JWBT1404-c11 JWBT1404-Brannan February 4, 2015 17:50
11-4 Chapter 11 Elementary Partial Differential Equations
The Method of Separation of Variables
The heat conduction problem (1), (3), (4) is linear since uappears only to the first power
throughout. The differential equation and boundary conditions are also homogeneous.This
suggests that we might approach the problem by seeking solutions of the differential equa-
tion and boundary conditions, and then superposing them to satisfy the initial condition.
The remainder of this section describes how this plan can be implemented.
One solution of the differential equation (1) that satisfies the boundary conditions (4)
is the function u(x,t)=0, but this solution does not satisfy the initial condition (3) except
in the trivial case in which f(x) is also zero. Thus our goal is to find other, nonzero solu-
tions of the differential equation and boundary conditions. To find the needed solutions, we
start by making a basic assumption about the form of the solutions that has far-reaching,
and perhaps unforeseen, consequences. The assumption is that u(x,t) is a product of two
functions, one depending only on xand the other depending only on t; thus
u(x,t)=X(x)T(t).(5)
Substituting from Eq. (5) for uin the differential equation (1) yields
𝛼2X′′T=XT′,(6)
where primes refer to ordinary differentiation with respect to the independent variable,
whether xor t. Equation (6) is equivalent to
X′′
X=1
𝛼2
T′
T,(7)
in which the variables are separated; that is, the left side depends only on xand the right
side only on t.
It is now crucial to realize that for Eq. (7) to be valid for 0 <x<L,t>0, it is necessary
that both sides of Eq. (7) must be equal to the same constant. Otherwise, if one independent
variable (say, x) were kept fixed and the other were allowed to vary, one side (the left in this
case) of Eq. (7) would remain unchanged while the other varied, thus violating the equality.
If we call this separation constant −λ, then Eq. (7) becomes
X′′
X=1
𝛼2
T′
T=−λ.(8)
Hence we obtain the following two ordinary differential equations for X(x) and T(t):
X′′ +λX=0, (9)
T′+𝛼2λT=0.(10)
We denote the separation constant by −λ (rather than λ) because it turns out that it must be
negative, and it is convenient to exhibit the minus sign explicitly.
The assumption (5) has led to the replacement of the partial differential equation (1)
by the two ordinary differential equations (9) and (10). Each of these equations is linear
and homogeneous, with constant coefficients, and so can be readily solved for any value
of λ. The product of two solutions of Eq. (9) and (10), respectively, provides a solution of
the partial differential equation (1). However we are interested only in those solutions of
Eq. (1) that also satisfy the boundary conditions (4). As we now show, this severely restricts
the possible values of λ.