Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 2006, 25 (3), 1081-1095 Genetic characterisation of the Egyptian vaccinal strain Abu-Hammad of bovine herpesvirus-1 A.A. El-Kholy (1) & K.A. Abdelrahman (2) (1) Veterinary Serum and Vaccine Research Institute, Rinderpest-Like Diseases Research Department, Abbasia, P.O. Box 131, Cairo, Egypt (2) National Research Centre, Veterinary Medicine Division, Veterinary Medicine and Parasites Research Department, Dokki, Giza, Egypt Submitted for publication: 30 May 2006 Accepted for publication: 26 August 2006 Summary The Egyptian Abu-Hammad vaccinal strain of bovine herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1) was genetically characterised by comparing HindIII endonuclease genomic fingerprints of the Egyptian BHV-1 with reference strain Cooper 1 of BHV-1 subtype 1 (BHV-1.1). Analyses of nucleotide (nt) and deduced amino acid (aa) sequences and phylogeny of the major viral immunogen, glycoprotein D (gD), were used to compare the Egyptian BHV-1 with related alphaherpesviruses. HindIII restriction digests revealed close identity between the Egyptian BHV-1 and reference BHV-1.1. Both nt and aa sequence alignments revealed variable degrees of sequence similarity with other alphaherpesviruses. Possible mutational frameshifts were observed at nt 509 and 615 of the Egyptian BHV-1 gD. The Egyptian vaccinal BHV-1 was grouped with BHV-1.1 in a distinct branch of the phylogenetic tree. Conservation of five cysteine residues and glycosylation domains emphasised the importance of the amino terminus for immunological and biological function of alphaherpesvirus gD. The most divergent domain of 17 residues at positions 168-184 and an additional cysteine residue at position 178 distinguish the Egyptian BHV-1 from other herpesviruses. This work demonstrated that HindIII genomic fingerprinting and sequencing of the gD gene are useful for genetic characterisation of BHV-1. They may also be applied to epidemiological studies and development of BHV-1 vaccines. Keywords Alphaherpesviruses – Bovine herpesvirus – DNA sequence analysis – Egypt – Glycoprotein gD – Phylogenetic analysis – Restriction endonuclease analysis – Vaccine strain. Introduction – conjunctivitis Bovine herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1), an important contagious viral pathogen of domestic and wild Bovidae, is distributed worldwide and has a significant economic impact on the livestock industry in many countries. It is associated with a broad spectrum of disease manifestations including: – balanoposthitis – severe respiratory rhinotracheitis) – vulvovaginitis infection (infectious bovine – shipping fever (pleuropneumonia) – systemic infection (11, 34, 43). In Egypt, attention has been drawn to BHV-1 since the 1960s as a significant cause of losses in feedlot and dairy cattle, mainly due to deaths from pneumoenteritis in cattle 1082 and buffalo calves, and abortions (2, 3, 13, 20, 30). The local Egyptian vaccinal strain of BHV-1, the Abu-Hammad strain, was isolated during an outbreak in Sharqia (14). Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 25 (3) Materials and methods Viruses and cells BHV-1, an enveloped DNA virus, is a member of the genus Varicellovirus of the sub-family Alphaherpesvirinae within the family Herpesviridae (31). All herpesviruses share a common overall genome structure, but differ in the fine details of genome organisation, nucleotide (nt) sequence and biological properties. The BHV-1 genome consists of a linear double-stranded DNA molecule of about 136 kilobases (kb), which is subdivided into a unique long segment (UL, 104 kb) and a short segment, containing a unique short region (US, 10 kb) flanked by internal and terminal inverted repeats (IRS & TRS, each one 11 kb long) with alternative orientations of US relative to the fixed UL (29). Based on restriction endonuclease analysis of BHV-1 genomic DNA, virus strains have been classified into subtypes 1, 2a and 2b (22). BHV-1 subtype 1 (BHV-1.1) is associated with respiratory infections, whereas BHV-1.2 is associated with genital infections in cattle (43). Recently, this classification has been extended, based on the individual fragment numbers or sizes produced by each restriction endonuclease. There are two main groups, consisting of fragments A to I and J to L, and subtypes with numeric codes, for example the 1.1.I, 1.1.II, 1.1.III, and 1.2.Iva obtained using the HindIII endonuclease. Although subtype 1 is probably more virulent than subtype 2b, only one antigenic type of BHV-1 has been recognised to date (44). The Egyptian vaccinal BHV-1 Abu-Hammad strain (14) and the reference Cooper 1 strain of BHV-1 (National Veterinary Services Laboratory, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services, Ames, Iowa, United States of America [USA]) were used in this study. Viral stocks were prepared by infecting Madin Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) cells at a multiplicity of infection of 0.1 (the ratio of input infectious units to the number of cells available for infection) from plaque-purified viruses, which were subsequently titrated on MDBK cell cultures. The MDBK cells were grown and maintained in minimum essential medium with Earle’s salts supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% bovine calf serum (BCS), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Prior to experimental work, both MDBK cells and BCS were attested to be free of BHV-1 by indirect immunofluorescence. The viral identity of both the Egyptian and reference strains of BHV-1 was proved by their strong reactions with the appropriate Egyptian and reference (Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Weybridge, England) anti-BHV-1 polyclonal antibody, using indirect immunofluorescence in MDBK cells (36). Extraction of viral DNA The BHV-1 nt sequence comprises at least ten genes with the potential to encode glycoproteins, namely gB, gC, gD, gE, gG, gH, gI, gK, gL and gM, that share important roles in pathogenicity, virulence and replication in host cells. Glycoprotein D (gD), a major viral immunogen, is essential for virus replication and is responsible for inducing the strongest immune response, reducing virus replication and shedding by the host (34). The gD gene is well studied and highly conserved among herpesviruses. It is located in the US region between map units 0.892 and 0.902 of the BHV1 genome, encoding a 71 kilodalton (kda) glycoprotein of 417 amino acids (aa), containing both N- and O-linked oligosaccharides (29, 33). These properties of gD make it an excellent candidate for genetic characterisation of the Egyptian vaccinal strain (Abu-Hammad) of BHV-1. The key objective of the current study was to genetically characterise the Egyptian vaccinal BHV-1 strain (AbuHammad) at the genomic level, by restriction endonuclease fingerprinting of the whole viral genome, and comparative sequence analysis of its major immunogen, gD, versus its counterparts in the genomes of related herpesviruses. Viral DNA was extracted following the procedure described by Vilcek et al. (39), with some modifications. Briefly, a 25 ml aliquot of each crude virus in culture supernatant from the BHV-1 (Abu-Hammad or Cooper 1) infected MDBK cells was clarified by centrifugation at 6,000 rpm/4ºC for 20 min. The clarified virus samples were then ultracentrifuged at 40,000 rpm/4ºC for 2 h, then the supernatants were discarded. The virus pellets were dissolved in 0.5 ml of 2% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), then mixed with 0.4 mg/ml proteinase K and incubated at 56ºC for 1 h with intermittent shaking. The mixture was then extracted with an equal volume of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol reagent (25:24:1, vol/vol/vol, equilibrated to pH 8.0 with 10 mM Tris HCl). DNA in the aqueous phase was precipitated with 2 volumes of cold absolute ethanol and 1/10 volume of 3M sodium acetate. The DNA was pelleted by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm/4ºC for 30 min. The DNA pellets were washed in cold 70% ethanol, re-precipitated by centrifugation, dried, dissolved in 25 µl of nuclease-free water and stored – 20ºC until used. The concentration and purity of the BHV-1 genomic DNA were measured as described previously (27). 1083 Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 25 (3) Restriction endonuclease analysis The restriction endonucleases HindIII and BamHI were used to cleave the genomic DNA of both Egyptian AbuHammad and reference Cooper 1 strains of BHV-1, following standard protocols (27). Electrophoretic patterns of the resulting viral genomic DNA fragments were analysed by 0.7% agarose gel electrophoresis as previously described (27). The DNA bands were visualised using ultraviolet transillumination after gel staining with ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/ml). Direct sequencing of polymerase chain reaction amplicons The PCR DNA amplicons of the Egyptian vaccinal AbuHammad strain of BHV-1 were purified using microcon columns (Amicon, USA) and directly sequenced in both directions with the same primers as those used to generate the PCR amplicons. Sequencing was carried out in an ABI PRISM system using the dideoxy chain-termination method (28), which is based on the incorporation of fluorescent-labelled dideoxynucleotide terminators. The primer walking strategy was used and the identity of each nt was verified at least twice. Polymerase chain reaction assay The oligonucleotide primers used in this study were selected from highly conserved sequences encoding the gD gene of the Cooper 1.1 strain of BHV-1 (GenBank Accession No. NC_001847). Sense 5’- GCGAACATGCAAGGGCCGACATTG -3’ Anti-sense 5’- CACGGCGTCGGGGGCCGCGGGCGT -3’ This primer set was used in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay to partially amplify the gD gene (a full-length gene lacking only a fragment of approximately 0.2 kb encoding the transmembrane anchor) of the BHV-1 genome. The PCR reaction was carried out in a total volume of 50 µl containing: 1X PCR buffer (20 mM Tris HCl pH 8.4 and 50 mM KCl); 1.5 mM MgCl2; 0.2 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphate mixture (dATP, dCTP, dGTP and dTTP); 100 pmol of each primer; 2.5 units (U) Thermus aquaticus (Taq) polymerase; 0.1 µg of extracted viral DNA and nuclease-free sterile double distilled water up to 50 µl. The resulting mixture was subjected to a precise thermal profile in a programmable thermocycler as follows: – one cycle: 96°C for 2 min – 35 cycles: 96°C for 50 s – 58°C for 50 s – 72°C for 1 min – one cycle: 72°C for 10 min. Analysis of polymerase chain reaction