Truth and v2 Strojie

The price for one copy of this booklet $2:
five copies for $7. Order from: W. F. Strojie,
41695 Clark-Smith Dr., Lebanon, OR 97355.
15 June 1979

TRUTH AND VATICAN Il
Our Lord said of Satan that he “’stood not in the truth, a liar and
murderer from the beginning.”” St. Paul predicted an
‘‘operation of error’”’ inthe latter days, at which time many will
be lost because they had insufficient love for the truth. Thus, we
come full circle from the beginning of Creation to the end of
time.
What is this operation of error? Surely it is connected with
that ‘‘loosing of Satan’’ St. John foretold in his Apocalypse. Ina
broad sense it can be seen in the worldwide substitution of evil
propaganda
for
truth
--
printing
all
the
news
that
fits,
etc.;
words used to deceive, rather than as signs and symbols of true
meaning. Ina special sense this operation of error attacks truth
at its earthly center, the divine deposit of Faith, by means of a
Vatican council and grab of the papal chair. Shocking? Of
course not. When has the devil ever neglected the papal chair.
Yet it is to be only near the end of time that the devil could
expect considerable success there -- the operation of error
which would bring on the Scriptural Great Apostacy.
The
devil
makes
truth
his
own
--
Theosophy,
the
pretended
search
for
truth,
a
pretended
inner
truth,
higher
truth,
in-
Spiration;
truth
through
dialogue
between
persons
holding
different
‘truths’.
Since
the
beginning
of
the
Second
Vatican
Council,
in
the
name
of
ecumenical
dialogue,
truth
the
Catholic
Church
has
always
taught
with
certainty
has
been
questioned,
distorted,
‘dialogued’,
and
indirectly
denied.
Latest
expression
of
this
is
contained
in
John
Paul
2’s
first
encyclical
where
he
speaks
of
‘‘a
shared
investigation
of
the
truth
in
the
full
evangelical
and
Christian
sense,’’
and
of
a
‘’coming
together
with
the
representatives
of
non-Christian
religions,
an
activity
expressed
by
dialogue,
contacts,
prayer
in
common,”
etc.
Consider
the
hundreds
of
sects
and
non-Christian
religions,
all
disagreeing
with
each
other,
as
a
source
of
Catholic
doctrine!
Paul
6
spoke
often
of
this
search
for
truth,
and
of
a
search
for
a
“man
who
will
save
us.’’
Strange
words.
Following
Montini,
his
‘revered
Paul
VI,
truly
my
father’’,
John
Paul
2
in
his
first
encyclical
changes
‘|
am
the
Way,
the
Truth,
and
the
Life”
toa
vague
notion
of
man
as
the
‘’Church’s
way”.

It
is
not
as
though
the
Catholic
people
were
being
deceived
by
a
subtle
heresy,
as
happened
at
times
in
the
past.
Not
at
all.
The
whole
show
is
carried
on
in
the
open,
so
that
all
can
see
who
will
see.
Walk
into
any
parish
church,
read
the
books
of
the
New
Order
of
Worship,
including
the
idiotic,
revolutionary,
mind-
destroying
hymns.
See
the
priest
at
the
new
Assembly,
still
wearing
his
priestly
vestments
but
acting
as
no
more
than
leader
of
the
worship
service.
He
produces
a
cup
and
some
bread
and
amid
more
or
less
commotion
his
‘’supper’’
is
distributed;
perhaps
by
the
new
“extraordinary
ministers,”
male
and
female,
to
all
present.
That
is
what
remains
of
the
Mass.
That stupid little table standing out before the beautiful old
altar is sign and symbol of the already accomplished
degradation of the Catholic priesthood.
You are used fo the “‘new way’’? Your parish priest performs
it reverently? The priests are assigned according to the more or
less ‘conservative’ make-up of the parish, high or low church.
This is adaptation, one of the words which has come into
frequent use since the Council, and which appears as a principle
in the Articles of the Liturgy.
One of the deceptions practiced from the first was to write in
the Articles on the Liturgy that Latin was fo be retained, which
provision was ignored from the start. Vatican 2 Articles are all
used this way. It doesn’t matter whether they contain explicit
heresy. Who would think of consulting them? Change, change,
adapt, adapt; two steps forward, one apparent step backward --
although | can’t really recall a step backward, except when
they revised Article 7 (after some complaints) so that it doesn’t
define the Mass exclusively as a supper. Typically, no more
than that was done.
Now the nun who in white pants suit comes to give com-
munion to the sick. We see from this what the reverend clergy
think today of what they call simply the Eucharist. Gone are the
solemn moments when the priest arrived with the Blessed
Sacrament,
when
a
candle
was
lit
and
all
knelt
in
silence.
What
to do about the nun? Have her thrown out. Refuse also to admit
priests who are party to the current corruption of Catholic
sacraments
and
belief.
To
act
in
this
way
is
to
give
testimony
of
your belief in the true Holy Eucharist.
What
about
the
priest
who
wears
two
hats,
a
modified
Trent
hat,
say
at
eight
oclock,
then
a
New
Order
hat
at
eleven?
Where

