in adrenal and gonadal steroidogenesis. Science 267 1828-1831. Liscum L & Munn NJ (1999) Intracellular cholesterol transport. Biochim Biophys Acta 1438 19-37. Liu J, Rone MB & Papadopoulos V (2006) Protein-protein interactions mediate mitochondrial cholesterol transport and steroid biosynthesis. J Biol Chem 281 3887938893. Lu S, Ciardelli T, Reyes VE & Humphreys RE (1991) Number and placement of hydrophobic residues in a longitudinal strip governs helix formation of peptides in the presence of lipid vesicles. J Biol Chem 266 10054-10057. Makridis C, Oberg K, Juhlin C, Rastad J, Johansson H, Lorelius LE & Akerstrom G (1990) Surgical treatment of mid-gut carcinoid tumors. World J Surg 14 377-383; discussion 384-375. Manary MJ, Muglia LJ, Vogt SK & Yarasheski KE (2006) Cortisol and its action on the glucocorticoid receptor in malnutrition and acute infection. Metabolism 55 550-554. Mastorakos G & Ilias I (2003) Maternal and fetal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axes during pregnancy and postpartum. Ann N YAcadSci 997 136-149. 147 Mathieu AP, Fleury A, Ducharme L, Lavigne P & LeHoux JG (2002a) Insights into steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR)-dependent cholesterol transfer in mitochondria: evidence from molecular modeling and structure-based thermodynamics supporting the existence of partially unfolded states of StAR. J Mol Endocrinol 29 327345. Mathieu AP, Lavigne P & LeHoux JG (2002b) Molecular modeling and structure-based thermodynamic analysis of the StAR protein. Endocr Res 28 419-423. Maxfield FR & Menon AK (2006) Intracellular sterol transport and distribution. Curr Opin Cell Biol 18 379-385. Miller WL (1988) Molecular biology of steroid hormone synthesis. Endocr Rev 9 295318. Miller WL (1997) Congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia: the human gene knockout for the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein. J Mol Endocrinol 19 227-240. Miller WL (2006) StAR Search - What We Know About How the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein Mediates Mitochondrial Cholesterol Import. Mol Endocrinol. Miller WL & Strauss JF, 3rd (1999) Molecular pathology and mechanism of action of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, StAR. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 69 131-141. Moog-Lutz C, Tomasetto C, Regnier CH, Wendling C, Lutz Y, Muller D, Chenard MP, Basset P & Rio MC (1997) MLN64 exhibits homology with the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (STAR) and is over-expressed in human breast carcinomas. Int J Cancer 71 183-191. Morar AS, Olteanu A, Young GB & Pielak GJ (2001) Solvent-induced collapse of alphasynuclein and acid-denatured cytochrome c. Protein Sci 10 2195-2199. Muga A, Mantsch HH & Surewicz WK (1991) Membrane binding induces destabilization of cytochrome c structure. Biochemistry 30 7219-7224. Mukai K, Mitani F, Nagasawa H, Suzuki R, Suzuki T, Suematsu M & Ishimura Y (2003) An inverse correlation between expression of a preprocathepsin B-related protein with cysteine-rich sequences and steroid 11 beta -hydroxylase in adrenocortical cells. J Biol Chem21% 17084-17092. Mulrow PJ (1972) The adrenal cortex. Annu Rev Physiol 34 409-424. Murcia M, Faraldo-Gomez JD, Maxfield FR & Roux B (2006) Modeling the structure of the StART domains of MLN64 and StAR proteins in complex with cholesterol. J Lipid Res 47 2614-2630. 148 Murphy BE & Marvin M (1974) Interaction of gelatin with stereospecific binding proteins and its enhancement of competitive binding assays. J Clin Pathol 27 687-692. Nakae J, Tajima T, Sugawara T, Arakane F, Hanaki K, Hotsubo T, Igarashi N, Igarashi Y, Ishii T, Koda N, et al. (1997) Analysis of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) gene in Japanese patients with congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia. Hum Mol Genet 6 571-576. Naud JF, McDuff FO, Sauve S, Montagne M, Webb BA, Smith SP, Chabot B & Lavigne P (2005) Structural and thermodynamical characterization of the complete p21 gene product of Max. Biochemistry 44 12746-12758. Ohno Y, Yanagibashi K, Yonezawa Y, Ishiwatari S & Matsuba M (1983) A possible role of "steroidogenic factor" in the corticoidogenic response to ACTH; effect of ACTH, cycloheximide and aminoglutethimide on the content of cholesterol in the outer and inner mitochondrial membrane of rat adrenal cortex. EndocrinolJpn 30 335-338. Okuyama E, Nishi N, Onishi S, Itoh S, Ishii Y, Miyanaka H, Fujita K & Ichikawa Y (1997) A novel splicing junction mutation in the gene for the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein causes congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82 2337-2342. Onuchic JN, Socci ND, Luthey-Schulten Z & Wolynes PG (1996) Protein folding funnels: the nature of the transition state ensemble. Fold Des 1 441-450. Oram JF & Heinecke JW (2005) ATP-binding cassette transporter Al: a cell cholesterol exporter that protects against cardiovascular disease. Physiol Rev 85 1343-1372. Pace CN (1986) Determination and analysis of urea and guanidine hydrochloride denaturation curves. Methods Enzymol 131 266-280. Papadopoulos V (1993) Peripheral-type benzodiazepine/diazepam binding inhibitor receptor: biological role in steroidogenic cell function. Endocr Rev 14 222-240. Papadopoulos V, Liu J & Culty M (2007) Is there a mitochondrial signaling complex facilitating cholesterol import? Mol Cell Endocrinol. Pedersen UR, Leidy C, Westh P & Peters GH (2006) The effect of calcium on the properties of charged phospholipid bilayers. Biochim Biophys Acta 1758 573-582. Petrescu AD, Gallegos AM, Okamura Y, Strauss JF, 3rd & Schroeder F (2001) Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein binds cholesterol and modulates mitochondrial membrane sterol domain dynamics. J Biol Chem 276 36970-36982. 149 Pon LA, Hartigan JA & Orme-Johnson NR (1986) Acute ACTH regulation of adrenal corticosteroid biosynthesis. Rapid accumulation of a phosphoprotein. J Biol Chem 261 13309-13316. Pon LA & Orme-Johnson NR (1988) Acute stimulation of corpus luteum cells by gonadotrophin or adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate causes accumulation of a phosphoprotein concurrent with acceleration of steroid synthesis. Endocrinology 123 1942-1948. Ponting CP & Aravind L (1999) START: a lipid-binding domain in StAR, HD-ZIP and signalling proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 24 130-132. Ponting CP, Schultz J, Milpetz F & Bork P (1999) SMART: identification and annotation of domains from signalling and extracellular protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 27 229-232. Porcelli AM, Ghelli A, Zanna C, Pinton P, Rizzuto R & Rugolo M (2005) pH difference across the outer mitochondrial membrane measured with a green fluorescent protein mutant. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 326 799-804. Posner BI, Kelly PA, Shiu RP & Friesen HG (1974) Studies of insulin, growth hormone and prolactin binding: tissue distribution, species variation and characterization. Endocrinology 95 521 -531. Privalle CT, Crivello JF & Jefcoate CR (1983) Regulation of intramitochondrial cholesterol transfer to side-chain cleavage cytochrome P-450 in rat adrenal gland. Proc Natl Acad Sci US AM 702-706. Privalov PL (1979) Stability of proteins: small globular proteins. Adv Protein Chem 33 167-241. Privalov PL & Makhatadze GI (1990) Heat capacity of proteins. II. Partial molar heat capacity of the unfolded polypeptide chain of proteins: protein unfolding effects. J Mol Biol 213 385-391. Qi X & Grabowski GA (2001) Differential membrane interactions of saposins A and C: implications for the functional specificity. J Biol Chem 276 27010-27017. Ray DB, Horst IA & Kowal J (1980) Adrenocorticotropic hormone increases specific proteins of the mitochondrial fraction that are translated inside or outside this organelle in cultured adrenal tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 11 4648-4652. Redfield C (2004) Using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to study molten globule states of proteins. Methods 34 121-132. 150 Rodenburg RJ, Holthuizen PE & Sussenbach JS (1997) A functional Spl binding site is essential for the activity of the adult liver-specific human insulin-like growth factor II promoter. Mol Endocrinol 11 237-250. Roderick SL, Chan WW, Agate DS, Olsen LR, Vetting MW, Rajashankar KR & Cohen DE (2002) Structure of human phosphatidylcholine transfer protein in complex with its ligand. Nat Struct Biol 9 507-511. Rodriguez-Agudo D, Ren S, Hylemon PB, Redford K, Natarajan R, Del Castillo A, Gil G & Pandak WM (2005) Human StarD5, a cytosolic StAR-related lipid binding protein. J Lipid Res 46 1615-1623. Romanowski MJ, Soccio RE, Breslow JL & Burley SK (2002) Crystal structure of the Mus musculus cholesterol-regulated START protein 4 (StarD4) containing a StARrelated lipid transfer domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA99 6949-6954. Ross