Thomas C. Holt looks at DuBois’ ideas over the course of his life, noting his shift from conservatism to
Marxism and socialism, from writing on Black people as “an alien people” to writing on the
systematic alienation of Black people in the U.S. To DuBois, alienation is material, cultural, and
spiritual. DuBois emphasizes the economic base of this alienation, the way in which Black people in
the U.S. are the builders of the economic infrastructure, yet dispossessed of its fruits. The worth of
Black labour and craft is undermined. He writes on the ways Black people are creators of one of a
truly original native culture, yet culturally demeaned. He also speaks to the ways Black Americans are
adherents to the nation’s basic ideals and values, yet shunned, abused, and stigmatized. In this shift
of ideologies, DuBois writes of the responsibility of the Black intellectual, the choice between
assimilation or affirmation of racial solidarity, similar in essence to Fanon. He was also influenced by
Freud, writing of the unconscious and irrational nature of oppression. Similar to Gandhi, diverging
from Fanon and Marx, DuBois spoke frequently of his commitment to non-violence. He also
emphasizes self-recognition as the basis for action and struggle, aligned with Marx’s class
consciousness and Fanon’s national consciousness. He writes that alienation, raised to the conscious
level, cultivated, and directed, has revolutionary potential. This is also aligned with his concept of
second-sight as a result of systematic oppression and alienation, yet a key tool for the revolution. As
DuBois developed an analysis of capitalism through Marx recentered around systematic racism and
disenfranchisement of Black Americans, he began to push for a Black separatist economy. He wrote
that there is no automatic power in socialism to override and suppress race prejudice, that American
capitalism produced a kind of labour aristocracy built on a mud-sill of Black labour. He advocated for
Black power through the consolidation and solidarity of capital. He shifted the talented tenth from a
method to access privilege to a revolutionary vanguard. Holt argues that DuBois did not, however,
foresee the rise of a Black labour aristocracy whose interests and values diverged from the Black
working class. This can be compared to Fanon.