A. Zakeri, E. Bahmani and A.S.R. Aghdam Corrosion Communications 5 (2022) 25–38
3.1. Plant extracts as GCIs
3.1.1. Preparation of extracts
According to the existing literature, various plant components’ ex-
tracts, including fruit, leaves, bark, peel, ower, root, seed, and even
whole plant extracts, are commonly utilized as GCIs. It should be noted
that phytochemical type and content dier based on the plant compo-
nent selection for extraction. It has been reported that phytochemical
contents of Sida acuta varied by plant part, with avonoids, saponins,
alkaloids, tannins, organic acid, and anthraquinones found in the leaves
extract and alkaloids, tannins, and anthraquinones exclusively con-
tained in the stem extract [47] . Leaves extracts, out of a variety of
extracts, were reported to exhibit the best overall protective perfor-
mance at low concentrations. This is mainly because phytochemicals are
primarily produced in leaves, where they are synthesized in the pres-
ence of sunlight, water, and CO
2
[ 10 , 48 ]. Some of the most common
phytochemicals that have a corrosion-inhibiting eect are avonoids,
glycosides, alkaloids, saponins, phytosterol, tannins, anthraquinones,
phenolic compounds, triterpenes, and phlobatannins. Most such phy-
tochemicals have polar functional groups like amide ( —CONH
2
), hy-
droxyl ( —OH), ester ( —COOC
2
H
5
), carboxylic acid ( —COOH), and
amino ( —NH
2
) that assist in their absorption [49–53] .
Following the selection of plant parts, the drying process is usually
accompanied by the sieving and grinding procedures to turn the plant
extract into powder. The traditional drying operation is usually carried
out at room temperature, in the shade or in the sun, and takes a lengthy
period. Following the drying process, several methods for separating
and extracting the desired extract from plants can be applied. In gen-
eral, the extraction principle is based on heating, followed by cooling,
and isolating active compounds (phytochemicals) [ 1 , 10 , 54 ]. It is worth
adding that the amounts of phytochemicals present in the extract are
also aected by a number of factors, including the plant’s age, vege-
tative cycle, geographic region, and the impact of weather conditions
[55] . Besides, there are extract powders that are commercially available
and can be used in the preparation of inhibitor stock solutions. Some of
the commonly used extraction processes along with their advantages
are presented in Table 1 . Besides, a typical experimental procedure for
yielding the Chamomile extract in powder form is shown schematically
in Fig. 5 .
3.1.2. Inhibition mechanism and efficiency of phytochemicals
Oftentimes, the electronic structures of the phytochemicals present
in the plant extracts are similar to those of organic CIs; therefore, it
is commonly recognized that these substances are capable of protecting
the ferrous metals in corrosive media [33] . To study the corrosion inhibi-
tion mechanism and performance of a specic plant extract, it is impor-
tant to determine the chemical compounds present in the plant extract.
Identication of the phytochemical substances such as volatile and non-
volatile compounds as well as heavy metals, fatty acids, and amino acids
can be carried out by chemical analysis techniques. Several commonly
used methods for determining phytochemical compounds are Fourier-
transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) [57] , liquid chromatography-
mass spectrometry (LC-MS) [58] , and gas chromatography-mass spec-
troscopy (GC-MS) [59] .
Gravimetric investigation together with surface and electrochemi-
cal analyses are some of the approaches used to study corrosion inhibi-
tion behavior. The most frequent method for determining the eciency
of GCIs is weight loss measurement, and an inhibitory mechanism can
be suggested based on the results. In this method, the eciency of an
inhibitor is evaluated on the account of substrate weight loss, which
is recorded before and after immersion in the electrolyte [60] . In the
meantime, modern electrochemical techniques such as electrochemi-
cal impedance spectroscopy (EIS), potentiodynamic polarization (PDP),
and electrochemical noise (EN) analysis have also been successfully im-
plemented. These ecient tests have provided certain results that are
comparable to those obtained using the traditional gravimetric method
[ 1 , 61 ]. These methods are briey described in this section.
3.1.2.1. Weight loss measurement (WLM). Prior to performing WLM,
metal specimens are prepared by polishing with several grades of abra-
sive paper, then thoroughly rinsed with solvents (ethanol, acetone,
and/or distilled water), and allowed to dry at ambient temperature. The
cleaned metal coupons are then weighed using a sensitive electronic bal-
ance before being immersed. To check for weight loss, the thoroughly
cleaned corroded specimens are reweighed after a dened duration of
exposure time. In addition to the synthesized solutions made from an-
alytical ingredients, many studies employed test solutions made from
original eld solution [62] . Specimen WLM in the absence and presence
of GCI is used to examine the eect of GCI in reducing corrosion rate on
metal coupons. The WLM methodology is straightforward and credible,
and it is used in several corrosion-monitoring systems as the primary
method of determining GCI eciency [63] .
3.1.2.2. Potentiodynamic polarization (PDP). PDP is another
electrochemical-based method for determining GCI performance,
corrosion rate, and corrosion prevention mechanism. In most studies,
the basic laboratory setup is employing three electrodes in the electro-
chemical cell for the measurement: counter (Pt or graphite), working
(metal substrate), and reference (calomel or Ag/AgCl) electrodes
immersed in a specied volume and concentration test solution [64] .
The reference electrode measures and controls the system’s voltage ( V ),
while the counter electrode measures and controls the current ( I ). The
open circuit potential ( E
ocp
) of the metal changes as the electrochemi-
cal reactions take place. After reaching equilibrium, a steady value is
measured, and then the PDP scan is conducted. Afterward, a Tafel plot
is established by providing a potential that ranges from 0.25 V below
the E
ocp
to 0.25 V higher potential value. The plots are then used to
calculate the corrosion potential ( E
corr
) and corrosion current density
( i
corr
). Moreover, dierent concentrations of GCIs and experimental
temperatures can be used to examine dierent impacts of GCIs on
corrosion inhibition performance [61] .
Table 1
Some extraction processes for plant extracts (phytochemicals) and their benets.
Method Advantage Note
Solvent extraction Improved energy eciency, high production output,
fast and easy operation
The most commonly used technique among others. Operation factors
aecting the properties of extract include type of solvents,
solvent-to-solid ratio, extraction time and temperature
Microwave-assisted extraction Enhanced reaction eciency, reduced reaction
durations, and minimized active component damage
Irradiation with microwaves has a synergistic impact of both breaking
and heating, while other methods do not have such capability
Enzyme-assisted extraction Suitable method for releasing bounded substances,
increased overall yield
Allowing for the utilization of practically the entire plant matrix
Ultrasound-assisted extraction Higher extraction yield, reaching almost 99.99% in
some studies. Without posing any damaging eects
to the structure of phytochemicals
Ultrasonic energy-assisted extraction aids the leaching of organic and
inorganic components. Ultrasound energy causes severe bubble
collapse, assisting diusion into the plant matrix, which in turn
enhances eciency
28