
NosoVeille – Bulletin de veille juin 2010
CCLIN Sud-Est – cclinse@chu-lyon.fr 5 / 30
Cathétérisme
NosoBase n° 27248
Efficacité et tolérance de la daptomycine dans le traitement des bactériémies à pathogènes à Gram
positif liées aux cathéters chez des patients atteints de cancer
Chaftari AM; Hachem R; Mulanovich V; Chemaly RF; Adachi J; Jacobson K; et al. Efficacy and safety of
daptomycin in the treatment of Gram-positive catheter-related bloodstream infections in cancer patients.
International journal of antimicrobial agents 2010; in press: 5 pages.
Mots-clés : DAPTOMYCINE; EFFICACITE; TOLERANCE; BACTERIEMIE; BACTERIE A GRAM POSITIF;
CATHETER; CANCER; VANCOMYCINE; ANTIBIORESISTANCE; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;
METICILLINO-RESISTANCE; ETUDE PROSPECTIVE
Excessive vancomycin usage has contributed to the emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and a
high vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) >1.0mug/mL has been associated with poor
outcome in patients with meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. In view of these
limitations, there is a need for an alternative agent. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of
daptomycin given as an alternative agent in the treatment of Gram-positive catheter-related bloodstream
infections (CRBSIs) in cancer patients. Between June 2006 and March 2008, 40 patients with probable or
definite CRBSI caused by Gram-positive organisms were prospectively enrolled to receive daptomycin
intravenous 6mg/kg/day for up to 4 weeks. In addition, 40 historical matched control patients treated with
vancomycin were retrospectively identified. The control group was matched based on underlying disease,
organism and neutropenic status. The daptomycin group was comparable with the vancomycin group in
terms of neutropenia rate, complications, adverse events, length of hospital stay and death. However, more
patients in the daptomycin group achieved symptom resolution at 48h compared with the vancomycin group
(76% vs. 53%; P=0.04). Similarly, more patients in the daptomycin group achieved microbiological
eradication at 48h compared with the vancomycin group (78% vs. 34%; P<0.001). Although not significant,
nephrotoxicity was almost three-fold lower in the daptomycin group. The overall response was significantly
better for daptomycin compared with vancomycin (68% vs. 32%; P=0.003). In conclusion, compared with
vancomycin, daptomycin treatment of Gram-positive CRBSI in cancer patients was significantly associated
with earlier clinical and microbiological response as well as improved overall response.
NosoBase n° 27234
Désinfection cutanée à l'aide de chlorhydrate d'octénidine pour le site d'insertion du cathéter
veineux central : essai contrôlé, randomisé, en double aveugle
Dettenkofer M; Wilson C; Gratwohl A; Schmoor C; Bertz H; Frei R; et al. Skin disinfection with octenidine
dihydrochloride for central venous catheter site care: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Clinical
microbiology and infection 2010/06; 16(6): 600-606.
Mots-clés : PEAU; CATHETER VEINEUX CENTRAL; ANTISEPTIQUE; ESSAI THERAPEUTIQUE;
ALCOOL; BACTERIEMIE; COLONISATION CUTANEE; PREVENTION; RANDOMISATION
To compare the efficacy of two commercially available, alcohol-based antiseptic solutions for preparation
and care of central venous catheter (CVC) insertion sites, with and without octenidine dihydrochloride, a
double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was undertaken in the haematology units and in one surgical unit
of two university hospitals. Adult patients with a non-tunnelled CVC were randomly assigned to two different
skin disinfection regimens at the insertion site: 0.1% octenidine with 30% 1-propanol and 45% 2-propanol,
and as control 74% ethanol with 10% 2-propanol. Endpoints were (i) skin colonization at the insertion site;
(ii) positive culture from the catheter tip (>/=15 CFU); and (iii) occurrence of CVC-associated bloodstream
infection (defined according to criteria set by the CDC). Four hundred patients with inserted CVC were
enrolled from May 2002 through April 2005. Both groups were similar in respect of patient characteristics
and co-morbidities. Skin colonization at the CVC insertion site during the first 10 days was significantly
reduced by octenidine treatment (relative difference octenidine vs. control: 0.21; 95%CI: 0.11-0.39, p
<0.0001). Positive culture of the catheter tip was significantly less frequent in the octenidine group (7.9%)
than in the control group (17.8%): OR = 0.39 (95%CI: 0.20-0.80, p 0.009). Patients treated with octenidine
had a non-significant reduction in catheter-associated bloodstream infections (4.1% vs. 8.3%; OR = 0.44;