Telechargé par amel fed

CHERIFI HALIM

publicité
‫ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ‬
‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‬
‫ﻣﻌﻬـﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺳﻴـﺪﻱ ﻋﺒـﺪ ﺍﷲ‬
‫ﻣﺬﻛـﺮﺓ ﻟﻨﻴـﻞ ﺷﻬـﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﺎﺟﺴﺘﻴـﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑـﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧـﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿـﻴﺔ‬
‫ﲣﺼـﺺ ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿـﻲ‬
‫ﲢـﺖ ﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ"‬
‫ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‬
‫"ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻭﺻﻔﻴﺔ ﲢﻠﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ"‬
‫ﺇﺷـﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻷﺳﺘــﺎﺫ‪:‬‬
‫ﺇﻋـﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻟـﺐ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘـﻮﺭ ﺑﻦ ﺗﻮﻣﻲ ﻧﺎﺻﺮ‬
‫ﺷﺮﻳﻔﻲ ﺣﻠﻴﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻨــﺔ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﻴـــﺔ‬
‫‪2009/2008‬‬
‫ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺷﻜﺮ‬
‫ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ‪" :‬ﻭ‪‬ﺇﹺﺫﹾ ﺗ‪‬ﺄﹶﺫﱠﻥﹶ ﺭ‪‬ﺑ‪‬ﻜﹸﻢ‪ ‬ﻟﹶﺌ‪‬ﻦ‪‬‬
‫ﺷ‪‬ﻜﹶﺮ‪‬ﺗ‪‬ﻢ‪ ‬ﻟﹶﺄﹶﺯﹺﻳﺪ‪‬ﻧ‪‬ﻜﹸﻢ‪ ‬ﻭ‪‬ﻟﹶﺌ‪‬ﻦ‪ ‬ﻛﹶﻔﹶﺮ‪‬ﺗ‪‬ﻢ‪ ‬ﺇﹺﻥﱠ ﻋ‪‬ﺬﹶﺍﺑﹺﻲ ﻟﹶﺸ‪‬ﺪ‪‬ﻳﺪ‪"(7) ‬‬
‫ﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ‪.07‬‬
‫ﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﲔ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﻲ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺍﺿﻊ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﺩﻋﻮ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻝ‬
‫ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‬
‫ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺃﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻜﺮ ﺍﳉﺰﻳﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ‪ :‬ﺑﻦ ﺗﻮﻣﻲ ﻧﺎﺻﺮ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻋﺪﺍﺕ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺋﺢ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﻓﺎﺩﱐ ‪‬ﺎ ﻃﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﻛﻞ ﺃﺳﺎﺗﺬﺓ ﻭﺩﻛﺎﺗﺮﺓ‬
‫ﻣﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻋﺪﻭﱐ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻜﺮ ﺍﳉﺰﻳﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺭﺅﺳﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﳘﻮﺍ‬
‫ﰲ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻻ ﻳﻔﻮﺗﲏ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺷﻜﺮ ﺯﻣﻼﺋﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪ‪‬ﻢ ﱄ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‬
‫ﻭﰲ ﺍﻷﺧﲑ ﺃﺷﻜﺮ ﻛﻞ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻋﺎﺋﻠﱵ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻢ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﻱ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﻨﻮﻱ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺷﺮﻳﻔﻲ ﺣﻠﻴﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻬﺮﺱ‬
‫ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺷﻜﺮ ‪- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬ﺃ‪-‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻬﺮﺱ‪- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬ﺏ‪-‬‬
‫ﻓﻬﺮﺱ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﻭﻝ ‪- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬ﺱ‪-‬‬
‫ﻓﻬﺮﺱ ﺍﻷﺷﻜﺎﻝ‪- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬ﻁ‪-‬‬
‫ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ‪- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬ﻉ‪-‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴﺪﻱ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺤﺚ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺷﻜﺎﻟﻴﺔ ‪-01- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ‪-02- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺎﺕ‬
‫ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﺘﻐﲑﺍﺕ ‪-03- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ‪-04- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺃﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ‪-04- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﺧﺘﲑ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ‪-05- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﺼﻄﻠﺤﺎﺕ ‪-06- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺸﺎ‪‬ﺔ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﺚ ‪-07- -------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺧﻼﺻـﺔ ‪-22- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ‪ :‬ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻱ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ‪ :‬ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‬
‫ﲤﻬﻴﺪ‪-25-----------------------------------------------‬‬‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ‪-26- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ‪-27- -------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﺃﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ‬
‫‪ -4‬ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ‬
‫‪ -1-4‬ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ‪-28- ----------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ‪-29- ------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﻳﱯ ‪-29- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -2-4‬ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻘﺎﺋﻲ ‪-30- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -3-4‬ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺐ ‪-30- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -5‬ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻩ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ‪-30- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪-30- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ‪-31- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -1-5‬ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ )ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻭﱄ( ‪-31- ---------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -2-5‬ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ )ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼﺼﻲ( ‪-31- ----------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -3-5‬ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ )ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﳔﺒﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ‬
‫‪ -6‬ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ( ‪-32- ------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺰﻣﲏ ‪-32- ----------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -1-6‬ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‪ :‬ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻭﱄ )‪9-7‬‬
‫ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ( ‪-32- -------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -2-6‬ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ )‪12-9‬‬
‫ﺳﻨﺔ( ‪-33- ---------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -3-6‬ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ‪ :‬ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺜﺒﻴﺖ )‪16-13‬‬
‫‪ -7‬ﳏﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‬
‫‪ -1-7‬ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺳﻨﺔ( ‪-33- -----------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪-33- --------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ‪-33- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -2-7‬ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﺒﻄﺔ‬
‫‪ -3-7‬ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ‪-34- -------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫)ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ( ‪-34- ------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -8‬ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ )ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ( ﻟﻼﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫‪ -9‬ﳏﻜﺎﺕ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﺒﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ‪-35- --------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -10‬ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﻭﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‬
‫‪ -1-10‬ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪-34- --------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ‪-36- ---------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ‪-37- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -1-1-10‬ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻣﺘﺮﻳﺔ ‪-37- ---------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -2-1-10‬ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ‪-37- -------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -3-1-10‬ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻮﺣﺮﻛﻴﺔ ‪-37- ----------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -4-1-10‬ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ‪-37- -------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -2-2‬ﺻﻔﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ‪-38- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -11‬ﺃﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫‪ -1-11‬ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ‪-38- --------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺎﺀ ‪-38- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -2-11‬ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺼﻴﻞ‬
‫‪ -3-11‬ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﻲ ‪-39- ---------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﺮﺑﲔ ‪-39- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -4-11‬ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻵﺑﺎﺀ‬
‫‪ -5-11‬ﺍﻷﺳﻠﻮﺏ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻬﺎﺕ ‪-39- -------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ‪-39- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -12‬ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ‬
‫‪-40- --------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -1-12‬ﳕﻮﺫﺝ ﺟﻴﻤﺒﻞ‬
‫"‪-40- ----------------------------------------------------------------- "GIMBEL‬‬
‫‪ -2-12‬ﳕﻮﺫﺝ "ﺩﻳﺮﻙ‬
‫‪-41- ---------------------------------------------------------------------"DERKE‬‬
‫‪-‬ﺧﻼﺻﺔ‪-42---------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ‬
‫ﲤﻬﻴـﺪ ‪-44 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ‪-45 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -2-1‬ﺗﻌﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ‬
‫•‬
‫ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺟﻮﺭﺩﻥ ﺃﻟﺒﻮﺭﺕ‬
‫•‬
‫ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ‬
‫•‬
‫ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻮﺭﺗﲔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ‪-46 --------------------------------------------‬‬
‫)‪-46-------------------------------(Allport¸1937¸p48‬‬
‫ﺟﻴﻠﻔﻮﺭﺩ‪-46----------------------------------- (Guilford¸1959¸p5):‬‬
‫ﺑﺮﻧﺲ) ‪-47-----------------------------------morton prince‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ‬
‫•‬
‫ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻓﻠﻮﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﺭﺕ‬
‫•‬
‫ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻗﻴﻠﻔﻲ ﻭ ﻫﺎﺭﺩﻱ‬
‫•‬
‫ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺟﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﻟﻮﻥ‬
‫•‬
‫ﻛﻴﻤﻒ)‪47-------------------------------------------------kemph‬‬
‫ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﺗﻮﻣﺎ ﺟﻮﺭﺝ‬
‫‪-3-1‬ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ‬
‫)‪-47------------------------------------------albort‬‬
‫)‪-47-------------------------------Guelfi et Hardy‬‬
‫‪-47-----------------------------Jean-Pierre Rollan‬‬
‫ﺧﻮﺭﻱ‪-47---------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ‪-48------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪1-3-1‬‬
‫ﺍﳍﻮ‪-48--------------------------------------------------------Id‬‬
‫‪2-3-1‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﻧﺎ)‪-48----------------------------------------------------Ego‬‬
‫‪3-3-1‬ﺍﻷﻧﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻋﻞ)‪-48----------------------------------------Super Ego‬‬
‫‪ -4-1‬ﺗﻄﻮﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ‪-49-----------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪-1-4-1‬ﺍﻟﻮﺭﺍﺛﺔ‪-49-----------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -2-4-1‬ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ‪-49-----------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ 3-4-1‬ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ‪-50------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ 4-4-1‬ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺳﺔ‪-50----------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪-5-1‬ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﳕﻮ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪-51-------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪1-5-1‬ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‪-51----------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ 2-5-1‬ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﺭﻳﻜﺴﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ‪-51----------------------‬‬
‫‪ -6-1‬ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪-52---------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -1-6-1‬ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪-52-----------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -2-6-1‬ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﳕﺎﻁ‪-52----------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -3-6-1‬ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‪-54---------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -4-6-1‬ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ‪-54-------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪-‬‬
‫‪ -5-6-1‬ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ‪-55---------------------‬‬
‫‪ -7-1‬ﻣﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪-56---------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -1-7-1‬ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﻭﺟﻪ )‪-56------------------------MMPE‬‬
‫‪-2-7-1‬ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻴﻔﻮﺭﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪-59----------California Psychological Inventory(CP‬‬
‫‪-3-7-1‬ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺃﻳﺰﻧﻚ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪-60------Eysenck Personality Questionnaire(EPQ‬‬
‫‪-4-7-1‬ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﺒﻮﺭﺝ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪-61-------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -8-1‬ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪-63--------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺧﻼﺻـﺔ ‪-65----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ‪ :‬ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‬
‫ﲤﻬﻴـﺪ‪-67------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ‪-68---------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‪-69--------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪1-2‬ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﻷﻟﺒﻮﺭﺕ )‪-69----------------------------G.allport‬‬
‫‪ -2-2‬ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﻟﻜﺎﺗﻞ ‪-70--------------------------------Kattell‬‬
‫‪-3‬ﻧﻘﺪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‪-72-----------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -4‬ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‪-73-------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪-5‬ﻣﻌﺎﻳﲑ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ‪-74------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -6‬ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﻋﻼﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪-75---------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -7‬ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪-76------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺧﻼﺻـﺔ‪-82-----------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ‪ :‬ﻣﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ‬
‫ﲤﻬﻴـﺪ‪-84--------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‪-85-------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -1-1‬ﺃﻫﻢ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺗﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‪-86---------------------------------‬‬
‫‪-2-1‬ﺃﻫﻢ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺗﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪-89---------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -3-1‬ﺍﳌﺸﺎﺭﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ ﺑﺎﻷﺭﻗﺎﻡ ﰲ ﻛﺄﺱ ﺇﻓﺮﻳﻘﻴﺎ ﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪-93--------------------‬‬
‫‪ -2-2‬ﻣﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ‪-94------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -1-2-2‬ﺍﳌﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ‪-94---------------------------‬‬
‫‪-2-2-2‬ﺍﳌﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ‪-95---------------------------‬‬
‫‪ 3-2-2‬ﺍﳌﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﳋﻄﻄﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ‪-96----------------------------‬‬
‫‪ 4-2-2‬ﺍﳌﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ‪-97-----------------------------‬‬
‫‪.3‬ﳕﻮﺫﺝ ﺧﻄﺔ ﺳﻨﻮﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪-99-----------------------------‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ‪-99----------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪-2‬ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﺒﺎﺭﺍﺓ‪-101-----------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺧﻼﺻﺔ‪-102------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ‪ :‬ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﱐ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ‪ :‬ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻭﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ‬
‫ﲤﻬﻴـﺪ ‪-104- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‬
‫)ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ( ‪-105- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻄﻼﻋﻴﺔ ‪-106- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﳎﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‬
‫‪ -1-3‬ﳎﺘﻤﻊ‬
‫‪ -2-3‬ﻋﻴﻨﺔ‬
‫‪-107- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ‪-107- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ‪-107- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -1-1-3‬ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ‬
‫‪ -4‬ﺃﺩﻭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪-1-4‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ‪-108- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ‪-109- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ‪-109- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -1-1-4‬ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﳏﺎﻭﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ‪-110- ---------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -2-1-4‬ﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ‬
‫‪-2-4‬‬
‫‪-111- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ‪-112- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -5‬ﳎﺎﻻﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ‪-113- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -1-5‬ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎﱐ ‪-113- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -2-5‬ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻜﺎﱐ ‪-113- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -6‬ﺻﻌﻮﺑﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ‪-113- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -7‬ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ‪-113- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺧﻼﺻـﺔ ‪-116- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ‪ :‬ﻋﺮﺽ ﻭﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻋﺮﺽ ﻭﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ‬
‫‪ -1-1‬ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺑﺎﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ‪-118- ------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ‪-118- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -2-1‬ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‬
‫‪-120- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -1-2-1‬ﻋﺮﺽ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ )‪ (01‬ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ‪-120- -------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -2-2-1‬ﻋﺮﺽ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (02‬ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ‪-134- --------------------‬‬
‫‪ -3-2-1‬ﻋﺮﺽ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﳏﻮﺭ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (03‬ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ‪-153- ---------------------‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺎﺕ ‪-176- --------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -1-2‬ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ‪-176- --------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -2-2‬ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ‪-180- ---------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -3-2‬ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ‬
‫‪ -4-2‬ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ‪-184- --------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ‪-189- ----------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺧﻼﺻـﺔ ‪-190- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ‪-192- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﳋﺎﲤـــﺔ ‪-195- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻗﺘﺮﺍﺣﺎﺕ ﻭﺗﻮﺻﻴﺎﺕ‬
‫‪-197- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﻼﺣـــﻖ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻬﺮﺱ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﻭﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ‬
‫ﺭﻗﻢ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺤﺔ‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫ﳕﻮﺫﺝ ﳋﻄﺔ ﺳﻨﻮﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫‪99‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫ﺧﻄﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﺒﺎﺭﺍﺓ‬
‫‪101‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ "ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ" ﺣﺴﺐ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ‪.‬‬
‫‪108‬‬
‫‪04‬‬
‫ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﻲ ﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ "ﻛﺎ‪."2‬‬
‫‪104‬‬
‫‪05‬‬
‫ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪.‬‬
‫‪118‬‬
‫‪06‬‬
‫ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﻛﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻋﺪﺓ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ‬
‫ﻓﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺇﻗﺒﺎﳍﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫‪07‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫‪08‬‬
‫ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫‪9-1‬‬
‫‪10-1‬‬
‫‪11-1‬‬
‫‪12-1‬‬
‫‪13-1‬‬
‫ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﻤﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺗﻮﻇﻴﻒ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻔﺤﻮﺻﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‬
‫‪120‬‬
‫‪122‬‬
‫‪124‬‬
‫‪126‬‬
‫‪128‬‬
‫‪130‬‬
‫‪134‬‬
‫‪136‬‬
‫ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫‪14-1‬‬
‫‪15-2‬‬
‫‪16-2‬‬
‫‪17-2‬‬
‫‪18-2‬‬
‫‪19-2‬‬
‫‪20-2‬‬
‫‪21-2‬‬
‫‪22-2‬‬
‫‪23-3‬‬
‫‪24-3‬‬
‫‪25-3‬‬
‫ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺗﻘﺮ‪‬ﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺇﺳﻬﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸﺎﻛﻞ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﺘﺮﺿﻬﻢ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺭﺩ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﻢ ﲡﺎﻩ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻛﺎﺕ ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻮﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺈﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﺤﻮﺻﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫‪138‬‬
‫‪140‬‬
‫‪142‬‬
‫‪144‬‬
‫‪146‬‬
‫ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪148 .‬‬
‫ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﲟﻼﻣﺢ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﻔﺮﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﻛﺘﺌﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫‪153‬‬
‫‪155‬‬
‫‪157‬‬
‫‪159‬‬
‫‪161‬‬
‫‪163‬‬
‫ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫‪26-3‬‬
‫‪27-3‬‬
‫‪28-3‬‬
‫‪29-3‬‬
‫ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﳍﺪﻭﺀ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ "ﺍﻟﻀﺒﻂ" ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫‪165‬‬
‫‪167‬‬
‫‪169‬‬
‫‪171‬‬
‫ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ "ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫‪30-3‬‬
‫ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻳﺪﻓﻊ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‬
‫‪176‬‬
‫"ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪.‬‬
‫‪31-3‬‬
‫‪32-3‬‬
‫‪33‬‬
‫ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ "ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﻳﻦ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻳﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﲰﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﺔ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ‬
‫‪180‬‬
‫‪184‬‬
‫‪189‬‬
‫ﻓﻬﺮﺱ ﺍﻷﺷﻜﺎﻝ‬
‫ﺭﻗﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺤﺔ‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(01‬‬
‫‪120‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(02‬‬
‫‪122‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(03‬‬
‫‪124‬‬
‫‪04‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(04‬‬
‫‪126‬‬
‫‪05‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(05‬‬
‫‪128‬‬
‫‪06‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(06‬‬
‫‪130‬‬
‫‪07‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(07‬‬
‫‪134‬‬
‫‪08‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(08‬‬
‫‪136‬‬
‫‪09‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(09‬‬
‫‪138‬‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(10‬‬
‫‪140‬‬
‫‪11‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(11‬‬
‫‪142‬‬
‫‪12‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(12‬‬
‫‪144‬‬
‫‪13‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(13‬‬
‫‪146‬‬
‫‪14‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(14‬‬
‫‪148‬‬
‫‪15‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(15‬‬
‫‪153‬‬
‫‪16‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(16‬‬
‫‪155‬‬
‫‪17‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(17‬‬
‫‪157‬‬
‫‪18‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(18‬‬
‫‪159‬‬
‫‪19‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(19‬‬
‫‪161‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(20‬‬
‫‪163‬‬
‫‪21‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(21‬‬
‫‪165‬‬
‫‪22‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(22‬‬
‫‪167‬‬
‫‪23‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(23‬‬
‫‪169‬‬
‫‪24‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(24‬‬
‫‪171‬‬
‫ﻣﻘﺪﻣـﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﻬﺘﻢ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺑﺎ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺭﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﺜﻴﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺠﻬﺎ ﺑﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻭﻣﺮﺩﻭﺩﻩ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﺗﺴﺎﻋﺎ ﻭﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻱ ﻗﺒﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﺭﺗﺒﻄﺖ ﺑﻪ‬
‫ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ‪ ،‬ﺗﻐﺬﻳﻪ ﻭﺗﻀﻔﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﺒﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ "ﻛﺎﻟﺒﻴﻮﻣﻴﻜﺎﻧﻴﻚ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪ "...‬ﳑﺎ ﺩﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺮﺍﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺜﻠﺔ ﺍﳊﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺘﻞ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺷﻌﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﺎﳌﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻭﺻﻠﺖ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺮﺍﻑ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺣﺜﲔ ﻭﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‬
‫ﰲ ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﻄﻄﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺗﻄﻮﻳﺮ ﺃﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺐ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻣﺒﻜﺮﺍ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺇﺛﺮﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﲟﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﳏﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ "ﳏﺪﺩﺍﺕ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺭﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ "...‬ﺩﻭﻥ ﺇﳘﺎﻝ ﺃﻱ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ‪.‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﺘﻤﺎﺷﻰ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻣﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ‪ ،‬ﻣﺴﺘﺨﺪﻣﺔ ﳐﺘﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳍﺎ ﺻﻠﺔ ﺑﺎ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺇﳚﺎﺩ ﻃﺮﻕ ﻭﺃﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﺔ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻠﻮﻍ ‪‬ﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺭﻓﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻭﺇﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻻﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ "ﺑﺪﻧﻴﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﻬﺎﺭﻳﺎ ﻭﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ" ﻳﺘﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻟﻠﺠﻮﺀ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻮﱃ ﺑﺎﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺒﻞ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﲰﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﻻﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻟﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺏ ﺍﳌﺴﺆﻭﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺎﺷﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻄﻮﻳﺮ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﱐ ﻭﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‪،‬‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﻻﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺴﺆﻭﻻ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ ﻭﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺘﻬﻢ ﻟﻠﻌﺒﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﺆ ﳍﻢ ﺑﺎﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﺒﻠﻲ‬
‫ﺭﻓﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻛﻮﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻻﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻜﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻭﺟﻮﺍﻧﺒﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﻭﻣﺘﺮﺍﺑﻄﺔ ﻭﲣﻀﻊ‬
‫ﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺒﲎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻬﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻻﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺬﻩ‬
‫ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺇﳘﺎﻝ ﺃﻱ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻐﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﺘﻜﺎﻣﻞ‬
‫ﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﰲ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻻﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻣﺪﺭﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺁﺧﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﺭﺩﻧﺎ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﰲ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﻠﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻻﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﰎ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﻳﺘﻀﻤﻦ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﻓﺼﻮﻝ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ‪،‬ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻄﺮﻕ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ‬
‫ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻀﻤﻦ ﻣﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻀﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻘﻲ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﻮﻱ ﺑﺪﻭﺭﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﻓﺼﻠﲔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪ :‬ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻄﻼﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﰒ‬
‫ﻭﺻﻒ ﺍﻷﺩﻭﺍﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪ ،‬ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪ ،‬ﺻﻌﻮﺑﺎﺗﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻌﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻘﻲ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻄﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﳏﺎﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻹﺷﻜﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺮﺍﻋﻰ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﻭﳏﺪﺩﺍﺕ "ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﺮﻛﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ 1"...‬ﻭﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺗﺴﺎﻫﻢ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺘﻄﻮﻳﺮ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻭﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺑﺎﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﻭﺍﳋﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻐﻼﳍﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﺣﺠﺮ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﻟﻠﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﳒﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺭﻓﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ‪،‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﺆﻫﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﺎﻋﺪﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻮﻕ ﰲ‬