4
is the truth in such a man? This kind of priest typifies and acts
out that ambiguity which is the chief mark of Vatican 2 policy
and action.
| have mentioned high and low church parishes. In this ar-
chdiocese | have looked into what might be described as
restrained Lutheran-Episcopalian ex-Catholic parishes, and
those | think of as Marxist-Holy Roller. But in both are used the
same ‘missal’ and hymn book, full of unbelievable banalities, a
“hiya God, you’re a good fellow”’ kind of mockery. ‘“Yahweh,
Yahweh, Yahweh... .the spirit is a-moving all over. . .shalom,
shalom, shalom.’’
Who are the priests party to this corruption of the Sacraments
and Catholic belief? They are all who are going along with the
New Order of Worship, composed in company with non-
Catholics and imposed by Paul 6 and the Vatican 2 bishops.
They are all the parish priests today, however much they
deceive themselves about their Catholic intention and
obedience.
One
of
the
underlying
deceits
of
the
devil
and
New
Clergy,
is
to
use
emotionalism
to
wipe
out
Catholic
doctrine
from
the
minds
of
their
people.
Most
of
the
old
reformers
have
done
this.
Following these older Protestants our formerly Catholic clergy
have replaced recollection, adoration, and interior prayer with
hymn singing and socializing -- the social and religious as one
thing, as at the synagogue. In this connection | have at hand a
five-page
letter
of
abuse
by
an
older
woman,
addressed
to
a
man who talked against the absurd Service of Resurrection.
This
woman,
a
Catholic
from
near
birth,
lays
it
down
as
doc-
trine
that
“Religion
is
in
the
heart,
not
the
mind!’’
This
notion,
_if
it
were
true,
would
make
straw
of
the
writings
of
the
Apostles
themselves;
of
St.
Jerome,
St.
Augustine,
St.
Thomas
Aquinas,
the
solemn
pronouncements
of
the
Popes,
and
the
writings
of
a
hundred
other
Doctors,
Fathers
and
Saints
of
the
Church.
Yet
it
is
the
operative
assumption
of
the
mod
parish.
Those
who
believe
this
lie
are
open
to
the
most
nonsensical
and
diabolic
errors.
The
Vatican
2
reformers
have
used
emotionalism
freely
from
the
first,
with
their
‘inner
light’
and
‘charisma’,
‘Spirit
of
Vatican
2’
fakery.
The
result
of
such
abandonment
of
reason
and
doctrine
appears
in
the
general
silliness
and
sen-
timentalism,
and
the
great
falling
away,
which
we
see
around
us.
The
general
abandonment
of
reason
is
quite
evident,
in
that
most
Catholics
refuse
to
see
the
resulting
moral
and
intellectual

confusion;
the
clergy
refuse
to
heed
reliable
statistics
of
present
chaos.
In
all
quarters,
whether
reform
or
so-called
Traditionalist,
there
has
been
taking
place
a
flight
from
reality.
Anyway,
‘‘Intellect
is
the
first
faculty
of
the
soul;
pure
faith
the
first
theological
virtue.’’
That
is
what
St.
John
of
the
Cross
taught,
and
doubtless
other
theologians.
As
mystical
doctor
of
the
Church
St.
John
knew
as
much
about
the
heart
as
any
other
man.
In the letter just cited appears one other item of deceit which
has been instilled surreptiously into the minds of New Catholics
--
that
truth
cannot
exist
outside
the
majority,
the
Vatican
2
‘“concensus’’. And so those few Catholics who now speak plainly
what had always been accepted as Catholic doctrine, are called
dissenters, which of course we are. The trickery consists in the
usual evil revolutionary practice of words distortion. In this
case ‘‘dissenter’’ is made to seem a necessarily bad word, as it
always is among Communists whose thing is “’solidarity’’. This
Same woman writer referred to, directs another Communist
epithet at the man to whom she is writing -- ‘“‘hate monger’”’.
‘‘Hate monger” is a term freely used by those who have made
of anger, hatred and envy a science for creating disorder, and
whose greeting to decent orderly people consists of sullen looks
and the clenched fist. | have at hand a photo of three very hard-
faced Catholic bishops, in which the one on the right extends
into the middle of the group a prominent upraised clenched fist.
The clenched fist or claw is a suitable sign for those bishops who
follow the popes of the crooked cross.
| Know from reading thousands of letters since | began
publishing eight years ago, that many used to go home from the
new services every Sunday angry and frustrated; but perhaps
most of these have since let go their sanity and got with if.
Others go along unthinkingly, like sheep or cows, to be aroused
at their parish church by the new emotional climate of ‘par-
ticipation’. Many husbands and wives are bitterly divided over
the reforms -- what an effect of a supposed-to-be Catholic
renewal! Children of these parents are of course confused; they
will never become unconfused but will be lost to the Faith.
Thousands of adults, lifetime Catholics and pre-Vatican 2
converts, have dropped out; fifty-percent or so in Europe. What
we now have are parishes no less reformed than were those in
Germany in the time of Luther. Yet John Paul 2 says that
Vatican 2 is a ‘‘solemn obligation which must be put info ef-
fect.’