Media Silence on Mossad's Role in Foiling Terror Attack

But who is Mossad or silence of the mediatic lambs
Yana Grinshpun
The automn has arrived with its ideological tribulations. How wonderful it was to spend some
weeks far from urban troubles, academic (and other) lefties, religious (islamic) twist and turns
and all this bric-à-brac. But reality, having an annoying custom to remind about itself when
one is awaiting for it least of all, here we are in France with the regular and habitual
procedures of concealing the information and using syntactical structures that never have an
agent:Le Figaro, Franceinfo and Co publish this
"Attentat déjoué contre l'opposition iranienne en France: ce que l'on sait
"Terror attack against iranian opposition avoided in France: what we know
And what we know is that a couple of belgian citizens of Iranian origin was planning a terror
attack in Villepinte, not that far from Paris to harm an annual gathering of the opposers to the
actual Iranian regime. What we know is that, for instance, Rudy Giuliani had to be there and
some other personnalities close to Trump had to be there. What we also know is that France
is one of the leader european countries to strive to keep unchanged nuclear deal with Rohani,
whereas Trump declared it was insane to deal with Iran.
So, what's so embarrassing in the avoiding the terror attack prepared by Iranians against the
opposers?
Several things: one of which is explicitely mentioned in the media. If the role of Iran is
prooved in the organisation of this attack, Macron would be obliged to react and he will have
difficulties to defend the Iranian nuclear deal. And this will severely upset our national
amateur of the Islamic Republic. Rohani suggested Macron a way to get out, calling the
opposers' gathering "a terrorist organization". The usage of this expression shows how well
our idelogical ennemies from the islamic world use the termesthat refer to the commonly
accepted value: "terrorism is bad". Thus, the opposers to Rohani's regime (National Council
of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) as they call themselves, are called "terrorists" by Rohani
himself. It's true that amongst this gathering , a groupe known as MEK (Mujahedin -eh-
Khalk) has been recognised as a terrorist groupe ny the US and by Europe till recently.
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tUxhyOYI08)
Nevertheless, this way of langauge usage reminds the discursive trick of our occidental pro-
palestinian medias who regularly call palestinian terrorists are "resistance or freedom
fighters" or "desperate youth". I'll get back to this particular lexical topic later.
But there is another annoying fact in this affaire, upon which the french media is silent as a
lamb or even more, the lambs, at least, can bleat.
The attack has been avoided thanks to the collaboration of the western intelligence services
with Mossad agents.
https://intelnews.org/2018/07/20/01-2360/

" On Thursday, authorities in Israel announced the lifting of a blanket censorship decree that
prevented local media from discussing the country’s role in helping the Europeans foil the
alleged bomb attack in Paris. According to Israel’s Channel 2, a private television station
based in Jerusalem, the Iranian attack was prevented after the Israeli agency Mossad detected
the whereabouts of several suspects involved in it. The Mossad then supplied Germany,
Belgium and France with intelligence that led to the arrests of some of those suspects.
However, Channel 2 said that the Israeli government did not give a reason for the initial
censorship imposed on the country’s media, nor did it explain why it had decided to lift it."
Or
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-mossad-says-it-helped-foil-an-iranian-terror-
attack-in-france-1.6292851
"The Mossad said to have thwarted an Iranian plot to attack a gathering of Iranian dissidents
in a Paris suburb in June. On Thursday, Israel lifted censorship on the publication of the
operation.
The Mossad gave Germany, France and Belgium crucial intelligence information about the
attack, which led to arrests of a cell headed by an Iranian diplomat.
The opposition rally was due to include a speech by U.S. President Donald Trump's
lawyer, Rudy Giuliani.
According to news reports, Mossad agents tracked down suspects in several countries."
So why, nothing of this appears officially in the french media? Of course, one can say who
cares who saved human lives, the important thing is that are save.
The problem is in the mediatic practice of concealment as for Israel and its very role in
helping human lives all over the planet. Israel lately helped the blues syrian refugees this
summer to leave Deraa (even the habitually antisemitic The Guardian mentions it,j though,
in its habitual style where israel is accused not to accept refugees! The journalist of The
Guardian seems to ignore that they are mostly muslipms and Israeli haters and very few of
the would like even in the worst situation to find a shelter in Israel)
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/06/29/israel-sends-aid-syrian-refugees-will-not-
allow-cross-border/).
Silence in the French media, no mention of the role the Israeli Army played in the operation,
and if a curious reder looks at the map, he'll see that without Israel nothing would be possible.
So why not to inform the readers who are already shaped by the eternally anti-sionist
brainwashing of our press?
One of the next post will be about all these reasons, but here I limit myself by the following
explanation:
Israel has been constructed by the french media as an ennemi number one, the nation that
doesn't have a right to exist where it exists, the incarnation of the Evil :Nationalisme
(unsupportable crime for our multicultural elite), Judaïsme (the sectarian religion of few who
thinks they are chose people: cf.de Gaulle (nobvember 1967):"people sure in himself and

arrogant dominator), Strength (whereas a victimhood is our credo in Europe). The european
medias like only dead Jews, preferably in the Holocauste, and the best, in the concentration
camps. But alive and livin in Israel, they appear as an oppressor. This is the image circulating
in the media discourses and shaping a collective representation of the public.
If the medias would suddenly change this image in a positive representation (saving people,
helping refugees, foiling terror attacks), the medias will simply discredit themselves in the
eyes of the readers. And it is impossible for the mediatic survival, they wouldn't be credible
any more.
The other important reason is that the French Press Agency is a gouvernmental organsiation
and it delivers the information delivered by the Ministery of Foreign affair which is clearly
anti-Israeli. Any information that could be beneficial to th eimage of the country is to be
concealed.