‫ﳎﺎﻝ ﲣﺼﺼﻬﻢ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺭﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻛﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺎﺕ ﲣﻀﻊ ﳌﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﻭﻣﻌﺎﻳﲑ ﻭﺍﺟﺐ ﺗﻮﻓﺮﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ‬
‫ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺘﻘﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺒﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﻹﺣﺎﻃﺔ ﲟﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ‬
‫ﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﺆ ﲟﺪﻯ ﻛﻔﺎﺀ‪‬ﻢ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﺒﻠﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺒﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﳜﻀﻊ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻻﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ "ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﺮﻛﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ "...،‬ﳝﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺫﻭﻱ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺀﺍﺕ "ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻳﺔ" ﰲ ﻟﻌﺒﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ ﻛﻐﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪﺍﻥ ﲢﺘﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻧﻴﺎﺕ ﻫﺎﺋﻠﺔ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻼﺣﻈﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻋﺠﺰﻫﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺮﺍﻑ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ‬
‫ﻣﺎ ﻭﺻﻠﺖ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻬﻘﺮ ﰲ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺒﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻕ ﻏﲑ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﳍﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ‪‬ﻤﺶ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﻈﻰ ﺑﺎﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﺒﲑ ﰲ ﺩﻭﻝ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺃﻭ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﲪﺎﺩ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ‪ ،‬ﲣﻄﻴﻂ ﻭﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﻭﻗﻴﺎﺩﺓ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،2‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪،2001،‬ﺹ‪.303‬‬
‫ﻭﺗﺘﺠﻪ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺁﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ ﻭﺍﳌﺨﺘﺼﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﺗﺜﻤﲔ‬
‫ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳉﻴﺪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺘﻤﻴﺔ ﺗﻮﻓﺮ ﺑﻌﺾ‬
‫ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺪﻓﻌﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺳﺘﻐﻼﻝ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﻗﺪﺭﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻳﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺭﻓﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ‪.‬‬
‫ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﻈﻰ ﺑﺎﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﳌﺨﺘﺼﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻠﻌﺐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺩﻭﺭﺍ ﻫﺎﻣﺎ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﻮﻋﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﳍﺪﻩ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻭﻣﺪﻯ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺘﻬﻢ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺒﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﻮﺀ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ‪ ،‬ﺗﺴﺘﻮﻗﻔﻨﺎ ﺍﻹﺷﻜﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫* ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺇﺗﺒﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻬﺘﻢ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‬
‫"ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ؟‬
‫* ﻭﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﺔ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ"ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ؟‬
‫ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪:‬‬
‫"ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺽ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺃﻭ ﺣﻞ ﳏﺘﻤﻞ ﻟﻠﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺪﺭﺳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺻﺤﺘﻪ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﻭﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﳉﻤﻊ ﺍﳊﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺜﺒﺖ‬
‫ﺻﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺽ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻨﻔﻴﻪ"‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺛﻼﺙ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺇﺧﻼﺹ ﳏﻤﺪ‪ ،‬ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﺣﺴﲔ ﺑﺎﻫﻲ‪ :‬ﻃﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ‪ ،2000 ،‬ﺹ ‪.56‬‬
‫ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ‪:‬‬‫ﺍﻟﻐﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﻟﻼﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ‪:‬‬‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‪:‬‬‫ﺇﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ‪،‬ﻳﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﱃ‬‫ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪:‬‬‫ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﻳﻦ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻬﻢ‪،‬ﻳﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ‬‫ﲰﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ‪:‬‬‫ ﻻ ﲢﻈﻰ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ"ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ‬‫ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﺘﻐﲑﺍﺕ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺍﳌﺘﻐﲑ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻞ‪ :‬ﻫﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺘﺄﺛﺮ ‪‬ﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﰲ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ‬
‫ﻣﺘﻤﺜﻞ ﰲ‪ :‬ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺍﳌﺘﻐﲑ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻊ‪ :‬ﻫﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﺄﺛﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﰲ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺘﻤﺜﻞ‬
‫ﰲ‪ :‬ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪:‬‬
‫ﻟﻘﺪ ﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺗﺒﻌﺎ ﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺒﻜﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻭﺫﻭﻱ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻼﺋﻤﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼﺼﻲ‬
‫ﳍﻢ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﲎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ "ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﺮﻛﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ ،"...‬ﺣﱴ ﻧﺴﺎﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻓﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﺎﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺗﻄﻮﻳﺮ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺭﻓﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺗﻜﻤﻦ ﰲ ﳏﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﺇﻟﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺑﺎﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ "ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ" ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳌﺎ ﳍﺎ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻣﻮﺟﻬﺎ‬
‫ﻭﳏﺮﻛﺎ ﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﺘﺠﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺗﺜﻤﲔ ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ‬
‫ﻭﺃﳘﻴﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻋﺎﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺃﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﻬﺪﻑ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻂ ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‬
‫"ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ"ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺔ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺒﻼ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﻞ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﳍﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺑﺮﻣﺞ ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ "ﻗﺼﲑ ﻭﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﺍﳌﺪﻯ"‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻐﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ‪‬ﻢ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻋﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﰲ‪.‬‬
‫ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﺼﻄﻠﺤﺎﺕ‪:‬‬
‫ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻋﺪﺓ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻭﻣﺼﻄﻠﺤﺎﺕ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﲝﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺯﺍﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻤﻮﺽ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﻮﺿﻴﺤﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﺟﻴﺪ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﳍﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ :‬ﻫﻮ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺼﻄﻠﺢ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ‬
‫ﳎﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﱐ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫"ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺗﺴﺘﻬﺪﻑ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺗﺘﻮﻓﺮ ﻟﺪﻳﻬﻢ ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ‬
‫ﻭﲰﺎﺕ ﻭﻗﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻳﺘﻄﻠﺒﻬﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻃﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﻋﺪﻡ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺔ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻟﻠﻤﻤﺎﺭﺳﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ"‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﲪﺎﺩ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ‪" :‬ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻃﺒﻘﺎ ﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ"‪.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻳﺮﻯ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﲔ "ﺭﻳﲏ" ﻭ"ﺁﻝ" ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻫﻮ‪" :‬ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺗﺘﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﺜﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ‬
‫ﻟﺪﻳﻬﻢ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻹﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ"‪.‬‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﲡﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳌﻴﻮﻝ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﺍﺛﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺭﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﲏ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺟﻬﺰﺓ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻋﻼﻭﻱ‪ ،‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﻧﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺭﺿﻮﺍﻥ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻭﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،2‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜـﺮ ﺍﻟﻌـﺮﰊ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘـﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪،‬‬
‫‪ ،1988‬ﺹ ‪.93‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﲪﺎﺩ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﻠﺠﻨﺴﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻮﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻫﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪ ،1996 ،‬ﺹ ‪.306‬‬
‫‪- Richard Mon Peti: Problème lier à la détection des talons en sport, Edition vigot, 1989, P 106-109.‬‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﺒﻄﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ‪ :‬ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ‪ :‬ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻫﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻔﻮﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻗﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻃﻔﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﻳﺆﻛﺪ‬
‫ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﺆﺍﺩ ﻧﺼﺤﻲ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ‪" :‬ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻮﻕ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﺒﻞ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻋﻄﻴﺖ ﻟﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﻪ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ"‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺃﻣﺎ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺣﺴﲏ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﺓ‪ ،‬ﻳﺮﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ‪" :‬ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺃﺩﺍﺋﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻳﲔ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﺪﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ"‪.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻑ ﻣﻴﺨﺎﺋﻴﻞ ﻣﻌﻮﺽ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ‪" :‬ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺒﺪﻱ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻗﺪﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﺿﺤﺔ‬
‫ﰲ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﱐ"‪.‬‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ :‬ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻪ "‪ "Erwin. H‬ﺑﺄﻧﻪ‪" :‬ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳝﻠﻚ ﻗﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﻋﺎﻝ‬
‫ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼﺼﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ"‪.‬‬
‫‪4‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻓﺆﺍﺩ ﻧﺼﺤﻲ‪ :‬ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻭﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ‪ ،1980 ،‬ﺹ ‪.182‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺣﺴﲏ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﺓ‪ :‬ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﻮﻗﲔ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪ ،‬ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻥ‪ ،2000 ،‬ﺹ ‪.35‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﻣﻴﺨﺎﺋﻴـﻞ ﻣﻌﻮﺽ‪ :‬ﻗﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺻﺤﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫـﻮﺏ‪ ،‬ﳎﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠـﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴـﺎ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴـﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﺴـﺘﻐﺎﱎ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻌـﺪﺩ ‪،01‬‬
‫ﺩﻳﺴﻤﱪ ‪ ،2001‬ﺹ ‪.52‬‬
‫‪- Erwin H: Entraînement sportif des enfants, Imprimé en France, Edition vigot, 1987, P 98.‬‬
‫‪4‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺸﺎ‪‬ﺔ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﺚ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ "ﺑﻦ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻋﻠﻲ"‪:‬‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﺃﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪ‪ ،‬ﻣﻜﻠﻒ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺭﻭﺱ ﻭﻋﻤﻴﺪ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﲜﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻐﺎﱎ‪ ،‬ﲢﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ‪" :‬ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻌﻴﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ‬
‫ﳌﻤﺎﺭﺳﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ" )‪ (12-11‬ﺳﻨﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺎﺅﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﻤﺪﺓ ﻟﺘﺤﺪﻳﺪ ﻗﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﻻﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ؟‬‫ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻳﲑ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺨﺪﻣﺔ ﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻟﻌﺒﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ؟‬‫ﻟﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻬﺪﻓﺖ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺛﻼﺙ ﺃﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻫﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺃﻭﻻ‪ :‬ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻄﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺗﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﰲ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﺷﺊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ‪ :‬ﺗﻘﻴﻴﻢ ﻗﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﰲ ﻟﻌﺒﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺛﺎﻟﺜﺎ‪ :‬ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﻌﺎﻳﲑ ﳏﺪﺩﺓ‪ ،‬ﻳﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﳌﻤﺎﺭﺳﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﳌﺴﺤﻲ‪ ،‬ﺗﻜﻮﻧﺖ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻲ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﺚ ﻣﻦ ‪ 140‬ﻻﻋﺐ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺷﺊ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺗﺮﺍﻭﺣﺖ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﺭﻫﻢ ﺑﲔ )‪ 12-11‬ﺳﻨﺔ(‪ ،‬ﰎ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻫﻢ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻋﺸﻮﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ‪ 38‬ﻻﻋﺐ ﻟﻸﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪ 18 :‬ﻻﻋﺐ‪ ،‬ﰎ‬
‫ﺍﻧﻘﻄﺎﻋﻬﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻏﻴﺎﺑﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ‪ ،‬ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ‬
‫ﻹﺻﺎﺑﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ‪ 20‬ﻻﻋﺐ ﰲ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻄﻼﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ﰎ ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴﺔ ﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ ﻣﻼﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﰎ ﺿﺒﻂ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺘﻐﲑﺍﺕ ﺍﻹﺟﺮﺍﺋﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺒﺤﺚ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ‪:‬‬
‫ﺃﺟﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﲡﺮﺑﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﻼﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﴰﻠﺖ ‪ 20‬ﻻﻋﺐ ﻣﻦ ﳎﺘﻤﻊ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﱵ ﰎ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﺒﻌﺎﺩ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺠﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﺚ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﰎ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻛﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺻﺪﻕ ﻭﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻭﻣﻮﺿﻌﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺨﺪﻣﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫)‪ ،(0.05‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻋﻜﺴﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺟﻴﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﻷﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺨﺪﻣﺔ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺳﻬﻠﺔ ﻭﻭﺍﺿﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻭﻏﲑ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﻛﺪﻩ ﺍﳋﱪﺍﺀ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺃﺳﺎﺗﺬﺓ ﻭﻣﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻭﺑﺎﺣﺜﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﻄﺎﺭﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺨﺪﻣﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﺾ ‪ 30‬ﻡ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﺛﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﺩﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﺭﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺎﺱ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﳉﺮﻱ ‪ 5‬ﺩﻗﺎﺋﻖ‪.‬‬‫‪ -2‬ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺗﻨﻄﻴﻂ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺑﺎﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﳉﺮﻱ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺮﺝ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺿﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﻷﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺛﺎﺑﺘﺔ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﳉﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺮﺓ‪.‬‬‫ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﰊ‪ ،‬ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺳﺒﲑﻣﺎﻥ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﳌﺌﻮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺎﻳﻦ ‪ ،F‬ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ‪ ،‬ﺍﻻﳓﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﳌﻌﻴﺎﺭﻱ‪ ،‬ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺻﺪﻕ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻴﺎﺭﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺟﺎﺕ‪ :‬ﺗﻮﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺃﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﻣﺴﻄﺮﺓ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻨﻴﺔ ﺻﺪﻗﺎ ﻭﺛﺒﺎﺗﺎ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﲔ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﱄ‪(0.92) :‬‬
‫ﻭ)‪ (0.88‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪.(0.05‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺗﺒﺎﻳﻨﺖ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻋﻴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ )‪ 12-11‬ﺳﻨﺔ( ﺑﲔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﻇﺎﻫﺮﻳﺔ ﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺄﻳﺪ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﺗﺄﺳﺴﺖ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﰲ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﻴﺎﺭﻳﺔ‬
‫ﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﻟﻌﻴﻨﱵ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻣﺌﻮﻳﺔ ﳏﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﲔ‬
‫)‪.(%76.31 ،%63.07‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ "ﻋﺒﺶ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻴﻞ ﻋﻤﺮ"‪:‬‬
‫ﲢﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ "ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ )‪12-11‬‬
‫ﺳﻨﺔ("‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺇﻃﺎﺭ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﺎﺟﺴﺘﲑ ﻟﺴﻨﺔ ‪ 2003‬ﲜﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪ ،‬ﻗﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪‬ﺪﻑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺃﻫﻢ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﳌﺪﺭﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺘﻢ ﺃﺧﺬﻫﺎ‬
‫ﺑﻌﲔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﺋﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻦ ﻣﺒﻜﺮ )‪ 12-11‬ﺳﻨﺔ(‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻕ‬
‫ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺗﺮﻗﻰ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ‪.‬‬
‫ﺗﺘﻤﺜﻞ ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ‪ :‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ﻣﺪﺭﺑﻮ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﻦ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﱵ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻛﺄﺩﺍﺓ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﻐﻼﻝ ﺍﻷﻣﺜﻞ ﻟﻺﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺗﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﺷﺘﻘﺖ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﳌﻌﺎﳉﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻹﺷﻜﺎﻟﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻔﻲ ﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪ ،‬ﻭﺩﻋﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲟﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻗﺼﺪ ﺇﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﻣﺪﻟﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺧﻄﻮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻄﻮﺍﺕ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﻠﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺻﺤﺔ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻣﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ‪ 24‬ﺳﺆﺍﻝ‪ ،‬ﰎ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﻪ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﳑﻦ ﺗﺘﻮﻓﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺀﺓ ﻭﺍﳋﱪﺓ ﺍﳌﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﻨﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺑﻠﻎ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩﻫﺎ ‪ 120‬ﻣﺪﺭﺏ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺐ ﺍﳌﺌﻮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺑﻌﺪ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻋﺪﺩ‬
‫ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻛﺎ‪) 2‬ﺗﺮﺑﻴﻊ(‪.‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺗﻮﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻼﺻﺔ ﻣﻔﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‬
‫ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﺒﲑﻳﻦ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺇﱃ ﳑﺎﺭﺳﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﻨﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻮﻓﺮ‬
‫ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻴﻮﻝ‪ ،‬ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍﺕ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺑﺔ ﳌﻤﺎﺭﺳﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ "ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻲ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻜﻴﻢ"‪:‬‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﺃﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﳏﺎﺿﺮ‪ ،‬ﺑﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﲜﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ‪ :‬ﻇﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻟﻜﻼ ﺍﳉﻨﺴﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺳﺒﻞ ﺗﻄﻮﻳﺮ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ )‪ 12-11‬ﺳﻨﺔ(‪.‬‬
‫ﻳﺘﻠﺨﺺ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ ﳏﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻻﺑﺘﺪﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻄﺔ‬
‫ﰲ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻣﺒﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﺿﻤﺎﻧﺎ ﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﻹﳒﺎﺯ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﳉﻴﺪ‪ ،‬ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻇﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﻮﺭ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻲ ﻟﺪﻯ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻭﺇﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻘﺎﺀ ‪‬ﻢ‪.‬‬
‫ﻗﺪ ﴰﻠﺖ ﳎﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻﻴﻮﻥ‬
‫ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪ ،‬ﻭﺁﺭﺍﺀ ﳔﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺣﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺭﻧﺎﺕ ﺑﲔ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻒ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻄﻮﺭ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻲ ﻟﺪﻳﻬﻢ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺑﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﻓﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻟﻶﺭﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻮﺻﻞ‬
‫ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﻮﻥ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺳﺒﻖ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﻠﻬﺎ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ ﰲ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻫﻲ ‪ 4172‬ﺗﻠﻤﻴﺬ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﻛﻼ ﺍﳉﻨﺴﲔ‪ ،‬ﰎ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻫﻢ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻋﺸﻮﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ ﺗﻼﻣﻴﺬ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﰲ ﺳﺒﻊ ﳏﺎﻓﻈﺎﺕ ﻋﺎﻡ ‪1983‬ﻡ‪ ،‬ﺑﻠﻎ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻹﻧﺎﺙ ‪ 2256‬ﻭﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﻮﺭ ‪ 1503‬ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻒ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺋﻲ‪ ،‬ﰎ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﺗﺰﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﰲ ﺟﻬﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺗﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﲟﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮﻳﺔ ﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ‪ ،‬ﰒ ﺩﻭﻧﺖ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻭﻭﺿﻊ‬
‫ﳍﺎ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﻭﳐﻄﻄﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﺑﻄﺎﺭﻳﺔ "ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ"‪ ،‬ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﰎ ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ‬
‫ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ‪ ،‬ﺿﻤﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻳﻊ ﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ ‪ 30‬ﻣﺘﺮ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻲ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ‬
‫‪ -4‬ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺠﺎﺭﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -5‬ﻭﺯﻥ ﻭﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ‬
‫‪ -6‬ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﺾ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -7‬ﺍﳌﻄﺎﻭﻟﺔ ‪ 300‬ﻣﺘﺮ ﻟﻺﻧﺎﺙ ﻭ‪ 500‬ﻣﺘﺮ ﻟﻠﺬﻛﻮﺭ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻹﳚﺎﺩ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ‪ ،‬ﺇﳚﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺐ ﺍﳌﺌﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﻭﺳﺎﻁ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺑﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﻘﺪ ﺃﺩﺭﺟﺖ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ‬
‫ﺟﺪﺍﻭﻝ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻞ ﳏﺎﻓﻈﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﻳﻨﺘﻤﻲ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼ ﺍﳉﻨﺴﲔ‪ ،‬ﰒ ﺳﺠﻠﺖ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ‬
‫ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﰲ ﺟﺪﻭﻟﲔ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻠﲔ ﻟﻠﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻹﻧﺎﺙ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻛﻞ‬
‫ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﺳﺠﻠﺖ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍﺩ‪ ،‬ﺣﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮ ﻭﺍﳉﻨﺲ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﻷﺧﲑ ﺗﻮﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺟﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪:‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻠﻲ ﺍﳌﻨﻈﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﺋﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻼﻣﻴﺬ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻟﻜﻼ ﺍﳉﻨﺴﲔ ﰲ ﺳﻦ‬
‫ﻣﺒﻜﺮ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﻃﺮﻕ ﻭﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﺏ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻟﻠﻤﺒﺘﺪﺋﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ‬
‫ﻟﻜﻼ ﺍﳉﻨﺴﲔ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﺐ ﻭﺍﻹﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﺟﻴﺪ‪ ،‬ﺿﻤﺎﻧﺎ ﻻﺳﺘﻤﺮﺍﺭ ﺗﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺋﻢ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻛﻼ ﺍﳉﻨﺴﲔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ‪ ،‬ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﻮﻍ‬
‫ﻭﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﺍﺛﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻄﺮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -4‬ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ‪:‬‬
‫ﺃﺟﺮﻳﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪ 1996‬ﺑﺪﺍﱄ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﲜﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻬﺎ "ﲰﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﻋﻼﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ" ﺃﻃﺮﻭﺣﺔ ﻟﻨﻴﻞ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ‬
‫ﻣﺎﺟﺴﺘﲑ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﺃﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﻄﻠﺒﺔ ﻭﻋﻼﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﻣﺪﻯ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻛﺘﺴﺎﺏ ﻭﺗﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻱ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻱ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -4‬ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺫﻭﻱ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﻔﻌﺔ ﻭﺫﻭﻱ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﺨﻔﻀﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -5‬ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﺮﺓ ﻭﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻭﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -6‬ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻛﺘﺌﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻣﻦ ﻃﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻭﻋﺪﺩﻫﻢ‬
