
CELL TRANSFORMATION AND SUSCEPTIBILITY TO PARVOVIRUSES
ical states can lead to the arrest of the parvoviral life cycle at
different steps, both on the surface and on the inside of the cell
(32). Therefore, there appear to be multiple conditional host
factors which determine permissiveness to parvoviruses. It fol
lows that the specific abortive interaction reported here for
diploid human fibroblasts cannot be necessarily generalized to
other cell types.
Induction of 11-1 Sensitivity by SV40 Transformation
The acquisition of permissiveness to H-l replication by SV40
transformants correlated with their sensitization to parvoviral
lytic action. H-l inocula which had little effect on the growth
of normal cultures caused a progressive degeneration of trans
formed derivatives. Thus, the preferential killing of transformed
cells is likely to result from their propensity to replicate H-l
rather than their lower resistance to its cytopathic effect. A
similar sensitization of SV40 transformants to the autonomous
parvovirus MVM was reported previously for mouse cells which
had been selected in vitro for their resistance to this virus (8).
Therefore, SV40 transformation overcomes both natural and
selected cellular protections against parvoviral attack.
The enhanced susceptibility of SV40 transformants to H-l
infection does not require their establishment into a permanent
culture. Thus, SV40 transformation appears to act directly and
not merely by facilitating cell immortalization. Since the expres
sion of the SV40 genome in transformants is restricted to the
early region-encoding T-antigens (33), the latter protein(s) is
likely to mediate sensitization to H-l. Large T-antigen is known
to activate cellular gene expression (33, 34). As stated above,
cell permissiveness to parvoviruses involves host functions,
some of which are not permanently expressed and might con
ceivably be induced by SV40. On the other hand, a direct
interaction between the H-l genome and SV40 T-antigen(s)
might also potentiate H-l replication. Another tumor virus,
adenovirus, was found to provide helper functions to H-l in
coinfected human cells (35) and encodes a tumor antigen which
could possibly interact directly with the DNA of the defective
parvovirus adeno-associated virus (7). Whatever mechanism it
involves, sensitization to H-l is apparently not specific for
tumor virus-transformed cells. Indeed we have recently ex
tended the present observation to human diploid fibroblasts
transformed by 7-irradiation (36). Nonvirally transformed cells
therefore appear to supply helper functions similar to those
encoded or induced by SV40.
Altogether, our data point to a positive interrelation between
two complex cellular phenotypes each composed of multiple
components, i.e., permissiveness to autonomous parvoviruses
and /// vitro malignant transformation. This result raises two
intriguing possibilities, (a) The lytic life cycle of parvoviruses
may provide specific markers for cell transformation. We report
here that SV40 transformation bypasses a limitation to H-l
DNA replication. In contrast, a postreplicative step of the
growth of parvovirus MVM was found to be stimulated as a
result of the transformation of rat cells with the retrovirus avian
erythroblastosis virus (37). An interesting issue is whether the
overcoming of distinct barriers to parvovirus replication re
quires the expression of different transformation traits, (b) The
suppresion of cancer development by autonomous parvoviruses
may result, at least in part, from oncolysis. The preferential
cytolytic replication of autonomous parvoviruses in trans
formed cells accounts for the ability of these viruses to specifi
cally inhibit in vitro malignant transformation (8). Whether
cancer cells provide a similar target for destruction by parvo
viruses in vivo remains to be determined.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are greatly indebted to Drs. A. van der Eb and B. Klein
for their generous gift of VH-10 and derived cells, to C. Kumps for
technical assistance, and to Dr. P. Tattersall for critical reading of the
manuscript. Some human mutant cells were kindly provided by Drs. C.
Arieti, A. Lehmann, and D. Bootsma.
REFERENCES
1. Tattersall, P., and Ward, D. The parvoviruses: an introduction. In: D. C.
Ward and P. Tattersall (eds.), Replication of Mammalian Parvoviruses, pp.
3-12. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Publisher,
1978.
2. Cukor, G., Blacklow, N. R., Hoggan, D., and Berns, K. I. Biology of adeno-
associated virus. In: K. I. Berns (ed.). The Parvoviruses, pp. 33-36. New
York: Plenum Publishing Corp., 1984.
3. Siegl, G. Biology of pathogenicity of autonomous parvoviruses. In: K. I.
Berns (ed.). The Parvoviruses, pp. 297-362. New York: Plenum Publishing
Corp., 1984.
4. Toolan, H. W. Lack of oncogenic effect of the H-viruses. Nature (Lond.),
214: 1036, 1967.
5. Toolan, H. W., Rhode, S. L., and Gierthy, J. F. Inhibition of 7,12-dimeth-
ylbenz(a)anthracene-induced tumors in Syrian hamsters by prior infection
with H-l parvovirus. Cancer Res., 42: 2552-2555, 1982.