amplification products (amplicons) The resulting PCR amplicons (10 µl to 15 µl) were analysed by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis (27). The DNA bands were visualised using ultraviolet transillumination after gel staining with ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/ml). PCR amplicons of the predicted size (approximately 1.1 kb) were gel purified using a DNA gel purification kit (ABgene, Germany) and quantified according to standard procedures (27). Computer-assisted sequence and phylogenetic analyses The resulting nt and deduced aa sequence data of the selected region of the gD gene of the Egyptian vaccinal Abu-Hammad strain of BHV-1 were compiled and submitted to GenBank (Accession No. AY690484). These sequence data were compared with those of related alphaherpesviruses accessed via GenBank, including: BHV-1.1 Cooper 1 (Accession No. NC_001847), BHV-1.2 ST (Accession No. AY437088), BHV-5 (TX89; Accession No. U14656), caprine herpesvirus-1 (CHV-1, E/CH; Accession No. AY437088), suid herpesvirus-1 Kaplan (pseudorabies virus; Accession No. AJ271966), human herpesvirus-1 KHS2 (HHV-1, herpes simplex virus type 1; Accession No. AF487902), and HHV-2 CAM4B (HHV-2, herpes simplex virus type 2; Accession No. U12180). The nt sequences were aligned using the Clustal W (1.82) program from the European Bioinformatics Institute (a part of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory). Clustal W is a fully automated program for global multiple alignment of DNA and protein sequences (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/services/ index.html). Phylogenetic correlation and tree construction were carried out using the PHYLIP and Treeview 32 (1.6.6) programs. All software used in this study was accessed through the appropriate interactive web services (http://www. evolution.gs.washington.edu/phylip.html and http://www. taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/ rod/rod.html). Results Restriction endonuclease analysis (fingerprinting) The electrophoretic profiles of BHV-1 genomic DNA digested with restriction endonuclease HindIII revealed identical DNA fingerprints for both the Egyptian (AbuHammad) and reference (Cooper 1) strains of BHV-1 1084 Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 25 (3) kb 1 2 3 A kb 1 2 3 4 B 12.2 11.1 10.1 C 12.2 D EF 9.0 GH I 8.0 J 7.0 K 5.0 L 4.0 M 2.0 1.6 1.0 1.1 kb 3.0 0.5 Lanes: 1: 1 kilobase (kb) DNA ladder (GIBCO-BRL) 2: Egyptian Abu-Hammad strain of bovine herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1) cut with HindIII 3: Reference Cooper 1 strain of BHV-1.1 cut with HindIII Lines indicate the BHV genomic DNA fragments from A to M Fig. 1 Agarose gel electrophoresis of genomic viral DNA cut with restriction endonucleases, separated on 0.7% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide (Fig. 1). However, no fingerprints could be obtained on repeated cutting of genomic DNA of either BHV-1 strain using BamHI (data not shown). Analysis of polymerase chain reaction amplification products (amplicons) Agarose gel electrophoretic analysis of the PCR amplicons indicated that the amplified DNA fragments encoding the gD from the Egyptian (Abu-Hammad) and reference (Cooper 1) strains of BHV-1 corresponded to the expected size of about 1.1 kb. The amplified DNA bands were of the same size for both BHV-1 strains (Fig. 2). Sequence and phylogenetic analyses of the bovine herpesvirus-1 glycoprotein D gene Analysis of the nt sequence (Fig. 3) of PCR amplicons from the Egyptian vaccinal strain Abu-Hammad of BHV-1 revealed a single open reading frame (ORF). This ORF was 1,083 nt long, starting from the first ATG at nt 7 and Lanes: 1: 100 base pair (bp) DNA ladder (consists of repeats of 100 bp fragment size, GIBCO-BRL) 2: PCR amplicons of the Egyptian Abu-Hammad strain of BHV-1 3: PCR amplicons of the reference Cooper 1 strain of BHV-1 4: Non-infected Madin Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) cell control Amplicons are approximately 1,100 bp in size Fig. 2 Agarose gel electrophoresis of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-derived amplicons of the bovine herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1) glycoprotein D gene, separated on 1.5% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide extending upstream to nt 1,089 in the sequence. A search for homologous sequences revealed sequence similarity between this ORF and the published gD gene of alphaherpesviruses. Therefore, the sequenced gene fragment of the Abu-Hammad strain was identified as a BHV-1 gD gene. Since the location of the gD gene is conserved throughout the sub-family (Alphaherpesvirinae), there was no need to further locate consensus sequences of other transcriptional regulatory elements, specifically the endogenous promoter (TATA) box or polyadenylation signal. The nucleotide composition of the ORF sequence was calculated to be A 17.26%, T 13.13%, C 35.26% and G 34.16%, with a G + C content of 69.42%. Nucleotide sequence alignment of the Egyptian BHV-1 gD and related alphaherpesviruses showed variable percentages of homology (7% to 98%), as illustrated in Table I. The highest gD sequence identity was recorded with the reference Cooper 1 strain of BHV-1.1 (98%), followed by the ST strain of BHV-1.2 (97%), the TX89 strain of BHV-5 (84%), the E/CH strain of CHV-1 (69%), and the Kaplan strain of suid herpesviruses 1085 Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 25 (3) -1- Egyptian vaccinal bovine herpesvirus-1 BHV-1 (Abu-Hammad), reference BHV-1.1 (Cooper 1), BHV-1.2 (ST), BHV-5 (TX89), caprine herpesvirus (E/CH), suid herpesvirus (Kaplan), human herpesvirus-1 (KHS2), and human herpesvirus-2 (CAM4B). Numbers on the sequence indicate nucleotide positions in the glycoprotein D gene relative to the GenBank data for each virus. Stars indicate that nucleotides in that column are identical in all sequences in the alignment Fig. 3 Nucleotide sequence alignment of related alphaherpesvirus genomes 1086 Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 25 (3) -2- Fig. 3 Nucleotide sequence alignment of related alphaherpesvirus genomes (contd) 1087 Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 25 (3) -3- Fig. 3 Nucleotide sequence alignment of related alphaherpesvirus genomes (contd) 1088 Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 25 (3) -4- Fig. 3 Nucleotide sequence alignment of related alphaherpesvirus genomes (contd) Table I Score table of multiple nucleotide sequence alignment of the Egyptian vaccinal bovine herpesvirus-1 Abu-Hammad strain (1,089 nucleotides) versus related alphaherpesviruses using the CLUSTAL W (1.82) program Alphaherpesvirus Length Sequence homology (nucleotides) percent BHV-1.1 Cooper 1 strain 1,254 98 BHV-1.2 ST strain 1,254 97 BHV-5 TX89 strain 1,254 84 CHV-1 E/CH strain 1,230 69 Suid HV-1 (pseudorabies virus) Kaplan strain 1,203 59 HHV-1 (herpes simplex 1) KHS2 strain 1,125 7 HHV-2 (herpes simplex 2) CAM4B strain 1,274 16 (bovine pseudorabies virus, 59%). In contrast, HHV-1 and HHV-2 scored extreme gD sequence divergences of 7% and 16%, respectively, from the Egyptian BHV-1 gD (Table I, Figs 3 and 4). Comparison of the Egyptian BHV-1 gD sequence with those of other alphaherpesviruses showed single or triplet mismatches or substitutions, mainly at nt 476, 509, 557, 567-569, 588, 598 and 615 (Fig. 3). The phylogenetic analysis of aligned gD sequences of these alphaherpesviruses (Fig. 4) revealed close ancestral genetic relationships. Amino acid sequence analysis and comparison of the Egyptian bovine herpesvirus-1 glycoprotein D The deduced aa sequence of the BHV-1 gD of the AbuHammad strain was compared with those of related glycoproteins of reference BHV-1.1 Cooper 1 (12), BHV-1.2 ST (18), BHV-5 TX89 (1), CHV-1 E/CH (16), suid HV-1 Kaplan (4), HHV-1 KHS2 (17), and HHV-2 CAM4B (40). As shown in Table II and Figure 5, the reference Cooper 1 strain of BHV-1.1 scored the highest gD sequence identity (90%) with the Egyptian BHV-1 gD, followed by BHV-1.2 (88%), BHV-5 (73%), CHV-1 (51%) and suid HV1 (27%). Little gD aa sequence identity could be recorded with the gD of either HHV-1 or HHV-2 (Table II, Fig. 5). All cysteine residues but one in the gD sequence of the Egyptian BHV-1 were conserved without deletions or substitution at residue position 75, 114, 126, 135 and 215. Only one cysteine residue (at position 178) of the Egyptian BHV-1 gD had no match in all other gD sequences in the current alignment (Fig. 5). In particular, the amino (N-) terminus, including the N-linked glycosylation domains at positions 40-42 and 102-104, was highly conserved in the gD of BHV-1 Abu-Hammad, BHV-1 Cooper 1, BHV-1.2 ST, CHV-1 E/CH and BHV-5 TX89 (Fig. 5). The major aa mismatches or substitutions in the Egyptian BHV-1 gD sequence were observed in aa residues at positions 157, 158, 160-164, 168-184, 188, 195, 196 and 198-202 (Fig. 5). The most divergent domain was at Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 25 (3) 1089 Reference BHV-1.1 (Cooper 1), BHV-5 (TX89), caprine herpesvirus (E/CH), suid herpesvirus (Kaplan strain of pseudorabies virus), human herpesvirus-1 (KHS2 strain of herpes simplex type 1), and human herpesvirus-2 (CAM4B strain of herpes simplex type 2). Numbers on the sequence indicate positions of amino acids in the glycoprotein D protein relative to the GenBank data for each virus. Dots mean that conserved (:) or semi-conserved (.) substitutions are observed, whereas stars (*) indicate that amino acid residues in that column are identical in all aligned sequences Fig. 4 Deduced amino acid sequence alignment of the Egyptian vaccinal bovine herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1) (Abu-Hammad) strain versus other related alphaherpesviruses 1090 Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 25 (3) Table II Score table for the deduced amino acid sequence identity of the Egyptian vaccinal bovine herpesvirus-1 Abu-Hammad strain (361 amino acids) versus related alphaherpesviruses using the CLUSTAL W (1.82) program Alphaherpesvirus Length Sequence homology (amino acid) percent BHV-1.1 Cooper 1 strain 417 90 BHV-1.2 ST strain 417 88 BHV-5 TX89 strain 417 73 CHV-1 E/CH strain 407 51 Suid HV-1 (pseudorabies virus) Kaplan strain 400 27 HHV-1 (herpes simplex 1) KHS2 strain 394 17 HHV-2 (herpes simplex 2) CAM4B strain 393 14 BHV-1.2 ST BHV-1 Abu-Hammad BHV-1.1 Cooperl BHV-5 TX89 CHV-1 E/CH Suid HV-1 Kaplan HHV-1 KHS2 HHV-2 CAM4B BHV-1.1 (Cooper 1), BHV-1.2 (ST), BHV-5 (TX89), caprine herpesvirus (E/CH), suid herpesvirus (Kaplan strain of pseudorabies virus), human herpesvirus-1 (KHS2 strain of herpes simplex