‫‪ 100‬ﻃﺎﻟﺐ‪ ،‬ﲟﻌﻬﺪ ﺩﺍﱄ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﲜﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﰎ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻋﺸﻮﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻋﺔ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ‪ 8‬ﺃﻓﻮﺍﺝ ﻣﻦ ﻃﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﺃﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪-1‬‬
‫ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﺒﻮﺭﺝ ﻟﻠﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺑﺄﺑﻌﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪-2‬‬
‫ﺇﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﺮﺓ‪.‬‬
‫‪-3‬‬
‫ﺇﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪-4‬‬
‫ﺇﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﺃﻫﻢ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺫﻭﻱ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﻔﻌﺔ ﻭﺫﻭﻱ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﺨﻔﻀﺔ ﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﻔﺌﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﲑﺓ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻱ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -4‬ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻴﺔ ﺩﺍﻟﺔ ﺑﲔ ﲰﺔ )ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻛﺘﺌﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻒ( ﻭﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -5‬ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺑﻮﻣﺴﺠﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭ‪:‬‬
‫ﺃﺟﺮﻳﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪ 1996‬ﲜﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻐﺎﱎ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻬﺎ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﺪﻯ ﻻﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰﻫﻢ )ﺩﻓﺎﻉ‪ ،‬ﻭﺳﻂ‪ ،‬ﻫﺠﻮﻡ(‪ ،‬ﺃﻃﺮﻭﺣﺔ ﻟﻨﻴﻞ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ‬
‫ﻣﺎﺟﺴﺘﲑ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﺃﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺍﻟﻜﺸﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺗﺒﻌﺎ ﻟﻠﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻛﻞ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻩ‪ ،‬ﲟﺎ ﻳﺘﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻭﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﻭﺿﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺘﻬﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻻﻋﺒﲔ ﰲ‬
‫ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﻟﻌﺐ ﺗﺘﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻭﲰﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ‪ :‬ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﻋﻼﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻃﺮﻭﺣﺔ ﻣﺎﺟﺴﺘﲑ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺟﺎﻣﻌـﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋـﺮ‪،‬‬
‫‪.1996‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺇﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻭﺍﺟﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ ﰲ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﻟﻌﺒﻬﻢ ﳛﺘﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﲰﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﲟﺎ‬
‫ﻳﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻭﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺘﺔ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻋﻨﺪ ‪-‬ﻛﺎﺗﻞ‪ -‬ﺳﻴﻤﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺪﻓﺎﻉ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ‪ ،‬ﺍﳍﺠﻮﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﻟﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﴰﻠﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ‪ 189‬ﻻﻋﺒﺎ ﺭﺍﺷﺪﺍ ﲡﺎﻭﺯﺕ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﺭﻫﻢ ‪ 17‬ﺳﻨﺔ ﻣﻮﺯﻋﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﻕ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﲏ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻏﺮﺏ‪ ،‬ﺷﺮﻕ‪ ،‬ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﺃﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﰎ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ‪- 16‬ﻟﺮﳝﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﺗﻞ‪ -‬ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ‪ 187‬ﺳﺆﺍﻝ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﺃﻫﻢ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﻻﻋﱯ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻵﺗﻴﺔ )ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺎﺀ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ(‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺇﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﻻﻋﱯ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻭﺍﳍﺠﻮﻡ ﰲ ﲰﱵ )ﺍﻟﺪﻫﺎﺀ ﻭﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ(‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﲤﻴﺰ ﻻﻋﱯ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ )ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﺍﻻﻓﺘﻘﺎﺭ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﰐ(‪.‬‬
‫‪ -4‬ﲤﻴﺰ ﻻﻋﱯ ﺍﻟﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ )ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺔ(‪.‬‬
‫‪ -5‬ﲤﻴﺰ ﻻﻋﱯ ﺍﳍﺠﻮﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ )ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﺭ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ‪ ،‬ﺿﻌﻒ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﱯ(‪.‬‬
‫‪-6‬ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻗﻼﻭﺯ ﺗﻮﺍﰐ‪:‬‬
‫ﺃﺟﺮﻳﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪ 2002‬ﲜﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻐﺎﱎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ "ﺃﺛﺮ ﺑﻌﺾ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼﺼﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ" ﺃﻃﺮﻭﺣﺔ ﻟﻨﻴﻞ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﺎﺟﺴﺘﲑ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﺃﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺃﺛﺮ ﲣﺼﺺ ﺃﻟﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲰﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﻛﺘﺌﺎﺑﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳍﺪﻭﺀ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻜﻒ‪ ،‬ﻟﻄﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ‬
‫ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﻲ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﻷﺛﺮ ﺍﻟﻀﺎﻏﻂ ﻟﺘﺨﺼﺺ ﺃﻟﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻟﻄﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ ﻭﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﻲ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﴰﻠﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﻼﺏ ﻣﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﻲ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﺮﺓ ﻭﺃﻟﻌﺎﺏ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﻭﻋﺪﺩﻫﻢ ‪ 80‬ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﺃﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﰲ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ‪-‬ﻓﺮﺍﻳﱪﻭﺝ‪ -‬ﻟﻠﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻤﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺃﻋﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺒﻄﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﺒﻮﺭﺝ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﺃﻫﻢ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻃﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺃﻟﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﺮﺓ ﺃﺛﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﺒﻮﺭﺝ ﺇﳚﺎﺑﻴﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲰﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳍﺪﻭﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﺳﻠﺒﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲰﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻀﺎﻏﻄﺔ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻃﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺃﻟﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﳍﺪﻭﺀ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻃﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﺮﺓ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻤﺎﺭﺓ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﺒﻮﺭﺝ ﰲ ﲰﺔ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳍﺪﻭﺀ( ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻄﺎﺑﻘﻬﺎ ﰲ ﲰﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻃﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺃﻟﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﺮﺓ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻤﺎﺭﺓ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻟﻼﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﻲ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻳﺔ ﰲ ﲰﺔ )ﺍﻻﻛﺘﺌﺎﺑﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳍﺪﻭﺀ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ( ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻄﺎﺑﻘﻬﺎ ﰲ ﲰﺔ )ﺍﻟﻜﻒ(‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﺒﻮﺭﺝ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺑﺄﺑﻌﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪-6‬ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺳﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﰲ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ )ﺳﺎﺝ ‪ (Sage. G‬ﻟﻠﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ﰲ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻻﻋﱯ ﺍﻷﻧﺸﻄﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻲ "ﻟﺪﻭﺍﺩﺯ" ﻭﺗﻮﺻﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻳﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﰲ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪- Sage. G: An asseessement of personality profiles and withim intercollegiate athletes from differents sport.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪c(ed), psychology of sports may field, publishing company 1976.‬‬
‫‪ -7‬ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺑﺮﻳﻜﺴﻦ‪:‬‬
‫ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺑﺮﻳﻜﺴﻦ ﺃﺟﺮﻳﺖ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪ 1967‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ‪‬ﺪﻑ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ﰲ ﲰﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﺑﻘﻲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻟﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ‬
‫ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺘﺔ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻟﻜﺎﺗﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻳﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﲰﺎﺕ‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -8‬ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻋﺼﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ‪:‬‬
‫ﺃﺟﺮﻳﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪ ،1979‬ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ‪‬ﺪﻑ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻤﻼﻛﻤﲔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻼﻛﻤﲔ ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰﻭﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﺜﺎﺑﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﺍﻻﺗﺰﺍﻥ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﱄ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻃﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺼﺮ ﺑﺎﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﺹ‪ ،‬ﺍﳊﻴﻮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻻﻛﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﰐ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -9‬ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺑﺎﺭﺳﺘﺮ‪:‬‬
‫‪‬ﺪﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲤﻴﺰ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺣﲔ ﺫﻭﻱ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻷﻗﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺘﺔ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻟﻜﺎﺗﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﱂ ﺗﻜﺸﻒ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻳﺔ‬
‫ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻋﺘﲔ‪.‬‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﻋﻨﺎﻥ‪ :‬ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴـﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴـﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴـﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳـﺎﺿﻴـﺔ )ﻧﻈﺮﻳـﺔ ﻭﺗﻄﺒﻴـﻖ‪-‬ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﻳﺐ(‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜـﺮ ﺍﻟﻌـﺮﰊ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪،1‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪ ،1995 ،‬ﺹ ‪.55‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﻋﺼﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ‪ :‬ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻤﻼﻛﻢ‪ ،‬ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺩﻛﺘﻮﺭﺍﻩ‪ ،‬ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺒﻨﲔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ‪.1979 ،‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﻋﻨﺎﻥ‪ :‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪.55‬‬
‫‪ -10‬ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻋﺮﻳﱯ ﻋﻮﺩﺓ‪:‬‬
‫ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻗﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺎ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻋﻮﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻻﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﰲ ﺩﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﻓﻴﺎﰐ‬
‫ﻭﺍﺗﻀﺢ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻻﻋﱯ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻻﺭﺗﻜﺎﺯ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﻡ‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﺗﻞ ﻟﻠﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻣﺘﺎﺯ ﻻﻋﺒﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﻜﲑ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺮﻥ‪ ،‬ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻐﻼﻝ ﻭﺍﳊﺬﺭ‪ ،‬ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲤﻴﺰ ‪‬ﺎ ﻻﻋﺒﻮﺍ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻜﺎﺯ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺪﻫﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻟﻘﺪ ﺃﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﺟﺮﻳﺖ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‬
‫ﻓﺮﻭﻗﺎ ﲤﻴﺰ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﺃﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﺟﺮﻳﺖ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺒﻴﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ "ﻛﻮﺑﺮ ‪ "1967‬ﻭ"ﻛﺎﻥ ‪ "1976‬ﻭ"ﺳﺘﺸﺮ ‪ "1977‬ﻭ"ﻣﻮﺭﺟﺎﻥ ‪ "1980‬ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰﻭﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳔﻔﺎﺽ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻖ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺃﲪﺪ ﻋﺮﰊ ﻋﻨﺎﻥ‪ :‬ﺍﻹﳒﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﻼﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﰲ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﻭﻋﻼﻗﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺩﻛﺘﻮﺭﺍﻩ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻣﻮﺳﻜﻮ‪.1984 ،‬‬
‫ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻭﺿﺤﺖ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﺟﺮﻳﺖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ‪" :‬ﻓﺮﻏﻠﻲ ‪،"1976‬‬
‫"ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺘﺮﻳﺴﻲ ‪" ،"1976‬ﻋﻮﺽ ‪" ،"1977‬ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ‪ "1982‬ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‬
‫ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰﻭﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻻﺗﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﱄ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﺬﻫﺐ ﺑﻌﺾ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻬﺘﻤﲔ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻮﻗﻊ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺗﺒﻌﺎ ﳌﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺐ ﻭﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ "ﺳﺎﱂ" ﻭﺧﻠﻴﻔﺔ" ‪ 1989‬ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻀﻤﻨﺖ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﻣﺘﺴﺎﺑﻘﻲ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﳌﻀﻤﺎﺭ ﰲ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ "ﺣﻨﻔﻲ ‪ "1987‬ﺍﻟﱵ ﴰﻠﺖ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﻟﺪﻯ‬
‫ﻻﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﺔ ﺗﺒﻌﺎ ﳌﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺐ‪ ،‬ﺻﺎﻧﻌﻲ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺐ‪ ،‬ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻜﺎﺯ‪ ،‬ﺍﳉﻨﺎﺡ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ "ﺳﻨﺠﺮ" ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺴﺒﻮﻝ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﺑﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺲ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﲤﻴﺰ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺲ ﺑﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﰲ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﳒﺎﺯ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳒﺪ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ "ﻛﺮﻭﻝ" ﻭ"ﻛﺮﻧﺸﻮ" ‪ 1970‬ﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻫﻞ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﰲ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺃﻭ ﳕﻂ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﺍﳌﻤﺎﺭﺳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﻲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺎﺕ )ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺭﻋﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳉﻤﺒﺎﺯ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺗﻴﻪ(‪.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻭﺃﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﲰﺎﺕ ﲤﻴﺰ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﳌﺼﺎﺭﻋﺔ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﲰﺎﺕ ﻧﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﲤﻴﺰ‬
‫‪‬ﺎ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﻮ ﺍﳉﻤﺒﺎﺯ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺗﻴﻪ‪.‬‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻋﻼﻭﻱ‪ :‬ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻋﺔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ‪ ،‬ﻣﺼﺮ‪ ،1998 ،‬ﺹ ‪.383-382‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻋﻼﻭﻱ‪ :‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪.313‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﺃﺳﺎﻣﺔ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺭﺍﺗﺐ‪ :‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻘﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،2‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪ ،1997 ،‬ﺹ ‪.44‬‬
‫ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﺮﺿﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﲤﺤﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﻠﺖ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻔﻲ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻟﺘﻼﺅﻣﻪ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺎﺭﺓ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﺮﺿﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ ﺃﻭ ﻃﻠﺒﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺳﻨﻬﻢ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺳﺘﺔ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﺳﻨﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻛﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺑﻮﻣﺴﺠﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭ ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻋﺮﻳﱯ ﻋﻮﺩﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻮﺻﻼ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻻﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﻻﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰﻭﻥ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ‬
‫ﻟﻌﺒﻬﻢ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺧﻠﺺ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻃﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰﻭﻥ ﺑﻘﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﱯ ﻭﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻒ‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺖ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﻋﱯ ﺍﻷﻟﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻛﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‬
‫ﺳﻨﺠﺮ ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺧﻠﺼﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺴﺒﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﺲ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﲤﻴﺰ‬
‫ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺲ ﺑﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﰲ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﳒﺎﺯ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ‪.‬‬
‫ﲤﻬﻴـﺪ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺣﺠﺮ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ‪‬ﻢ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‪ ،‬ﳑﻦ‬
‫ﻳﺘﻤﺘﻌﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﻭﻗﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺗﺘﻔﻖ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺗﺘﻮﺍﻓﺮ ﻟﺪﻳﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺣﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﺆ ﳍﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻔﻮﻕ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﺗﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﳉﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮﻱ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃ‪‬ﺎ‬
‫ﺗﺄﰐ ﺑﺄﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻔﺴﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻜﺜﻒ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﻦ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﰲ ﺇﺣﺮﺍﺯ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﺓ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺿﻠﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ‪/‬ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻃﺒﻘﺎ ﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻭﻳﻌﺮﻓﻪ "ﳏﻤﺪ ﻟﻄﻔﻲ ﻃﻪ" ﺑﺄﻧﻪ‪" :‬ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺴﺐ ﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‪ ،‬ﳑﻦ‬
‫ﻳﺘﻤﺘﻌﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﻭﻗﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺗﺘﻔﻖ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺗﺘﻮﺍﻓﺮ ﻟﺪﻳﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺣﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﺆ ﳍﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻔﻮﻕ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ"‪.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻭﺣﺴﺐ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭﺓ "ﻫﺪﻯ ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﳋﻀﺮﻱ" ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻫﻮ‪" :‬ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ‬
‫ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺎﺣﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﲜﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺆﺛﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺑﺎﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﻳﺔ"‪.‬‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫ﻭﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﺐ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ ﻋﺪﺩ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‪ ،‬ﲝﻴﺚ ﺗﺘﻮﻓﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﻣﺆﺷﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺀﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﺆ ﳍﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ‪.(CF. RÖTHIG 1983.314) .‬‬
‫‪4‬‬
‫ﻭﻳﺸﲑ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ "ﺯﻛﻲ ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ" ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ‬
‫ﻧﻈﺮﺓ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﺷﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺿﻮﺀ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺴﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﰲ ﺍﻵﻭﻧﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﲑﺓ‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﲪﺎﺩ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ‪ ،2001 ،‬ﺹ ‪.303‬‬
‫‪-2‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﻟﻄﻔﻲ ﻃﻪ‪ :‬ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪ ،2002 ،‬ﺹ ‪.13‬‬
‫‪-3‬ﻫﺪﻯ ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻤـﺪ ﺍﳋﻀـﺮﻱ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜـﺔ ﻻﻧﺘﻘـﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺣـﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻜﺘﺒـﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪،‬‬
‫‪ ،2004‬ﺹ‪.19‬‬
‫‪- Jürgen Weineck: Manuel d'entraînement, 4e édition révisée et augmentée, vigot.‬‬
‫‪4‬‬
‫ﳒﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ ﺍﳌﺘﺨﺼﺼﲔ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺍﲡﻬﻮﺍ ﺑﺪﺍﺭﺳﺘﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﻮﺽ‬
‫ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ‪ ،‬ﺣﱴ ﻳﺘﺴﲎ ﳍﻢ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺇﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﳏﻮﺭ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺒﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﳌﺎ ﳛﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﺆ ﳌﺴﺘﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺒﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺎﺭﺓ ﰲ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻌﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺒﲎ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ‪" :‬ﺗﻘﻨﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺑﺪﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﺮﺑﻮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﻔﺴﻴﺔ"‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻳﺸﲑ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺎﺯﻡ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺗﺘﻀﺢ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺸﻒ ﺍﳌﺒﻜﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺫﻭﻱ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ‬
‫ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﲤﻜﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻡ ﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻮﻟﺔ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﺼﺮ ﺍﻹﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﺎﺣﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻧﺸﻄﺔ ﺍﳌﻤﺎﺭﺳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻭﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﺗﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﳉﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮﻱ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃ‪‬ﺎ‬
‫ﺗﺄﰐ ﺑﺄﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻔﺴﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻜﺜﻒ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﻦ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﰲ ﺇﺣﺮﺍﺯ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ‪.‬‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺸﲑ ﻓﻴﺼﻞ ﻋﻴﺎﺵ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻻ ﺗﻘﺘﺼﺮ ﺃﳘﻴﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺇﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻷﺑﻄﺎﻝ‬
‫ﻓﻘﻂ‪ ،‬ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻼﺋﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺇﺷﺒﺎﻉ ﻣﻴﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﺭﻏﺒﺎﺗﻪ‬
‫ﻋﻨﺪ ﳑﺎﺭﺳﺎﺗﻪ‪.‬‬
‫‪4‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﺯﻛﻲ ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﻔـﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳـﺎﺿﻲ )ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ‪-‬ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴـﺔ‪-‬ﺍﻟﺮﻋﺎﻳﺔ(‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳـﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﺒﺎﻋـﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸـﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳـﻊ‪،‬‬
‫‪،2006‬ﺹ‪.231‬‬
‫‪-2‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺎﺯﻡ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ‪:‬ﺃﺳﺲ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍ ﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﻓﺎﺀ ﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ‪ ،‬ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ‪،2005 ،‬ﺹ‪.21‬‬
‫‪-3‬ﺭﻳﺴﺎﻥ ﺧﺮﻳﺒﻂ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺭﲪﺔ ﳏﻤﺪ‪ :‬ﻃﺮﻕ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻟﻠﻤﻼﻳﲔ‪ ،1990 ،‬ﺹ ‪.11‬‬
‫‪ -4‬ﻓﻴﺼﻞ ﻋﻴﺎﺵ‪ :‬ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﺍ‪‬ﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺜﻘﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻋﺪﺩ ‪،02‬ﻣﺴﺘﻐﺎﱎ‪،1997،‬ﺹ‪.40‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﺃﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﳛﻘﻖ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻋﺶ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺟﻴﺔ )ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳋﻄﻄﻴﺔ( ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻄﻠﺒﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﻧﺸﻄﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻟﺘﺤﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳚﺐ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﺮﻫﺎ ﺣﱴ ﳛﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻣﻊ ﻧﻮﻉ‬
‫ﻣﻌﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻏﺒﲔ ﰲ ﳑﺎﺭﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﳌﻴﻮﳍﻢ ﻭﺍﲡﺎﻫﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍ‪‬ﻢ‬
‫ﻭﻗﺪﺭﺍ‪‬ﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺗﻜﺮﻳﺲ ﺍﳉﻬﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﺎﻟﻴﻒ ﰲ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﻭﺗﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺘﻮﻗﻊ ﳍﻢ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﺒﻞ‪.‬‬
‫ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﳓﻮ ﻣﻼﻣﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻮﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﳊﺴﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ‬
‫ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﻠﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ‪.‬‬
‫ﻣﻜﺎﻓﺤﺔ ﺗﺴﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺎ ﺑﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ‪‬ﻢ‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻋﻤﺮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻋﺒﺶ‪ :‬ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪ ،2001 ،‬ﺹ‪.17‬‬
‫ﺕ‬
‫ﻭﻳﻀﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﲪﺎﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﲢﻘﻖ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﺍﻑ‬
‫ﺍﻵﺗﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ ü‬ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻋﺪﻳﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﻣﺒﻜﺮﺍ ﳑﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻄﻴﻂ ﳍﻢ‬
‫ﲟﺪﻯ ﺯﻣﲏ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﺒﻜﺮﺍ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ ﻓﺘﺮﺓ‬
‫ﳑﻜﻨﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ ü‬ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ ﻣﻨﺬ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎ ﻣﻊ ﻗﺪﺭﺍ‪‬ﻢ ﻭﻣﻴﻮﳍﻢ ﻭﺍﲡﺎﻫﺎ‪‬ﻢ‪.‬‬
‫‪ ü‬ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺰ ﺍﳉﻬﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﳌﻴﺰﺍﻧﻴﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻋﺪﻳﻦ‪.‬‬
‫‪ ü‬ﺗﻄﻮﻳﺮ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﲢﺴﲔ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﻷﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻨﻌﻜﺲ‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺇﳚﺎﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﻏﺒﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻤﺎﺭﺳﺔ ﻭﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﺘﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻫﺪﺓ‪.‬‬
‫‪-4‬ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﺃﳘﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﺃﻫﺪﺍﻓﻪ ﻳﺘﺒﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻧﻮﻋﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻛﺎﻵﰐ‪:‬‬
‫* ﺃﺷﺎﺭﺕ "ﺑﻮﳉﺎ ﻛﻮﻓﺎ" ‪ (1986) Bolga Kova‬ﺇﱃ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪:‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺑﻐﺮﺽ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ )ﲨﺎﻋﺔ( ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺎﺕ ﻛﻤﺠﻤﻮﻋﺔ‬
‫ﻣﺘﺠﺎﻧﺴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲡﻨﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﺒﻄﺔ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ‪.‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ‪‬ﺪﻑ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺨﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻣﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻷﻭﳌﱯ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ ﺫﻭﻱ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﲤﻜﻦ ﺻﻌﻮﺑﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﳊﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺒﻴﺔ‪...‬ﺇﱁ‪.‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﲪﺎﺩ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.304-303‬‬
‫‪-2‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﻟﻄﻔﻲ ﻃﻪ‪ :‬ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪،‬ﺹ‪.19-18‬‬
‫* ﻭﻳﺬﻛﺮ "ﺃﻛﺮﺍﻣﻮﻑ" ‪ AKRAMOV‬ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻳﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ‪:‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -1-4‬ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﻳﱯ‪:‬‬
‫ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺮﰊ‪ ،‬ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺪﺍﻏﻮﺟﻲ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﻳﱯ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﻳﺐ ﻳﻠﻌﺐ ﺩﻭﺭﺍ ﻫﺎﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺮﰊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﺎﺭﻥ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ‬
