Simian Reservoirs for Yellow Fever
J.P. Woodall. Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil
In both Africa and South America, monkeys have been found to be the
most important amplifying hosts for the yellow fever (YF) virus in nature,
while the true reservoir is the various species of vector mosquitoes, in
which the virus is a life-long infection transmitted to their progeny. In
Africa, the virus appears to have adapted to become non-fatal to mon-
keys, whereas infected New World monkeys have a variable fatality rate,
suggesting that the virus has had a shorter time in South America to
evolve to a less virulent relationship with its hosts. Muzo, Colombia, is
the only known locality in the world where a rural YF outbreak occurred
in the absence of monkeys.
Specimens of most subfamilies of African and South America monkeys
have been tested and found to produce sufficiently high level viremias to
infect mosquitoes and ensure transmission. In many cases, cyclic trans-
mission by A. aegypti and other vector mosquitoes between monkeys
has been demonstrated in the laboratory. Survivors become immune to
further infection.
Some authorities have questioned whether enzootic YF in Africa, or in
small islands like Trinidad, West Indies, can find sufficient non-immune
monkeys on a regular basis to maintain a natural cycle, and have postu-
lated the involvement of another non-human primate, such as a species
of African galago in Kenya and marsupials in Muzo, Colombia, both of
which have been found naturally infected
In Central and South America, YF virus occurs in the jungle where,
unlike the situation in Africa, there are no forest-dwelling A. aegypti or
other aedines to maintain it. But it has found suitable vectors in canopy-
dwelling Haemagogus and Sabethes mosquitoes, and is maintained in a
cycle involving them and tree-living monkeys. This cycle in the absence
of A. aegypti is known as sylvatic yellow fever.
Pets: Contagious Companions
D.H. Lloyd. Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, United Kingdom
It is well recognised that infected pet animals can serve as sources of
infection for humans. These infections vary from common, relatively low-
grade diseases, such as dermatophytosis caused by Microsporum canis,
to rare but fatal diseases such as rabies. Recently, the risks posed by
commensal organisms that can be carried by dogs and cats and passed
to in-contact people have become more apparent. These risks relate not
only to their potential pathogenicity to humans, particularly those with
increased susceptibility to infection, but also to their possession of multi-
resistance to systemic antimicrobials. Particular attention has been
focused on Eschericia coli, Enterococcus spp. and the pathogenic
staphylococci, especially methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
(MRSA). Recent data show that MRSA is readily transferred between
companion animals and man, including both owners and veterinary staff,
and indicate that transfer occurs more readily when the pet is infected.
Prevalences varying from 14 to 27% carriage of MRSA have been
reported amongst staff in veterinary hospitals in Europe and North
America. Chronic and recurrent human infections have been reported
when susceptible humans have been in contact with carrier pets, with
resolution of infection when the pet animal source has been removed. In
a risk factor study of owners of pets with S. aureus infection, MRSA was
found in the nasal mucosae of 11% of owners with MRSA-infected pets
but in none of the owners with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus infected
pets. Molecular studies indicate that the MRSA isolates found infecting or
carried by pets are in most cases epidemic human hospital strains and
there is concern that such strains may be becoming established in
domestic pets. There is a particular need for further studies of the occur-
rence of MRSA in healthy dogs and cats.
SESSION 3 (Parallel Session)
Agents of Bioterrorism
Friday, February 23, 2007
Room: Brahms/Mahler/Bruckner
15:30–17:00
Where Will Anthrax Strike Next? Generating and
Validating Prediction Maps of Anthrax Oubreaks
in North America and Central Asia
J.K. Blackburn1, Y. Pazilov2, L. Luknova2, Y. Sansyzbayev3, D.J.
Rogers4, M.E. Hugh-Jones1. 1WHO Collaborating Center for Remote
Sensing & GIS for Public Health, Louisiana State University, Baton
Rouge, LA, USA; 2Kazakh Sciene Center for Quarantine & Zoonotic
Diseases, Almaty, Kazakhstan; 3Technology Management Company,
BNI, Almaty, Kazakhstan; 4TALA Research Group, Dept of Zoology,
Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
Anthrax, caused by the bacterium Bacillus anthracis, threatens public
health as a zoonosis and a biological weapon, and can lead to massive
economic losses in livestock and wildlife, with two of the largest North
American outbreaks in several years in the 2005/2006 summers. This
same threat exists throughout Central Asia. Despite this, our understand-
ing of anthrax natural ecology is weak, yet necessary for cost effective
control within its endemic range, and to distinguish natural outbreaks
from bioterrorism events.
While the traditional control response of annual vaccination, outbreak
site management and herd treatment is effective it needs to be made
more efficient, rapid, and make better use of recent scientific advances.
Improving our understanding of complex disease systems and distribu-
tions across international borders requires a multi-disciplinary, collabora-
tive international approach. Ecological modeling and GIS-based
analyses can provide methodologies for predicting the spatial distribution
of anthrax, while at the same time GIS-based surveillance systems can
be employed to track disease and response in (near) real-time. Reliable
spatial predictions of endemicity allow control programs to target and
monitor specific farms and their livestock, not counties or municipalities,
which pays off in greater efficiency and quicker recognition of unusual
outbreaks.
This paper will review current ecological modeling approaches used in
anthrax prediction. Model predictions for the distribution of B. anthracis
will be presented for both the contiguous United States and the
Kazakhstan, where similar outbreak patterns and control efforts are pres-
ent. These modeling approaches provide insight into disease agent-spe-
cific biogeographic affinities across multiple continents and landscapes.
Additionally, these predictions allow for an evaluation of the species
success within an evolutionary ecology framework. Integrating disease
predictions and GIS-based tools also provides a framework for identify-
ing gaps in vaccination and carcass disposal efforts, exploring the ecol-
ogy of natural outbreaks, and improving response time through carefully
monitored democratization of data and farmer education programs.
Genotyping Bacillus anthracis: From Global
Diversity to Epidemiological and Bioforensic
Investigations
Matthew N. Van Ert1, W.R. Easterday2, L.Y. Huynh3, M.E. Hugh-Jones4,
T. Hadfield1, J. Ravel5, T. Pearson2, T.S. Simonson2, J.M. U’Ren2, P.R.
Coker4, K.L. Smith6, B. Wang7, L.J. Kenefic2, D.M. Wagner2, C.M.
Fraser-Liggett5, and P. Keim2.1Midwest Research Institute, Palm Bay,
Florida, United States of America; 2Department of Biological Sciences,
Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona United States of
America; 3Graduate Division of Biological and Biomedical Sciences,
Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America;
4Department of Environmental Studies, Louisiana State University,
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America; 5The Institute for
3.002
3.001
2.004
2.003
49
IMED 2007
ABSTRACTS FRIDAY •February 23, 2007
International Meeting on Emerging Diseases and Surveillance 2007