4
Preface
Schizophrenia is recognised as one of the most complex mental health disorders, entwined in both misconceptions
and truth. Historically, those diagnosed with schizophrenia have been subjects of both fear and admiration, with
their lives often marked by signicant challenges, including early mortality. Nonetheless, individuals like Swedish
musician Ted Gärdestad, mathematician John Nash, and writer Zelda Fitzgerald have made remarkable contributions
in elds such as art, music, mathematics, and science, demonstrating exceptional talent amidst their struggles.
During my time at university, a friend shared his experiences with psychotic episodes — tumultuous journeys
often culminating in disaster, and the vital role mental health professionals played in his recovery. This period
coincided with Sweden’s phasing out of its last mental health institutions, a move debated sparingly at the time.
We now understand that deinstitutionalisation, often executed without adequate alternative care, led to severe
consequences for many. Although care standards have improved, people with schizophrenia still face a reduced
life expectancy, emphasising the need to address their specic requirements in mental health care and policy
discussions.
First published in 2014, this report arose during an era when mental health was perceived as a static eld. More
recently, I’ve observed a revival in the importance of mental health policy, largely driven by the onset of COVID-19
and an increasing awareness of the interconnection between mental and physical health. This has propelled
mental health on the policy agenda. Organisations like the EU and WHO, along with various countries, now regard
mental health care as a priority. The realisation that mental health challenges can aect anyone, together with the
acknowledgment of the advantages of mental health awareness in the workplace and the clear link between mental
and physical well-being, has fuelled this positive shift in policy.
However, amidst these broader changes in mental health policy, there’s a risk that the distinct needs of those with
severe mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia, might be overshadowed. We all acknowledge the benets, both
individual and societal, of addressing mental health through legislation and guidelines. The question remains: does
this eort adequately cover the requirements of severe mental illnesses? The approach undoubtedly requires more
complexity. It needs to be comprehensive, encompassing policy formulation, treatment guidelines, and scientic
innovation, all working together to facilitate real advancement.
The authors of the original report played a pivotal role in raising the prole of mental health in policy discussions.
I express my profound gratitude to them and to the 13 authors of this latest version. Their exceptional expertise in
mental health, particularly in schizophrenia, oers invaluable insights into advancements in science, healthcare, and
policy. Their dedication and empathy have been evident throughout the development of this report.
Innovation in neuroscience, especially in drug research and development, continues to be a challenging and
intricate eld. We are grateful to organisations like Lundbeck and Bohringer Ingelheim for not only sustaining their
interest in advancing this area but also providing independent educational grants to promote knowledge in this
eld. These contributions have been essential in facilitating the creation of this report.
This report delves into the specic needs of people with schizophrenia, exploring supportive measures for their
welfare. While it may be too late for some, like my university friend, it’s never too late to initiate change. This is
highlighted by our practical and achievable recommendations for change. Our message to all nations, policy makers,
payers, and healthcare professionals is unequivocal: aim for excellence, but most importantly – start somewhere!
Kajsa Wilhelmsson, LLM and MSc
Acting Director, Oxford Health Policy Forum CIC.