cancer in the past 12 months and a matched control
group of 30 women. Both samples will be studied
three times over a period of 2 years and will com-
plete self-report questionnaires and will be inter-
viewed. In addition, medical and demographic
information will be obtained from patient hospital
records. RESULTS: The results of this research
are based on two stages of analysis. At the first
stage, we conducted a qualitative analysis of the
180 interviews of both the study group and the con-
trol group at three times of measurement. In this
stage we content-coded responses and extracted 15
unique codes that reveal the effects of a diagnosis
of breast cancer on women’s self-concept and rela-
tional strivings. We are currently conducting a lon-
gitudinal quantative analysis of the data and these
findings will be ready for presentation at the time of
the conference. CONCLUSIONS: This research
reveals the profound impact of being diagnosed
with breast cancer on the self-concept of survivors.
This research is unique in the sense that it repre-
sents a prospective longitudinal study of women
diagnosed with breast cancer from the time of diag-
nosis up until 2 years later. Specifically, both the
qualititive and quantitative aspects of this research
are examined longitudinally and provide us with a
unique perspective on the possibility of personal
growth over time. RESEARCH IMPLICA-
TIONS: Most of the research on the psycho-social
aspects of breast cancer is based on cross-sectional
designs which do not provide an understanding of
how women’s coping strategies unfold over time
Today, when coping with cancer is understood as a
long-term process, it is imperative to continue to
examine psychosocial functioning beyond the time
frame of the current research, and to use both qual-
itative and quantitative measures to provide a
richer understanding of patient well-being. CLINI-
CAL IMPLICATIONS: This research will provide
the basis for the development of clinical interven-
tions designed to help women cope over time with
the diagnosis of breast cancer, and will inform clini-
cians on how to promote growth and an existential
sense of meaning in the face of severe adversity.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FUNDING: This
research was funded by a grant from the Israel Can-
cer Society.
P3-0422
Different Effects of Reflective Pondering and
Brooding on Depression Among Breast Cancer
Patients –The Mediating Role of Active Coping
Wen Yau Hsu, Ashley Wei-Ting Wang
Department of Psychology, National Chengchi
University, Taipei, Taiwan
BACKGROUND: In this study, we aim to clarify
the adaptive and maladaptive effects of different
types of cognitive processing (reflective pondering
and brooding) on depression among breast cancer
patients. We proposed a hypothesized model, in
which, controlling for T1 depression, brooding pre-
dicts depression directively, whereas reflective pon-
dering predicts lower level of depression through
the mediating of active coping. METHOD: A lon-
gitudinal study was conducted with 311 female
newly-diagnosed breast cancer patients at the third
month after the cancer surgery (T1) and 12 month
after the surgery (T2). The Hospital Anxiety and
Depression Scale (HADS) was used to assess
depression. The Ruminative Responses Scale-short
form (RRS-SF; Treynor, Gonzalez, & Nolen-
Hoeksema, 2003) was used to assess reflective pon-
dering and brooding. The Chinese version of the
brief COPE (Carver, 1997) was used to assess active
coping. The HADS and the RRS-SF were assessed
at both T1 and T2. The brief COPE (Carver, 1997)
were assessed at T2. RESULTS: According to the
criterion proposed by Ho and Bentler (1999), the
hypothesized models fit the data well (v
(616)2
/
df =2.13; CFI =0.95; RMSEA =0.061). Control-
ling for T1 depression, T1 brooding predicted T2
brooding (b=0.45; p<0.05), and T1 reflective
pondering predicted T2 reflective pondering
(b=0.70; p<0.05). T2 brooding predicted T2
depression (b=0.49; p<0.05), whereas T2 reflec-
tive pondering did not significantly predicts T2
depression (b=0.04). However, T2 reflective pon-
dering predicted T2 active coping (b=0.54;
p<0.05) and T2 active coping predicted T2 depres-
sion (b=0.37; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS:
Ruminative style has two aspects: reflective ponder-
ing and brooding (Treynor, Gonzalez, & Nolen-
Hoeksema, 2003). Brooding has maladaptive effects
(e.g., increase depressive level) on general popula-
tion and cancer patients. Although reflection is
thought to be associated with problem solving and
the promotion of mental health, the results have
shown that reflection does not always have an
adaptive effect on depression. Marroqu
ın, Fontes,
Scilletta, and Miranda (2010)argue that whether
reflective pondering is adaptive likely depends on
the active nature of the surrounding coping
response. The results supported that the adaptive
effect of reflective pondering is mediated by active
coping. RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS: With
regard to depression among cancer, reflective pon-
dering was associated with a lower level of depres-
sion through the full mediating of active coping;
brooding, with a higher level of depression. The
results indicate that reflective pondering per se does
not have an adaptive effect, but through improving
active coping, it has a adaptive effect on cancer
adaptation. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: To
improve life quality and reduce depressive mood
among cancer patients, two different types of
cognitive processing (reflective pondering and
brooding) should be differentiated. Interventions
that designed to reduce brooding and increase
©2014 The Authors. Psycho-Oncology ©2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Psycho-Oncology 23 (Suppl. 3): 338–417 (2014)
DOI: 10.1111/j.1099-1611.2014.3697
Poster Abstracts of the IPOS 16th World Congress 339