4
Katouzian, H., Ideology and Method in Economics, New York University Press, 1980, chapitres 1-4.
Brown, E.K., "The Neoclassical and Post-Keynesian Research Programs: The Methodological Issues", Review of Social Economy, Vol.
39, no. 2 (October, 1981), pp. 111-32.
Gill, F., "Some Methodological Implications of the Marginal Revolution", Australian Economic Papers, Vol. 20, no. 36 (June, 1981), pp.
72-82.
Blaug, M., La méthodologie économique, Paris: Economica, 1982, chapitres 1-2. [*]
Boland, L.A., The Foundations of Economic Method, London: George Allen & Unwin, 1982, chapitre 10.
Caldwell, B.J., Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century, London: George Allen & Unwin, 1982, chapitres
5-9.
Canterbery, E.R., et R.J. Burkhardt, "What Do We Mean by Asking Whether Economics is a Science?", Why Economics is Not Yet a
Science, A.S. Eichner (dir.), Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe Inc., 1983, pp. 15-40.
Dow, S.C., Macroeconomic Thought, A Methodological Approach, Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd., 1985, chapitre 2.
Mingat, A., P. Salmon, et A. Wolfelsperger, Méthologie économique, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1985.
Ahonen, G., "Paradigmatic Growth of Knowledge Explaining Responses to Criticism in Economics", Research in the History of
Economic Thought and Methodology, Vol. 4 (1986), pp. 251-82.
de Radkowski, G. H., Critique de l’axiomatique de la valeur, ou pour une véritable méthode en économique, Grenoble: Presses
Universitaires de Grenoble, 1987.
Pheby, J., Methodology and Economics: A Critical Introduction, London: Macmillan, 1988, chapitres 3-6.
Seccareccia, M., "The Realism of Assumptions and the Partial Interpretation View: A Comment", Philosophy of the Social Sciences,
Vol. 18, no. 4 (December, 1988), pp. 523-26.
Hirsch, A., et N. De Marchi, Milton Friedman, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1990, Part I.
Hamouda, O.F., et B.B. Price, Verification in Economics and History, London: Routledge, 1991, Chapitre 1.
Hausman, D.M., Essays on Philosophy and Economic Methodology, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Hausman, D.M., The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics, Cambridge University Press, 1992, Partie II.
Brochier, H., "L'économie et l'unité de la méthode scientifique", Économies et sociétés, Vol. 26, no. 8 (1992), pp. 59-72.
Argyrous, G., "Kuhn's Paradigms and Neoclassical Economics", Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 8, no. 2 (October, 1992), pp. 231-48.
Zouboulakis, M., La science économique à la recherche de ses fondements : la tradition épistémologique ricardienne, 1826 - 1891,
Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1993.
Nadeau, R., "Friedman et son discours de la méthode", Milton Friedman et son oeuvre, M. Lavoie et M. Seccareccia (dir.), Montréal:
Presses de l'Université de Montréal, 1993, pp. 131-50.
Meidinger, C., Science économique : questions de méthode, Paris: Librairie Vibert, 1994.
Redman, D.A., "Karl Popper's Theory of Science and Econometrics", Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 28, no. 1 (March, 1994), pp.
67-99.
Desjardins, D., "Réfutation et comparaison", Dialogue, Revue canadienne de philosophie, Vol. 34, no. 3 (été, 1995), pp. 561-80.
Voir aussi symposium dans la revue Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 12, no. 2 (October, 1996), pp. 183-220.
Lawson, T., Economics and Reality, London: Routledge, 1997.
Redman, D.A., The Rise of Political Economy as a Science: Methodology and the Classical Economists, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press,
1997, Partie II.
Lawson, T., “Economics as a Distinct Social Science? On the Nature, Scope and Method of Economics”, Économie appliquée, Vol 50
(1997), pp. 5-35.
Davis, J., D. Wade Hands, et U. Mäki (eds), The Handbook of Economic Methodology, Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, 1998.
Hausman, D.M., “Problems with Realism in Economics”, Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 14, no. 2 (October, 1998), pp. 185-213.
Fleetwood, S., Critical Realism in Economics: Development and Debate, London: Routledge, 1999.
Lawson, T., “What Has Realism Got to Do with It?”, Economics and Philiosophy, Vol. 15, no. 2 (October, 1999), pp. 269-88.
Jallais, S., et I. This-Saint-Jean, “L’économie néoclassique : le paradigme idéal de la science économique ?”, Économies et sociétés,
Vol. 34, no. 7 (juillet, 2000), pp. 133-45.
Fuller, S., Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
Kadvany, J., Imre Lakatos and the Guises of Reason, Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2001.
Peter, F., “Rhetoric vs Realism in Economic Methodology: A Critical Assessment”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 25, no. 5
(September, 2001), pp. 571-89.[*]
Dow, S.C., Economic Methodology: An Inquiry, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, chapitres 5-9.
(iii) Méthodologie de l'histoire de la pensée économique : 'relativisme' contre 'absolutisme'
Stigler, G.J., "The Influence of Events and Policies on Economic Theory", American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, Vol.
50, no. 2 (May, 1960), pp. 36-45.
Fetter, F.W., "The Relation of the History of Economic Thought to Economic History", American Economic Review, Papers and
Proceedings, Vol. 55, no. 2 (May, 1965), pp. 136-42.
Mitchell, W.C., "On the Study of Economic Classics", Types of Economic Theory, Vol.I, New York: Augustus M. Kelly Publishers, 1967,
pp. 1-34.
Spengler, J.J., "Exogenous and Endogenous Influences in the Formation of Post-1870 Economic Thought: A Sociology of Knowledge
Approach", Events, Ideology and Economic Theory, R. Eagly (dir.), Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1968, pp. 159-87.
Coats, A.W., "Is There a 'Structure of Scientific Revolutions' in Economics", Kyklos, Vol. 22 (1969), pp. 289-94.
Lutfalla, M., "Les cadres sociaux de la connaissance économique", L'année sociologique, Série 3, Vol. 20 (1969), pp. 61-75.
Bronfenbrenner, M., "The 'Structure of Revolutions' in Economic Thought", History of Political Economy, Vol. 3, no. 1 (Spring, 1971),
pp. 136-51. [*]
Stanfield, R., "Kuhnian Scientific Revolutions and the Keynesian Revolution", Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 8, no. 1 (March, 1974),
pp. 97-110.
De Vroey, M., "The Transition from Classical to Neoclassical Economics: A Scientific Revolution", The Methodology of Economic
Thought, W.J. Samuels (dir.), New Brunswick, N.J.: Transactions Books, 1980, pp. 297-321.
Blaug, M., La pensée économique : origine et développement, Paris: Economica, 1981, chapitre 16. [*]
Tarascio, V.J., "The Crisis in Economic Theory: A Sociological Perspective", Research in the History of Economic Thought and
Methodology, Vol. 4 (1986), pp. 283-95.
Blaug, M., "On the Historiography of Economics", Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 12, no. 1 (1990), pp. 27-37.
Backhouse, R.E., "Vision and Progress in Economic Thought: Schumpeter after Kuhn", Joseph A. Schumpeter, Historian of Economics,
L.S. Moss (dir.), London: Routledge, 1996, pp. 21-32.
Cot, A.L., and J. Lallement, "The Historiography of Economics: A Methodological Approach", Joseph A. Schumpeter, Historian of
Economics, L.S. Moss (dir.), London: Routledge, 1996, pp. 44-59.