Reading With and Against the Grain

Telechargé par Safa Abbas
Reading With and Against the Grain
Published by Cal Poly Pomona’s Reading, Advising, & Mentoring Program
One reason to become a good reader is to understand how writers write. A good reader is one who
reads actively, interacting with the text in many ways and reading deeply, looking for more than main
ideas or answers to simple questions. Understanding ideas, questioning ideas, coming to your own
conclusions, reading what words literally say as well as what words imply, and thinking about and
considering what a writer does not say as well as what she does say are all parts of critical thinking and
reading reading, thinking, writing are the intertwined parts of the reading and writing process.
We have borrowed two labels, “reading with the grain” and “reading against the grain” from David
Bartholomae and Anthony Petrosky.1 We have found that these labels and their applications to reading
have helped students become more active readers, and we want to introduce them to you, suggesting
that you too may find them useful.
Although we are going to present these labels and ideas sequentially, when you are reading and writing,
you will probably find that sometimes you will be reading “with the grain,” other times “against the
grain.” In other words, there is no set order for doing this kind of reading. At times it happens
sequentially; at other times a reading may require you to move between reading “with and against the
grain.”
Reading to understand a text as an author likely intended it to be understood, seeing through a writer's
eyes, through his or her lens is reading “with the grain.” When you read “with the grain,” you are
seeking to understand an author's point of view. You might imagine that you are walking along in
dialogue with an author, considering and examining a text to come to terms with an author's ideas as
ways of thinking and seeing. Imagine a performance in which you are having a conversation with an
author; you would give her point of view thoughtful consideration, trying to see as you think she would
see. In this conversation, you want to make a text live, giving attention to the terms the author uses,
looking closely at the words, themes, ideas, images, point of view, or plot of a text. Your goal in reading
“with the grain” is to experience as much as possible as the author likely intended; even if you disagree,
this is the time to work with an author. A thoughtful, careful reading of a text is important.
A good author chooses her words carefully, working with care to convey meaning to her readers.
Reading carelessly might cause you to create a poor or incomplete reading. The readings in college
courses are complex; you will not only encounter complex academic texts, but also texts that use satire
and/or humor, subtle ways of writing that require careful, thoughtful reading to fully understand. All
these texts rely on carefully chosen words, tone, and style to convey meaning and provide clues about
the author's likely intention.
“Reading with the grain” helps you to gain an understanding of a text and what an author is attempting
to communicate. Before you can enact a fully developed critique of a text, you must first come to terms
with it and understand it as thoroughly as possible. A good reader moves from reading a text “with the
grain” to reading “against the grain.” As you read “against the grain,” you again enact a text with the
writer, walking alongside her, questioning, exploring, and closely examining her points, ideas, ways
of seeing and articulating her ideas. You seek out contradictions, silences, and faulty logic of the text.
You begin to ask questions: What does this text tell me about the author, about the author's ideas,
biases? What has the author left unsaid? Why? What cultural stance does the author reflect? What does
this tell me? What are the limits of the text? What do those limits suggest?
You are no longer looking through an author's lens. Your enactment is pushing “against the grain” of
what an author has written. Now you try on many lenses, many ways of reading, seeing, interpreting,
and thinking about a text. Imagine that you are in a disagreement with an author. How might she
respond? What ways can you envision her answering your questions? What would her performance
be? Think of yourself as an expert, questioning, pushing, and testing for inconsistencies and
ambiguities.
In some ways, this is very idealistic because you might find that you identify so closely with an essay
that it is difficult for you to read “against the grain,” but to become a strong reader, you need to learn
to read “against the grain” of a text, even those you like and admire. On the other hand, you might find
an essay that you react to negatively, finding yourself in strong disagreement with it. You might find
it very difficult to read “with the grain” of an essay or story; yet, we would ask you to voice and work
through your objections, disagreements, and frustrations, so you can approach a text to read “with the
grain.” You cannot develop an effective and complete “against the grain” mindset until you have a
clear understanding of what you think are the author's intentions and point of view. Thus, reading both
“with and against the grain” enables you to fully engage with a text and an author's ideas, moving
toward developing your own reading. Keep in mind that at times you may find reading “with and
against the grain” difficult or seemingly impossible, but the rewards for you are abundant as you
become a stronger reader, writer, and thinker.
As a final note, bear in mind that reading with and against the grain is not meant to be implemented in
a systematic manner. It is not necessary to initially read every text with the grain and then follow-up
by reading it against the grain. At times, you may find yourself fluctuating between reading with and
against the grain. This is a normal occurrence for strong readers. Remember, these styles should be
used to provoke your thinking process as you read.
Ways of Reading. 3rd. ed. Eds. David Bartholomae and Anthonly Petrosky. Boston, MA: St. Martins
Press, 1993.
Breaking Boundaries. 2000. Comfort, Carol. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458.
1 / 2 100%
La catégorie de ce document est-elle correcte?
Merci pour votre participation!

Faire une suggestion

Avez-vous trouvé des erreurs dans l'interface ou les textes ? Ou savez-vous comment améliorer l'interface utilisateur de StudyLib ? N'hésitez pas à envoyer vos suggestions. C'est très important pour nous!