The
price
for
one
copy
of
this
booklet
$2:
five
copies
for
$7.
Order
from:
W.
F.
Strojie,
41695
Clark-Smith
Dr.,
Lebanon,
OR
97355.
15
June
1979
TRUTH
AND
VATICAN
Il
Our
Lord
said
of
Satan
that
he
“’stood
not
in
the
truth,
a
liar
and
murderer
from
the
beginning.””
St.
Paul
predicted
an
‘‘operation
of
error’”’
inthe
latter
days,
at
which
time
many
will
be
lost
because
they
had
insufficient
love
for
the
truth.
Thus,
we
come
full
circle
from
the
beginning
of
Creation
to
the
end
of
time.
What
is
this
operation
of
error?
Surely
it
is
connected
with
that
‘‘loosing
of
Satan’’
St.
John
foretold
in
his
Apocalypse.
Ina
broad
sense
it
can
be
seen
in
the
worldwide
substitution
of
evil
propaganda
for
truth
--
printing
all
the
news
that
fits,
etc.;
words
used
to
deceive,
rather
than
as
signs
and
symbols
of
true
meaning.
Ina
special
sense
this
operation
of
error
attacks
truth
at
its
earthly
center,
the
divine
deposit
of
Faith,
by
means
of
a
Vatican
council
and
grab
of
the
papal
chair.
Shocking?
Of
course
not.
When
has
the
devil
ever
neglected
the
papal
chair.
Yet
it
is
to
be
only
near
the
end
of
time
that
the
devil
could
expect
considerable
success
there
--
the
operation
of
error
which
would
bring
on
the
Scriptural
Great
Apostacy.
The
devil
makes
truth
his
own
--
Theosophy,
the
pretended
search
for
truth,
a
pretended
inner
truth,
higher
truth,
in-
Spiration;
truth
through
dialogue
between
persons
holding
different
‘truths’.
Since
the
beginning
of
the
Second
Vatican
Council,
in
the
name
of
ecumenical
dialogue,
truth
the
Catholic
Church
has
always
taught
with
certainty
has
been
questioned,
distorted,
‘dialogued’,
and
indirectly
denied.
Latest
expression
of
this
is
contained
in
John
Paul
2’s
first
encyclical
where
he
speaks
of
‘‘a
shared
investigation
of
the
truth
in
the
full
evangelical
and
Christian
sense,’’
and
of
a
‘’coming
together
with
the
representatives
of
non-Christian
religions,
an
activity
expressed
by
dialogue,
contacts,
prayer
in
common,”
etc.
Consider
the
hundreds
of
sects
and
non-Christian
religions,
all
disagreeing
with
each
other,
as
a
source
of
Catholic
doctrine!
Paul
6
spoke
often
of
this
search
for
truth,
and
of
a
search
for
a
“man
who
will
save
us.’’
Strange
words.
Following
Montini,
his
‘revered
Paul
VI,
truly
my
father’’,
John
Paul
2
in
his
first
encyclical
changes
‘|
am
the
Way,
the
Truth,
and
the
Life”
toa
vague
notion
of
man
as
the
‘’Church’s
way”.
It
is
not
as
though
the
Catholic
people
were
being
deceived
by
a
subtle
heresy,
as
happened
at
times
in
the
past.
Not
at
all.
The
whole
show
is
carried
on
in
the
open,
so
that
all
can
see
who
will
see.
Walk
into
any
parish
church,
read
the
books
of
the
New
Order
of
Worship,
including
the
idiotic,
revolutionary,
mind-
destroying
hymns.
See
the
priest
at
the
new
Assembly,
still
wearing
his
priestly
vestments
but
acting
as
no
more
than
leader
of
the
worship
service.
He
produces
a
cup
and
some
bread
and
amid
more
or
less
commotion
his
‘’supper’’
is
distributed;
perhaps
by
the
new
“extraordinary
ministers,”
male
and
female,
to
all
present.
That
is
what
remains
of
the
Mass.
That
stupid
little
table
standing
out
before
the
beautiful
old
altar
is
sign
and
symbol
of
the
already
accomplished
degradation
of
the
Catholic
priesthood.
You
are
used
fo
the
“‘new
way’’?