PD & Subramanian S (1981) Thermodynamics of protein association reactions: forces contributing to stability. Biochemistry 20 3096-3102. Rudel LL & Shelness GS (2000) Cholesterol esters and atherosclerosis-a game of ACAT and mouse. Nat Med 6 1313-1314. Rudenko G & Deisenhofer J (2003) The low-density lipoprotein receptor: ligands, debates and lore. Curr Opin Struct Biol 13 683-689. Salemi R, McDougall JG, Hardy KJ & Wintour EM (2000) Effect of adrenomedullin infusion on basal and stimulated aldosterone secretion in conscious sheep with cervical adrenal autotransplants. J Endocrinol 166 389-399. Sandhoff TW, Hales DB, Hales KH & McLean MP (1998) Transcriptional regulation of the rat steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene by steroidogenic factor 1. Endocrinology 139 4820-4831. Scallen TJ & Sanghvi A (1983) Regulation of three key enzymes in cholesterol metabolism by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 80 24772480. Scheraga HA, Nemethy G & Steinberg IZ (1962) The contribution of hydrophobic bonds to the thermal stability of protein conformations. J Biol Chem 237 2506-2508. Schwaiger M, Herzog V & Neupert W (1987) Characterization of translocation contact sites involved in the import of mitochondrial proteins. J Cell Biol 105 235-246. Shea-Eaton WK, Trinidad MJ, Lopez D, Nackley A & McLean MP (2001) Sterol regulatory element binding protein-la regulation of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene. Endocrinology 142 1525-1533. 151 Shelat SG, Flanagan-Cato LM & Fluharty SJ (1999) Glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid regulation of angiotensin II type 1 receptor binding and inositol triphosphate formation in WB cells. J Endocrinol 162 381-391. Shrake A & Ross PD (1990) Ligand-induced biphasic protein denaturation. J Biol Chem 265 5055-5059. Silverman E, Eimerl S & Orly J (1999) CCAAT enhancer-binding protein beta and GATA-4 binding regions within the promoter of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) gene are required for transcription in rat ovarian cells. J Biol Chem 21A 17987-17996. Simpson ER & Waterman MR (1988) Regulation of the synthesis of steroidogenic enzymes in adrenal cortical cells by ACTH. Annu Rev Physiol 50 427-440. Soccio RE, Adams RM, Maxwell KN & Breslow JL (2005) Differential gene regulation of StarD4 and StarD5 cholesterol transfer proteins. Activation of StarD4 by sterol regulatory element-binding protein-2 and StarD5 by endoplasmic reticulum stress. J Biol Chem 280 19410-19418. Soccio RE & Breslow JL (2003) StAR-related lipid transfer (START) proteins: mediators of intracellular lipid metabolism. J Biol Chem 278 22183-22186. Soccio RE & Breslow JL (2004) Intracellular cholesterol transport. Arterioscler Thromb Vase Biol 24 1150-1160. Song M, Shao H, Mujeeb A, James TL & Miller WL (2001) Molten-globule structure and membrane binding of the N-terminal protease-resistant domain (63-193) of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR). BiochemJ356 151-158. Spinella DG, Bernardino AK, Redding AC, Koutz P, Wei Y, Pratt EK, Myers KK, Chappell G, Gerken S & McConnell SJ (1999) Tandem arrayed ligation of expressed sequence tags (TALEST): a new method for generating global gene expression profiles. Nucleic Acids Res 27 e22. Stefkova J, Poledne R & Hubacek JA (2004) ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters in human metabolism and diseases. Physiol Res 53 235-243. Stevens VL, Xu T & Lambeth JD (1992) Cholesterol pools in rat adrenal mitochondria: use of cholesterol oxidase to infer a complex pool structure. Endocrinology 130 15571563. Stigter D, Alonso DO & Dill KA (1991) Protein stability: electrostatics and compact denatured states. Proc Natl Acad Sci USAS8 4176-4180. 152 Stocco DM (1997a) A StAR search: implications in controlling steroidgenesis. Biol Reprod 56 328-336. Stocco DM (1997b) The steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein two years later. An update. Endocrine 6 99-109. Stocco DM (1998) A review of the characteristics of the protein required for the acute regulation of steroid hormone biosynthesis: the case for the steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 217 123-129. Stocco DM (2000) The role of the StAR protein in steroidogenesis: challenges for the future. J Endocrinol 164 247-253. Stocco DM (2001a) StAR protein and the regulation of steroid hormone biosynthesis. Annu Rev Physiol 63 193-213. Stocco DM (2001b) Tracking the role of a