‫ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‪ ،‬ﻣﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲡﺎﺭﺏ ﻭﺧﱪﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﺮﰊ )ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺏ( ﰲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2-4‬ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻘﺎﺋﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺒﺪﺃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﺒﻜﺮﺍ ﻣﻨﺬ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ‬
‫ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻱ ﻭﰲ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺮﺓ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻨﻈﻤﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﺘﺨﺬ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﲟﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ‬
‫ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺼﻬﻢ ﻣﻊ ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻧﺎﺟﺤﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3-4‬ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺐ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺘﻄﻠﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﰊ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺐ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺑﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻮﺣﺪ‬
‫ﺍﻷﲝﺎﺙ ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﻤﺢ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻨﺒﺆ ﺑﺼﻼﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﻄﻮﺭﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﺒﻠﻲ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫ‬
‫ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺼﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﻴﺪﺓ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﳜﺺ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ‪ ،‬ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﻛﺰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺐ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧﻪ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﶈﻴﻄﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪ -5‬ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪:‬‬
‫‪- AKRAMOV: sélection et préparation des jeunes footballeur, o.p.u, Alger, 1990, P 42‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪- AKRAMOV: sélection et préparation des jeunes footballeur¸ op cit, P 42.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺯﻛﻲ ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﲡﺎﻫﲔ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﲔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﳜﺺ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪:‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻩ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺿﻮﺀ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻗﺪﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻟﻔﺘﺮﺓ ﺯﻣﻨﻴﺔ ﳑﺘﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ‪ 15-10‬ﺳﻨﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺒﻼ‪ ،‬ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺛﺒﺘﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ‬
‫ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻴﺔ ﺩﺍﻟﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺊ ﰲ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺑﻌﺾ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻮﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﺓ ﻭﺗﺸﻤﻞ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻳﻞ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺪﻯ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻻﲡﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﳊﺎﱄ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺭﺋﻴﺴﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻞ‬
‫ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺃﻫﺪﺍﻓﻬﺎ ﻭﻣﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎ‪‬ﺎ ﻭﺍﳌﺆﺷﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﺆ ﺑﺎﳌﺴﺘﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺊ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﺍﻷﺧﺬ‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻠﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1-5‬ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ )ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻭﱄ(‪:‬‬
‫ ﻭﻳﺘﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺯ ﺍﻷﻭﱄ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻋﺎﻡ‪.‬‬‫ ‪‬ﺪﻑ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻁ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﻈﻬﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﺩﻭﻥ ﲣﺼﺼﻴﺔ‪.‬‬‫ ﲡﺮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺎﺭﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻓﺔ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺤﻮﺻﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺗﺴﺘﻘﻲ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ‬‫ﻛﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ‪.‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﺯﻛﻲ ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ‪:‬ﺍﻟﺘﻔـﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳـﺎﺿﻲ )ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ‪-‬ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴـﺔ‪-‬ﺍﻟﺮﻋﺎﻳﺔ(‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪،‬ﺹ‪.232‬‬
‫ ﻳﻄﺒﻖ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺎﺭﻭﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻣﺞ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺆﺳﺴﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ‬‫ﺃﳌﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﲔ ﻭﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ "ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻣﻠﺔ"‪.‬‬
‫ ﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺎﻥ ‪‬ﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ‬‫ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2-5‬ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ )ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼﺼﻲ(‪:‬‬
‫ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺃﻭﻟﺌﻚ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﰎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺅﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‪.‬‬‫ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﻓﺘﺮﺓ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺒﻴﺔ ﻛﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ )ﻣﻦ ﺳﻨﺔ ﺇﱃ ‪ 3‬ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ(‪.‬‬‫ ﺗﺴﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰎ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ‬‫ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻟﻠﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺗﻘﺪﻣﺎ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺟﺪﺍﻭﻝ‬‫ﺃﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺗﻨﺒﺆﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺗﺴﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﻋﺪﺓ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ‪.‬‬‫‪ -3-5‬ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ )ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﳔﺒﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ(‪:‬‬
‫ ﻭﺗﺴﺘﻬﺪﻑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﳔﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭﻟﺌﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻧﻔﺬﻭﺍ ﺧﻄﻂ ﻭﺑﺮﺍﻣﺞ‬‫ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺗﺘﻢ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺿﻮﺀ ﺃﺭﻓﻊ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‬‫ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼﺼﻲ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -6‬ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﲏ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﺪﻯ ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﳋﻀﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﲝﺴﺐ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﺘﺨﺼﺼﲔ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﲏ‬
‫‪-1‬ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﲪﺎﺩ‪:‬ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪.311‬‬
‫ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻤﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺗﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﲏ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻤﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺛﻼﺙ‬
‫ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺭﺋﻴﺴﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ‪:‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -1-6‬ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‪ :‬ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻭﱄ )‪ 9-7‬ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ(‬
‫ﺗﺒﺪﺃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻣﻨﺔ )ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻁ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ(‬
‫ﻭﻳﺮﺍﻋﻰ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﲏ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﺘﻀﻤﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻛﺪ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ )ﺳﻼﻣﺔ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﺟﻬﺰﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮﻳﺔ(‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻲ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2-6‬ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ )‪ 12-9‬ﺳﻨﺔ(‬
‫ﺗﺒﺪﺃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺳﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺳﻌﺔ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻭﺣﱴ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﻋﺸﺮ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﺘﻀﻤﻦ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﺎﻗﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﺮﻭﺑﻮﻣﺘﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﳕﻂ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺀﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺑﺴﻼﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺍﳉﻬﺎﺯﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻼﺋﻤﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3-6‬ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ‪ :‬ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺜﺒﻴﺖ )‪ 16-13‬ﺳﻨﺔ(‬
‫ﺗﺒﺪﺃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻭﺗﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺳﺔ ﻋﺸﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﺘﻀﻤﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺘﻘﺪﻣﺔ‬
‫ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﻣﺘﻌﻤﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﻮﺍﺣﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺴﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻼﺋﻤﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﺒﺔ‬
‫)ﳕﻂ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ(‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼﺼﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ‬
‫ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻛﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻼﻣﺔ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﻲ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻋﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺴﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼﺼﻲ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺃﺟﻬﺰﺓ ﺭﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﰲ ‪‬ﺎﻳﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﳚﺐ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ‬
‫‪-1‬ﻫﺪﻯ ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﳋﻀﺮﻱ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜـﺔ ﻻﻧﺘﻘـﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺣـﺔ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪،‬ﺹ‪.37-36-35‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﺎﻓﺴﺎﺕ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻗﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ ﻟﻼﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺑﺄ‪‬ﺎ‬
‫ﲤﺜﻞ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﳌﺘﺎﺣﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -7‬ﳏﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ‪/‬ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺎﺣﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻤﻘﺔ ﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﳌﺆﺛﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺍﺋﻖ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻤﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﺒﻄﺔ ﺑﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺗﺸﻤﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -1-7‬ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﺗﺘﻤﺜﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﺍﺛﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺭﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺰﻣﲏ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺟﻬﺰﺓ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2-7‬ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﺒﻄﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ‪ :‬ﺗﺘﻤﺜﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3-7‬ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ )ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ(‪ :‬ﺗﺘﻤﺜﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﲡﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳌﻴﻮﻝ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻳﺸﲑ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺯﻛﻲ ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳏﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺆﺷﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺗﺘﻤﺜﻞ ﰲ‪:‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺭﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ )ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻴﺔ(‪ ،‬ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‬
‫)ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ(‪ ،‬ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺲ ﺣﺮﻛﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻨﺠﺎﺡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻟﻼﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺩ‪ .‬ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﲪﺎﺩ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪،‬ﺹ ‪.303‬‬
‫‪-2‬ﺯﻛﻲ ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﻔـﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳـﺎﺿﻲ )ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ‪-‬ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴـﺔ‪-‬ﺍﻟﺮﻋﺎﻳﺔ(‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪،‬ﺹ‪.255‬‬
‫ﻭﺃﺷﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﺪﻯ ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﳋﻀﺮﻱ ﺇﱃ ﳏﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺭﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ )ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ(‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺲ ﺣﺮﻛﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﻟﻠﻨﺠﺎﺡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ‬
‫ﳏﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ‪.‬‬
‫‪-8‬ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ )ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ( ﻟﻼﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻟﺪﻳﻨﺎ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﺃﻥ ﳑﺎﺭﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ )ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ( ﺣﱴ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﳌﺘﻐﲑﺓ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﳑﺎﺭﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﻬﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺑﺬﻟﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ ﻭﺍﳌﺨﺘﺼﲔ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺣﻘﻘﺖ ﰲ‬
‫ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺗﻘﺪﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﳜﺘﺺ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻄﻠﺒﻬﺎ ﺃﻧﺸﻄﺔ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺼﲔ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺗﺘﻀﻤﻦ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ )ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﻜﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺟﻴﺔ(‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،...‬ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻄﺮﻕ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﰲ ﺷﱴ ﺻﻮﺭﻩ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ )ﺑﺼﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﲰﻌﻲ‪ ،‬ﺣﺮﻛﻲ( ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻴﻮﻝ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻫﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺍﻓﻌﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺇﻏﻔﺎﳍﺎ‪.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻭﻳﺸﲑ ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﲪﺎﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ )ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ( ﻟﻼﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺗﺘﻤﺜﻞ ﰲ "ﲰﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﲡﺎﻫﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻭﺍﳌﻴﻮﻝ"‪.‬‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﻫﺪﻯ ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﳋﻀﺮﻱ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜـﺔ ﻻﻧﺘﻘـﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺣـﺔ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪،‬ﺹ‪.69‬‬
‫‪-2‬ﺯﻛﻲ ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﻔـﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳـﺎﺿﻲ )ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ‪-‬ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴـﺔ‪-‬ﺍﻟﺮﻋﺎﻳﺔ(‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪،‬ﺹ‪.258‬‬
‫‪-3‬ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﲪﺎﺩ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪،‬ﺹ‪.303‬‬
‫ﻭﺗﺸﲑ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﺪﻯ ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﳋﻀﺮﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺁﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ ﻭﺍﳌﺨﺘﺼﲔ ﺍﺗﻔﻘﺖ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﳍﺎ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻓﻤﺜﻼ‪ :‬ﻳﻌﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﺍ ﻫﺎﻣﺎ ﻟﻠﺘﻨﺒﺆ ﺑﺎﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﺒﻞ‬
‫‪ -9‬ﳏﻜﺎﺕ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﳉﺪﺩ ﻣﻦ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺘﻤﻊ‬
‫ﻭﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻷﻧﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺒﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﶈﺎﻓﻈﺎﺕ ﺃﻭ ﻭﻓﻖ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﳏﺪﺩﺓ‬
‫ﻳﻌﲎ ‪‬ﺎ ﺍﳋﱪﺍﺀ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﺘﻀﻤﻦ‪:‬‬
‫ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻋﻲ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ‪.‬‬‫ ﻣﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﻭﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺎﺭﺓ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﲏ ﻟﻠﻄﻔﻞ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﱯ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﻟﱪﻭﻓﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻲ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻋﻴﺔ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻴﺔ‪.‬‬‫‪ -‬ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﺍﺛﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -10‬ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﻭﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍ‪‬ﺪ‪ ،‬ﲨﺎﻱ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻜﻲ‪ :‬ﲣﻄﻴﻂ ﺑﺮﺍﻣﺞ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﻭﺗﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﻋﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ‪ ،‬ﻣﺼـﺮ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪ ،1997 ،‬ﺹ ‪.107‬‬
‫ﺍﻫﺘﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﻮﻥ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲤﻴﺰ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺒﻜﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﻣﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺻﻞ ﻻﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺳﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﺘﺎﺣﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻱ ﳎﺘﻤﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍ‪‬ﺘﻤﻌﺎﺕ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻞ ﻭﻟﻜﻲ ﻧﺘﺠﻨﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻉ ﰲ ﺃﺧﻄﺎﺀ ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﺟﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺧﱪﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ‪ ،‬ﻳﺮﻯ "‪" 1،"EDGAR‬ﺍﻧﻪ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻫﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﺍﳌﻮﺭﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪.‬‬‫ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ‪.‬‬‫‪ -‬ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻓﻌﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1-10‬ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﳘﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻓﻬﻢ ﻭﲢﺪﻳﺪ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺍﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﺴﺐ "ﺃﺭﻭﻳﻦ‬
‫ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ‪:‬‬
‫‪H‬‬
‫‪" "ERWIN.‬ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺗﻠﻌﺐ ﺩﻭﺭﺍ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪ -1-1-10‬ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻣﺘﺮﻳﺔ‪ :‬ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﲟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﳕﻮ ﺟﺴﻤﻲ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﺃﳘﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺃ‪‬ﻢ‪:‬‬
‫ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻃﻮﻻ‪ ،‬ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻭﺯﻧﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺣﻴﻮﻳﺔ‪.‬‬‫ ﻳﺘﻤﺘﻌﻮﻥ ﺑﺼﺤﺔ ﺟﻴﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﺗﻔﻮﻕ ﺯﻣﻼﺀﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻳﲔ‪.‬‬‫‪ -‬ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﺴﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ )ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻨﻴﺔ(‪.‬‬
‫‪- EDGAR. H: Méthodologie d'Entraînement, Edition Vigot, Paris, 1985, P153.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪- ERWIN H: Entraînement sportif des entfans, Imprimé en France, Edition Vigot, 1987, P88.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪ -2-1-10‬ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﻧﻘﺼﺪ ‪‬ﺎ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﺪﺍﻭﻣﺔ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻼﻫﻮﺍﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻭﺭﺩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ‪ ،‬ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻋﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﻜﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﺮﻭﻧﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻲ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3-1-10‬ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻮﺣﺮﻛﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﻧﻌﲏ ‪‬ﺎ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺯﻥ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺮﺷﺎﻗﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﻭﺑﺪﻭ‪‬ﺎ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -4-1-10‬ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﳒﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪:‬‬
‫ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﻼﺀ ﻭﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﻭﻗﻴﺎﺩﺗﻪ ‪.‬‬‫ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﳎﺘﻤﻌﻪ )ﺍﻟﺰﻣﻼﺀ‪ ،‬ﺍﻷﺳﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﺮﰊ‪.(...‬‬‫‪ -‬ﻳﺸﻌﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﺘﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻭﻣﺘﻌﺎﻭﻧﲔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻟﻮﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺎﻫﺔ‪ ،‬ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﳌﻠﻌﻮﺏ‪".‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -2-10‬ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤﻴﺬ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳝﻠﻚ ﻣﻮﻫﺒﺔ ﺟﻴﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺱ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺳﻴﺔ ﻭﻟﺪﻳﻪ ﺩﺭﺟﺎﺕ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻣﺘﺤﺎﻧﺎﺕ‪،‬‬
‫ﺳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﺪﻳﻪ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﰲ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺻﻞ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﳍﺪﻑ ﺍﳌﻨﺸﻮﺩ‪.‬‬
‫ﺇﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‪ ،‬ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﰲ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻻﺕ ﻛﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ ﺗﺪﻗﻴﻖ ﻭﺿﺒﻂ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺳﺘﻜﻮﻥ‬‫ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﳒﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻟﻠﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﳒﺎﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻮﻟﺔ ﺣﱴ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ‬‫ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺎﺏ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪.‬‬‫‪ -1‬ﻣﺎﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺷﻴﻐﻞ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻱ‪ ،‬ﺗﺮﲨﺔ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺳﻨﻴﻢ ﺭﻓﻌﺖ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻀﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﺼﺮ‪ ،‬ﺩﻭﻥ ﺳﻨﺔ ﻧﺸﺮ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪-22‬‬
‫‪.24‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺗﺸﺠﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻮﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -11‬ﺃﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﻃﺮﻕ ﻭﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻭﺗﺸﺨﻴﺼﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﳘﻬﺎ‪:‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪ -1-11‬ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺎﺀ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺎﺀ ﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﺔ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻜﺸﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ‪،‬‬
‫ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻼﻣﺢ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺗﺘﻤﺜﻞ ﰲ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺫﻛﺎﺋﻬﻢ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2-11‬ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ‪ ،‬ﺃﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ ﳌﺎ ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻗﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻗﺔ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3-11‬ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﺮﺑﲔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳌﻔﻴﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﺪﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺷﺮ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺮﰊ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤﻴﺬ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻷﻧﺸﻄﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺘﻄﻠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺍﳌﺮﰊ ﺑﺪﻭﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻧﺸﻄﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ ﻣﺘﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﻠﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -4-11‬ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻵﺑﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻬﺎﺕ‪:‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﻗﺎﺳﻢ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻗﺎﺳﻢ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﰲ ﺃﻟﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﺍﳌﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﻨﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ‪ ،1978 ،‬ﺹ ‪.253-250‬‬
‫‪-2‬ﺯﻳﻨﺐ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺷﻘﲑ‪ :‬ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﻮﻗﲔ ﻭﺍﳌﺘﻤﻴﺰﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻀﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﺔ‪ ،1998 ،‬ﺹ ‪.178‬‬
‫ﺑﺪﺕ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﻣﻨﺬ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ "ﺗﺮﻣﺎﻥ ‪ "TURMAN‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪،‬‬‫ﺍﻟﱵ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻣﻬﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻵﺑﺎﺀ ﻷﻭﻻﺩﻫﻢ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻜﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻣﻲ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺷﺮ‪ ،‬ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -5-11‬ﺍﻷﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺇﻥ ﻻﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ‪ ،‬ﻋﺪﺩﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﻳﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﻐﺮﻗﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤﻴﺬ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤﻴﺬﺓ‪ ،‬ﻟﻠﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ‬‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﳑﻜﻦ ﻟﻸﺩﺍﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ ﻳﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺍﳌﺮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﳋﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﻓﺮﺓ ﻟﻠﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪.‬‬‫ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﻓﺮ ﳍﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺻﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﻤﻞ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ‪.‬‬‫ ﻳﺘﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺻﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻟﻠﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪.‬‬‫‪ -‬ﻳﻌﻄﻴﻬﻢ ﺛﻘﺔ ﺃﻛﱪ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﳚﺎﺑﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﻤﺮﰊ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺎﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﶈﺎﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻟﻠﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ‪.‬‬‫ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﳎﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ‪.‬‬‫‪ -‬ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺘﻪ ﻟﻠﻄﻔﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﰲ ﺇﻃﺎﺭ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺳﻴﺔ ﻭﰲ ﻓﻨﺎﺋﻬﺎ‪.‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪.310‬‬
‫‪-2‬ﺳﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ‪ :‬ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﰲ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﻮﻗﲔ –ﲝﻮﺙ ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺆﲤﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻟﺮﻋﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﻮﻗﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴـﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠـﻴﻢ‪ ،‬ﻣﺼـﺮ‪،‬‬
‫‪ ،1991‬ﺹ ‪.28‬‬
‫ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﳌﺮﺑﻮﻥ ﺧﲑ ﻣﺼﺪﺭ ﻟﻠﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ‪ ،‬ﻷ‪‬ﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲤﺎﺱ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﺼﺺ‪ ،‬ﻭﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎ‪‬ﻢ‪ ،‬ﻫﺎﻣﺔ‬
‫ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﳜﺺ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻭﻃﺮﻕ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻠﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﳒﺎﺣﺎ‪‬ﻢ‪ ،‬ﺇﺧﻔﺎﻗﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﻭﲰﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -12‬ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1-12‬ﳕﻮﺫﺝ ﺟﻴﻤﺒﻞ "‪:"GIMBEL‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﺣﺚ ﺃﳌﺎﱐ‪ ،‬ﻳﺸﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺒﻴﲔ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻫﻲ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺴﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺭﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﻓﻊ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﳛﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﺗﺘﻤﺜﻞ ﰲ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺟﻴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ‬
‫ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﺗﺘﻤﺜﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﻇﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺍﻗﺘﺮﺡ "ﺟﻴﻤﺒﻞ"‪ ،‬ﺍﳋﻄﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪:‬‬
‫ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺴﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺭﻓﻮﳉﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻣﻦ‬‫ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﺴﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺭﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﰒ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ‬‫ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺠﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺗﻨﻔﻴﺬ ﺑﺮﺍﻣﺞ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻛﻞ ﺗﻠﻤﻴﺬ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻠﻤﻴﺬﺓ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺗﻨﻔﻴﺬ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻲ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻨﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻳﺘﺮﺍﻭﺡ ﺯﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ‪ 12‬ﺇﱃ ‪ 24‬ﺷﻬﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﺘﻢ ﺧﻼﻝ‬‫ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺧﻀﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤﻴﺬ ﻟﻼﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺭﺻﺪ ﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﺗﻘﺪﻣﻬﻢ ﻭﺗﺘﺒﻌﻬﻢ‪.‬‬