6. Casto, B. C., and Goodheart, C. R. Inhibition of adenovirus transformation
in vitro by AAV-1. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 140: 72-78, 1972.
7. Ostrove, J. M., Duckworth, D. H., and Berns, K. I. Inhibition of adenovirus-
transformed cell oncogenicity by adeno-associated virus. Virology, 113: 521-
533, 1981.
8. Mousset, S., and Rommelaere, J. Minute virus of mice inhibits cell transfor
mation by simian virus 40. Nature (Lond.), 300: 537-539, 1982.
9. Singer, I. I., and Rhode, S. L. Electron microscopy and cytochemistry of H-
1 parvovirus intracellular morphogenesis. In: D. C. Ward and P. Tattersall
(eds.). Replication of Mammalian Parvoviruses, pp. 479-504. Cold Spring
Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Publisher, 1978.
10. Shein, H. M., and Enders, J. F. Multiplication and cytopathogenicity of
simian vacuolating virus 40 in cultures of human tissues. Proc. Soc. Exp.
Biol. Med., 709:495-500, 1962.
11. Tattersall, P., Cawte, P. J., Shatkin, A. J., and Ward, D. C. Three structural
polypeptides coded for by minute virus of mice, a parvovirus. J. Virol., 20:
273-289, 1976.
12. Rhode, S. L. H-l DNA synthesis. In: D. C. Ward and P. Tattersall (eds.),
Replication of Mammalian Parvoviruses, pp. 279-296. Cold Spring Harbor,
NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Publisher, 1978.
13. Rommelaere, J., and Ward, D. C. Effect of UV-irradiation on DNA repli
cation of the parvovirus minute virus of mice in mouse fibroblasts. Nucleic
Acids Res., 10: 2577-2596, 1982.
14. Cornells, J. J., Su, Z. Z., Ward, D. C., and Rommelaere, J. Indirect induction
of mutagenesis of intact parvovirus H-l in mammalian cells treated with
UV-light or with UV-irradiated H-I or SV40 viruses. Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci.
USA, 78:4480-4484, 1981.
15. Linser, P., Bruning, H., and Armentrout, R. W. Uptake of minute virus of
mice into cultured rodent cells. J. Virol., 31: 537-545, 1979.
16. Lavi, S. Carcinogen-mediated amplification of viral DNA sequences in simian
virus 40-transformed Chinese hamster embryo cells. Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci.
USA, 78: 6144-6148, 1981.
17. Southern, E. M. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments
separated by gel electrophoresis. J. Mol. Biol., 98: 503-517, 1975.
18. Winocour, E., and Keshet, I. Indiscriminate recombination in simian virus
40-infected monkey cells. Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA, 77:4861-4865, 1980.
19. Merchlinsky, M. J., Tattersall, P. J., Leary, J. J., Cotmore, S. F., Gardiner,
E. M., and Ward, D. C. Construction of an infectious molecular clone of the
autonomous parvovirus minute virus of mice. J. Virol., 47: 227-232, 1983.
20. Paradiso, P. R., Williams, K. R., and Costantino, R. L. Mapping of the
amino terminus of the H-l parvovirus major capsid proteins. J. Virol., 52:
77-81, 1984.
21. Rigby, P. W. J., Dieckmann, M., Rhodes, C., and Berg, P. Labeling deoxy-
ribonucleic acid to high spa-ilk activity in vitro by nick translation with DNA
polymerase I. J. Mol. Biol., 113: 237-251, 1977.
22. Luo, Z. Y., Cornells, J. J., Vos, J. M., and Rommelaere, J. UV-enhanced
reactivation of capsid protein synthesis and infectious centre formation in
mouse cells infected with UV-irradiated minute virus of mice. Int. J. Radiât.
Biol., 40:119-126, 1982.
23. Ward, D. C., and Tattersall, P. J. Minute virus of mice. In: H. L. Foster, J.
D. Small, and J. G. Fox (eds.), The Mouse in BiomédicalResearch, Vol. 2,
pp. 313-334. New York: Academic Press, 1982.
24. Astell, C. R., Chow, M. B., and Ward, D. C. Sequence analysis of the termini
of virion and replicative forms of minute virus of mice DNA suggests a
modified rolling hairpin model for autonomous parvovirus DNA replication.
J. Virol., 54: 171-177, 1985.
25. Toolan, H., and Ledinko, N. Growth and cytopathogenicity of H-viruses in
human and simian cell cultures. Nature (Lond.), 208: 812-813, 1965.
26. Rhode, S. L., and Paradiso, P. R. Parvovirus genome: nucleotide sequence
3578
on July 8, 2017. © 1986 American Association for Cancer Research. cancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from