star in the sky of the new millennium. Mol Endocrinol 15 1245-1254. Stocco DM (2002) Clinical disorders associated with abnormal cholesterol transport: mutations in the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein. Mol Cell Endocrinol 191 19-25. Stocco DM & Ascoli M (1993) The use of genetic manipulation of MA-10 Leydig tumor cells to demonstrate the role of mitochondrial proteins in the acute regulation of steroidogenesis. Endocrinology 132 959-967. Stocco DM & Chen W (1991) Presence of identical mitochondrial proteins in unstimulated constitutive steroid-producing R2C rat Leydig tumor and stimulated nonconstitutive steroid-producing MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells. Endocrinology 128 1918-1926. Stocco DM & Clark BJ (1996) Regulation of the acute production of steroids in steroidogenic cells. Endocr Rev 17 221-244. Stocco DM & Clark BJ (1997) The role of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein in steroidogenesis. Steroids 62 29-36. Stocco DM, Clark BJ, Reinhart AJ, Williams SC, Dyson M, Dassi B, Walsh LP, Manna PR, Wang XJ, Zeleznik AJ, et al. (2001) Elements involved in the regulation of the StAR gene. Mol Cell Endocrinol 111 55-59. Stocco DM & Kilgore MW (1988) Induction of mitochondrial proteins in MA-10 Leydig tumour cells with human choriogonadotropin. Biochem J 249 95-103. 153 Stocco DM & Sodeman TC (1991) The 30-kDa mitochondrial proteins induced by hormone stimulation in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells are processed from larger precursors. J Biol Chem 266 19731-19738. Stocco DM, Wang X, Jo Y & Manna PR (2005) Multiple signaling pathways regulating steroidogenesis and steroidogenic acute regulatory protein expression: more complicated than we thought. Mol Endocrinol 19 2647-2659. Strauss JF, 3rd, Kallen CB, Christenson LK, Watari H, Devoto L, Arakane F, Kiriakidou M & Sugawara T (1999) The steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR): a window into the complexities of intracellular cholesterol trafficking. Recent Prog Horm Res 54 369-394; discussion 394-365. Strauss JF, 3rd, Kishida T, Christenson LK, Fujimoto T & Hiroi H (2003) START domain proteins and the intracellular trafficking of cholesterol in steroidogenic cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 202 59-65. Sturley SL, Patterson MC, Balch W & Liscum L (2004) The pathophysiology and mechanisms of NP-C disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1685 83-87. Sugawara T, Holt JA, Driscoll D, Strauss JF, 3rd, Lin D, Miller WL, Patterson D, Clancy KP, Hart IM, Clark BJ, et al. (1995a) Human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein: functional activity in COS-1 cells, tissue-specific expression, and mapping of the structural gene to 8p 11.2 and a pseudogene to chromosome 13. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92 4778-4782. Sugawara T, Holt JA, Kiriakidou M & Strauss JF, 3rd (1996) Steroidogenic factor 1dependent promoter activity of the human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) gene. Biochemistry 35 9052-9059. Sugawara T, Kiriakidou M, McAllister JM, Kallen CB & Strauss JF, 3rd (1997) Multiple steroidogenic factor 1 binding elements in the human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene 5'-flanking region are required for maximal promoter activity and cyclic AMP responsiveness. Biochemistry 36 7249-7255. Sugawara T, Lin D, Holt JA, Martin KO, Javitt NB, Miller WL & Strauss JF, 3rd (1995b) Structure of the human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) gene: StAR stimulates mitochondrial cholesterol 27-hydroxylase activity. Biochemistry 34 1250612512. Sugawara T, Nomura E, Sakuragi N & Fujimoto S (2001) The effect of the arylhydrocarbon receptor on the human steroidogenic acute regulatory gene promoter activity. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 78 253-260. Sun G, Porter W & Safe S (1998) Estrogen-induced retinoic acid receptor alpha 1 gene expression: role of estrogen receptor-Spl complex. Mol Endocrinol 12 882-890. 154 Swietnicki W (2006) Folding aggregated proteins into functionally active forms. