218 Chapter 6
was allowed to engage in the compulsive ritual immedi-
ately after the provocation, however, her or his anxiety
would generally decrease rapidly (although only tempo-
rarily) and therefore reinforce the compulsive ritual.
This model predicts, then, that exposure to feared
objects or situations should be useful in treating OCD if the
exposure is followed by prevention of the ritual, enabling
the person to see that the anxiety will subside naturally in
time without the ritual (see also Rachman & Shafran, 1998).
This is indeed the core of the most eective form of behav-
ior therapy for OCD, as discussed later. Thus, the early
behavioral model has been very useful in helping us
understand what factors maintain obsessive-compulsive
behavior, and it has also generated an eective form of
treatment. However, it has not been so helpful in explain-
ing why people with OCD develop obsessions in the first
place and why some people never develop compulsive
behaviors.
OCD AND PREPAREDNESS The preparedness concept
described earlier that considers the evolutionarily adaptive
nature of fear and anxiety for our early ancestors also can
help us to understand the occurrence and persistence of
OCD (De Silva, Rachman, & Seligman, 1977; Rapoport,
1989). The fact that many people with OCD have obses-
sions and compulsions focused on dirt, contamination, and
other potentially dangerous situations has led many
researchers to conclude that these features of the disorder
likely have deep evolutionary roots (Mineka & Zinbarg,
1996, 2006). In addition, some theorists have argued that
the displacement activities that many species of animals
engage in under situations of conflict or high arousal
resemble the compulsive rituals seen in obsessive-
compulsive disorder (Craske, 1999; Mineka & Zinbarg,
1996; Rapoport, 1989; Winslow & Insel, 1991). Displace-
ment activities often involve grooming (such as a bird
preening its feathers) or nesting under conditions of high
conflict or frustration. They may therefore be related to the
distress-induced grooming (such as washing) or tidying
rituals seen in people with OCD, which are often provoked
by obsessive thoughts that elicit anxiety.
THE EFFECTS OF ATTEMPTING TO SUPPRESS OBSES-
SIVE THOUGHTS Quick, don’t think about a white
bear! Gotcha. When most people attempt to suppress
unwanted thoughts they sometimes experience a para-
doxical increase in those thoughts later (Wegner, 1994). As
already noted, people with normal and abnormal obses-
sions dier primarily in the degree to which they resist
their own thoughts and find them unacceptable. Thus,
one factor contributing to the frequency of obsessive
thoughts, and the negative moods with which they are
often associated, may be these attempts to suppress them
(similar to what was discussed earlier about the eects of
attempts to control worry in people with GAD). For
adulthood, but also can occur in children, where its
symptoms are strikingly similar to those of adults (Poulton
et al., 2009; Torres et al., 2006). Childhood or early adoles-
cent onset is more common in boys than in girls and is
often associated with greater severity (Lomax et al., 2009)
and greater heritability (Grisham et al., 2008). In most cases
the disorder has a gradual onset, and once it becomes a
serious condition, it tends to be chronic, although the
severity of symptoms sometimes waxes and wanes over
time (Mataix-Cols et al., 2002).
Comorbidity with Other Disorders
OCD frequently co-occurs with other anxiety disorders,
most commonly social anxiety, panic disorder, GAD, and
PTSD (Kessler, Chiu, Demler, et al., 2005; Mathews, 2009).
Moreover, approximately 25 to 50 percent of people with
OCD experience major depression at some time in their
lives and as many as 80 percent experience significant
depressive symptoms (Steketee & Barlow, 2002; Torres et
al., 2006), often at least partly in response to having OCD.
Psychological Causal Factors
The following psychological factors may cause obsessive-
compulsive disorder.
OCD AS LEARNED BEHAVIOR The dominant behav-
ioral or learning view of obsessive-compulsive disorder is
derived from Mowrer’s two-process theory of avoidance
learning (1947). According to this theory, neutral stimuli
become associated with frightening thoughts or experi-
ences through classical conditioning and come to elicit
anxiety. For example, touching a doorknob or shaking
hands might become associated with the “scary” idea of
contamination. Once having made this association, the
person may discover that the anxiety produced by shaking
hands or touching a doorknob can be reduced by hand
washing. Washing his or her hands extensively reduces the
anxiety, and so the washing response is reinforced, which
makes it more likely to occur again in the future when
other situations evoke anxiety about contamination (Rach-
man & Shafran, 1998). Once learned, such avoidance
responses are extremely resistant to extinction (Mineka &
Zinbarg, 2006). Moreover, any stressors that raise anxiety
levels can lead to a heightened frequency of avoidance
responses in animals or compulsive rituals in humans
(Cromer et al., 2007).
Several classic experiments conducted by Rachman
and Hodgson (1980) supported this theory. They found
that for most people with OCD, exposure to a situation that
provoked their obsession (e.g., a doorknob or toilet seat for
someone with obsessions about contamination) did indeed
produce distress, which would continue for a moderate
amount of time and then gradually dissipate. If the person
M06_BUTC4568_18_GE_C06.indd 218 24/09/2020 14:03