‫ ﰲ ‪‬ﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱪﻧﺎﻣﺞ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻲ‪ ،‬ﻳﺘﻢ ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺗﻨﺒﺆﻳﺔ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺗﻠﻤﻴﺬ ﻭﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﳒﺎﺣﻪ‬‫ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺒﻼ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼﺼﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻃﺒﻘﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﺆﺷﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻹﳚﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺍﺗﻀﺤﺖ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﲪﺎﺩ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ‪ ،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪.316‬‬
‫‪ -2-12‬ﳕﻮﺫﺝ "ﺩﻳﺮﻙ ‪:"DERKE‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺍﻗﺘﺮﺡ "ﺩﻳﺮﻙ" ﺛﻼﺙ ﺧﻄﻮﺍﺕ ﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﳋﻄﻮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‪:‬‬
‫ﻫﻲ ﺗﺘﻀﻤﻦ ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﺗﻔﺴﲑﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺩﳝﻲ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﻴﻒ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻂ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻲ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳋﻄﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺗﺘﻀﻤﻦ‪ :‬ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﲰﺎﺕ ﻭﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺟﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺊ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﳕﻄﻪ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻳﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼﺼﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺫﺍ‪‬ﺎ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻋﺎﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳋﻄﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﺘﻀﻤﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﲣﻄﻴﻂ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﱯ‪ ،‬ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺑﺪﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺳﻢ ﻭﻳﺘﻢ ﺗﺘﺒﻊ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﰲ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺗﻜﻴﻔﻬﻢ ﻟﻠﺘﻤﺮﻳﻦ‪ ،‬ﰒ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﺘﻢ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﻢ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻴﻪ‪.‬‬
‫ﺧﻼﺻـﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﻜﺘﺴﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ‪ ،‬ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻟﺬﻭﻱ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺏ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﲝﻜﻢ ﻛﻔﺎﺀﺗﻪ ﺍﳌﻬﻨﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺧﱪﺗﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﻓﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﻄﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺃﻱ ﻟﻌﺒﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻷ‪‬ﺎ ﲢﻤﻞ ﰲ‬
‫ﻃﻴﺎ‪‬ﺎ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺑﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﻮﻕ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﲪﺎﺩ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪.317‬‬
‫ﺇﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ ﺟﺪﺍ‪ ،‬ﻭﲢﻘﻴﻘﻪ ﻳﺘﻄﻠﺐ ﻋﻤﻼ ﲨﺎﻋﻴﺎ ﻳﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻓﻴﻪ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺼﺎﺋﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺪﻯ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻠﻪ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺏ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻭﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺴﻲ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺋﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﻜﺘﺸﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺑﺮﻭﺯﻫﻢ‬
‫ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻘﺎﺀ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻞ‪ ،‬ﻷ‪‬ـﺎ ﺗـﺘﻢ‬
‫ﺑﻔﻌﻞ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﳌﺘﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺘﻜﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻜﻞ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻟﺴـﺎﺑﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﳍـﺎ‬
‫ﺃﳘﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﳌﻮﺍﺻﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﺸﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺒﻮﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﲤﻬﻴـﺪ‪:‬‬
‫ﳛﺎﻭﻝ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﺭﺱ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﻭﺧﱪﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻭﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺮﺗﺒﻄﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﳎﺎﻻ‪‬ﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﺎ‪‬ﺎ ﻭﳑﺎﺭﺳﺎ‪‬ﺎ ﻭﳏﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴـﲑ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﺆ ‪‬ﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﻟﻺﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻜﺘﺴﺒﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻲ ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺗﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﺍﻫـﺘﻢ ﻋﻠﻤـﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﺳﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﲢﻠﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﲜﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﲡﻌﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ‬
‫ﻓﺮﻳﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺫﺍ‪‬ﺎ ﻭﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺑﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﱂ ﺗﺒـﺪﺃ ﺇﻻ ﰲ ﻣﻨﺘﺼـﻒ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﳏﺎﻭﻻﺕ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﰲ ﺃﳕﺎﻁ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩﺍﹰ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﺴﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺳﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺰﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﻭﻧﻈﺮﺍﹰ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﶈـﺎﻭﻻﺕ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺒﻜﺮﺓ ﺗﺒﲔ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺻﺤﺘﻬﺎ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺻﺒﺤﺖ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻟﺔ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮﻧﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺳﻨﺘﻄﺮﻕ ﺇﱃ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻌﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﶈﻴﻄﺔ ‪‬ﺎ ﻭ ﻛـﺬﺍ‬
‫ﻋﻼﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻭ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﺔ ﻭ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﺩﺓ‪،‬ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻧﺴـﺘﻌﺮﺽ‬‫ﺍﳌﻠﺤﻮﻅ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳒﺪ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻓﻔﻲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻲ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻳﺾ‪،‬ﻭ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧـﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠـﻲ ﻫـﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻞ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻛﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ‪،‬ﻭ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌـﺎﱄ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﳌﺘﺰﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﺑﺖ ﺍﳍﺎﺩﺉ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺎ‪،‬ﻭ ﻟﻜﻦ ﰲ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﳎﺰﺃﺓ‬
‫ﻭ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺘﻜﺎﻣﻞ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻓﺎﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺣﺼﻴﻠﺔ ﺗﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻨﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﺔ ﻭ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺑﻴﺌﻴـﺔ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴـﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﻳﻘﺼـﺪ‬‫ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻜﻮﻳﻦ‪constitution‬‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ )ﺍﳌﻮﺭﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ( ﻭ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﻴﺔ‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ )ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ( ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﳑﺎ ﲢﺪﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﺍﺛﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ‪.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺗﺘﺄﻟﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻮﺍﻃﻒ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻭ ﻧﺰﻭﻋﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻌﻀـﻬﻢ ﻋـﻦ‬‫ﺑﻌﺾ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ‪،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﳜﺘﻠﻔﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺑﺄ‪‬ﺎ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺆﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﳌﺘﻤﺎﺛﻠﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺎﺀ ﻭ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓـﺔ‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺔ ﺑﻄﺮﺍﺋﻖ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻟﺪﻯ ﻭﺿﻌﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻇﺮﻭﻑ ﻣﺘﺸﺎ‪‬ﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫‪ -2-1‬ﺗﻌﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺬﻫﺐ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ ﺍﱃ ﺍﻥ ﻟﻔـﻆ ‪ personality‬ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐـﺔ ﺍﻻﳒﻠﻴﺰﻳـﺔ‪،‬ﺍﻭ ‪personalitè‬‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﻧﺴﻴﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻔﻆ ‪ persona‬ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻼﺗﻴﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﳝﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﻳﺘﻔﻖ ﺍﳉﻤﻴـﻊ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺍﻥ ﻟﻔـﻆ‬
‫ﺑﺮﺳﻮﻧﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺍﻟﻘﻨﺎﻉ‪،‬ﻭ ﻟﻘﺪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﻂ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﺑﺎﳌﺴﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻧﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﱘ‪،‬ﺍﺫ ﺍﻋﺘﺎﺩ ﳑﺜﻠﻮ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﻣﺎﻥ‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﳝﺔ ﺍﺭﺗﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻗﻨﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﻫﻬﻢ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﻌﻄﻮ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﻮﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﺘﻤﺜﻴﻠﻪ‪،‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻧﺒﻴﻞ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ‪:‬ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺼﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻹﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ)ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ‪-‬ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ‪-‬ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ‪-‬ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻓﻖ‪-‬ﺍﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺑﺎﺕ‪-‬ﺍﻹﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻼﺝ(‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺍﻳﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ‬
‫ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪ ،2004 ،‬ﺹ ‪.17‬‬
‫‪-2‬ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺩﺳﻮﻗﻲ‪:‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻓﻖ‪،‬ﻁ‪ ،3‬ﻣﺼﺮ‪ ،1985 ،‬ﺹ‪.229‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﺭﻛﺲ ﻧﺎﻳﺖ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﺮﻳﺖ ﻧﺎﻳﺖ‪ :‬ﺍﳌﺪﺧﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ‪،‬ﺗﻌﺮﻳﺐ ﺩﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﺎﱐ ‪،‬ﻁ‪،2‬ﺍﳌﺆﺳﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴـﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺍﺳـﺎﺕ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ‪،‬ﺑﲑﻭﺕ‪ ,1993 ،‬ﺹ‪.282‬‬
‫ﻭ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻟﻜﻲ ﳚﻌﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻌﺒﺎﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ‪‬ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﺎﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ "ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺩﻳﻨﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ‪،‬ﻟـﻪ‬
‫ﻗﺪﺭ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ‪،‬ﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﻬﺰﺓ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﱰﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﻴـﺔ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺪﺩ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻗﻒ‪،‬ﻭ ﺃﺳﻠﻮﺑﻪ ﺍﳋـﺎﺹ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻴﻒ ﻟﻠﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻨﺘﺞ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻮﺀ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ"‪.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﺍﳍﺎﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻬﺔ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪:‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺟﻮﺭﺩﻥ ﺃﻟﺒﻮﺭﺕ )‪:(Allport¸1937¸p48‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ‪" :‬ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﻬﺰﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳉﺴﺪﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺪﺩ ﻃﺎﺑﻌـﻪ‬
‫ﺍﳋﺎﺹ ﰲ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻪ ﻟﺒﻴﺌﺘﻪ"ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﻝ ﺍﳌﺆﻟﻒ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ)‪ (1961¸p28‬ﰲ ﻧﺺ ﺃﺣﺪﺙ ﺑﻌﺒـﺎﺭﺓ"ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘـﻪ‬
‫ﻟﺒﻴﺌﺘﻪ"ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ"ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺪﺩ ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﻭﻓﻜﺮﻩ"‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ‬
‫ﺟﻴﻠﻔﻮﺭﺩ‪(Guilford¸1959¸p5):‬‬
‫"ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻫﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﲰﺎﺗﻪ"‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫‪.‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺮﻛﺰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻮﺭﺗﲔ ﺑﺮﻧﺲ ‪:morton prince‬‬
‫"ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺍﻓﻊ ﻭ ﻧﺰﻋﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺍﺋﺰ ﻓﻄﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫ﻭ ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻟﺪﻳﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺰﻋﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﻣﻜﺘﺴﺒﺔ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ‬
‫ﻛﻴﻤﻒ‪kemph:‬‬
‫ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻬﺎ ﺑﺄ‪‬ﺎ ﺃﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﺨﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﺑﲔ ﺩﻭﺍﻓﻌﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺗﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺰﻳﺔ ﻭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻓﻠﻮﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﺭﺕ ‪:albort‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺳﻴﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻏﻨﻴﻢ‪:‬ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ‪،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪ ،1983 ،‬ﺹ ‪.04‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺍﲪﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ‪:‬ﺃﺳﺲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ‪،‬ﻁ‪ ،3‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﻴﺔ‪،‬ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ‪،‬ﻣﺼﺮ‪ ،2000،‬ﺹ‪.450‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﺍﲪﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ‪ :‬ﺍﻷﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻁ‪،4‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﻴﺔ‪،‬ﺇﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ‪،‬ﻣﺼﺮ‪ ،1987 ،‬ﺹ ‪.39‬‬
‫ﻓﲑﻯ ﺃ‪‬ﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻟﻠﻤﺜﲑﺍﺕ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴـﺔ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻗﻴﻠﻔﻲ ﻭ ﻫﺎﺭﺩﻱ‬
‫•‬
‫‪Guelfi et Hardy‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻻﻧﺪﻣﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﺑﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻱ ‪‬ﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻛﻴﺎﺕ‪،‬ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﻭ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ‪.‬‬
‫)‪.(cottraux¸in fèline¸Guelfi et Hardy¸2002¸p47‬‬
‫ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺟﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﻟﻮﻥ‬
‫•‬
‫‪Jean-Pierre Rolland‬‬
‫ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﺗﻌﻄﻲ ﺷﻜﻼ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ﻣﺪﻣﺞ ﺃﻭ ﺩﻳﻨﺎﻣﻲ ﻟﻠﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲤﻴﺰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ‪.‬‬
‫•‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﺗﻮﻣﺎ ﺟﻮﺭﺝ ﺧﻮﺭﻱ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﺪ ﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﻟﻠﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫‪ 3-1‬ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺘﺤﺪﺙ ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻣﻜﻮﻧﺎﺕ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ‪:‬‬‫‪ 1-3-1‬ﺍﳍﻮ‪:Id‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻭﺟﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ‪:‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻲ‪،‬ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻜﺘﺎﺏ‪،‬ﻣﺼﺮ‪،2002،‬ﺹ‪.9‬‬
‫‪- Jean-Pierre Rolland:l’évaluation de la personnalité(le modèle en cinq facteurs)¸pierre mardaga‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪éditeur¸Belgique¸2004¸p19.‬‬
‫‪-3‬ﺗﻮﻣﺎ ﺟـﻮﺭﺝ ﺧـﻮﺭﻱ‪:‬ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼـﻴﺔ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻬـﺎ‪-‬ﺳـﻠﻮﻛﻬﺎ ﻭ ﻋﻼﻗﺘـﻬﺎ ﺑـﺎﻟﺘﻌﻠﻢ‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺍﳌﺆﺳﺴـﺔ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﻴـﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺍﺳـﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﺸـﺮ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪،‬ﺑﲑﻭﺕ‪،1996،‬ﺹ‪.6‬‬
‫ﳛﺘﻮﻱ ﺍﳍﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺭﻭﺛﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﻛﻤﺎ ﳛﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻜﺘﺴﺒﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﺖ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺖ ﰲ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﺍﻉ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺍﳍﻮ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺪﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴـﻖ ﻣﻠﺬﺍﺗـﻪ ﻭ ﺷـﻬﻮﺍﺗﻪ ﻭ ﻻ‬
‫ﻳﻌﺘﺮﻑ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ 2-3-1‬ﺍﻷﻧﺎ‪:Ego‬‬
‫ﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺰﻳﺔ ﺑﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﺗﻌﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺭﻏﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﳍﻮ ﲟﺎ ﻳﺘﻔﻖ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ‪.‬‬
‫‪3-3-1‬ﺍﻷﻧﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ‪Super Ego‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻣﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻄﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴﺔ ﻭ ﲤﺜﻴﻠﻬﺎ‪،‬ﻭ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻭ ﺭﺩﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻋﻦ ﺇﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﻣـﺎ‬
‫ﳜﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﳌﺜﻞ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﻭ ﻫﻮ ﻻ ﺷﻌﻮﺭﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺪ ﻛﺒﲑ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻳﺮﻯ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﳜﻀﻊ ﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ‪:‬‬
‫*ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﺓ‪:‬‬
‫ﻭ ﺗﺒﻌﺎ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﻓﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻳﺴﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﻘﻖ ﻟﻪ ﲡﻨﺐ ﺍﻷﱂ ﻭ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻹﺷﺒﺎﻉ‪.‬‬
‫*ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺴﻴﻄﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻣﻊ ﺗﻄﻮﺭ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻻ ﺗﻌﲏ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﺯﻭﺍﻝ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﺓ ﺑﻞ‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﳎﺮﺩ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻟﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﺗﺰﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﻊ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ‪.‬‬
‫*ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﺓ‪):‬ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻹﺟﺒﺎﺭﻱ(‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻷﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﺍﳌﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻔﻴﺪﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺿﺎﺭﺓ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -4-1‬ﺗﻄﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﺘﺪﺧﻞ ﻋﺪﺓ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺧﻼﻝ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﳕﻮ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﱄ‪:‬‬‫‪-1-4-1‬ﺍﻟﻮﺭﺍﺛﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻋﺼﻤﺖ ﻣﻄﺎﻭﻉ‪ :‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭ ﺃﳘﻴﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻨﺎ‪،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ )ﺝ‪.‬ﻡ‪.‬ﻉ( ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪ ،1981 ،‬ﺹ ‪.127-126‬‬
‫ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺭﺍﺛﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﻤﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﳉﻴﻨﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺑﻮﻳﻦ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺑﻨﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺋﻦ ﺍﳊﻲ ﻳﺒﺪﺃ ﲞﻠﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻫﻲ ‪-zygoto‬ﻣﻜﻮﻧﺔ ﻣﻦ ‪ 24‬ﺯﻭﺟﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻣﻮﺯﻭﻣﺎﺕ‪-chromosomes-‬ﻧﺼﻔﻬﺎ ﻳـﺄﰐ‬
‫ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻷﺏ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻒ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﻳﺄﰐ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻷﻡ‪.‬ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻣﻮﺯﻭﻣﺎﺕ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ‬
‫ﻭ ﺗﺘﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﺑﻄﺮﻕ ﻋﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻳﻨﺘﺞ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻵﺑﺎﺀ ﻭ ﺍﻷﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋـﻞ ﻣﻌﻘـﺪ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻭ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺮﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻛﺮﻭﻣﻮﺯﻭﻡ ﳛﻤﻞ ﻋﺪﺩﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺭﺛﺎﺕ "ﺍﳉﻴﻨﺎﺕ"ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺪﺩ‬
‫ﻛﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﺍﺛﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -2-4-1‬ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ‪،‬ﻭ ﲤﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﲨﻴﻊ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﺜﲑﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺴﺘﺠﻴﺐ ﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻭ ‪‬ﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺗﺸﻤﻞ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﻴﺔ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﰲ ﳕﻮﻩ ﻭ ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮ ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﺃﻣﺜﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﳍﺮﻣﻮﻧﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳋﻠﻮﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺑـﲔ ﺍﳋﻼﻳـﺎ ﻭ ﻛـﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴـﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺴﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻳﺔ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﳍﻀﻢ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺧﺮﺍﺝ‪...‬ﺍﱁ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺗﺸﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴﺔ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﻭ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﳑﺎ ﻳـﺆﺛﺮ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺀ‪،‬ﻭ ﺃﻱ ﻣﺜﲑﺍﺕ ﺿﻮﺋﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺻـﻮﺗﻴﺔ ﻭ ﻛـﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻧـﻮﺍﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ )ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ‪،‬ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﺑﻐﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺇﺧﻮﺓ ﻭ ﺃﺻﺪﻗﺎﺀ ﻭ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣـﻦ‬
‫ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺃﻭ ﲟﻌﲎ ﺃﻭﺳﻊ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﳌﺘﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺇﻃﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﻘـﺎﰲ ﻭ ﰲ‬
‫ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪ 3-4-1‬ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ‪:‬‬
‫ﻟﻠﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﺑﺄﻣﻪ‪،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﳌﺼﺪﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳝﺘﺺ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﻏﺬﺍﺋﻪ‪،‬ﰒ ﺗﺘﻄﻮﺭ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻧﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﺯﻳﺪﺍﻥ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﻄﻔﻞ ﻭ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻫﻖ ﻭ ﺃﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪ ،1972 ،‬ﺹ ‪.76‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﻟﺒﻴﺐ ﻓﺮﺍﺝ ﻭ ﺍﲪﺪ ﺯﻛﻲ ﳏﻤﺪ‪:‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻲ‪،‬ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻀﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﺔ‪،1967،‬ﺹ‪.284‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻳﺘﺄﺛﺮ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﰲ ﻣﻴﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻟﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﻋﺰﻭﻓﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭ ﻛﺮﺍﻫﻴﺘﻪ ﻟﻪ‪،‬‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﻴﻄﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻮ ﺍﻷﺳﺮﺓ‪،‬ﻭ ﺑﺎ‪‬ﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﻴﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ‪،‬ﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ‪‬ﻴﻤﻦ ﻋﻠـﻰ‬
‫ﻧﺸﺄﺗﻪ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺮﺣﻞ ﳕﻮﻩ‪،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺼﺮﻳﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﲡﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﳓﻮ ﺃﻟﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻌﺼﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‪،‬ﻓﺎﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑ ﻭ ﺍﻹﻧﺴـﺎﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺋﻲ‪،‬ﻳﺘﺮﺩﺩﺍﻥ ﻃﻮﻳﻼ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﳝﺪﺍ ﺃﻳﺪﻳﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻃﻌﺎﻡ ﱂ ﻳﺘﻌﻮﺩﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ‪،‬ﻭ ﱂ ﻳﺮﻳﺎ ﻋﺸﲑ‪‬ﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺫﻭﻳﻬﻤـﺎ‬
‫ﻳﺄﻛﻼﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ 4-4-1‬ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺳﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﳕﻮﻩ ﻭ ﺇﻋﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﻟﻠﺤﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﺒﻠﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻟﺐ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺻﺎﻏﻪ ﺍﳌﱰﻝ ﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻬﺬﻳﺐ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﲟﺎ ‪‬ﻴﺌﻪ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻮﺍﺣﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ‬
‫ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ‪‬ﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪ‪-‬ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺳﺔ‪-‬ﳎﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﺳﻊ ﻟﻠﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻐﲑ‬
‫ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻴﻒ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺤﻘﻮﻕ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺒﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻗﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻟﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺳﻴﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺛﺮ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺷﺮ ﰲ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫*ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺳﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ‪.‬‬
‫*ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺱ‪.‬‬
‫*ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺳﻲ‪.‬‬
‫‪-5-1‬ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﳕﻮ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪1-5-1‬ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻓﺆﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﻬﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪ‪ :‬ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﻤﻮ‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ ‪ ،1956 ،‬ﺹ ‪.40‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻋﺼﻤﺖ ﻣﻄﺎﻭﻉ‪ :‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪ ,‬ﺹ‪.134‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮﻱ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺪﻓﻮﻋﺎ ﺑﻘﻮﻯ ﻧﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﻟﺒﻴﺪﻭ)‪ (libido‬ﻭ ﺗﻌﲏ ﻛﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﺠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺋﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮﻱ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺼﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺔ ﻭ ﲢﺎﺷﻲ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻴﺎﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻃﻔﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻤﻨﺬ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺒﻜﺮﺓ ﻭ ﺣﱴ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻫﻘﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻐﲑﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ ﻧﺘﻴﺠـﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺼﺮﺍﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﻀﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻜﺘﺴﺒﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﰲ ﳏﺎﻭﻻﺗﻪ ﻹﺭﺿﺎﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﺒﻴﺪﻭ‪.‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻄﺮﻕ ﻓﺮﻭﻳـﺪ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﲬﺲ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﻔﺮﺩ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺃﻭﻻ‪:‬ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻤﻴﺔ)‪،(oral stage‬ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺩﺓ ﺣﱴ ﺳﻨﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ‪:‬ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺟﻴﺔ)‪ 2-1،(anal stage‬ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ‪.‬‬
‫ﺛﺎﻟﺜﺎ‪:‬ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺒﻴﺔ)‪ 6-2،(phallic stage‬ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ‪.‬‬
‫ﺭﺍﺑﻌﺎ‪:‬ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﻮﻥ)‪ 12-6،(latency stage‬ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ‪.‬‬
‫ﺧﺎﻣﺴﺎ‪:‬ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﺳﻠﻴﺔ)‪-12،(genital stage‬ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻟﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ 2-5-1‬ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﺭﻳﻜﺴﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺃﻛﺪ ﺍﺭﻳﻜﺴﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺌﺘﻪ ﺍﶈﻴﻄﺔ ﻭ ﻣﺜﲑﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ‬
‫ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻪ‪،‬ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﴰﻠﺖ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﺭﻳﻜﺴﻮﻥ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺬ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺩﺓ ﺣﱴ ﺍﻟﺸـﻴﺨﻮﺧﺔ‪،‬ﺣﻴﺚ‬
‫ﻧﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻫﻢ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﺭﻳﻜﺴﻮﻥ ﻟﻘﺒﻮﳍﺎ ﻋﺎﳌﻴﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺃﻭﻻ‪:‬ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ‪/‬ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ)ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻴﻼﺩ‪.(1-‬‬
