
Right: a crucible from 
the metal-processing 
workshop.
Below: photo-
grammetric image of 
the metal-processing 
workshop.
Photo: G. Pollin
Photo: L. Mazou
showed the presence of cellars in a narrow 
passage, containing cooking ceramics with 
animal residues and amphorae buried in the 
oor. These nds suggest that the building also 
provided storage space, as in phase 2.
It is conceivable that the area was used for 
storage (or other economic functions) in both 
phase 2 and phase 4, though evidence for the 
later period is insufficient for a definitive 
conclusion. But a large amount of both Egyptian 
and imported amphorae from the western 
and eastern Mediterranean (Tunisia; Tripolitania 
in modern-day Libya, Cilicia, Pamphylia and 
Knidos, all in modern-day Turkey; Crete; Gaza) 
during phases 2 to 4 found around this area 
could support this hypothesis.
In the eastern part of sector P18, a metal 
processing workshop was discovered in 
2017–18 (images below). Its various levels 
correspond to the working stages of such a 
facility, containing beads and copper drops, 
thick layers of ash, rejects and many crucible 
fragments, terracotta moulds and smelting 
waste. Again, while there is no definitive 
evidence, the production of copper objects 
might have been linked to the storage facility 
in the same area – producing, for example, 
tools, locks and bolts, or seals.
Conclusions
If the area served as a storage facility during 
phases 2 and 4, its mode seems to have evolved 
from bulk storage to storage in amphorae and 
small underground spaces. These changes might 
indicate a parallel change of the neighbourhood, 
evolving from a single, large storage structure 
into a residential area with individual food stocks.
It is hard to tell whether the storage facility 
belonged to the state or a private owner, and 
whether grains were distributed for local 
consumption or for trade (short or long 
distance?). Its location certainly is surprising, 
as it is far from the transport facilities in the 
lower parts of the city. However, it does seem 
safe to conclude that a storage facility continued 
to operate at this spot over an extended 
period, as attested by the great number of 
Egyptian and imported amphorae. The arrival 
of amphorae from across the Mediterranean 
during phases 2 to 4 is remarkable, reafrming 
Buto’s place in the distribution network of 
imported foodstuffs.
36
• Pascale Ballet (Paris Nanterre University, 
ArScAn) has directed the University of Paris 
Nanterre mission at Buto since 2001. Loïc Mazou 
(Poitiers University, HeRMA) has conducted 
excavation in the center of kom A since 2014. 
Others sectors have been excavated by G. 
Marouard, M. Pithon, G. Lecuyot, B. Redon and 
R. Séguier, with J. Marchand, M. Pesenti, R. 
Reimann and A. Simony as ceramicists. The team 
of the University of Paris Nanterre works through 
the concession of the German Archaeological 
Institute (DAI), with the support of the French 
Foreign Ofce and Ifao (Cairo).
Further reading on Buto:
Surveys and excavations 2001–06: P. Ballet 
et al., Tell el-Fara‘în–Buto VI (Archäologische 
Veröffentlichungen 110; in press).
Post-2007 excavations: G. Marouard and M. 
Pithon (Ptolemaic quarter), G. Lecuyot and 
B. Redon (bath complex rst excavated by 
the EES in the 1960s), EA 40 (2012).
For surveying and mapping on kom A in 
2010–12: G. Marouard, MDAIK (forthcoming).
Several preliminary reports of the results can 
be found in MDAIK 59, 63, 65 and BIFAO 111.