type 1), and human herpesvirus-2 (CAM4B strain of herpes simplex type 2), generated from nucleotide sequences encoding for glycoprotein D of the analysed viral genomes. The sequences were first aligned using the Clustal W (1.82) programme and the phylogenetic analyses were performed using the PHYLIP package Fig. 5 Phylogenetic tree of the Egyptian vaccinal bovine herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1) (Abu-Hammad) strain and related alphaherpesviruses segment 168-184 in the Egyptian gD consensus aa sequence; this region might be relevant to the gD specificity of each alphaherpesvirus. However, the resulting translation contains a possible frameshift at nt 508 and 614 compared with other BHV gD genes. Frequent mutations within the coding region may result in frameshifts or premature stop codons. Discussion Herpesviruses are a major cause of pneumoenteritis, abortion and death among livestock, especially cattle and buffalo calves (2, 11, 30, 33, 43). The study of the molecular virology of ruminant herpesviruses has recently made considerable progress in terms of genomic sequence analyses, laying a good foundation for further studies of BHV-1 and related viruses (29). This report describes the genetic characterisation of the Egyptian vaccinal strain Abu-Hammad of BHV-1, based on the application of two main approaches. The first utilised comparison of the genomic fingerprints of the Egyptian BHV-1 with that of reference strain Cooper 1 of BHV-1.1. The second approach relied on analysis of the nt sequences, deduced aa sequences and phylogeny of the major viral immunogen, gD, of the Egyptian BHV-1 and related herpesviruses. This was carried out to compare the genetic type of the Egyptian vaccinal strain with other reference and vaccinal strains of BHV-1 and reveal potential targets for BHV-1 diagnosis, development of new vaccines, epidemiological studies and improved control programmes. Genomic fingerprinting, based on the sizes and electrophoretic patterns of the viral DNA fragments (A to M) observed after HindIII endonuclease cleavage revealed close identity between the Abu-Hammad BHV-1 and the reference Cooper 1 BHV-1.1. The size and pattern of HindIII fragments K and L in both strains were characteristic of BHV-1.1 viral genomes (21, 22, 44). It has been reported that the endonuclease HindIII is the enzyme of choice to most clearly reflect differences among BHV-1 strains or isolates (22). According to the results of the current study, the Egyptian vaccinal BHV-1 Abu-Hammad strain fits clearly into the BHV-1.1 group. The Egyptian BHV-1 gD gene content exhibited similar GC-rich content to the gD-like glycoproteins of other alphaherpesviruses (1, 4, 16, 25, 33, 40). In spite of high gD nt sequence identity (98%) between BHV-1 AbuHammad and reference BHV-1.1 Cooper 1, a lower deduced aa homology (90%) was observed. Similarly, lower aa homology percentages were recorded between the Egyptian BHV-1 gD and the other alphaherpesviruses studied, compared with the observed nt sequence Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 25 (3) homology. This could be attributed to the occurrence of a possible mutational frameshift at nt 509 and 615, which was biased toward the carboxy-terminus of BHV-1 gD. Like BHV-1, the other herpesviruses selected for comparison in this study are all neurotropic mammalian alphaherpesviruses (31). For example, BHV-5 is the causative agent of a fatal meningo-encephalitis in calves and is closely related to BHV-1 (41). Both nt and deduced aa sequence alignments revealed variable degrees of sequence homology with the Egyptian BHV-1 gD: homology was high with BHV-1.1 Cooper 1 and BHV-1.2, moderate with BHV-5, low with CHV-1 and suid HV-1 (pseudorabies virus), and very low with HHV-1 and HHV-2. It has been established that the BHV-1 gD gene is located in the US region of the viral genome between map units 0.892 and 0.902 (33), which is approximately collinear with the gD-like glycoproteins of other alphaherpesviruses (1, 4, 16, 25), but inverted relative to the genomic map locations of HHV-1 gD and HHV-2 gD (40). The first five cysteine residues were conserved among the gD (aa) sequences in this study. It has been suggested that these residues may be disulphide bonded, and they are possibly important in maintaining the proper conformational structure and function of alphaherpesvirus gD. Nevertheless, occurrence of these conserved cysteine residues and glycosylation domains (particularly in BHV-5) in the highly conserved amino- (N-) terminal half of gD emphasises the importance of the N-terminus for the immunological and biological function of gD. These results are in accordance with earlier studies (1, 33). The presence of the most divergent domain of 17 aa residues at positions 168-184 and the additional cysteine residue at position 178 could be used as a tool to distinguish the Egyptian BHV-1 Abu-Hammad strain from related herpesviruses. The gD nt and deduced aa sequence data enabled phylogenetic characterisation of the Egyptian BHV-1 AbuHammad strain and correlated with the results of genomic fingerprinting after restriction endonuclease cleavage. Phylogenetic trees based on either gD nt sequences or deduced aa sequences were similar. Three major branches were apparent in the constructed trees, revealing