material–enhanced MR imaging, with his-
tologic findings as the reference standard
in cadaveric specimens and (b) and to
investigate the signal intensity changes in
the meniscus and perimeniscal soft tissues
with conventional and contrast-enhanced
MR imaging in symptomatic patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cadaveric Study
The knees from eight adult cadavers
were radiographed (frontal and lateral
projections) to determine the presence of
osteoarticular disease. Two knees were
excluded from further study owing to the
presence of moderate or severe osteoar-
throsis, as determined in consensus by
two musculoskeletal radiologists (O.H.,
R.D.B.). The remaining six knees (12 me-
nisci) from the cadavers of four men and
two women aged 57–78 years (mean, 70
years) at the time of death were evaluated
with conventional and contrast-enhanced
MR imaging, anatomic inspection, high-
spatial-resolution MR imaging, and histo-
logic assessment, and the results were eval-
uated with statistical analyses.
Conventional and contrast-enhanced MR
imaging.—Initially, MR imaging was per-
formed by using intermediate-weighted
spin-echo (repetition time msec/echo time
msec, 2,000/14) and fat-suppressed T1-
weighted spin-echo (600/14) sequences in
the sagittal and coronal planes. The imag-
ing parameters were as follows: section
thickness, 3 mm with no intersection
gap; field of view, 8 ⫻8 cm in the sagittal
plane and 10 ⫻10 cm in the coronal
plane; matrix, 256 ⫻192; and four sig-
nals acquired. MR imaging was per-
formed with a 1.5-T system (Signa; GE
Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis) with a
5-inch-diameter (12.7-cm) surface coil.
The wedge-shaped structure of low sig-
nal intensity that is known to represent
at least part of the meniscus (16,17) was
measured. Measurements of the radial di-
mensions, from the free edge to the pe-
ripheral border, of the 12 menisci in the
six knees were performed electronically
at an MR workstation (Advantage Win-
dows version 2.0; GE Medical Systems) by
two musculoskeletal radiologists (O.H.,
N.L.) working independently. The radial
dimension of each meniscus was mea-
sured in the sagittal plane on two contig-
uous sections through the midportions
(as determined by counting the number
of image sections in which the meniscus
was visible) of the anterior and posterior
horns. The radial dimensions of the body
segments also were measured on two
contiguous sections in the coronal plane.
With these six measurements obtained
for each of the 12 menisci, a total of 72
radial measurements were initially re-
corded. In addition, these MR images were
evaluated for the presence of meniscal
tears by using widely accepted diagnostic
criteria (ie, grade 3 signal intensity, ab-
normal meniscal morphology, or both)
(18–20).
After the conventional MR images
were evaluated, intraarterial injection of
contrast material was performed accord-
ing to the technique used by Danzig et al
(21). First, a cannula was inserted into the
superficial femoral artery, 10 cm proximal
to the joint line, and perfusion with a hep-
arin-saline solution was performed to re-
move blood clots from the vascular tree.
Then, the distal portion of the popliteal
artery was occluded just proximal to its
trifurcation, and a solution consisting of
1 mL gadopentetate dimeglumine (Mag-
nevist; Schering, Berlin, Germany) and
250 mL of saline solution was injected in
the antegrade direction by using manual
pressure. After injection of the contrast
material, MR imaging was performed
with the same parameters as for conven-
tional imaging. MR imaging began
within 2 minutes following the injection
and was completed within 30 minutes.
The radial dimensions of the wedge-
shaped structure of low signal intensity
again were measured by the same two
musculoskeletal radiologists according to
the technique already described. These
72 measurements obtained after contrast
material administration were recorded
and later compared with the 72 measure-
ments obtained before contrast material
administration. Subsequently, for each
meniscus, the same reviewers together di-
rectly compared the MR images obtained
before and after injection of contrast ma-
terial by viewing the two sets of images of
each knee simultaneously and recording
the presence of contrast enhancement in
the wedge-shaped structure and in the
adjacent soft tissues. A five-point scale
was used for this assessment: 0, no en-
hancement; 1, minimal enhancement; 2,
mild enhancement; 3, moderate enhance-
ment; and 4, marked enhancement. If a
meniscal tear was present, the presence
of contrast enhancement in and around
the meniscal tear was recorded by using
the same five-point scale.
Anatomic inspection.—Each cadaveric
specimen was then frozen, and 3-mm-
thick sections were obtained with a band
saw in either a coronal (n⫽3) or a
sagittal (n⫽3) plane to match the MR
imaging planes. The sections were col-
lected with attention paid to preserva-
tion of all capsular attachments and sy-
novial tissue adjacent to the menisci.
This process yielded 12 anterior horns
(six medial, six lateral), 12 posterior
horns (six medial, six lateral), and 12
body segments (six medial, six lateral),
for a total of 36 gross anatomic speci-
mens. The radial dimensions of these sec-
tions of menisci were measured at ⫻5
magnification from their inner apex to
their peripheral border by the same two
musculoskeletal radiologists working in-
dependently.
High-spatial-resolution MR imaging.—
High-spatial-resolution MR imaging sub-
sequently was performed on the 36 gross
Figure 1. High-spatial-resolution FLASH MR
image (100/9, 30° flip angle) of a cadaveric
medial meniscus shows measurement of the
radial dimension of the anterior horn from its
free edge (straight arrow) to its peripheral bor-
der (curved arrow).
TABLE 1
Gadolinium Enhancement in the
Meniscus and Perimeniscal Soft
Tissues in Cadaveric Knees
Meniscus and
Meniscal
Segment Meniscus Soft Tissues
Medial
Anterior horn 0 (0) 0.9 (0–2)
Body 0 (0) 0.2 (0–1)
Posterior horn 0 (0) 1.8 (1–3)
Lateral 0 (0)
Anterior horn 0 (0) 1.3 (1–3)
Body 0 (0) 2.7 (2–4)
Posterior horn 0 (0) 1.9 (1–3)
Note.—Data are mean ratings determined
with a five-point scale for degree of enhance-
ment: 0, none; 1, minimal; 2, mild; 3, mod-
erate; 4, marked. Numbers in parentheses are
the range.
194 䡠Radiology 䡠October 2000 Hauger et al