Your
parish
priest
performs
it
reverently?
The
priests
are
assigned
according
to
the
more
or
less
‘conservative’
make-up
of
the
parish,
high
or
low
church.
This
is
adaptation,
one
of
the
words
which
has
come
into
frequent
use
since
the
Council,
and
which
appears
as
a
principle
in
the
Articles
of
the
Liturgy.
One
of
the
deceptions
practiced
from
the
first
was
to
write
in
the
Articles
on
the
Liturgy
that
Latin
was
fo
be
retained,
which
provision
was
ignored
from
the
start.
Vatican
2
Articles
are
all
used
this
way.
It
doesn’t
matter
whether
they
contain
explicit
heresy.
Who
would
think
of
consulting
them?
Change,
change,
adapt,
adapt;
two
steps
forward,
one
apparent
step
backward
--
although
|
can’t
really
recall
a
step
backward,
except
when
they
revised
Article
7
(after
some
complaints)
so
that
it
doesn’t
define
the
Mass
exclusively
as
a
supper.
Typically,
no
more
than
that
was
done.
Now
the
nun
who
in
white
pants
suit
comes
to
give
com-
munion
to
the
sick.
We
see
from
this
what
the
reverend
clergy
think
today
of
what
they
call
simply
the
Eucharist.
Gone
are
the
solemn
moments
when
the
priest
arrived
with
the
Blessed
Sacrament,
when
a
candle
was
lit
and
all
knelt
in
silence.
What
to
do
about
the
nun?
Have
her
thrown
out.
Refuse
also
to
admit
priests
who
are
party
to
the
current
corruption
of
Catholic
sacraments
and
belief.
To
act
in
this
way
is
to
give
testimony
of
your
belief
in
the
true
Holy
Eucharist.
What
about
the
priest
who
wears
two
hats,
a
modified
Trent
hat,
say
at
eight
oclock,
then
a
New
Order
hat
at
eleven?
Where
4
is
the
truth
in
such
a
man?
This
kind
of
priest
typifies
and
acts
out
that
ambiguity
which
is
the
chief
mark
of
Vatican
2
policy
and
action.
|
have
mentioned
high
and
low
church
parishes.
In
this
ar-
chdiocese
|
have
looked
into
what
might
be
described
as
restrained
Lutheran-Episcopalian
ex-Catholic
parishes,
and
those
|
think
of
as
Marxist-Holy
Roller.
But
in
both
are
used
the
same
‘missal’
and
hymn
book,
full
of
unbelievable
banalities,
a
“hiya
God,
you’re
a
good
fellow”’
kind
of
mockery.
‘“Yahweh,
Yahweh,
Yahweh...
.the
spirit
is
a-moving
all
over.
.
.shalom,
shalom,
shalom.’’
Who
are
the
priests
party
to
this
corruption
of
the
Sacraments
and
Catholic
belief?
They
are
all
who
are
going
along
with
the
New
Order
of
Worship,
composed
in
company
with
non-
Catholics
and
imposed
by
Paul
6
and
the
Vatican
2
bishops.
They
are
all
the
parish
priests
today,
however
much
they
deceive
themselves
about
their
Catholic
intention
and
obedience.
One
of
the
underlying
deceits
of
the
devil
and
New
Clergy,
is
to
use
emotionalism
to
wipe
out
Catholic
doctrine
from
the
minds
of
their
people.
Most
of
the
old
reformers
have
done
this.
Following
these
older
Protestants
our
formerly
Catholic
clergy
have
replaced
recollection,
adoration,
and
interior
prayer
with
hymn
singing
and
socializing
--
the
social
and
religious
as
one
thing,
as
at
the
synagogue.
In
this
connection
|
have
at
hand
a
five-page
letter
of
abuse
by
an
older
woman,
addressed
to
a
man
who
talked
against
the
absurd
Service
of
Resurrection.
This
woman,
a
Catholic
from
near
birth,
lays
it
down
as
doc-
trine
that
“Religion
is
in
the
heart,
not
the
mind!’’
This
notion,
_if
it
were
true,
would
make
straw
of
the
writings
of
the
Apostles
themselves;
of
St.
