Telechargé par sedlam06

analgesicscreeeningmodel-150119013834-conversion-gate02

publicité
PHARMACOLOGICAL SCREENING OF
ANALGESIC AGENTS
Presented by :
CHAITRA. N
1st year M-Pharm
Dept.of Pharmacology
PESCP,Bangalore
CONTENTS
Introduction.
Mechanism of Action.
Classification.
Screening techniques.
 In vivo.
 In vitro.
References.
INTRODUCTION
 Pain is a complex unpleasant phenomenon composed
of sensory experiences that include time, space,
intensity, emotion, cognition and motivation.
 An analgesic or painkiller is any member of the
group of drugs used to achieve analgesia — relief
from pain.
 Analgesics is defined as the are agents which
selectively relieve pain by acting in the CNS or by
peripheral pain mechanisms without significantly
CLASSIFICATION
Analgesics are classified as :
 Narcotics
Ex. Morphine, Pethadine,
Fentanyl
 Non-narcotics
Ex. NSAID
MECHANISM OF ACTION
 Analgesic drugs act in various ways on
the peripheral and central nervous systems.
 Opioids produce analgesia by binding to specific
G – protein coupled receptors in brain and spinal
cord.
 NSAIDs inhibit the activity of
both cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and
cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and thereby the
synthesis of prostaglandins and thromboxanes.
SCREENING
MODELS
IN VIVO MODELS
 Pain - state models using Thermal stimuli.


* Tail - flick model using radiant heat.
* Hot - plate test.
* Paw - withdrawal test.
Pain - state models using Electrical stimuli.
* Electrical stimulation of the tail.
* Grid - shock test.
* Stimulation of the limbs.
Pain - state models using Chemical stimuli.
* Formalin test.
* Acetic acid induced writhing test.
IN VITRO MODELS
 3H-Naloxone binding assay.
 3H-Dihydromorphine binding to 𝜇 opiate receptors
in rat brain.

Receptor binding of nociceptin.

Bioassays for nociceptin.

Receptor binding of cannabinoids.

Vanilloid receptor binding.
IN VIVO
MODELS
HOT – PLATE TEST
Purpose and rationale
 The paws of mice and rats are sensitive to heat at
temperatures which are not damaging to skin.
 The responses are jumping, withdrawal of the
paws and licking of the paws.
 The responses is prolonged after administration
of centrally acting analgesics, whereas peripheral
analgesics of the acetylsalicylic acid or phenylacetic acid type do not generally affect these
Procedure
Groups of 10 mice (18-22g) are selected and
divided into standard,
test & control group respectively
The temperature of the hot plate is maintained at 55° to 56°C.
The animals are placed on the hot plate & time
until either
licking or jumping occurs is recorded.
The latency is recorded before & after 20,
60 and 90 min after the administration of
standard or test compound.
Evaluation
 The prolongation of latency time between the
test, standard and control animals are
compared.
 Using various doses ED50 values can be
calculated.
TAIL FLICK MODEL
Purpose and rationale
 The tail flick test with radiant heat is an
simplified method.
 The application of thermal radiation to the tail
of an animal provokes the withdrawal of tail.
 The morphine like drugs are capable of
prolonging the reaction time.
Procedure
Wistar rats (170-210g) are selected
and divided into
standard, test & control group
respectively temperature is
Appropriate
maintained on
the radiant source
The tail of the rat is placed on the radiant
source & time
taken for the rat to withdraw its tail is
recorded.
Usually withdrawal time is within 2-10s
The Tail-flick latency is recorded
before & after the
administration of standard or test
compound.
Evaluation
 The tail flick latency in the test,
standard and control animals are
compared.
 Using various doses ED50 values can
be calculated.
GRID - SHOCK TEST
Purpose and rationale
 The electric grid shock test in mice has been
described by
Blake et al.
 The analgesic properties of drugs like
Morphine, Acetylsalicylic acid can be
measured by the Flinch – jump response of
Procedure
Male mice (18-20g) are selected and
placed
individually in plastic chamber.
The floor of the box is wired with
stainless
steel wire.
The stimulus is given in the form of
square wave
pulses ( 30 cycles per
The
second).
output of stimulator is
connected to alternate
wires of grid.
The fixed resistance is placed with the
grid & parallel to an oscilloscope to allow
calibration in milliamperes.
With increase in shock intensities the
mice flinch, exhibit startling reaction &
increase locomotion or
attempt to jump.
The behavior is accurately
reflected on the oscilloscope by
marked fluctuations of the
displayed pulse.
Pain thresholds are determined in
each individual mouse twice before &
after the administration of
the test drug.
Evaluation
 The current measured in milliamperes is
recorded for each animal before and after
administration of the drug.
 The average pain threshold values for each
group at each time interval are calculated and
statistically compared with the control values.
WRITHING TESTS
Purpose and rationale
 Pain is induced by injecting irritants like
acetic acid into peritoneal cavity of mice.
 The animals react with characteristic
stretching behavior which is writhing.
 The test is suitable to detect analgesic
activity of peripherally acting drugs.
Procedure
Mice (20-25g) are selected and divided
into standard, test & control group
respectively
Appropriate volume of acetic acid
solution is administered to the mice
(control group) and placed
individually in the glass jar.
The onset of writhing, abdominal
contractions &
trunk twist response are recorded for 10
min.
The test and standard drug is
administered 15 min prior to the
acetic acid administration.
Evaluation
 The writhing period is recorded and
compared with the control group.
 Writhing response in the drug treated
must be less when compared to the
acetic acid treated control.
IN VITRO
MODELS
BIOASSAYS FOR NOCICEPTIN
Purpose and rationale
Nociceptin receptors in the periphery can be
characterized by studies in isolated organs (Guerrini et
al. 1998; Bigoni et al. 1999): the guinea pig ileum
according to Paton (1957), the mouse vas deferens
according
to Hughes et al. (1975), the rabbit vas deferens
Procedure
Tissues are taken from male Swiss mice, guinea pigs,
Sprague Dawley rats &
New Zealand albino rabbit.
Suspended in 10 ml organ baths containing Krebs
solution oxygenated
with 95% O2 & 5% CO2.
Temperature is set around 33°-35°C & a resting
tension of 0.3-1g is
applied.
The tissues are stimulated through two platinum ring ele
The electrically evoked contractions are measured
isotonically with a strain
gauge transducer and recorded on a
After equilibration period of about 60 min the contractions
induced by electrical field stimulation are stable; at this
time, cumulative concentration response curves
to nociceptin or opioid peptides are performed.
Four electrical field stimulation are performed
with each tissue
at 30 min intervals.
Agonists & Antagonists are added
to the bath.
Contractile responses to electrical field stimulation
are expressed as
% increment to the spontaneous activity of
tissue. effects of the application of agonists or
Thethe
biological
antagonists are expressed as % inhibition of electrical
filed stimulation-induced contraction.
Evaluation
 The agonists and antagonists
potencies are recorded and expressed
as means of ±SEM.
REFERENCES
Drug screening methods – SK Gupta.
 Essentials of Medical Pharmacology - Tripathi
K.D.
Drug Discovery and Evaluation - H. Gerhard
Vogel.
International Research Journal Of Pharmacy.
Téléchargement