a range of genetic differences among alphaherpesviruses. Importantly, the Egyptian Abu-Hammad and reference BHV-1.1 Cooper 1 strains represented two close lineages 1091 lying in the same branch of the phylogenetic tree, suggesting a unique antigenic subtype, BHV-1.1, for both strains. Phylogenetic reconstruction of herpesvirus evolution is generally founded on aa sequence comparisons of specific proteins (15). It has been established that nt substitution, insertion, deletion or duplication events are manifested in aa sequences as differences in branch lengths or absence of branches in the phylogenetic tree, proportional to the genetic change (8). The results obtained in this study correlate with the reported antigenic differences among alphaherpesviruses, particularly in viral glycoproteins gB, gC, gD and gH (6, 9, 15, 19, 23, 24, 33, 41). Moreover, these results agree with recent reports regarding the importance of gD gene-based molecular assays for pathogenetic and epidemiological studies of BHV-1 infections (5, 10, 26, 33, 37, 39, 42, 44). Similar positive reactions with the local and reference antiBHV-1 polyclonal antiserum in the virus neutralistion test indicated high antigenic identity between the Egyptian (Abu-Hammad) and reference (Cooper 1) strains of BHV1. In spite of the considerable degree of sequence conservation among antigenically related ruminant alphaherpesviruses (7, 31, 35), some herpesviruses react poorly with antibodies raised against antigenically heterologous viral strains (31, 38). Several microbial genome sequences have been published that indicate the value of comparisons at the genomic level for studies of pathogenesis, host range and cross-immunity among related pathogens (32, 38). In conclusion, the findings of the current study showed that genomic fingerprinting, based on endonuclease HindIII cleavage, and direct sequencing of gD gene-derived PCR amplicons were relevant tools for genetic characterisation of BHV-1 strains. Phylogenetic analyses indicated that the Egyptian vaccinal strain (Abu-Hammad) was grouped as a BHV-1.1 in a distinct branch within the phylogenetic tree, together with the reference (Cooper 1) strain of BHV-1.1. The comparative genetic analyses conducted in this study were useful not only to trace conservation of the Egyptian BHV-1 among related alphaherpesviruses but also to establish genetic tools for nationwide epidemiological studies. It is highly recommended to use locally isolated viruses for vaccine preparation, to prevent viruses escaping neutralisation by antibody raised against heterologous variants, and thus to obtain efficient BHV-1 vaccines. 1092 Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 25 (3) Caractérisation génétique de la souche vaccinale égyptienne Abu-Hammad de l’herpèsvirus bovin 1 A.A. El-Kholy & K.A. Abdelrahman Résumé Les auteurs décrivent la caractérisation génétique de la souche vaccinale AbuHammad de l’herpèsvirus bovin 1 (BHV-1), réalisée en comparant les empreintes génétiques obtenues par digestion avec l’endonucléase HindIII du BHV-1 égyptien, d’une part, et de la souche de référence Cooper 1 du BHV-1 sous-type 1 (BHV-1.1), d’autre part. L’analyse des nucléotides et des séquences d’acides aminés qui en résultent, ainsi que de la phylogenèse du principal immunogène viral, la gycoprotéine D, a ensuite permis de comparer la souche égyptienne avec d’autres alpha-herpèsvirus. La digestion par l’enzyme de restriction HindIII a révélé un lien de parenté étroit entre la souche BHV-1 égyptienne et la souche de référence BHV-1.1. L’alignement des séquences de nucléotides et d’acides aminés a révélé une certaine parenté, à des degrés divers, avec d’autres alphaherpèsvirus. Un décalage du cadre de lecture a été constaté sur les nucléotides 509 et 615 de la glycoprotéine D de la souche égyptienne BHV-1. La souche vaccinale égyptienne BHV-1 a été classée avec la souche BHV-1.1 sur une branche distincte de l’arbre phylogénétique. La persistance de cinq résidus de cystéine et domaines de glycosylation met en relief l’importance des acides aminés en position terminale pour les fonctions immunologiques et biologiques de la glycoprotéine D des alpha-herpèsvirus. Le domaine extrêmement divergent de 17 résidus en position 168 et 184 et la présence d’un résidu supplémentaire de cystéine en position 178 permettent de distinguer la souche égyptienne BHV-1 des autres herpèsvirus. Cette recherche démontre que le marquage génomique au moyen de HindIII et le séquençage du gène de la glycoprotéine D sont des techniques utiles pour la caractérisation génique du BHV-1, pouvant également s’appliquer aux études épidémiologiques et à la mise au point de vaccins contre le BHV-1. Mots-clés Alpha-herpèsvirus – Analyse par restriction de l’endonucléase – Analyse par séquençage de l’ADN – Égypte – Herpèsvirus bovin – Souche vaccinale. Caracterización genética de la cepa de vacuna egipcia Abu-Hammad del herpesvirus bovino 1 A.A. El-Kholy & K.A. Abdelrahman Resumen Los autores describen la caracterización genética de la cepa de vacuna egipcia Abu-Hammad del herpesvirus bovino 1 (BHV-1). Para ello se compararon entre sí las huellas genéticas obtenidas por digestión con la endonucleasa HindIII del genoma del BHV-1 egipcio, por un lado, y de la cepa de referencia Cooper 1 del subtipo 1 del herpesvirus