
leachates (Lesage et al., 1990; Denovan and Strand, 1992; Lesage et al., 1992) and laboratory 
municipal waste digesters (Deipser and Stegmann, 1994; Deipser and Stegmann, 1997; 
Deipser, 1998), enzymatic reductive dechlorination of CFC-113 was observed leading to the 
formation of HCFC-123a, chlorotrifluoroethene (CTFE), and two isomers of HCFC-133. 
The reductive dehalogenation of the HCFCs has received less attention. HCFC-21 and HCFC-
123 were reported to be enzymatically dechlorinated under anaerobic conditions in freshwater 
and salt marsh sediments (Oremland et al., 1996). A disruption of fluorine-carbon bonds 
under environmental conditions has not been observed so far neither in CFCs nor in HCFCs 
(Key et al., 1997). No data on dehalogenation of HFC-134a, HCFC-141b, HCFC-142b which 
are currently in use as replacement products for CFCs, are reported. Also, no comparative 
study has been reported so far on the dehalogenation of CFCs relative to HCFCs.  
Two major processes determine the fate of (H)CFCs in groundwater: volatilization and 
biodegradation. A parallel study showed the importance of water table fluctuations on the 
volatilization of these compounds from the saturated zone (Werner and Höhener, 2002). This 
process can represent a non negligible contribution to the removal of (H)CFC’s from 
groundwater. 
The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential reductive dehalogenation of the 
nine most widely used CFCs and HCFCs in a methanogenic enrichment culture from sewage 
sludge. The compounds were chosen from the production data (see Fig.1) published by the 
Alternative Fluorocarbons Environmental Acceptability Study (AFEAS), an association of the 
leading manufacturers of CFCs and HCFCs. 
 
Materials and methods  
Chemicals 
(Hydro)chlorofluorocarbons CFC-11, CFC-12, CFC-114, HCFC-21, HCFC-22, HCFC-142b 
and  HFC-134a were obtained from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland) in the highest available 
purity. CFC-113 was obtained from Merck (Dietikon, Switzerland). HCFC-141b was 
obtained from Prochimac SA (Neuchâtel, Switzerland). CFC-115 was obtained from a 
refrigeration system (unknown manufacturer).  The relevant physical-chemical properties of 
the compounds are given in Table 1. All water used was distilled and was 18 megaohm 
resistance or greater. 
 
Table 1: Chemical properties, industrial use and experimental parameters of the CFCs and 
HCFCs used in this study. 
 
Short Name  Use1) Henry GC  Initial 
name   coefficient retention concentration 
    
[mol/l*atm] time [min]  in solution [nM] 
CFC-11  Trichlorofluoromethane  R, I, A  0.01042) 4.18 365 
CFC-12  Dichlorodifluoromethane  R, I, A  0.002912) 2.19 371 
HCFC-21 Dichlorofluoromethane  -  0.08443) 4.09 4540 
HCFC-22 Chlorodifluoromethane  R  0.03194) 2.13 2540 
CFC-113 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane S  0.0024) 8.40 99 
CFC-114 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane A  0.000834) 3.23 80 
CFC-115 Chloropentafluoroethane  R  0.000384) 1.93 89 
HFC-134a 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane  R  0.025) 2.42 1780 
HCFC-141b  1,1-Dichloro-1-fluoroethane  I, A, S  0.00796) 7.80 2257 
HCFC-142b 1-Chloro-1,1-difluoroethane  I  0.0146) 3.40 2500 
1) Refrigerant; I: Insulation foam; A: Aerosol; S: Solvent; 2) Warner and Weiss, 1985; 3) VP/WSOL; 
4) Yaws et al., 1991; 5) Chang and Criddle, 1995; 6) Kanakidou et al., 1995. 
3