‫ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ‪:‬ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﰐ‪/‬ﺍﻟﺸﻚ)‪.(2-1‬‬
‫ﺛﺎﻟﺜﺎ‪:‬ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺩﺭﺓ‪/‬ﺍﻟﺸﻌﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻧﺐ)‪.(6-2‬‬
‫ﺭﺍﺑﻌﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﺑﺮﺓ‪/‬ﺍﻟﺸﻌﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻘﺺ)‪.(12-6‬‬
‫ﺧﺎﻣﺴﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﳍﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﺰﺓ‪/‬ﺍﳍﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻣﻀﺔ)‪.(18-12‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -6-1‬ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺑﺪﺭ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺒﺎﱐ‪ :‬ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ‪-‬ﺗﻄﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺧﺼﺎﺏ ﺣﱴ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻫﻘﺔ‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﺍﻗﲔ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪ ،‬ﺍﳉﺎﺑﺮﻳﺔ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻳﺖ‪ ،2000 ،‬ﺹ ‪.86-82‬‬
‫ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﺪﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼـﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺳـﻮﻑ‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻧﻌﺮﺽ ﺑﺈﳚﺎﺯ ﻷﻫﻢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﺎﺫﺝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫‪Psychodynamic theory‬‬
‫• ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪Type(constitutional¸tempermental)theories‬‬
‫• ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﳕﺎﻁ‪.‬‬
‫‪Trait theories‬‬
‫• ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‪.‬‬
‫‪Social learnig theory‬‬
‫• ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ‪.‬‬
‫‪Interaction model‬‬
‫• ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻠﻲ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1-6-1‬ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﺳﻴﺠﻤﻮﻧﺪ ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪ‬
‫‪Freud‬‬
‫‪ Sigmund‬ﻣﺆﺳﺲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ‪،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺧﻀﻌﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻳﺪ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻼﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﺪ "ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻳﺪﻳﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﺪﺩ ‪"Neo-freudians‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺜﺎﻝ "ﻛﺎﺭﻝ ﻳـﻮﻧﺞ ‪ "jung‬ﻭ‬
‫"ﺃﺭﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﻭﻡ ‪،"Fromm‬ﻭ "ﺃﺭﻳﻚ ﺇﺭﻳﻜﺴﻮﻥ ‪ "Erickson‬ﻭ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻛﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻟﻠﺨﱪﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻣﻊ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺮﺿﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﺝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻨﻴﻜﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﻣﻊ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺮﺿﻰ ﺑﺎﻷﻣﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﻳﻨﺴﺒﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺒﻌﺜﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴـﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺰﻳﺔ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻼﺷﻌﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﱪﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺳﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﻜﺘﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﳌـﺆﺛﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺗﻠـﻚ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺰﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2-6-1‬ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﳕﺎﻁ‪:‬‬
‫ﺇﻥ ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺃﳕﺎﻁ ﺍﲡﺎﻩ ﻗﺪﱘ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺗﺆﻛﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﳕﺎﻁ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻨﻴﻔﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ "ﻛﺮﺗﺸﻤﺮ"‪ Kretchmer‬ﺍﻟﺬﻱ‬
‫ﺫﻫﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﳕﺎﻁ ﺟﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭ ﻫﻲ‪:‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻋﻼﻭﻱ‪:‬ﻣﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪،‬ﻁ‪،5‬ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪ ،2006،‬ﺹ ‪.85‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺟﺎﺑﺮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻤﻴﺪ ﺟﺎﺑﺮ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ‪:‬ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻀﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪ ،1985،‬ﺹ ‪.323‬‬
‫*ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻂ ﺍﳌﻜﺘﱰ‪ pylnic:‬ﻭ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﲔ ﻭ ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺑﺎﳌﺮﺡ ﻭ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺼـﺮﺍﺣﺔ ﻭ‬
‫ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﱄ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮ ﰲ ﻋﻘﺪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺍﻗﺔ‪.‬‬
‫*ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻂ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻫﻦ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻴﻒ‪ asthenic:‬ﻭ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻴـﻞ ﻭ ﻳﺘﻤﻴـﺰ ﺻـﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺑـﺎﻻﻧﻄﻮﺍﺀ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻛﺘﺌﺎﺏ‪.‬‬
‫*ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻂ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ athletic:‬ﻭ ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻥ‪.‬‬
‫‪-‬ﻭ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻕ ﳒﺪ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﺷﻴﻠﺪﻭﻥ )‪ (sheldon‬ﰲ ﺍﻷﳕﺎﻁ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﺣﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﺧﺬ ﺛﻼﺙ ﺻﻮﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﻮﻏﺮﺍﻓﻴﺔ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻭ‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﳎﺮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻼﺑﺴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻠﻒ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﳕﺎﻁ ﻫﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺃ‪-‬ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻂ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﲏ‪ :‬ﻭ ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﺑﺴﻤﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻭ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺧﻮ‪.‬‬
‫ﺏ‪-‬ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﻲ‪ :‬ﻭ ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺝ‪-‬ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻂ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻴﻞ‪ :‬ﻭ ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺤﺎﻓﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻮﻣﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﳕﺎﻁ ﻧﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﻫﻲ‪:‬‬
‫*ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﱰﻋﺔ ﺍﻻﺣﺸﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﻭ ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰﻭﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺴﺎﻃﺔ ﻭ ﺍﳌﺮﺡ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺼﱪ ﻭ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻮ‪.‬‬
‫*ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﱰﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ‪:‬ﻭ ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﺃﺻﺤﺎ‪‬ﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻭ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻃﺮﺓ‬
‫ﻭ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﺍﺣﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻻﻧﺪﻓﺎﻉ‪.‬‬
‫*ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﱰﻋﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﻴﺔ‪:‬ﻭ ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﺃﺻﺤﺎ‪‬ﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺰﻟﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻻﺑﺘﻌﺎﺩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺻﺎﱀ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻫﺮﻱ‪،‬ﻭﻫﻴﺐ ﳎﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﻴﺴﻲ‪ :‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﻨﺪﻱ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪،‬ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻥ‪ ،1999،‬ﺹ ‪.188‬‬
‫‪ -2-6-1‬ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺛﺎﺑﺘﺔ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻼﺣﻆ ﻓﻴﻪ‪،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﳝﻜـﻦ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺃﻭ ﳕﻴﺰ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‪،‬ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻓﺈﻥ‬
‫ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺛﺒﺎ‪‬ﺎ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ‪،‬ﲟﻌﲎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻭﺻﻔﻪ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻋﺎﻡ ﺑﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺇﺳﻨﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺃﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺒﻮﺍ ‪‬ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳـﺔ ﻫـﻮ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﻮﺭﺕ ‪ allport‬ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺣﺼﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺎﺭﺏ ‪18000‬ﲰﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﺭﺕ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺗﻨﺘﻈﻢ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﲝﻴﺚ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺒﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻣﺪﺭﺝ ﻫﺮﻣﻲ ﺗﺴﻮﺩﻩ ﺇﻣﺎ ﲰﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻛﱪﻯ ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﺭﺋﻴﺴﻴﺔ‬
‫‪trait‬‬
‫‪ ،caxdinal‬ﺃﻭ ﻋﺪﺓ ﲰﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻳﺔ‬
‫‪ central‬ﻭ ﺗﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﻟﺴـﻤﺎﺕ‬
‫‪trait‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻮﻳﺔ‪،‬ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻣﻦ ﻳﱪﺯ ﻋﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻷﻥ ﲰﺔ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺭﺋﻴﺴﻴﺔ ﺗﺴﻴﻄﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﻛـﺎﻥ‬
‫ﺗﺼﻒ ﺷﺨﺼﺎ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻧﺼﻔﻪ ﺑﺎﳊﻴﻮﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -3-6-1‬ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﺸﺪﺩ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻟﺮﻭﺗﺮ)‪ :(1954‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﰲ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼـﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻓﺎﻟﺘﻌﻠﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻛﺘﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺋﻌﺔ ﳝﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﻐﺰﻯ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗـﻒ ﺍﻟـﱵ‬
‫ﺗﻄﺮﺃ‪،‬ﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺩﺍﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﶈﻴﻄﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻨﺠﻠﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﻮﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ‪،‬ﻭ ﻗﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ ﺑﻪ )ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺷـﺪ ﳎﻠﺒـﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻤﻜﺎﻓﺄﺓ ﰲ ﻇﺮﻭﻑ ﳏﺪﺩﺓ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﱄ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻫﺪﻑ(‪.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻋﺼﻤﺖ ﻣﻄﺎﻭﻉ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭ ﺃﳘﻴﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻨﺎ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪.125‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺁﻥ ﺗﺎﻳﻠﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ‪،‬ﺗﺮﲨﺔ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﲰﻌﺎﻥ‪،‬ﻣﺪﺧﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪،‬ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ‪،‬ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﺔ‪،‬ﺩﻣﺸﻖ‪،‬ﺳﻮﺭﻳﺎ‪ ،1996،‬ﺹ ‪.305‬‬
‫‪ 4-6-1‬ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ‪:‬‬
‫ﺃﺷﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺗﻔﺎﻋﻼ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ " ‪ "environment‬ﺃﻱ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﻣﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ"‬
‫‪trait‬‬
‫‪ "approach‬ﻭ ﻣـﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﻗـﻒ"‬
‫‪situation‬‬
‫‪ "approach‬ﻭﰲ ﺿﻮﺀ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻓﻘـﻂ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻣـﻦ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻗﺪ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺻﻞ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻏﲑ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﰒ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻂ ﺑﲔ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻭ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻋﻠﺔ ﺣﱴ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘـﺎﺋﺞ ﺃﻛﺜـﺮ ﺩﻗـﺔ ﻟﻔﻬـﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﺆ ﺑﺴﻠﻮﻛﻬﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﰲ ﺇﻃﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻔﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﲔ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﻲ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺑﻌـﺾ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﻌﲔ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺧﺎﺹ‬
‫" ‪situation specific‬‬
‫‪ "personality trait‬ﻛﻤﺪﺧﻞ ﺗﻔﺎﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻭ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻟﻠﺘﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﺃﺷﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺣﲔ ﺍﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻈﻬـﺮ ﻫـﺬﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻖ ﻓﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻠﻘﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﻻﻣﺘﺤﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ‪،‬ﰲ‬
‫ﺣﲔ ﺍﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻠﻘﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻋﻼﻭﻱ‪:‬ﻣﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪.118-117‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -7-1‬ﻣﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺇﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺴﺘﺨﺪﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﺧﺼﺎﺋﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺼﲔ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﻋﻠـﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪،‬ﰲ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺣﺪﺩﻫﺎ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﻴﺔ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﰲ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻃﺮﻕ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫*ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺔ‪tests‬‬
‫‪ objectifs‬ﺃﻭ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﺍﻟـﺬﺍﰐ‪ self-tests‬ﺣﻴـﺚ ﺗﻘﺘﺼـﺮ‬
‫ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻔﺤﻮﺹ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺄﺷﲑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺻﺢ ﺃﻭ ﺧﻄﺄ ﺃﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﻧﻌﻢ ﺃﻭ ﻻ‪،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺗﻪ‬
‫ﲟﺜﺎﺑﺔ ﻣﺆﺷﺮﺍﺕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲰﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫*ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻻﺳﻘﺎﻃﻴﺔ‬
‫‪tests‬‬
‫‪ projective‬ﻭ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺗﺘﺮﻙ ﻟﻠﻤﻔﺤﻮﺹ ﺣﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﻭ ﺍﳊـﺪﻳﺚ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﻭ ﺍﳌﺜﲑﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻣﻀﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻬﺪﻑ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﺧﺼـﺎﺋﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴـﻲ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﻼﻉ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﻼﻉ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻭﺭ ﰲ ﺫﻫﻦ ﻋﻤﻴﻠﻪ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺍﳌﻔﺤﻮﺹ ﺑﺈﺳﻘﺎﻁ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﻣﺸﺎﻋﺮ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺟﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺭﻏﺒﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺻﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺭﺳﻮﻡ‪.‬‬
‫*ﻣﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ‪ Race-scales‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﺑﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﺁﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺁﻭ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﺗﻘﺎﺭﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻧﺴـﺘﺨﺪﻣﻬﺎ‬
‫ﰲ ﻣﺆﺳﺴﺎﺗﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﺋﺮ ﺍﳊﻜﻮﻣﻴﺔ ﺧﲑ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻭ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻧﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﺑﺮﺯ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﻭ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺷﺎﺋﻌﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿـﻲ‬
‫ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﳚﺎﺯ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1-7-1‬ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﻭﺟﻪ )‪:(MMPE‬‬
‫ﻃﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ "ﻣﺎﻛﺴﻨﻠﻲ" ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ "ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻙ ﻫﺎﺛﺎﻭﻱ" ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﰲ ﻋﺎﻡ ‪،1940‬ﻭ‬
‫ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻫﻦ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺷﻴﻮﻋﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌـﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻴـﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺸﻔﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﻋﺪﺓ ﺃﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻭﺍﺣـﺪ‪،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣـﻦ‬
‫ﻣﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﰐ‪،‬ﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻭﻗﺖ ﳏﺪﺩ ﻟﻺﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺍﺗﻪ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺍﺟﺔ‪:‬ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻮﱘ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﺯﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪،‬ﻋﻤﺎﻥ‪ ،1997،‬ﺹ‪.248‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻷﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻘﻴﺴﻬﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻘﻴﺎﺱ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺸﺆﻭﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺋﻠﻴﺔ‪،‬ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺘﻐﲑﺍﺕ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻛﺎﳌﻬﻨﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠـﻴﻢ‪،‬ﻭ ﺑﻌـﺾ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻋﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻋﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻮﺍﺱ ﻭ ﺍﳋﻮﻑ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺓ ﺍﳍﻼﻭﺱ ﻭ ﺍﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺑﺎﺕ ‪..‬ﺍﱁ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺍﳌﺘﻐﲑﺍﺕ ﲤﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﲬﺴﻤﺎﺋﺔ ﻭ ﲬﺴﲔ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ‪،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻄﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻔﺤﻮﺹ‬
‫ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﻛﻞ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺷﲑ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻧﻌﻢ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻔﺘﺮﺽ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻣﻊ‬
‫ﲰﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ‪ 14‬ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺳﺎ‪،‬ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻨﻴﻜﻴـﺔ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﲟﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻕ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻀﺎﺑﻄﺔ ﻭ ﻟﻘﺪ ﺻﻤﻤﺖ ﻣﻔـﺎﺗﻴﺢ ﺧﺎﺻـﺔ ﺑﺘﺼـﺤﻴﺢ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻔﺤﻮﺹ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﺰ ﳌﺎ ﺗﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻨﻴﻜﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﺓ‪:‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﺍﳌﺮﺿﻰ ]ﻩ‪.‬ﺱ[‪.‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﻛﺘﺌﺎﺏ ]ﺫ[‪.‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﺍﳍﺴﺘﲑﻳﺎ ]ﻩ‪.‬ﻱ[‪.‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﻮﺛﺔ ]ﻡ‪.‬ﻑ[‪.‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺍﻧﻮﻳﺎ ]ﺏ‪.‬ﺃ[‪.‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺷﻨﻴﺎ]ﺏ‪.‬ﺙ[‪.‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺼﺎﻡ ]ﺱ‪.‬ﻙ[‪.‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﺍﳍﻮﺱ ﺍﳋﻔﻴﻒ ]ﻡ‪.‬ﺃ[‪.‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﻄﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ]ﺱ‪.‬ﻱ[‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺍﺟﺔ‪:‬ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻮﱘ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ‪،‬ﺹ‪.249-248‬‬
‫ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﺰﺍ ﳌﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻕ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ‪:‬‬
‫*‪ -‬ﺍﳌﻘﻴﺎﺱ‪:‬‬
‫ﻭﺗﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﺩﺭﺟﺎﺕ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳚﻴﺐ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﻔﺤﻮﺹ ﺑﺈﺟﺎﺑﺔ )ﻻ‬
‫ﺃﺩﺭﻱ( ﻭ ﺗﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﻔﻌﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﺤﻴﻔﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻴﺔ)ﺑﺮﻭﻓﻴﻞ( ﻏﲑ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺔ‪،‬ﺇﺫ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﻏﻮﺏ ﻓﻴﻪ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ‪.‬‬
‫*‪ -‬ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ )‪:(F‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﺨﻔﻀﺔ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺗﻌﻄﻲ ﺩﻟﻴﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻔﺤﻮﺹ ﻣﻌﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﻭﻣﺮﺗﺒﻄﺔ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ‪،‬ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻟﻠﻤﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ‪،‬ﻭ‬
‫ﻗﺪ ﻳﻌﺰﻯ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻔﺤﻮﺹ ﺑﺎﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺳﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ‪.‬‬
‫*‪ -‬ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ )‪:(L‬‬
‫ﺗﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻔﺤﻮﺹ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﺑﺼـﺤﺘﻬﺎ‬
‫ﻟﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪،‬ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺪ ﻳﺜﲑ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳉﺪﻝ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ‪،‬ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻌﺰﻯ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻴـﻞ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻔﺤﻮﺹ ﻟﻠﻜﺬﺏ ﺃﻭ ﺇﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻏﲑ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪.‬‬
‫*‪ -‬ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺤﻴﺢ )‪:(k‬‬
‫ﻳﻌﱪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺑﺼﻔﺔ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﲡﺎﻩ ﺍﳌﻔﺤﻮﺹ ﳓﻮ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻳﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ‪،‬ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻮﺍﺣﻲ ﺩﻓﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻟﻺﻳﻬﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻻﲡـﺎﻩ ﳓـﻮ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﻱ‪،‬ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﺨﻔﻀﺔ ﻓﺘﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﰐ ﺍﳌﻐﺎﱃ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭ ﳏﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﺇﻇﻬـﺎﺭ ﻧﻔﺴـﻪ‬
‫ﲟﻈﻬﺮ ﻻ ﺳﻮﻱ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻋﻼﻭﻱ‪ :‬ﻣﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪.139‬‬
‫‪-2-7-1‬ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻴﻔﻮﺭﻧﻴﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ )‪California Psychological Inventory(CPI‬‬
‫ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺻﻴﻐﺔ ﳑﺎﺛﻠﺔ ﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻌـﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﻭﺟـﻪ )‪،(MMPI‬ﻭ‬
‫ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻳﻄﺒﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻳﲔ ﻭ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﳌﺮﺿﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻋﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳـﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺟـﻮﺥ‬
‫‪ H.G.Gough‬ﻭ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ‪ 480‬ﻓﻘﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺪ ﻧﺼﻔﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳـﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﻭﺟﻪ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻒ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﻋﺪ ﺧﺼﻴﺼﺎ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻤﺮﺍﻫﻘﲔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺷﺪﻳﻦ‪،‬ﻭ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ‪ 18‬ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺳﺎ ﻓﺮﻋﻴﺎ ﺗﻘﻴﺲ ﺃﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻳـﺔ‬
‫)ﺍﻟﺴﻮﻳﺔ( ‪.Normal Personality‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﺻﻨﻔﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺃﺭﺑﻌـﺔ ﺃﻗﺴـﺎﻡ ﻫـﻲ ‪:‬ﻓﺎﻋﻠﻴـﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗـﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻠﻴﺔ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻀﺒﻂ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﰐ‪،‬ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺩﳝﻲ‪،‬ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻩ ﳓﻮ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ‬
‫)‪1968‬‬
‫‪،(Gough‬ﻭ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﺍﻻﺳـﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ‪ 18‬ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻓﺮﻋﻴﺎ ﺗﺘﻌﻠﻖ ‪‬ﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﻫﻲ‪:‬‬
‫*ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻠﻴﺔ)ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ‪،‬ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﺍﺕ(‪:‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ‪-2/‬ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪-3/‬ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪-4/‬ﺍﳊﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ‪-5/‬ﺗﻘﺒﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ‪-6/‬ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻴﺎﻥ‪.‬‬
‫*ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻀﺒﻂ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﰐ)ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺸﺌﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻨﻀﺞ‪،‬ﲢﻤﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﺔ(‪:‬‬
‫‪-7‬ﲢﻤﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﺔ‪-8/‬ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺸﺌﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪-9/‬ﺿﺒﻂ ﺍﻟـﻨﻔﺲ‪ -10/‬ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻤـﻞ‪-11/‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﳉﻴﺪ‪-12/‬ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻤﺎﺀ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﺎﻋﺔ‪.‬‬
‫*ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺩﳝﻲ)ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺼﻴﻞ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺀﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ(‪:‬‬
‫‪-13‬ﺍﻻﳒﺎﺯ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻻﻣﺘﺜﺎﻝ‪-14/‬ﺍﻻﳒﺎﺯ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻞ‪-15/‬ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺀﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫*ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻩ ﳓﻮ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ)ﺍﻷﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻲ‪،‬ﳕﻂ ﺍﳌﻴﻮﻝ(‪:‬‬
‫‪-16‬ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻲ‪-17/‬ﺍﳌﺮﻭﻧﺔ‪-18/‬ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺛﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﻋﻼﻡ‪:‬ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻮﱘ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻮﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‪،‬ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪،2000،‬ﺹ‪.609‬‬
‫‪-3-7-1‬ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺃﻳﺰﻧﻚ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ)‪Eysenck Personality Questionnaire(EPQ‬‬
‫ﺻــﺪﺭ ﺍﺳــﺘﺨﺒﺎﺭ ﺃﻳﺰﻧــﻚ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼــﻴﺔ ﻋــﺎﻡ ‪ 1975‬ﻭﻳﻘــﻴﺲ ﺃﺭﺑﻌــﺔ‬
‫ﺃﺑﻌﺎﺩ‪:‬ﺍﻟﺬﻫﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪،‬ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺎﺑﻴﺔ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ)ﺍﳉﺎﺫﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ( ﻭ ﺃﻫﻢ ﻣﺎ ﳝﻴﺰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺨﺒﺎﺭ ﻋـﻦ‬
‫ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﺃﻳﺰﻧﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻟﻪ‪،‬ﺍﺣﺘﻮﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺨﺒﺎﺭ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﻣﻘﻴـﺎﺱ ﺇﺿـﺎﰲ ﻫـﻮ ﻣﻘﻴـﺎﺱ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﻫﺎﻧﻴﺔ)‪ psycho-ticism (p‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺟﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﻌﺾ ﲢﺴﻴﻨﺎﺕ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺎﺑﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻭ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ‪،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺨﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﺣﺪﺙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺇﺿﺎﰲ ﻟﻠﺘﻤﻴﻴـﺰ ﺑـﲔ ﺍ‪‬ـﺮﻣﲔ ﻭ ﻏـﲑ‬
‫ـﺆ‬
‫ـﺪﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒـ‬
‫ـﺬﺍ ﻣﻔﻴـ‬
‫ـﺮﺍﻡ ©‪ Criminality‬ﻫـ‬
‫ـﺎﺱ ﺍﻹﺟـ‬
‫ـﻮﻥ ﻣﻘﻴـ‬
‫ـﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜـ‬
‫ـﺮﻣﲔ‪،‬ﻭ ﳝﻜـ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ـ‬
‫ﺑﺎﳉﻨﻮﺡ‪ Delinquency‬ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺩ ﻟﻺﺟﺮﺍﻡ ‪.Recidivism‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﺗﺐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﻮﺭ ﺑﺘﻌﺮﻳﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺨﺒﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﺎﺗﻪ ﻭ ﻧﺺ ﺑﻨﻮﺩﻩ ﻟﻜـﻞ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺷﺪﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺍﻷﻃﻔﺎﻝ‪،‬ﻭ ﺃﻫﻢ ﻣﺎ ﳝﻴﺰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺨﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﻣﻊ "ﺳﻴﺒﻞ ﺃﻳﺰﻧﻚ"‪،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﺖ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺷـﺪﻳﻦ ﻣـﻦ ‪1330‬‬
‫ﻣﻔﺤﻮﺻﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﻣﻬﻦ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻼﺏ‪،‬ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﺣﺴﺒﺖ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻣﻌـﺎﻣﻼﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻮﺩ ﺫﺍ‪‬ﺎ‪،‬ﻣﻊ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﻟﺘﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻟﻠﻌﻴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﺔ ﺑﺼﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ‬
‫ﻋﻦ ﻧﻀﲑﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﻻﳒﻠﻴﺰﻳﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﺗﺮﺍﻭﺣﺖ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﺃﻟﻔﺎ ﺑﲔ ‪ 0.45‬ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﺎﻧﻴـﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ‪0.80‬‬
‫ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺎﺑﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺟﺖ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻄﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻻﳓﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻌﻴﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌـﺔ‪،‬ﺣﻴﺚ‬
‫ﺗﻜﺮﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﺒﻨﺎﻧﻴﲔ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﺍﲪﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ‪:‬ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﳉﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﺐ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ‪،‬ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻳﺦ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻳﺖ‪،1996،‬ﺹ‪.266‬‬
‫‪-4-7-1‬ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﺒﻮﺭﺝ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻒ‪:‬‬
‫ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﺒﻮﺭﺝ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ )‪ (FPI‬ﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﺟـﻮﻛﻦ‬
‫ﻓـﺎﺭﻧﱪﺝ‪Fahrenberg‬‬
‫ﻭ‬
