data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36045/3604592786506c3056937ec8f8f8e157b4d51c25" alt=""
1
1. Introduction
Scholarly and practical interest in the music of past periods has a relatively short history. With few
exceptions, music composed before the 19th century existed in a culture of the present. The high
percentage of significant 17th- and 18th-century works for which all scores have been lost clearly
demonstrates this lack of regard for all „old‟ music.
The early 19th-century revival of the works of J.S. Bach, which were largely overlooked in his own
time, was the first such instance in the history of Western music. This unprecedented interest in Bach's
works, most famously represented by Mendelssohn's heavily romanticised arrangement of the St.
Matthew Passion in 1829, quickly expanded to other composers of the 17th and 18th centuries. The high
esteem which Bach was accorded necessitated a critical edition of his works, and the Bach-
Gesellschaft's effort in this regard, produced over the second half of the century, was a milestone for
scholarly music editing. The elevated stature of J.S. Bach also had a decisive influence on composition,
which continues to this day.
By the last decade of the 19th century, a new focus had emerged from the desire to perform the music of
J.S. Bach and his contemporaries correctly and respectfully – that of historically informed performance,
popularly advertised as „authentic‟. This field, a union of performance and research, has steadily gained
momentum over the last century, growing in scope to encompass the romantic period, and gaining
significance to the point where it has become a part of mainstream performance.
Among the first substantial texts on historical performance practice are Edward Dannreuther's two
volumes on Musical Ornamentation, published in 1893 and 1895. This early survey of the subject first
presents resources from 1600-1750, intended “to illustrate J.S. Bach's ways by reference to the practice
antecedent to and contemporary with him”. In the second volume, “an attempt is made to trace the use,
partial perversion, and gradual disuse of Bach's ornaments up to the present day [Berlioz, Liszt and
Wagner].”
The Bach-centric view demonstrated by Dannreuther persists in more recent surveys on ornamentation,
including the famously opposing works of Robert Donington and Frederick Neumann.
This focus on a
single atypical composer not only results in a rather skewed perspective of music history, but also
prioritises questions regarding the execution of notated ornaments rather than the introduction of new
ornamental material by the performer. The focus here on the latter explores some relatively new
ground, while also avoiding one of the major philosophical challenges of the historical performance
practice movement. While it is theoretically possible that a single „correct‟ realisation of an ornament
symbol exists, the same can hardly be said of free ornamentation.
This thesis aims to provide the theoretical knowledge necessary for an instrumentalist to begin to
ornament melodies in an 18th-century style. While the revival of this practice is underway among
historical performance practice enthusiasts, melodic embellishment remains something of a taboo or at
the least a neglected field in mainstream classical music education.
Discussion of the reasons for this
Edward Dannreuther, Musical Ornamentation (London: Novello, Ewer & Co, 1893), part 1, viii.
Robert Donington, The Interpretation of Early Music (London: Faber and Faber, 1974); Frederick Neumann,
Ornamentation in Baroque and Post-Baroque Music (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1978).
Andrew Manze and Pavlo Beznosiuk are highly respected examples.