2
Section 1. Introduction
In the early years of floating exchange rates, economists expected to find a close
association between movements in exchange rates and national price levels. Based on the
presumption of approximate purchasing power parity (PPP), it was felt that control of
domestic inflation would become more problematic in an environment of exchange rate
volatility. However, a substantial literature, covering many different countries, has by
now documented that exchange rate changes are at best weakly associated with changes
in domestic prices at the consumer level. The low degree of ‘exchange rate pass-through’
both at the disaggregated level, for individual traded goods prices, and more generally in
aggregate price indices, has been extensively documented.
Recently, a debate on the causes of low exchange rate pass-through has begun.
Some writers argue that the ultimate explanation is microeconomic, based on various
structural features of international trade, such as pricing to market by imperfectly
competitive firms (Corsetti and Dedola 2002), domestic content in the distribution of
traded goods (Corsetti and Dedola 2002; Burstein, Neves and Rebelo 2000), the
importance of non-traded goods in consumption (Betts and Kehoe 2001), or the role of
substitution between goods in response to exchange rate changes (Burstein, Eichenbaum
and Rebelo 2002). Others argue, however, that the failure of pass-through is a more
macroeconomic phenomenon, related to the slow adjustment of goods prices at the
consumer level (Engel 2002). Campa and Goldberg (2002) provide evidence for OECD
countries that both factors are important in the evolution of exchange rate pass-through
estimates over time, but ultimately come down on the side of a microeconomic
explanation, based on the changing composition of import goods.