www.dlapiper.com | 03
INTRODUCTION
UNICEF is committed to helping companies and governments adopt best practice in relation to all aspects of children’s
rights. This includes both the ways in which products and services are marketed and advertised to children and the
use of children in advertising or marketing, and ultimately extends to any related laws, policies or practices that impact
children as consumers.
The objective of the ‘Advertising and Marketing to Children’ project is to capture as much information as possible
about the regulatory framework within which companies and their marketing and advertising agencies operate.
This is both from a legislative perspective and where voluntary codes apply.
DLA Piper has been commissioned by UNICEF to conduct research across thirty seven jurisdictions and to produce
this report which has been done with the support of UNICEF, lawyers from DLA Piper ofces and associate rms
around the world.
DLA Piper’s involvement in this project forms part of the partnership between DLA Piper and UNICEF which to the
end of September 2016 has seen the rm undertake over 13,000 hours of pro bono assistance to an estimated value of
some £3.3 million towards UNICEF’s global child justice programme.
This report is the result of an analysis of the regulatory framework with respect to advertising and marketing to
children in the following jurisdictions:
1. Argentina;
2. Australia;
3. Austria;
4. Belgium;
5. Brazil;
6. Canada;
7. Chile;
8. China;
9. Colombia;
10. Denmark;
11. Ecu ador;
12. European Union;
13. France;
14. Germany;
15. Ghana;
16. Hong Kong;
17. India;
18. Indonesia;
19. Italy;
20. Japan;
21. Jordan;
22. Kenya;
23. Myanmar;
24. Netherlands;
25. Pakistan;
26. Poland;
27. Qatar;
28. Russia;
29. Saudi Arabia;
30. Spain;
31. Sweden;
32. Switzerland;
33. Thailand;
34. United Arab Emirates;
35. United Kingdom;
36. United States of
America; and
37. Zambia.
The report demonstrates the diversity of legislative and self-regulatory frameworks that govern advertising and
marketing to children internationally. There are also commonalities across the jurisdictions covered. The executive
summary explores the themes and patterns that emerge from this initial analysis, both in terms of best practice and
areas that require a strengthened regime and a greater focus. The full research table in relation to each jurisdiction
covered in this research stage are included as appendices to this report. We would like to thank all our contributors
for their assistance and commitment in helping us to complete the report.
We have tried to make the report as comprehensive as possible but it should not be regarded as exhaustive.
Ourresearchers, whose names and contact details are listed at the end of the report, have endeavoured to access
the most up to date versions of legislation but this has not always been possible. In some jurisdictions, DLA Piper has
conducted online research which has been reviewed by local counsel; in the case of Saudi Arabia, this local review
has not yet been completed. As such this publication is intended and should be understood as a general overview and
should not be relied on or used as a substitute for taking legal advice in any specic situation. DLA Piper UK LLP will
accept no responsibility for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this publication.
Copyright © 2016 DLA Piper UK LLP. All rights reserved.