
Thomas C. Holt looks at DuBois’ ideas over the course of his life, noting his shift from conservatism to 
Marxism and socialism, from writing on Black people as “an alien people” to writing on the 
systematic alienation of Black people in the U.S. To DuBois, alienation is material, cultural, and 
spiritual. DuBois emphasizes the economic base of this alienation, the way in which Black people in 
the U.S. are the builders of the economic infrastructure, yet dispossessed of its fruits. The worth of 
Black labour and craft is undermined. He writes on the ways Black people are creators of one of a 
truly original native culture, yet culturally demeaned. He also speaks to the ways Black Americans are 
adherents to the nation’s basic ideals and values, yet shunned, abused, and stigmatized. In this shift 
of ideologies, DuBois writes of the responsibility of the Black intellectual, the choice between 
assimilation or affirmation of racial solidarity, similar in essence to Fanon. He was also influenced by 
Freud, writing of the unconscious and irrational nature of oppression. Similar to Gandhi, diverging 
from Fanon and Marx, DuBois spoke frequently of his commitment to non-violence. He also 
emphasizes self-recognition as the basis for action and struggle, aligned with Marx’s class 
consciousness and Fanon’s national consciousness. He writes that alienation, raised to the conscious 
level, cultivated, and directed, has revolutionary potential. This is also aligned with his concept of 
second-sight as a result of systematic oppression and alienation, yet a key tool for the revolution. As 
DuBois developed an analysis of capitalism through Marx recentered around systematic racism and 
disenfranchisement of Black Americans, he began to push for a Black separatist economy. He wrote 
that there is no automatic power in socialism to override and suppress race prejudice, that American 
capitalism produced a kind of labour aristocracy built on a mud-sill of Black labour. He advocated for 
Black power through the consolidation and solidarity of capital. He shifted the talented tenth from a 
method to access privilege to a revolutionary vanguard. Holt argues that DuBois did not, however, 
foresee the rise of a Black labour aristocracy whose interests and values diverged from the Black 
working class. This can be compared to Fanon.