Jerome,
St.
Augustine,
St.
Thomas
Aquinas,
the
solemn
pronouncements
of
the
Popes,
and
the
writings
of
a
hundred
other
Doctors,
Fathers
and
Saints
of
the
Church.
Yet
it
is
the
operative
assumption
of
the
mod
parish.
Those
who
believe
this
lie
are
open
to
the
most
nonsensical
and
diabolic
errors.
The
Vatican
2
reformers
have
used
emotionalism
freely
from
the
first,
with
their
‘inner
light’
and
‘charisma’,
‘Spirit
of
Vatican
2’
fakery.
The
result
of
such
abandonment
of
reason
and
doctrine
appears
in
the
general
silliness
and
sen-
timentalism,
and
the
great
falling
away,
which
we
see
around
us.
The
general
abandonment
of
reason
is
quite
evident,
in
that
most
Catholics
refuse
to
see
the
resulting
moral
and
intellectual
confusion;
the
clergy
refuse
to
heed
reliable
statistics
of
present
chaos.
In
all
quarters,
whether
reform
or
so-called
Traditionalist,
there
has
been
taking
place
a
flight
from
reality.
Anyway,
‘‘Intellect
is
the
first
faculty
of
the
soul;
pure
faith
the
first
theological
virtue.’’
That
is
what
St.
John
of
the
Cross
taught,
and
doubtless
other
theologians.
As
mystical
doctor
of
the
Church
St.
John
knew
as
much
about
the
heart
as
any
other
man.
In
the
letter
just
cited
appears
one
other
item
of
deceit
which
has
been
instilled
surreptiously
into
the
minds
of
New
Catholics
--
that
truth
cannot
exist
outside
the
majority,
the
Vatican
2
‘“concensus’’.
And
so
those
few
Catholics
who
now
speak
plainly
what
had
always
been
accepted
as
Catholic
doctrine,
are
called
dissenters,
which
of
course
we
are.
The
trickery
consists
in
the
usual
evil
revolutionary
practice
of
words
distortion.
In
this
case
‘‘dissenter’’
is
made
to
seem
a
necessarily
bad
word,
as
it
always
is
among
Communists
whose
thing
is
“’solidarity’’.
This
Same
woman
writer
referred
to,
directs
another
Communist
epithet
at
the
man
to
whom
she
is
writing
--
‘“‘hate
monger’”’.
‘‘Hate
monger”
is
a
term
freely
used
by
those
who
have
made
of
anger,
hatred
and
envy
a
science
for
creating
disorder,
and
whose
greeting
to
decent
orderly
people
consists
of
sullen
looks
and
the
clenched
fist.
|
have
at
hand
a
photo
of
three
very
hard-
faced
Catholic
bishops,
in
which
the
one
on
the
right
extends
into
the
middle
of
the
group
a
prominent
upraised
clenched
fist.
The
clenched
fist
or
claw
is
a
suitable
sign
for
those
bishops
who
follow
the
popes
of
the
crooked
cross.
|
Know
from
reading
thousands
of
letters
since
|
began
publishing
eight
years
ago,
that
many
used
to
go
home
from
the
new
services
every
Sunday
angry
and
frustrated;
but
perhaps
most
of
these
have
since
let
go
their
sanity
and
got
with
if.
Others
go
along
unthinkingly,
like
sheep
or
cows,
to
be
aroused
at
their
parish
church
by
the
new
emotional
climate
of
‘par-
ticipation’.
Many
husbands
and
wives
are
bitterly
divided
over
the
reforms
--
what
an
effect
of
a
supposed-to-be
Catholic
renewal!
Children
of
these
parents
are
of
course
confused;
they
will
never
become
unconfused
but
will
be
lost
to
the
Faith.
Thousands
of
adults,
lifetime
Catholics
and
pre-Vatican
2
converts,
have
dropped
out;
fifty-percent
or
so
in
Europe.
What
we
now
have
are
parishes
no
less
reformed
than
were
those
in
Germany
in
the
time
of
Luther.
Yet
John
Paul
2
says
that
Vatican
2
is
a
‘‘solemn
obligation
which
must
be
put
info
ef-
fect.’
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
1
/
36
100%