‫ﻫﺮﺑﺮﺕ ﺳﻴﻠﺞ ‪ selg‬ﻭ ﺭﺍﻳﻨﺮ ﻫﺎﻣﺒﻞ ‪ Hampel‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﺎﺗﺬﺓ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﲜﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﺒـﻮﺭﺝ ﺑﺄﳌﺎﻧﻴـﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺪ ﺻﻮﺭ‪‬ﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻋﻼﻭﻱ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ‪‬ﺪﻑ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ‪ 9‬ﺃﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ‪ 3‬ﺃﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻓﺮﻋﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﺗﺘﻀـﻤﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ‪ 212‬ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺍﻧﻪ ﳍﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﲔ ﺃ‪،‬ﺏ ﺗﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ‪ 114‬ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ‪.‬ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺩﻳـﻞ‬
‫‪ Diehl‬ﺃﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﲜﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺟﻴﺴﻦ ﺑﺄﳌﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺑﺘﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺼﻐﺮﺓ ﻟﻠﻘﺎﺋﻤـﺔ ﺗﺘﻀـﻤﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺃﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻭ ﺗﺘﻀﻤﻦ ‪ 56‬ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ‪.‬ﻭ ﺍﻷﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﻴﺴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺼﻐﺮﺓ ﺳﻮﻑ‬
‫ﻧﺬﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﺈﳚﺎﺯ ﻭﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺮﻕ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻞ ﻭ ﻫﻲ‪:‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ‪Nervositat‬‬
‫‪-2‬ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ‪Aggressivitat‬‬
‫‪-3‬ﺍﻻﻛﺘﺌﺎﺑﻴﺔ‬
‫‪-4‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ‬
‫‪Depressivitat‬‬
‫ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ‪ErregbarKeit‬‬
‫‪-5‬ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪Geselligheit‬‬
‫‪-6‬ﺍﳍﺪﻭﺀ‪Gelassenheit‬‬
‫‪-7‬ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ‪Dominanz‬‬
‫‪-8‬ﺍﻟﻜﻒ)ﺍﻟﻀﺒﻂ(‪Gehemmtheit‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻋﻼﻭﻱ‪:‬ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻋﺔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ‪،‬ﺹ‪.78‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫*ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ‪:‬‬‫ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺒﻴﺔ ﰎ ﺇﳚﺎﺩ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺼﻐﺮﺓ ﻟﻠﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺰﺋـﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺼـﻔﻴﺔ ﻭ‬
‫ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﺎﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﻣﻜﻮﻧﺔ ﻣﻦ ‪ 140‬ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﻮﺭ‪ 151،‬ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻧﺎﺙ ﺗﺘﺮﺍﻭﺡ‬
‫ﺃﻋﻤﺎﺭﻫﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ‪ 24-18‬ﺳﻨﺔ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺍﻭﺣﺖ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻣـﺎ ﺑـﲔ ‪ 0.64‬ﺇﱃ ‪ ،0.83‬ﻭ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﺔ ﰎ ﺇﳚﺎﺩ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺼﻐﺮﺓ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ‪ 82‬ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﻣـﻦ‬
‫ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺑﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺯﻣﲏ ﻗﺪﺭﻩ ‪ 10‬ﺃﻳﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺍﻭﺣﺖ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺃﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ‬
‫ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ‪.0.87-0.67‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻕ‪:‬‬‫ﰎ ﺇﳚﺎﺩ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﻄﻮﻟﺔ ﻟﻠﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ )‪ 212‬ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ( ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺃﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﺧﺘﺒـﺎﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻛﻤﺤﻜﺎﺕ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﻴﻨﺴﻮﺗﺎ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﻭﺟﻪ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼـﻴﺔ ‪ MMPI‬ﻭ ﻗﺎﺋﻤـﺔ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻟﻴﻔﻮﺭﻧﻴﺎ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ)‪ (CPI‬ﻭ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺃﻳﺰﻧﻚ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ )‪ (EPI‬ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﺗﻞ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼـﻴﺔ )‬
‫‪ (16PF‬ﻭ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ‪،‬ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺷﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻕ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎﶈﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫ﻷﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺼﻐﺮﺓ ﺗﺮﺍﻭﺣﺖ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﲔ ﺃﺑﻌﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺃﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻄﻮﻟﺔ‪-‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺤﻚ‪-‬ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ‪ 0.75‬ﺇﱃ ‪ 0.92‬ﻭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﳌﺼـﺮﻳﺔ ﰎ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺻـﻞ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﺻﺪﻕ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻟﺔ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻕ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎﶈﻚ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒـﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴـﺎﺑﻘﺔ‬
‫ﻛﻤﺤﻜﺎﺕ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -8-1‬ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺣﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻋﻠﻲ ﳛﻲ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻮﺭﻱ ﻓﺎﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﱐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿـﻲ ﻳﻌﺘـﱪ ﺇﺣـﺪﻯ‬
‫ﺍﲡﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺛﻘﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺮﺟﻊ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺒـﺪﺍﺋﻲ ﳝـﺎﺭﺱ‬
‫ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﺸﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺗﻠﻘﺎﺋﻴﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻹﺷﺒﺎﻉ ﺣﺎﺟﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺄﻗﺎﻡ ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌـﺪﻭ‬
‫ﻭﺍﳉﺮﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺣﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻣﻲ ﻭﺍﳌﺼﺎﺭﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻔﺰ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﳏﺎﻛﻴﺎ ﺃﺟﺪﺍﺩﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻠﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﰒ ﺃﺿﺎﻑ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﺑﻌـﺾ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻟﻜﺮﺍﺕ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻀﺎﺭﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﺎﺕ ﻭﻭﺿﻊ ﳍﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﻭﻟﻮﺍﺋﺢ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻗﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺒﺎﺕ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺟﺎﻫﺪﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻄﻮﻳﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻘﺎﺀ ‪‬ﺎ ﺣﱴ ﺃﺻﺒﺤﺖ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﻈﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳍﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻷﻣﻢ ﻭ ﺃﺻﺒﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻧﺎ ﻟﻜﻔﺎﺡ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺿﺪ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﻦ ‪،‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﺒـﻎ ﺃﻋﻠـﻰ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﻭ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮﻧﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﱐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﻋﻨﺼـﺮﺍ ﻣـﻦ‬
‫ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﺎﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻭﻓﺮﺻﺔ ﻟﺸﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻟﻴﺘﻌﺎﺭﻓﻮﺍ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺑﺎﻹﺿـﺎﻓﺔ‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﺴﺎﻫﻢ ﰲ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﺑﺈﻋﻄﺎﺋﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺻﺔ ﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺻﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﻭﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﺍﻉ ﻭﺑﺬﻝ ﺍﳉﻬﺪ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﻌﺪ ﻋﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﻬﲏ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻌﻦ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﲢﺪﺩ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻭﻛﺜﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳝﺎﺭﺳـﻪ ﺍﻟﻔـﺮﺩ‪،‬‬
‫ﻓﺎﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺗﺒﺎﺩﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﻜﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﻭﻳﺘﺄﺛﺮ ﺑﺎﻵﺧﺮ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﻨﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻔﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﱪﺯ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻟﺴﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﳝﻜﻨﻨـﺎ ﲤﻴﻴـﺰ ﲰـﺎﺕ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺃ‪ -‬ﲰﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﻜﺲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -‬ﲰﺎﺕ ﲢﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﻭﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺝ‪ -‬ﲰﺎﺕ ﲤﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﺑﺖ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﳌﺘﺸﺎ‪‬ﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻋﻠﻲ ﳛﻴﺎ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻮﺭﻱ ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ‪ ،‬ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،1971 ،1‬ﺹ‪.210 – 209‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﻧﺰﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻟﺐ‪ :‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ‪ ،‬ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ‪ ،1993 ،‬ﺹ ‪.104‬‬
‫ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺍﺭﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﻭﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻻ ﳝﺎﺭﺳﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺆﺷﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ‪ ،‬ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﳒﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼـﺺ ﰲ ﻧـﻮﻉ‬
‫ﻣﻌﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﻳﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺗﺘﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﳍﺪﻭﺀ ﻭﺍﻟـﺬﻛﺎﺀ‬
‫ﻭﻧﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ‪ ،‬ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺪﻳﻒ ﺗﺘﻄﻠﺐ ﺷﺪﺓ ﻭﺗﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﺍﻹﻳﻘﺎﻉ ﻭﺍﳌﻄﺎﻭﻟﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﳌﻤﺎﺭﺱ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﺎ ﺃﻭ ﲨﺎﻋﻴﺎ ﻳﻬﺪﻑ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﺸـﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﳊﻴﻮﻳـﺔ‬
‫ﻓﺎﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺴﻞ ﻗﻄﺒﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻓﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﲣﻠﻖ ﺟﻮ ﻳﺒﺚ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺱ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳌﻤﺎﺭﺳـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﻈﻤﺔ ﺗﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻗﻮﻱ ﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺒﻌﺚ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻭﺭ ﰲ ﻧﻔـﻮﺱ ﺍﻟﻼﻋـﺒﲔ‬
‫ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻱ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺇﺫﻥ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻃﻴﺔ ﺑﻨﻮﻋﻴﻬﺎ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﲨﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺃﻭ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻤـﺎﺭﺱ ﻭﺗﻘـﻮﻱ‬
‫ﻣﺪﺍﺭﻛﻪ ﻭﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﺗﻜﺴﺒﻪ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﺸﺠﺎﻋﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ‪ ،‬ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻋـﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻛﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﲡﻌﻠﻪ ﻳﻨﺪﻣﺞ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺘﻤﻊ ﺑﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺳﻮﻳﺔ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻧﺰﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻟﺐ‪ :‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪.107‬‬
‫ﺧﻼﺻـﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺃﺻﺒﺤﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺼـﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺳـﻌﺔ ﲟﺘﻄﻠﺒـﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪،‬ﺇﺫ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮﻧﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﱐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻳﺴﺎﻫﻢ ﰲ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻭﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻪ‬
‫ﺑﺈﻋﻄﺎﺋﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺻﺔ ﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺻﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺼـﺮﺍﻉ ﻭﺑـﺬﻝ‬
‫ﺍﳉﻬﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﲤﻬﻴـﺪ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﱐ‪،‬ﻭﲢﺘﻞ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﺔ ﻫﺎﻣـﺔ‬
‫ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﻌﻰ ﺟﺎﻫﺪﺓ ﻟﺘﻔﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﱐ ﰲ ﻇﻞ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺘﻐﲑﺍﺕ‬
‫ﲟﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺘﻐﲑﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻭﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻳﻌﻄﻲ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺔ ﻟﻠﺠﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﺑﻄﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪،‬ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭ ﲰﺎ‪‬ﺎ ﻭ ﻋﻼﻗﺘﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ ﻭ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ ﺑﺘﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺳـﻠﻮﻙ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﳓﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺡ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﺸﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺇﻥ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﻮﻕ ﻳﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﳝﺘﺎﺯﻭﻥ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﳒﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﰲ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﲰﺔ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ ﻣـﻦ ﲰـﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﺗﻮﻓﺮﻫﺎ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺗﻨﺎﻁ ‪‬ﻢ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ ﻗﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳝﺜﻠﻮ‪‬ﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﺴﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺘﻐﲑﺍﺕ ﺑﺒﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺗـﺄﺛﲑ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣـﺪﺓ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ‪.‬‬
‫ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﺜﻠﻤﺎ ﺗﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪،‬ﺗﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔـﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﻟﺴـﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼـﻴﺔ ﺗﺒﻌـﺎ‬
‫ﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻈﺮ‪‬ﻢ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﻧﻮﺭﺩ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺑـﺾ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﻮﺍ ﲟﺠﺎﻝ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺮﻯ "ﻛﺎﺗﻞ" ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ )ﻫﻲ ﳎﻮﻋﺔ ﺭﺩﻭﺩ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺮﺑﻄﻬﺎ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺣـﺪﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﻤﺢ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻮﺿﻊ ﲢﺖ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ‪،‬ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﳉﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘـﺔ ﺫﺍ‪‬ـﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻌﻈـﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺣﻮﺍﻝ("ﺳﻴﺪ ﻏﻨﻴﻢ‪،1975،‬ﺹ‪."251‬‬
‫ﺃﻣﺎ )ﺟﻴﻠﻔﻮﺭﺩ( ﻓﲑﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻫﻲ‪ " :‬ﺃﻱ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﳝﻜﻦ ﲤﻴﻴﺰﻩ ﻭ ﺫﻭ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﻧﺴﱯ ﻭ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺳـﻪ‬
‫ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻋﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ"‪.( Guilford¸1959¸p06.‬‬
‫ـﺘﻐﲑ‬
‫ـﱵ ﺗـ‬
‫ـﻠﻮﻛﻴﺔ ﺍﻟـ‬
‫ـﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴـ‬
‫ـﻦ ﺍﻷﻓﻌـ‬
‫ـﺔ ﻣـ‬
‫ـﺎ ﳎﻤﻮﻋـ‬
‫ـﻤﺎﺕ "ﺑﺄ‪‬ـ‬
‫ـﻚ" ﺍﻟﺴـ‬
‫ـﺮﻑ "ﺍﻳﺰﻧـ‬
‫ﻭ ﻳﻌـ‬
‫ﻣﻌﺎ"‪ ، ( Eysenck¸1953¸p 10).‬ﻭ ﺗﻌﺪ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺣﺪﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺣﺴﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻭﻳﻌﺮﻓﻬﺎ )ﺟﻮﺭﺩﻥ ﺃﻟﺒﻮﺭﺕ ‪ (G.allport‬ﺑﺄ‪‬ﺎ‪" :‬ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻧﻔﺴﻲ ﻋﺼﱯ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻋﺎﻡ ﳜـﺘﺺ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻭﻳﻌﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﳌﺜﲑﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻴﺎ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺻﺪﺍﺭ ﻭﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺃﺷﻜﺎﻝ‬
‫ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻴﻴﻔﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑﻱ"‪.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﻮﺀ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﻟﺘﻌﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺧﺎﺻﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺻﻔﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﻧﺴﱯ‪،‬ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻓﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻱ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺮﻭﻗﺎ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻭﺭﺍﺛﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻜﺘﺴﺒﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜـﻮﻥ ﺟﺴـﻤﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﲟﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺍﲪﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ‪ :‬ﺍﻷﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ‪،‬ﺹ ‪.67‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺳﻴﺪ ﲪﺪ ﻏﻨﻴﻢ‪ :‬ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻀﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪ ،1975 ،‬ﺹ ‪.35‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺛﺎﺑﺘﺔ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻼﺣﻆ ﻓﻴﻪ‪،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﳝﻜـﻦ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺃﻭ ﳕﻴﺰ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‪.‬ﻭ ﻣـﻦ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻓﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺛﺒﺎ‪‬ﺎ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﲟﻌﲎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻭﺻﻔﻪ ﺑﺸـﻜﻞ‬
‫ﻋﺎﻡ ﺑﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺇﺳﻨﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪1-2‬ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﻷﻟﺒﻮﺭﺕ )‪:(G.allport‬‬
‫ﻋﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﺭﺕ )‪ (1961‬ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺑﺄ‪‬ﺎ "ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻧﻔﺴﻲ ﻋﺼﱯ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻋﺎﻡ)ﺧﺎﺹ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺩ( ﻳﻌﻤﻞ ﻋﻠـﻰ‬
‫ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﳌﺜﲑﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺎ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻴﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺻﺪﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺃﺷـﻜﺎﻝ ﻣﺘﺴـﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﻣـﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻴﻔﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑﻱ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﱪ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ‪‬ﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻋﺎﻡ ﺃﻭ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺇﻻ ﺃ‪‬ﺎ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﰲ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘـﺔ ﻋﺎﻣـﺔ ﻭ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﺓ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﺗﺄﰐ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻜﻔﻲ ﻟﻮﺻﻒ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻟـﺔ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻗـﺔ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺎﻣﻞ‪،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺣﺼﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﺭﺕ ﺣﻮﺍﱄ ‪ 5000‬ﲰﺔ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﺻﻒ ‪‬ﺎ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻓﻬـﻞ ﻳﺴـﻬﻞ‬
‫ﻭﺻﻒ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺿﻮﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‪،‬ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑـﲔ ﻫـﺬﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﰲ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﺩﻝ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﳝﻴﻞ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻟﻮﺻﻒ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺿﻮﺀ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺑﺴﻴﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﻣﺜـﻞ ﺍﻟﺒـﻮﺭﺕ ﻭ‬
‫ﻭﻟﻴﻢ ﺟﻴﻤﺲ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻴﺆﻛﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻣﻬﻤﲔ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻮﺍﺟﻬﻬﺎ‪:‬‬
‫ﺃ‪-‬ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﻄﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻮﻳﲏ‪.‬‬
‫ﺏ‪-‬ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﻱ)ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻈﻮﺍﻫﺮ(‪.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻋﺼﻤﺖ ﻣﻄﺎﻭﻉ‪:‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭ ﺃﳘﻴﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻨﺎ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪.125‬‬
‫‪-2‬ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻲ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﺎﱐ‪ :‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﻠﻮﻡ‪،‬ﺑﲑﻭﺕ‪،‬ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ‪،1994 ،‬ﺹ ‪.247-246‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻟﻠﺘﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻀﺮﺏ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻟﻠﺨﺠﻞ‪،‬ﻓﲑﻯ ﺍﻧﻪ ﲰﺔ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﻫﻲ ﲰﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣـﻦ‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﻣﻈﻬﺮﻫﺎ‪،‬ﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﺘﺨﺬ ﺃﺷﻜﺎﻻ ﺷﱴ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﲔ‪،‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻣﻌﲔ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜـﻮﻥ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺷﺌﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺆﺛﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﺭﺍﺛﻴﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﺇﺑﻌﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻭ ﲣﻠﻴﺼﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪،‬ﻭ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺁﺧﺮ‬
‫ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﺎﲨﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺷﻌﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﻌﻒ ﺛﺒﺘﺘﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻇﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﻴﺌﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﺰﻣﺘﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﰲ‬
‫ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺍﳋﺠﻞ ﻓﺈ‪‬ﺎ ﺗﺒﺪﻭ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﲔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪،‬ﻭ ﻛﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻳﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﺷﺨﺼﺎﻥ‬
‫ﳋﱪﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻗﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻳﺘﻤﺜﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻹﺣﺒﺎﻁ ﻭ ﺍﻹﺧﻔﺎﻕ ﻓﻴﺴﺘﻜﲔ ﺍﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻭ ﻳﺮﺗﺒﻚ ﻭ ﳚﺘـﺮ ﺗﻔﻜـﲑﻩ‬
‫ﺇﺟﺘﺮﺍﺭﻳﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﻴﺪﺍ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﻧﺎﻇﺮﻳﻪ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻝ ﺍﳌﺸﻜﻠﺔ‪،‬ﰲ ﺣﲔ ﻳﺘﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺍﳋﱪﺓ ﲝﺰﻡ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﺠﺪﺩ‬
‫ﻧﺸﺎﻃﻪ ﳌﻮﺍﺟﻬﺔ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2-2‬ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﻟﻜﺎﺗﻞ ‪:Kattell‬‬
‫ﳝﻴﺰ ﻛﺎﺗﻞ ﺑﲔ ﻧﻮﻋﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‪:‬ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺴـﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴـﻄﺤﻴﺔ‬
‫‪traits‬‬
‫‪ surface‬ﻭ‬
‫ﺗﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﰲ ﴰﻮﳍﺎ ﺗﺒﻌﺎ ﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﻭ ﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻴﺔ ﻣـﻦ ﻋﻨﺎﺻـﺮ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ )ﺍﳉﺰﻳﺌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ ﻟﻠﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻀﻴﻘﺔ ﺗﻀﻢ ﻋﺪﺩﺍ ﻛﺒﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ(‪،‬ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﻋـﱪ‬
‫ﻛﺎﺗﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ"ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺤﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻱ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻫﻲ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘـﺄﻟﻒ‬
‫ﻣﻌﺎ ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ"‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﰲ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﻛﺎﺗﻞ ﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺤﻴﺔ ﻭ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻧﻮﺍﺣﻲ ﻗﻨﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻭﺻﻒ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼـﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻭ‬
‫ﺗﻮﺿﺢ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺓ ﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳﺔ ‪.source traits‬‬
‫ﻭ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳﺔ ﳏﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺤﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻭﲤﺜﻞ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﺑﺘﺔ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﻛﺎﺗﻞ ﳝﻴﺰ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﺠﻤﻊ ﻣﻌﺎ ﻋـﻦ ﻃﺮﻳـﻖ ﲢﻠﻴـﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻗﻴـﺪ ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻤﻌﺎﺕ‬
‫‪analysis‬‬
‫‪– Cluster‬ﻷ‪‬ﺎ ﺗﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﻣﻌﺎ‪ -‬ﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻠﻲ ‪ Factor analysis‬ﻭ ﺍﻷﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﱂ ﻳﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻧﻪ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﺳـﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﻋـﺪﺩ‬
‫ﳏﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﻢ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺎﺕ ﺗﻘﻴﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﺮﺿﻴﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﺗﻞ ﺑﺸﻤﻮﻝ ﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻓﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﻬﺘﻢ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﲟﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﲰﺎﺕ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﲣﺘﺺ‬
‫‪‬ﺎ ﲨﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﻭ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻛﺼﻔﺔ ﻓﺮﻳﺪﺓ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ‪،‬ﻭ ﺍﻟﺴـﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻛﺔ‬
‫‪ Common‬ﳝﻠﻜﻬﺎ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺃﻭ ﲨﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻭ ﻳﻌﺘﻤـﺪ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﻋﻠـﻰ‬
‫‪traits‬‬
‫ﺍﻹﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﺍﺛﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﺎﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺸﺎ‪‬ﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﺪﺓ ‪ Unique‬ﳜﺘﺺ ‪‬ﺎ ﻓـﺮﺩ‬
‫ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻏﲑﻩ‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﰲ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‪،‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﻭﺟﺪ ﻛﺎﺗﻞ ﺟﺪﻭﻯ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺗﺒﻌﺎ ﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ‬
‫ﺃﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﻭ ﻫﻲ ﲰﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﺔ‪traits‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ‪traits‬‬
‫‪ Ability‬ﻭ ﲰﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ‪Temperament traits‬‬
‫ﻭ ﺍﻟﺴـﻤﺎﺕ‬
‫‪ Dynamic‬ﻭ ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺑﺄ‪‬ﺎ ﺷﻖ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘـﻪ ﳓـﻮ ﺍﻷﻫـﺪﺍﻑ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻮﻟﺔ‪.‬ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻓﺘﺘﻀﻤﻦ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﻓﺰ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﳌﻴﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻜﺘﺴﺒﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ‪،‬ﻭ‬
‫ﲤﺜﻞ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﺄﺛﺮ ﺑﺘﻌﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﺍﻋـﺚ ﻓﺘﺒـﺪﻭ ﺧﻠﻘﻴـﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺟﺒﻠﻴـﺔ‬
‫‪ Constitutional‬ﺇﱃ ﺣﺪ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﻓﺘﺸﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻗﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻧﻘﻄﺔ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻹﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳـﺎﺱ ﺍﻣﺒﲑﻳﻘـﻲ‪،‬ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﺑﺮﻭﻓﻴـﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﻹﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﺃﻱ ﻻﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻮﺍﻓﺮ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺫﻱ ﺍﳌﻌـﲎ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﻭﺻﻒ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﰲ ﺗﻔﺎﻋﻠﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺿﻐﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻐﲑﺍ‪‬ﺎ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻭ ﺑﺘﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺃﻟﺒﻮﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻓﺈﻧﻨﺎ ﳒﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺒﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻄﺮﻳﺔ‪،‬ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻳﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﻳﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﻏﲑ ﺗﺎﻡ ﺇﺫ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺎﺗﻞ ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻜﻮﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ‬
‫ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‪.‬ﻓﺎﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﺘﺄﻟﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺣﺪﺍﺕ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﺃﻃﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺗﻌﺒﲑ "ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ"ﻭ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﻳﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻲ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﳌﺘﺂﻟﻔﺔ ﻓﺘﺒﺪﻭ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻓـﺮﺍﺩ ﳐـﺘﻠﻔﲔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗـﻒ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺟﺎﺑﺮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻤﻴﺪ ﺟﺎﺑﺮ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ‪:‬ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ‪،‬ﺹ ‪.325-324‬‬
‫ﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻏﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻌﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻓﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻳﻔﻀﻞ ﺍﻻﺧﺬ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺣﻴـﺚ ﳝﻜـﻦ‬
‫ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺑﻜﻞ ﲰﺔ‪.‬ﻭ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺎﻥ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ‪‬ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺳﻬﻞ‬
‫ﻭ ﻣﻴﺴﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻭ ﰲ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪-3‬ﻧﻘﺪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‪:‬‬