bovino 1 (BHV-1.1), por el otro. Después, utilizando el análisis de nucleótidos, así como las secuencias aminoacídicas y la filogenia del principal inmunógeno del virus, la glicoproteína D (gD), deducidas a partir de ahí, 1093 Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 25 (3) se comparó el BHV-1 egipcio con otros alfa-herpesvirus afines. La digestión con HindIII puso de manifiesto un estrecho parentesco entre el BHV-1 y la cepa de referencia BHV-1.1. La yuxtaposición de las secuencias de nucleótidos y de aminoácidos reveló diversos grados de semejanza con las secuencias de otros alfa-herpesvirus. En los nucleótidos 509 y 615 de la glicoproteína del BHV-1 egipcio se observaron posibles desfases del marco de lectura. La cepa de vacuna egipcia fue clasificada, junto con el BHV-1.1, en una rama independiente del árbol filogenético. La conservación de cinco residuos de cisteína y regiones de glicosilación ponía de relieve la importancia del extremo amino-terminal para la función inmunológica y biológica de la gD de los alfa-herpesvirus. La región extremadamente divergente de 17 residuos en las posiciones 168 a 184, así como un residuo adicional de cisteína en la posición 178, son los rasgos que distinguen al BHV-1 egipcio de otros herpesvirus. El trabajo de los autores demostró que la obtención de la huella genómica con HindIII y la secuenciación del gen de la glicoproteína D son procedimientos útiles para la caracterización genética del BHV-1, procedimientos que también pueden aplicarse a estudios epidemiológicos y a la fabricación de vacunas contra el BHV-1. Palabras clave Alfa-herpesvirus – Análisis de la secuencia de ADN – Análisis por endonucleasas de restricción – Cepa de vacuna – Egipto – Herpesvirus bovino. References 1. Abdelmagid O.Y., Minocha H.C., Collins J.K. & Chowdhury S.I. (1995). – Fine mapping of bovine herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1) glycoprotein D (gD) neutralizing epitopes by type-specific monoclonal antibodies and sequence comparison with BHV-5 gD. Virology, 206 (1), 242-253. 2. Aly N.M., Shehab G.G. & Abd El-Rahim I.H.A. (2003). – Bovine viral diarrhoea, bovine herpesvirus and parainfluenza3 virus infection in three cattle herds in Egypt in 2000. Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 22 (3), 879-892. 3. Baz T., Taha M.M., Zahran M., Monira H. & El-Dobeigy A.I. (1982). – Respiratory viral newborn calf diseases in Egypt: I- studies on the role of IBR infection. Egypt. J. agricult. Res., 60 (7), 105-122. 4. Brack A.R., Klupp B.G., Granzow H., Tirabassi R., Enquist L.W. & Mettenleiter T.C. (2000). – Role of the cytoplasmic tail of pseudorabies virus glycoprotein E in virion formation. J. Virol., 74 (9), 4004-4016. 5. Collins J.K., Butcher A.C. & Riegel C.A. (1985). – Immune response to bovine herpesvirus type 1 infections: virusspecific antibodies in sera from infected animals. J. clin. Microbiol., 21, 546-552. 6. Collins J.K., Ayers V.K., Whetstone C.A. & van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk S. (1993). – Antigenic differences between the major glycoproteins of bovine herpesvirus type 1.1 and bovine encephalitis herpesvirus type 1.3. J. gen. Virol., 74, 1509-1517. 7. Engels M., Loepfe E., Wild P., Schraner E. & Wyler R. (1987). – The genome of caprine herpesvirus 1: genome structure and relatedness to bovine herpesvirus 1. J. gen. Virol., 68, 2019-2023. 8. Felsenstein J. (2001). – Taking variation of evolutionary rates between sites into account in inferring phylogenies. J. molec. Evol., 53, 447-455. 9. Friedli K. & Metzler A.E. (1987). – Reactivity of monoclonal antibodies to proteins of a neurotropic bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV-1) strain and to proteins of representative BHV-1 strains. Arch. Virol., 94, 109-122. 10. Fuchs M., Hubert P., Detterer J. & Rziha H.-J. (1999). – Detection of bovine herpesvirus type 1 in blood from naturally infected cattle by using a sensitive PCR that discriminates between wild-type virus and virus lacking glycoprotein E. J. clin. Microbiol., 37, 2498-2507. 1094 Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 25 (3) 11. Gibbs E.P.J. & Rweyemamu M.M. (1977). – Bovine herpesviruses. I. Bovine herpesvirus-1. Vet. Bull., 47, 317343. 24. Meyer G., Bare O. & Thiry E. (1999). – Identification and characterization of bovine herpesvirus type 5 glycoprotein H gene and gene products. J. gen. Virol., 80, 2849-2859. 12. Goltz M., Buhk H.J., Broll H., Lewin M., Mankertz A., Boerner B., Borchers K. & Weigelt W. (2006). – Nucleotide sequence of the HindIII O and K fragments located in the US region of the bovine herpesvirus 1 genome. Unpublished GenBank accession number: NC_001847. 25. Petrovskis E.A., Meyer A.L. & Post L.E. (1988). – Reduced yield of infectious pseudorabies and herpes simplex virus from cell lines producing viral glycoprotein gp50. J. Virol., 62, 2196-2199. 13. Hafez S.M. & Frey H.Y. (1973). – Serological evidence of bovine viral diarrhea-mucosal disease and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis in Egypt. Bull. epiz. Dis. Afr., 21, 5-10. 14. Hafez S.M., Thanna I. Baz, Mohsen A.Y. & Monira H. (1976). – Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis in Egypt: isolation and serological identification of the virus. J. Egypt. vet. med. Assoc., 36 (1), 129-139. 