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17 367-372. Syed AA & Weaver JU (2005) Glucocorticoid sensitivity: the hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal-tissue axis. Obes Res 13 1131-1133. Tall AR (1998) An overview of reverse cholesterol transport. Eur Heart J 19 Suppl A A31-35. Tamm LK (1986) Incorporation of a synthetic mitochondrial signal peptide into charged and uncharged phospholipid monolayers. Biochemistry 25 7470-7476. Tappy L (1999) Metabolic effects of glucocorticoids: the unfinished story. Eur J Clin Invest 29 814-815. Tee MK, Lin D, Sugawara T, Holt JA, Guiguen Y, Buckingham B, Strauss JF, 3rd & Miller WL (1995) T—>A transversion 11 bp from a splice acceptor site in the human gene for steroidogenic acute regulatory protein causes congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia. Hum Mol Genet 4 2299-2305. Towbin H, Staehelin T & Gordon J (1979) Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl AcadSci USA76 4350-4354. Tsujishita Y & Hurley JH (2000) Structure and lipid transport mechanism of a StARrelated domain. Nat Struct Biol 7 408-414. Tuckey RC, Headlam MJ, Bose HS & Miller WL (2002) Transfer of cholesterol between phospholipid vesicles mediated by the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR). J Biol Chem 277 47123-47128. Vaidehi N, Floriano WB, Trabanino R, Hall SE, Freddolino P, Choi EJ, Zamanakos G & Goddard WA, 3rd (2002) Prediction of structure and function of G protein-coupled receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99 12622-12627. Venepally P & Waterman MR (1995) Two Spl-binding sites mediate cAMP-induced transcription of the bovine CYP11A gene through the protein kinase A signaling pathway. J Biol Chem 270 25402-25410. Verrey F (1998) Early aldosterone effects. Exp Nephrol 6 294-301. Wang CY & Wang YB (2006) [Advances in the study of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein]. Zhonghua Nan KeXue 12 733-736. Wang N, Ranalletta M, Matsuura F, Peng F & Tall AR (2006) LXR-induced redistribution of ABCG1 to plasma membrane in macrophages enhances cholesterol mass efflux to HDL. Arterioscler Thromb Vase Biol 26 1310-1316. 155 Wang X, Walsh LP & Stocco DM (1999) The role of arachidonic acid on LH-stimulated steroidogenesis and steroidogenic acute regulatory protein accumulation in MA-10 mouse Ley dig tumor cells. Endocrine 10 7-12. Watari H, Arakane F, Moog-Lutz C, Kallen CB, Tomasetto C, Gerton GL, Rio MC, Baker ME & Strauss JF, 3rd (1997) MLN64 contains a domain with homology to the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) that stimulates steroidogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA94 8462-8467. Watari H, Blanchette-Mackie EJ, Dwyer NK, Sun G, Glick JM, Patel S, Neufeld EB, Pentchev PG & Strauss JF, 3rd (2000) NPC1-containing compartment of human granulosa-lutein cells: a role in the intracellular trafficking of cholesterol supporting steroidogenesis. Exp Cell Res 255 56-66. Weisiger R, Gollan J & Ockner R (1981) Receptor for albumin on the liver cell surface may mediate uptake of fatty acids and other albumin-bound substances. Science 211 1048-1051. Wojcik-Gladysz A, Nowak KW, Pierzchala-Koziec K, Wankowska M, Misztal T, Polkowska J, Nowak M, Kaczmarek P, Gorska T, Szczepankiewicz D, et al. (2006) Aspects of central and peripheral regulation of reproduction in mammals. Reprod Biol 6 Suppl 1 89-103. Wooton-Kee CR & Clark BJ (2000) Steroidogenic factor-1 influences proteindeoxyribonucleic acid interactions within the cyclic adenosine 3,5-monophosphateresponsive regions of the murine steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene. Endocrinology 141 1345-1355. Yaworsky DC, Baker BY, Bose HS, Best KB, Jensen LB, Bell JD, Baldwin MA & Miller WL (2005) pH-dependent Interactions of the carboxyl-terminal helix of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein with synthetic membranes. J Biol Chem 280 2045-2054. Zager PG, Luetscher JA, Hsueh WA, Chavarri MR & Dowdy AJ (1979) Adrenocorticotropin-stimulated secretion of aldosterone and Cortisol, computed from plasma and red blood cell measurements. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 48 441-450. Zagrovic B, Jayachandran G, Millett IS, Doniach S & Pande VS (2005) How large is an alpha-helix? Studies of the radii of gyration of helical peptides by small-angle X-ray scattering and molecular dynamics. JMol Biol 353 232-241. Zannis VI, Chroni A & Krieger M (2006) Role of apoA-I, ABCA1, LCAT, and SR-BI in the biogenesis of HDL. JMol Med 84 276-294. Zazopoulos E, Lalli E, Stocco DM & Sassone-Corsi P (1997) DNA binding and transcriptional repression by DAX-1 blocks steroidogenesis. Nature 390 311-315. 156 Zee CS, Go JL, Kim PE, Mitchell D & Ahmadi J (2003) Imaging of the pituitary and parasellar region. Neurosurg Clin N Am 14 55-80, vi.