who had been employed either by other companies that participated in the same pension
scheme, or in the lead battery factory but with little potential for exposure to lead. The
deaths occurred during the period 1926–85 and the study incorporated data reported
previously by Dingwall-Fordyce and Lane (1963) and Malcolm and Barnett (1982). After
adjusting for age by 10-year-age groups, there were no significantly elevated proportional
mortality odds ratios for cancer risk in relation to lead-exposed employment. A slightly
elevated risk was suggested for cancer of the stomach.
There has been an extended study of lead battery and lead smelter workers in the USA
(Cooper & Gaffey 1975; Cooper, 1976; Kang et al., 1980; Cooper, 1981; Cooper et al.,
1985; Cooper, 1988; Wong & Harris, 2000). The original cohort (Cooper & Gaffey, 1975)
included 4680 battery workers from 10 plants; the most recent update (Wong & Harris,
2000) relates to a reduced cohort of 4518 battery workers. All subjects manufacturing lead
batteries were employed for at least 1 year during the period 1947–70, and the most recent
follow-up has been analysed for the period 1947–95. There were 195 battery workers
(4.3%) who were untraced on the closing date of the study. Exposure data were limited
but blood lead and urinary lead measurements were taken, mainly after 1960. For lead
battery workers with three or more blood lead measurements, the mean blood concen-
tration was 63 µg/dL and, for those with 10 or more urinary lead measurements, the mean
urine concentration was 130 µg/dL. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated
after comparison with the mortality rates for the male population in the USA, and were
adjusted for age and calendar period. For all cancers, the overall SMR was 104.7 (624
observed; 95% CI, 96.6–113.2). There was a significantly elevated SMR for stomach
cancer (152.8; 45 observed; 95% CI, 111.5–204.5) and non-significantly elevated SMR
for lung cancer (113.9; 210 observed; 95% CI, 99.0–130.4). [The Working Group noted
that it is possible that ethnicity, dietary habits, prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection,
or socioeconomic status played a role in the excess of stomach cancer.] Findings were also
reported for a nested case–control study of stomach cancer, using 30 cases and 120 age-
matched controls from a single large battery factory. [The authors noted a large percentage
of Italian- and Irish-born members of the study population (23% of the controls in the
case–control study). Being Italian- or Irish-born was associated with a twofold excess risk
for stomach cancer in this population. The Working Group considered that confounding
by place of birth (which is not available for the whole cohort) would probably account for
only a proportion of the 1.5-fold excess reported for this whole population.] The nested
case–control study did not show any significantly increased odds ratios or trends for any
of the three exposure indices that were investigated (duration of employment at the plant,
duration of employment in intermediate or high exposure areas of the plant, [crudely]
weighted cumulative exposure). [The Working Group noted that the analysis by duration
of employment needs to be interpreted with caution, especially among workforces that
were subject to active surveillance and potential removal from work.]
IARC MONOGRAPHS VOLUME 87184
P 165-200 DEF.qxp 09/08/2006 11:30 Page 184