15. Karlin S., Mocarski E.S. & Schachtel G.A. (1994). – Molecular evolution of herpesviruses: genomic and protein sequence comparisons. J. Virol., 68 (3), 1886-1902. 16. Keuser V., Detry B., Thiry J., Fays K., Schynts F., Pastoret P.-P., Vanderplasschen A. & Thiry E. (2006). – Characterization of caprine herpesvirus 1 glycoprotein D gene and its translation product. Virus Res., 115 (2), 112-121. 17. Kim J.K., Kim Y.K., Hong J.B., Kim S.Y. & Ahn J.K. (2002). – Isolation of the enhanced neurovirulent HSV-1 strains from Korean patients. Unpublished GenBank accession number: AF487902. 18. Leung-Tack P., Audonnet J.C. & Riviere M. (1994). – The complete DNA sequence and the genetic organization of the short unique region (US) of the bovine herpesvirus type 1 (ST strain). Virology, 199 (2), 409-421. 26. Rocha M.A., Barbosa E.F., Guimaraes S.E.F., Dias Neto E. & Gouveia A.M.G. (1998). – A high sensitivity-nested PCR assay for BHV-1 detection in semen of naturally infected cattle. Vet. Microbiol., 63, 1-11. 27. Sambrook J. & Russell D.W. (2000). – Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, Plainview, New York. 28. Sanger F., Nicklen S. & Coulson A.R. (1977). – DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. natl Acad. Sci. USA, 74 (12), 5463-5467. 29. Schwyzer M. & Ackermann M. (1996). – Molecular virology of ruminant herpesviruses. Vet. Microbiol., 53, 17-29. 30. Shehab G.J., Rawhia M.A.O., Hosny J.A. & Nawal M.A. (1996). – An outbreak of pneumoenteritis in calves caused by IBR and rotaviruses in Egypt: virological and immunopathological aspects. Egypt. J. comp. Pathol. clin. Pathol., 9 (2), 15-37. 31. Studdert M.J. (1999). – Bovine herpesvirus (Herpesviridae). In Encyclopedia of virology, 2nd Ed. (A. Granoff & R. Webster, eds). Academic Press, London, 183-184. 32. Thomson N., Sebaihia M., Ana C.-T., Bentley S., Lisa C. & Julian P. (2003). – Genome watch: the value of comparison. Nature Rev. Microbiol., 1, 11-12. 19. Lyaku J.R.S., Nettleton P.F. & Marsden H. (1992). – A comparison of serological relationships among five ruminant alphaherpesviruses by ELISA. Arch. Virol., 124, 333-341. 33. Tikoo S.K., Fitzpatrick D., Babiuk L.A. & Zamb T.J. (1990). – Molecular cloning, sequencing and expression of functional bovine herpesvirus-1 glycoprotein gIV in transfected bovine cells. J. Virol., 64, 5132-5142. 20. Madbouly H.M. & Hussein M.M. (1997). – Isolation of BHV1 from a dairy herd showing genital form of infection. Alex. J. vet. Sci., 13 (4), 439-446. 34. Tikoo S.K., Campos M. & Babiuk L.A. (1995). – Bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV-1): biology, pathogenesis, and control. Adv. Virus Res., 45, 191-223. 21. Mayfield J.E., Good P.J., VanOort H.J., Campbell A.R. & Reed D.E. (1983). – Cloning and cleavage site mapping of DNA from bovine herpesvirus 1 (Cooper strain). J. Virol., 47, 259-264. 22. Metzler A.E., Matile H., Gassmann U., Engels M. & Wyler R. (1985). – European isolates of bovine herpesvirus 1: a comparison of restriction endonuclease sites, polypeptides, and reactivity with monoclonal antibodies. Arch. Virol., 85, 57-69. 23. Metzler A.E., Schudel A.A. & Engels M. (1986). – Bovine herpesvirus 1: molecular and antigenic characteristics of variants isolated from calves with neurological disease. Arch. Virol., 87, 205-217. 35. Vanderplaschen A., Bublot M., Pastoret P.-P. & Thiry E. (1993). – Restriction maps of the DNA of cervid herpesvirus 1 and cervid herpesvirus 2, two viruses related to bovine herpesvirus 1. Arch. Virol., 128, 379-388. 36. Van Donkersgoed J. & Babiuk L. (1991). – Diagnosis and managing the respiratory form of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis. Vet. Med., 1, 86-94. 37. Van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk S. & Babiuk L.A. (1986). – Synthesis and processing of bovine herpesvirus 1 glycoproteins. J. Virol., 59 (2), 401-410. 38. Van Oirschot J.T. (1999). – Bovine viral vaccines, diagnostics, and eradication. In Veterinary vaccines and diagnostics (R.O. Schultz, ed.). Academic Press, London, 197-213. Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 25 (3) 39. Vilcek S., Nettleton J.A., Herring J.A. & Herring A.J. (1994). – Rapid detection of bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV-1) using the polymerase chain reaction. Vet. Microbiol., 42, 53-64. 40. Watson R.J. (1983). – DNA sequence of the Herpes simplex virus type 2 glycoprotein D gene. Gene, 26 (2-3), 307-312. 41. Whitbeck J.C., Bello L.J. & Lawrence W.C. (1999). – Comparison of the bovine herpesvirus 1 gI gene and the herpes simplex virus type 1 gB gene. J. Virol., 62 (9), 3319-3327. 42. Wiedmann M., Brandon R., Wanger P., Dubovi E.J. & Batt C.A. (1993). – Detection of BHV-1 in bovine semen by a nested PCR assay. J. virol. Meth., 44, 129-140. 1095 43. Wyler R., Engels M. & Schwyzer M. (1989). – Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis/vulvovaginitis (BHV-1). In Herpesvirus diseases of cattle, horses, and pigs (G. Witman, ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1-72. 44. Wyss S., Engels M., Bruckner L., Regli W. & Ackermann M. (2000). – Molecular epidemiological study with bovine herpesvirus 1 isolates. In Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of Veterinary Virology, 27-30 August 2000, The European Society of Veterinary Virology (ESVV), Brescia, Italy, 85-86.