8220 AQUATIC EMERGENT PLANTS*
8220 A. Introduction
1.
Organism Characteristics
Emergent plants are important components of aquatic and
wetland ecosystems. They are among the primary producers,
providing oxygen, food, and habitat for periphyton and many
other organisms, including invertebrates, fish, amphibians, birds,
and mammals. These plants function in nutrient cycling and in
stabilizing sediments of near-shore environments.
2.
Test Applications
This method is designed to evaluate the phytotoxicity of
chemical substances in water on emergent plants. The method
uses several measurement endpoints of toxic response, including
seed germination, root elongation, root dry weight, and dry
weight of the seedling shoot. Seed germination and seedling
growth represent the first phase of plant development. Significant
inhibition of this developmental phase may diminish the ability
of affected plants to compete and survive in their environment.
The seed germination and seedling growth tests are simple,
versatile, and useful for screening toxicity in water.
1–3
The tests
are useful for evaluating toxicity of metals,
4–6
organic com-
pounds,
5,7
and complex effluents.
2,3
They can be conducted in
fresh, sea, or brackish water with the use of appropriate plant
species. They are applicable to turbid or discolored aqueous
samples.
3
Sediments can be screened for toxicity by testing
aqueous extracts, pore water, or whole sediment.
2,8
One advantage of seed germination and seedling growth tests
is that seeds can be obtained in bulk and stored for extended
periods with minimal maintenance costs. Stored plant seeds are
quiescent and resistant to environmental stress. Under favorable
germination conditions, seeds undergo rapid changes and be-
come highly sensitive to the environment.
1
Standard water (Sec-
tion 8010E.4b1) can be used as dilution water and control
solution (see 8220C.2). The tests are highly desirable to com-
plement other plant tests (e.g., algal or duckweed tests), where
nutrients and adurants could interact.
The tests can be conducted in darkness or light with the
species suggested. When both dark- and light-phase experiments
are conducted, one can evaluate the effects of photodegradation
on the availability and toxicity of toxicants.
The tests can be performed with a relatively small volume of
test solution (30 mL/vessel or less) compared to aquatic animal
testing (100 to 200 mL/vessel). A small volume may be used to
lower the cost of sample collection and storage; however, as the
volume of test medium is lowered, the capacity to detect phy-
totoxic effects may be diminished.
Other toxicity tests for aquatic emergent plants are available.
9,10
3. References
1. MAYER,A.M.&A.POLJAKOFF-MYBER. 1982. The Germination of
Seeds, 3rd ed. Pergamon Press, Oxford, England.
2. WALSH, G.E., D.E. WEBER, T.L. SIMON & L.K. BRASHERS. 1991.
Toxicity tests of effluents with marsh plants in water and sediments.
Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 10:517.
3. WANG,W.&J.WILLIAMS. 1988. Screening and biomonitoring of
industrial effluents using phytotoxicity tests. Environ. Toxicol.
Chem. 7:645.
4. WONG, M.H. & A.D. BRADSHAW. 1982. A comparison of the toxicity
of heavy metals, using root elongation of rye grass, Lolium perenne.
New Phytol. 91:255.
5. WANG, W. 1987. Root elongation method for toxicity testing of
organic and inorganic pollutants. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 6:409.
6. GORSUCH, J.W., R.O. KRINGLE & K.A. ROBILLARD. 1990. Chemical
Effects on the Germination and Early Growth of Terrestrial Plants,
ASTM STP 1091. American Soc. Testing & Materials, Philadel-
phia, Pa.
7. RATSCH, H.C. 1983. Interlaboratory Root Elongation Testing of
Toxic Substances on Selected Plant Species, EPA-600/3-83-051.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis Environmental
Research Lab., Corvallis, Ore.
8. WALSH, G.E., D.E. WEBER, L.K. BRASHERS & T.L. SIMON. 1990.
Artificial sediments for use in tests with wetland plants. Environ.
Exper. Bot. 30:341.
9. AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS. 2009. Standard
guide for conducting renewal phytotoxicity tests with freshwater
emergent macrophytes. E1841-96, Annual Book of ASTM Stan-
dards, Vol. 11.06. American Soc. Testing & Materials, W. Consho-
hocken, Pa.
10. AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS. 2009. Standard
guide for conducting static, axenic, 14-day phytotoxicity tests in test
tubes with the submersed aquatic macrophyte, Myriophyllum sibri-
cum Komarov. E1913-04, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
11.06. American Soc. Testing & Materials, W. Conshohocken, Pa.
4. Bibliography
HOLST, R.W. & T.C. ELLWANGER. 1982. Pesticide Assessment Guide-
lines. Subdivision J. Hazard Evaluation: Non-Target Plants. Off.
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, D.C.
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. 1985. Toxic Substances Con-
trol Act Test Guidelines: Environmental Effects Testing Guidelines.
40 CFR Part 797, Federal Register 50(188):39389.
U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION. 1987. Seed germination and root
elongation. In Environmental Assessment Technical Handbook,
4.06. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Center for
Veterinary Medicine, Washington, D.C.
BOUTIN, C., K.E. FREEMARK & C.J. KEDDY. 1993. Proposed Guidelines
for Registration of Chemical Pesticides: Nontarget Plant Testing
and Evaluation, Environment Canada Tech. Rep. Ser. No. 145.
Hull, Quebec, Canada.
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS. 2001. Practice for con-
ducting early seedling growth tests. E1598-94, Annual Book of
ASTM Standards, Vol. 11.05. American Soc. Testing & Materials,
W. Conshohocken, Pa.
* Approved by Standard Methods Committee, 1997. Editorial revisions, 2010.
Joint Task Group: 21st Edition—Wuncheng Wang (chair), James F. Fairchild, L.
Gordon Goldsborough, Robert W. Holst, Lawrence A. Kapustka, Jerry C.
Smrchek, Jane Staveley, David E. Weber.
1