hr-roadm-2011-final

Telechargé par With Sou26
White Paper
Building a Fully Flexible Optical
Layer with Next-Generation
ROADMs
Prepared by
Sterling Perrin
Senior Analyst, Heavy Reading
www.heavyreading.com
on behalf of
www.finisar.com
www.jdsu.com
October 2011
HEAVY READING | OCTOBER 2011 | WHITE PAPER | BUILDING A FULLY FLEXIBLE OPTICAL LAYER WITH NEXT-GENERATION ROADMS 2
Introduction
The optical networking industry is in the midst of a Reconfigurable Optical Add
Drop Multiplexer (ROADM) renaissance. While early-generation ROADMs brought
operators some benefits in provisioning optical bandwidth and reducing techni-
cian truck rolls, they lack much of the flexibility operators need particularly at the
end-points of a connection where wavelengths are added to and dropped from
the network.
Over the past 18 months, a new generation of ROADMs has emerged that
promises the flexibility to achieve highly automated mesh networking at the
photonic layer. The key components of this new ROADM generation include: color
independent or "colorless" functions; direction independent or "directionless
functions; freedom from wavelength contention or "contentionless" functions; and
flexible use of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) grid, or "flexible
spectrum."
Significantly, interest in these functions and their benefits cut across operator types
and is global.
This white paper provides a timely update on the evolution to next-generation
ROADMs, from technology, application and service provider adoption perspec-
tives. The paper provides the latest operator and supplier thinking on colorless,
directionless, contentionless and flexible spectrum technologies. Among the topics
covered are:
The different technology building blocks in play for CDC-F, such as ad-
vanced Wavelength Selective Switch (WSS) elements, route and select
architectures, multicast switches and coherent receivers
Emerging applications for CDC networks, such as network defragmenta-
tion and optical layer restoration
Operator timelines for migrating to next-gen ROADM networks
Beyond 100G transport and the emergence of the "Super Channel"
HEAVY READING | OCTOBER 2011 | WHITE PAPER | BUILDING A FULLY FLEXIBLE OPTICAL LAYER WITH NEXT-GENERATION ROADMS 3
Colorless, Directionless, Contentionless Overview
Colorless, directionless and contentionless functionality, commonly abbreviated as
"CDC," form the core of the emerging generation of ROADMs. A fourth function
called flex spectrum or flexible grid is also important, though it is less linked techni-
cally to CDC. Arguably the fourth generation of ROADMs, for the purposes of this
paper we term ROADMs with the collective group of functions as next-generation
ROADMs.
In this section, we define the core set of colorless, directionless and contentionless
functions.
Colorless
Current-generation ROADMs are limited by fixed add/drop transceiver and
wavelength assignments. When a wavelength is selected in existing ROADM
deployments, the transceiver must be manually connected to the correct mux/
demux port at the add/drop site. While express nodes benefit from the presence
of the ROADMs, the add/drop sites must be physically wired and rewired whenev-
er a change is made.
New "colorless" ROADM node architectures provide the means for building
ROADMs that automate the assignment of add/drop wavelength functionality.
There are several variations for building colorless ROADMs, but they typically
involve using additional WSSs in place of different multiplexers and demultiplexers
in the ROADM subsystem. (We will discuss architecture options later in this paper.)
Regardless of architecture approach, the end result is that any wavelength (color)
can be assigned to any port at the add/drop site, completely by software control
and tunable transponders (now widely deployed) without a technician on site.
Directionless
Directionless and colorless ROADMs are increasingly being discussed together as
"must haves" for true optical layer flexibility. As described above, existing ROADMs
are directionally dependent, meaning that add/drop port pairs and the trans-
ponders connected to them are fixed to an outgoing direction (i.e., North only,
South only, etc.). Changing the direction of a particular transponder requires
physical rewiring by a technician. Directionless ROADMs, by contrast, allow any
wavelength to be routed to any direction served by the node, by software
control, and without physical rewiring.
Contentionless
Colorless and directionless ROADMs have been under discussion within the industry
for some time. Newer is the concept of contentionless ROADMs networks. Driving
the operator requirement for contentionless ROADMs is the fact that, even with
colorless and directionless functionality, a ROADM network is still has limitations
that could require manual intervention in some cases. In other words, the color-
less/directionless network is still not completely flexible.
The problem is that wavelength blocking can concur when two wavelengths of
the same color converge at the same WSS structure at the same time. This causes
network contention. Operators must avoid this potential blocking/contention
HEAVY READING | OCTOBER 2011 | WHITE PAPER | BUILDING A FULLY FLEXIBLE OPTICAL LAYER WITH NEXT-GENERATION ROADMS 4
situation by partitioning the add/drop structures so that different colored wave-
lengths are associated with different structures thus eliminating the possibility for
two red wavelengths to converge on the same add/drop structure simultaneously.
While this level of engineering does resolve wavelength contention potential from
a provisioned perspective, it means that operators sacrifice a level of dynamic
flexibility and may require additional add/drop structures to accommodate
particular wavelength channels. A contentionless architecture, by contrast, allows
multiple copies of the same wavelength on a single add/drop structure (without
any partitioning restrictions).
A colorless/directionless architecture combined with true contentionless functio-
nality is the end goal of any network operator that has deployed or is planning to
deploy a ROADM network. Such architectures, known as CDC, give them the
ultimate level of flexibility at the optical layer.
HEAVY READING | OCTOBER 2011 | WHITE PAPER | BUILDING A FULLY FLEXIBLE OPTICAL LAYER WITH NEXT-GENERATION ROADMS 5
Value Propositions for Operators
In September Light Reading led a webinar, sponsored by BTI Systems, on next-
generation ROADMs, during which we asked audience participants to select the
primary operator benefit of NG ROADMs. Figure 1 shows the poll results of the 51
network operators that responded to the question.
The network operator responses indicate that rapid service provisioning through
"touchless" activation is the number one perceived benefit (33 percent of the
vote) but that cost reductions measured in both capex and opex, and topology
flexibility are also of critical importance. Simplified operations through automation
and investment security weighed in as secondary requirements.
In our recent interview with BT, Business Development Director Dave Hook cited
the need to reduce operations requirements as the primary driving force behind
their transport network evolutions including ROADMs "with the goal of a zero
touch architecture as the Holy Grail." Among the key benefits of NG ROADMs,
according to Hook, are:
Ability to respond to identify and respond to root failures much more
quickly than in the past
Reconfigurability at the optical layer
The ability to improve fiber utilization
Reduced power consumption
On this last point, Hook notes that "BT has a commitment to reduce its carbon
footprint considerably," so the ROADM benefits line up nicely with the organiza-
tion's corporate goals. We note this to underscore a point that is raised repeatedly
in our ROADM discussions with operators: NG ROADMs are rarely being evaluated
in isolation but are in integral component of their transport network evolution.
Figure 1: Primary Operator Benefit for NG ROADM Networks
N=51
Source: Light Reading Webinar "Next-Generation ROADMs," September 2001
1 / 18 100%
La catégorie de ce document est-elle correcte?
Merci pour votre participation!

Faire une suggestion

Avez-vous trouvé des erreurs dans linterface ou les textes ? Ou savez-vous comment améliorer linterface utilisateur de StudyLib ? Nhésitez pas à envoyer vos suggestions. Cest très important pour nous !