‫ﻻﺣﺖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺧﲑﺓ ﺑﻮﺍﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺒﺔ ﺃﻣﻞ ﲞﺼﻮﺹ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ‪،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻟﻘـﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺘـﺮ‬
‫ﻣﻴﺸﻴﻞ)‪ (1973-1968‬ﻇﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺪﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‪،‬ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺗﻰ ﺑﻌﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﻳﺒﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﻷﺛﺮ‪،‬ﻭ ﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﺇﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﻟﻠﺘﻘﻨﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﻣﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺴـﻤﺎﺕ‪،‬ﻭ‬
‫ﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺒﲔ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﻋﱪ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗـﻒ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔـﺔ‪،‬ﻓﺎﻻﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﶈﻴﻄﻲ)ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﻲ( ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺰﻋﻮﻣﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﻣﻠﺤﻮﻅ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻛﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺆﻭﻝ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ‪‬ﺎ ﻣﺆﺷﺮﺍﺕ ﺛﺎﺑﺘﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ‬
‫ﺇﻻ ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻴﺎﺕ ﻓﺎﺋﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼﺺ‪،‬ﻭ ﺗﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻔﺎﺻﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﺘﺪﻋﻴﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺃﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﻟﻘﻴﺎﺳﻬﺎ)ﻣﻴﺸﻴﻞ ‪.(1968‬‬
‫ﳚﺪ ﻭﻳﻠﻴﺎﻡ ﺏ‪.‬ﺃﻟﺴﺘﻮﻥ)‪ (1976‬ﺇﻟﺘﺒﺎﺳﺎ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻴﺸﻴﻞ‪،‬ﻭ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﲢﻠـﻴﻼ ﻟﻠﺴـﻤﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﺗﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺜﲑ‪-‬ﺍﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺔ‪،‬ﺇﺫ ﻣﻊ ﺇﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻃـﺮﺍﺯ ﻣـﺜﲑﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻛﺲ)‪،(x‬ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﻛﺲ)‪ (x‬ﺑﺈﺑﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺔ ﺱ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻓﻴﻬـﺎ‬
‫ﻣﺜﲑﺍﺕ ﺍﻛﺲ)‪،(x‬ﻭ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺃﻟﺴﺘﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﲨﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ‪،‬ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻋـﺪﺓ ﺯﻣـﺮ‬
‫ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻣﺴﺎﺱ ﺑﻮﺻﻒ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻻ ﺗﻼﺋﻢ ﳕﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺴـﻤﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺸـﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻘـﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﻓﻊ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﰲ ﺃﻱ ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﳑﺎﺛﻞ ﺗﺼﲑ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﻐﲑﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻧﺎﺷﻄﺔ ﻭ ﺗﺘﻔﺎﻋـﻞ‪،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣـﻊ‬
‫ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻓﺤﺴﺐ ﺑﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ‪.‬ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﻭﺣﺪﻫﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ‪،‬ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﻱ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺗﻔﺎﻋﻠﻲ ‪ interactionist‬ﻳﺮﺑﻂ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﻗﻒ‪.‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﺁﻥ ﺗﺎﻳﻠﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ‪:‬ﻣﺪﺧﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ‪،‬ﺹ‪.286‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -4‬ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‪:‬‬
‫ﺇﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮﻭﻥ ﻭ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺘﻬﻢ "ﺳﲑﻝ ﺑﲑﺕ" ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺷﺨﺺ‬
‫ﻋﺪﺓ ﲰﺎﺕ ﻭ ﳑﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﺗﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﱐ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﺑﺎﺭﺯﺍ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﰲ ﺣﲔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻭﺿﻮﺣﺎ‪،‬ﻋﻜﺲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﳒﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺷﺨﺺ ﲤﻴﺰ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣـﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺛﺎﺑﺘﺔ ﺑﻞ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺘﻐﲑ ﺣﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ‪،‬ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺿﻊ‬
‫ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺩﺭﺟﺎ‪‬ـﺎ‬
‫ﻟﺪﻳﻬﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺼﻨﻔﺔ ﻛﺎﻵﰐ‪:‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻴﺔ‪:‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻣﺔ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ‪،‬ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺔ‪،‬ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺱ‪...‬ﺍﱁ‪.‬‬
‫‪-2‬ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻴﺔ‪:‬ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﻂﺀ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻜﻒ‪،‬ﺍﳌﺜﺎﺑﺮﺓ‪...‬ﺍﱁ‪.‬‬
‫‪-3‬ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ‪:‬ﺣﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺬﻛﺮ‪،‬ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻴﻞ‪،‬ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻴﻢ‪...‬ﺍﱁ‪.‬‬
‫‪-4‬ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺟﻴﺔ‪:‬ﺷﺪﺓ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ‪،‬ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻃﻒ‪،‬ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ‪...‬ﺍﱁ‪.‬‬
‫‪-5‬ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑﻳﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ‪:‬ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳋﻀﻮﻉ‪،‬ﺍﻻﻧﻄﻮﺍﺀ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ‪...‬ﺍﱁ‪.‬‬
‫‪-6‬ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪:‬ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺛﺮ ﺑﺎ‪‬ﺘﻤﻊ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ‪،‬ﺍﻻﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ‪...‬ﺍﱁ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﻳﱪﺯ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ‪،‬ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﻧﻌﺮﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﱴ ﳓـﺪﺩ‬
‫ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻪ‪.‬ﻳﺘﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄ‪‬ﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﻴﺲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴـﻤﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺃﺛﺮ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ‪،‬ﻓﺄﺻﺒﺤﺖ ﻟﺪﻳﻨﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻈﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺟﻴﺔ ﻭ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﻮﻳﻀﺔ‪:‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ‪،‬ﺹ‪.190‬‬
‫‪-5‬ﻣﻌﺎﻳﲑ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ‪-‬ﻣﺜﻞ ﻛﻞ ﺍﳌﺘﻐﲑﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻴﻄﺔ‪ -‬ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ ﻭ‬
‫ﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﺴﺘﻨﺘﺞ ﻓﻘﻂ‪،‬ﻓﺈﻧﻨﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻮﻗﻊ ﺻﻌﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺃﺧﻄﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻬﺎ‪،‬ﻭ‬
‫ﻟﻜﻦ ﺃﻟﺒﻮﺭﺕ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ "ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﲰﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ"‪،‬ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﻌﺎﻳﲑ ﲦﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻟﺘﺤﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻭ‬
‫ﻫﻲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎ ﺳﻴﺪ ﻏﻨﻴﻢ)‪ 1975‬ﺹ ‪ (251‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﺃﻥ ﻟﻠﺴﻤﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﲰﻲ)ﲟﻌﲎ ﺃ‪‬ﺎ ﻋﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺗﻌﻘﻴﺪﺍ(‪.‬‬
‫‪-2‬ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﺓ)ﻋﺎﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺗﻨﺘﻈﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺘﺴﻘﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺎ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻳﻦ‬
‫ﲰﺔ(‪.‬‬
‫‪-3‬ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺩﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﺔ)ﲟﻌﲎ ﺃ‪‬ﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﺪﻭﺭ ﺩﺍﻓﻌﻲ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ(‪.‬‬
‫‪-4‬ﺃﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺤﺪﺩ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺎ)ﻭﻫـﺬﺍ ﻣـﺎ ﻳﺘﻀـﺢ ﻣـﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﺮﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﻔﺮﺩ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﳉﺔ ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﳓﻮ ﻣﺎ ﳒﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻠﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﺰﻧﻚ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺗﻞ ﻭ ﻏﲑﳘﺎ‪.‬‬
‫‪-5‬ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻠﺔ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ)ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺗﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ(‬
‫‪-6‬ﺃﻥ ﲰﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪-‬ﺇﺫﺍ ﻧﻈﺮﻧﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ‪ -‬ﻗﺪ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﳋﻠﻘﻴـﺔ‬
‫ﺫﺍ‪‬ﺎ)ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﺘﻔﻖ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﺗﺘﻔﻖ ﻭ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ(‪.‬‬
‫‪-7‬ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﺘﺴﻘﺔ ﻣﻊ ﲰﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺩﻟﻴﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻫـﺬﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ)ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﲰﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻗﻀﺔ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﻣﺎ ﳒﺪ ﰲ ﲰـﱵ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺎﻓﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻹﳘﺎﻝ(‪.‬‬
‫‪ -8‬ﺃﻥ ﲰﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﻮﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺘﻮﻳﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﻮﺀ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻌﻬـﺎ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ) ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﺮﻳـﺪﺓ ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﺔ(‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -6‬ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﻋﻼﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ ﺍﳌﻬﺘﻤﲔ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻮﻕ ﰲ ﺭﻳﺎﺿـﺔ‬
‫ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻣﺮﻫﻮﻥ –ﺇﱃ ﺣﺪ ﻛﺒﲑ‪ -‬ﲟﺪﻯ ﻣﻼﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻔﺮﺩ ﺑﻄﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻛﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﳓﻠﻞ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺲ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ‪‬ﺎ ﺭﻳﺎﺿـﺔ‬
‫ﻓﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﺗﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻱ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻌﻄﻲ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻟﺘﻀﺎﻓﺮ ﺍﳉﻬﺪ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺜـﻞ‬
‫ﺭﻳﺎﺿﺎﺕ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﲨﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻛﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺃﻭ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﺔ‪...‬ﺇﱁ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺓ ﲤﺜﻞ ﻣﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﲢﻤﻠﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﶈﺪﺩ‪ ،‬ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺗﺘﻮﺯﻉ ﻣﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺓ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻋﺪﻳﺪﻳﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﻮﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻮﻗﻊ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﲤﻴﺰ ﻻﻋـﺐ ﺍﻟﺘـﻨﺲ‬
‫ﺑﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻌﺔ ﰲ ﲰﺎﺕ ﻧﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻭﲢﻤﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻧﺘﻮﻗﻊ ﺍﳔﻔﺎﺽ ﲰـﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻟﻪ‪.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺍﲪﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ‪ :‬ﺍﻷﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ‪،‬ﺹ‪.84-83‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺃﺳﺎﻣﺔ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺭﺍﺗﺐ‪ :‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻘﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪.43‬‬
‫‪ -7‬ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺃﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺒﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰﻭﻥ ﻋـﻦ ﻏـﲑ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﺑﺎﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﺩﺭﺟﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪-‬ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻴﺔ‪-‬ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﱄ‪-‬ﺍﻟﺮﻏﺒﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻓﺲ‪-‬ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻖ ﺍﳌﻨﺨﻔﺾ‪.‬‬‫ﻭ ﺃﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰﻭﻥ ﻋﻦ ﻏـﲑ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿـﻴﲔ‬
‫ﺑﺎﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﺩﺭﺟﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﺔ‪-‬ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻴﺔ‪-‬ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﱄ‪-‬ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ‪-‬ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪.‬‬‫ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺃﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻣﺼﺮﻳﺔ ﻗﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﲪﺪ ﺃﻣﲔ ﻓﻮﺯﻱ ﻋﻦ ﲤﻴﺰ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﻋﻦ ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﺑﺎﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﺩﺭﺟﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪:‬ﺍﳍﺎﺩﻓﻴﺔ‪-‬ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﻼﻟﻴﺔ‪-‬ﺍﳉﺮﺃﺓ‪-‬ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪-‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﱄ‪-‬ﺍﳌﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻢ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﻛﺪﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﲝﺎﺙ ﺃ‪‬ﺎ ﲤﻴﺰ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﻋﻦ ﻏﲑﻫـﻢ‬
‫ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺃ‪ -‬ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺘﻔﻖ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﺘﺢ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ‪،‬ﻭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣـﺎ ﺃﺛﺒﺘﺘـﻪ ﺑﻌـﺾ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺒﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻛـﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﻭ‬
‫ﺷﺎﻧﻮﻥ‬
‫‪et channon‬‬
‫‪،(1940) Karter‬ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺑﻴﺪﻳﻠﻒ ‪،(1954) Buddulph‬ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ‬
‫‪Marks‬‬
‫)‪،(1954‬ﻭﻳﺮﻧﺮ ‪،(1960)Werner‬ﺭﻳﻔـﺮ‪،(1965) Ruffer‬ﺷـﺎﻧﺪﻝ ‪،(1965) Shendel‬‬
‫ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻗﺮﻭﻓﺰ ‪ ،(1966) Groves‬ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻭﻳﺮﻧﺮ ﻭﻗﻮﺕ ﻫﺎﻳﻞ‪(1966 ) Werner et Gott heil‬‬
‫ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ‬
‫‪‬ﺮﻣﺎﻥ‪Beherman‬‬
‫)‪ (1967‬ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ‬
‫ﺇﻛﺠﺎﻣﻲ‪Ikegami‬‬
‫)‪.2 (1970‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺃﲪﺪ ﺍﻣﲔ ﻓﻮﺯﻱ‪:‬ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻘﺎﺕ‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪،‬ﻣﺼﺮ‪ ،2003،‬ﺹ‪.138-137‬‬
‫‪- Richard B, Alderman (r): Manuel de psychologie du sport, Ed vigot,1983,Paris, P 165.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻳﺘﺴﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻑﺀ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﻼﺀ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻨـﺎﺱ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ‪‬ﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﻴﻒ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺭﻏﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻣـﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﰲ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗﻒ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﻔﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﺒﻄﺔ ﺑﺎﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﻬﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭﻫـﻲ‬
‫ﲰﺎﺕ ﻫﺎﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﲰﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﺗﺒﺪﻭ ﻣﺸﺎ‪‬ﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﺎﻣﻞ )‪ ”cyclothymie” (A‬ﰲ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ‬
‫‪ ،Cattel‬ﻭﲰـﺔ‪F‬‬
‫)ﺍﻟﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺍﻗﺔ( ﻟﺘﻮﺭﺳﺘﻮﻥ ‪.Thurstone‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -‬ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺮﻯ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ )‪ 1(Richard et Alderman, 1983‬ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﲰﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿـﻴﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣـﻦ ﻫـﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳـﺎﺕ‪:‬‬
‫ﻭ)‪1960‬‬
‫‪ (Werner‬ﻭ)‪1960‬‬
‫ﻭ)‪ (Bruner1969‬ﻭ)‪1969‬‬
‫‪ (Meriman‬ﻭ)‪1964‬‬
‫‪ (Jinger‬ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ‬
‫)‪1970‬‬
‫)‪1958‬‬
‫‪ (Telman‬ﻭ)‪1966‬‬
‫‪(Booth‬‬
‫‪(Johnson‬‬
‫‪ ،(Can‬ﻭﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﰎ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺻﻞ‬
‫ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﻳﺘﺴﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺣﻴﺎ‪‬ﻢ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻈﻬﺮﻭﻥ ﻫـﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴـﻤﺔ ﰲ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻌﺎﻣــﻞ ﺍﻟﺴــﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻋﺎﻣــﻞ ﺷــﺎﻣﻞ ﻳﺸــﲑ ﺑﺼــﻔﺔ ﻋﺎﻣــﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺛﺒــﺎﺕ ﻭﺗﻮﻛﻴــﺪ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ‪،‬ﺍﻷﻣﻦ‪،‬ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ‪،‬ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻭﻣﺔ‪،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻨﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﱐ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻓﺴﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﲰﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻭﲡﻌﻠﻪ ﰲ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻏﺒـﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘـﺄﺛﲑ ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﻬﻢ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﺗﺘﺠﻪ ﳓﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻟﺘﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻭﻗﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻵﺧـﺮﻳﻦ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﺧﻀﺎﻋﻬﻢ ﺃﻭ ﺇﻏﺮﺍﺋﻬﻢ ﺃﻭ ﺇﺻﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻷﻭﺍﻣﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻏﺒﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻻ ﺗﺘـﺄﺛﺮ ﻓﻘـﻂ ﰲ‬
‫ﺭﻏﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻴﺌﺘﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﰲ ﺳﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪.‬‬
‫‪- Richard (b), Alderman (r): Manuel de psychologie du sport,op ct,p166.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻢ ﻣﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﳏﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﺍﳌﺘﻄﺮﻑ ﻟﻠﺬﺍﺕ‬
‫)ﻛﺎﻟﺘﻔﺎﺧﺮ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺎﻫﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻭﺭ( ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ )ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻨﻒ( ﻭﺍﻷﻧﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺴﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻋـﺪﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻌﺎﺩﺓ ﳓﻮ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭﺍﻻﲡﺎﻩ ﻟﻸﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺝ‪ -‬ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﺖ ﺁﺭﺍﺀ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﳌﺼﻄﻠﺢ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻴﺔ ﻧﺬﻛﺮ ﻣـﻦ ﺑﻴﻨـﻬﻢ "ﻛـﺎﺭﻝ‬
‫ﺟﻮﺳﺘﺎﻑ ﻳﻮﻧﻎ‪"-"C.G.jung‬ﻫﲑﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺭﺷﺎﺥ‪"-"H.Rorschach‬ﻭﻟﻴﻢ ﺷﻴﻠﺪﻭﻥ‪-"W.Sheldon‬‬
‫ﺭﳝﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﺗﻞ ﻭ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻭﻱ‪...‬ﺍﱁ‪.‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﳌﺼـﻄﻠﺢ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴـﺎﻁ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌـﺎﺟﻢ ﺍﻻﳒﻠﻴﺰﻳـﺔ ﻛـﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺠـﻢ ﺍﻟـﺬﻱ‬
‫ﻭﺿﻌﻪ"ﺩ‪.‬ﺟﻮﻧﺴﻮﻥ" ﻭ ﻇﻬﺮ ﻋﺎﻡ ‪1755‬ﻡ‪،‬ﻭ ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﱂ ﳜﱪﻧﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﻄﻠﺢ‪،‬ﺃﻣﺎ "ﻣـﻮﺭﻱ" ﰲ‬
‫ﻣﻌﺠﻢ ﺃﻛﺴﻔﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﻋﺎﻡ ‪1897‬ﻡ ﻓﻴﻘﺘﺒﺲ ﻋﻦ "ﻛﻮﻟﺰ" ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺼﻄﻠﺢ ﲟﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺃﻛﺜـﺮ‬
‫ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ‪:‬ﺇﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻫﻮ ﺍﲡﺎﻩ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻣﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴﺔ"‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﺷﺎﺭﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻴﺔ ﲤﻴﺰ ﻭ ﺗﻈﻬـﺮ ﺑﺪﺭﺟـﺔ‬
‫ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻌﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺩﺭﺍﺳـﺔ )ﻃﺎﳌـﺎﻥ ‪ (1964‬ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳـﺔ )ﺇﻳﻨـﺘﺞ‬
‫ﻭﺳﺘﻤﱪﺝ ‪ (1965‬ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ )ﻓﺎﺭﻧﺮﺩ ‪ (1966‬ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ )ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺮ ‪ (1969‬ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ )ﻛـﲔ ‪(1970‬‬
‫ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ )ﻛﻤﺎﺟﺎﻣﻲ ‪.(1970‬‬
‫ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ﻣﻠﺨﺺ ﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻹﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺻﻔﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺷﺨﺺ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻧﺎﺱ ﺣﻮﻟﻪ ﻳﺘﺤﺪﺙ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ ﻭ ﻻ ﳛـﺐ ﺍﻟﻘـﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳـﺔ‬
‫ﻣﻨﻔﺮﺩﺍ‪ ،‬ﻣﺘﻔﺎﺋﻞ ﻭ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻜﺘﺮﺙ‪،‬ﳛﺐ ﺍﻟﻀﺤﻚ ﻭ ﺍﳌﺮﺡ‪،‬ﺩﺍﺋﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﻭ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﳝﻴﻞ ﻟﻠﻌـﺪﻭﺍﻥ ﻭ‬
‫ﻳﻨﻔﻌﻞ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺼﻌﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺗﻪ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺃﲪﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ‪ :‬ﺍﻷﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪.235‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺃﲪﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ‪ :‬ﺍﻷﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪.241‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﻮﺍﺋﻲ ﻓﻴﻤﻴﻞ ﻟﻠﺨﺠﻞ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺴﺤﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻟﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻻﻛﺘﺌﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﻠﺐ‪.‬‬
‫ﺩ‪ -‬ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ )ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ(‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﲢﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ )ﻣﻔﻬـﻮﻡ ﺍﻟـﺬﺍﺕ(‬
‫ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻓﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﻛﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻻﻗﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻭﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻭﺍﺣﺘـﺮﺍﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺗﺸﺘﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻧﻔﺴـﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺫﺍﺗـﻪ ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﺗﺼﻮﺭﻩ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﺎﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ‪‬ﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺑﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﰲ‬
‫ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ )ﻫﻮﺗﻮﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﻧﺴﻮﻥ ‪ (1954‬ﻭ)ﻗﺮﺍﻓﺰ ‪ (1966‬ﻭ)ﻛـﺮﻭﻝ ‪ (1967‬ﻭ)ﺑﺮﻳﻨـﺮ‬
‫‪.(1969‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺃﺛﺒﺘﺖ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻟﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﻭﲢﺼﻴﻠﻪ ﳊﻴﺎﺗﻪ‬
‫ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺩﳝﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺼﻴـﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳـﺮﻯ‬
‫‪‬ﺎ ﺍﻹﻧﺴـﺎﻥ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻫﻲ ﻧﺘـﺎﺝ ﻧﻈﺮﺓ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻟﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳـﺮﻯ )ﺳـﻴﻤﻮﻧﺪﺱ ‪ (1951 symonds‬ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﺗﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻼﺣﻆ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﺃﻭ ﻳﺪﺭﻙ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪.‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﻣﺎﺫﺍ ﻳﻔﻜﺮ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪.‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻘﺪﺭ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻘﻴﻢ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪.‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﻛﻴﻒ ﳛﺎﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﻓﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻳﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪.‬‬
‫‪- Richard (b), Alderman (r): Manuel de psychologie du sport, op ct,p170-171.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻭﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﺍﻻﻗﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ‬
‫ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻌﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻭ ﺍﳌﺮﺡ‪.‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻘﻈﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﻴﻮﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﻠﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻮﻑ‪.‬‬
‫‪ü‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻖ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﻤﺄﻧﻴﻨﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻫ‪ -‬ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺩ )ﻗﻮﺓ ﳎﺎ‪‬ﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﻋﺐ(‪:‬‬
‫ﺣﺴﺐ‬
‫)‪et Alderman 1983‬‬
‫‪ (Richard‬ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿـﺔ ﻭﰲ‬
‫ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ )‪ (Werner 1960‬ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ )‪ (Gatteil et Werner 1966‬ﻭ)‪ (1967kroll‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﺮﻯ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺃﻥ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴـﻤﺔ ﰲ‬
‫ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﻣﺪﻋﺎﺓ ﻟﻠﺘﺴﺎﺅﻝ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻥ ﻋﻜﺲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺍﻭﺓ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻳﻔﺘﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰﻭﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺼـﻼﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴـﺔ‬
‫ﻛﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻲ ﻭﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﺑﺒﺬﻝ ﺍﳉﻬﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﺸـﺎﻕ‬
‫ﻭﲢﻤﻞ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﻋﺐ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﻄﺎﺭ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺗﺒﺪﻭ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺣﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳎﺎ‪‬ﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﻋﺐ‪.‬‬‫ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﻮﺱ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﳍﺰﳝﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻮﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺐ‪.‬‬‫‪ -‬ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲢﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﲪﺎﺱ ﻭﺗﺸﺠﻴﻊ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻟﻪ‪.‬‬
‫‪- Richard (b), Alderman (r): Manuel de psychologie du sport, op ct, p173.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻭ‪ -‬ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﱄ‪:‬‬
‫ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺎﺭﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﻇﻬﺮ‪‬ﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺣﺎﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻔﻲ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ "ﻭﺍﻳﺘﻨﺞ" ﻭ"ﺳﺘﻴﻤﱪﺝ" ‪ 1965‬ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ )ﺑـﻮﺙ ‪(1968‬‬
‫ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻫﺎﻧﺖ )‪ (1969‬ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ )ﻛﲔ ‪ (1970‬ﰎ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰﻭﻥ ‪‬ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ‬
‫ﻭﻳﻈﻬﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﻨﺨﻔﺾ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻖ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺣﲔ ﺃﺷﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ )ﺟﻮﻧﺴﻦ ‪ (1964‬ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ )ﺭﺍﻓـﺮ‬
‫‪ (1965‬ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻳﻜﻴﻘﺎﻣﻲ)‪ (1970‬ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻻ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﺿﺤﺔ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿـﻴﲔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻻﺗﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﱄ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ‬‫ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻭ ﻫﺎﺩﺉ‪.‬‬‫ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﱯ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﻟﻨﻀﺞ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﱄ‪.‬‬‫ ﺿﺒﻂ ﺍﻻﻧﺪﻓﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻴﺔ‪.‬‬‫ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﻨﺨﻔﺾ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﱯ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﺓ ﻛﺎﳍﺰﳝﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺻﺎﺑﺔ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪.‬‬‫‪ -‬ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﺅﻟﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪- Richard (b), Alderman (r): Manuel de psychologie du sport, op ct, p173.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺧﻼﺻـﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺧﲑ ﺃﻥ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺗﻠﻌﺐ ﺩﻭﺭﺍ ﻫﺎﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎ ﰲ ﺗﻮﺟﻴـﻪ‬
‫ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻭ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﳒﺎﺯ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﺪﻳﻪ‪،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺸﺎﺭ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺼﻔﺔ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺑﺄ‪‬ﺎ ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻩ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﺰ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺴﻠﻚ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ‪،‬ﺃﻭ ﻫﻲ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﺮﻕ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻬﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮ‪.‬‬
‫ﲤﻬﻴـﺪ‪:‬‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻫﲑﻳﺔ ﺍﶈﺒﻮﺑﺔ ﺑﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺃﳓﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‪،‬ﻭ ﻫﻲ ﺗﺘﻄﻮﺭ‬
‫ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ‪،‬ﻭ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺮﻋﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻫﲑ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﲔ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﺝ ﺍﻟﻄﱯ‪،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﺻﺒﺤﺖ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺄﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻣﺘﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺟﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺗﺮﻗﻰ ﰲ ﻣﺼﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮ ﻗﻮﺓ‬
‫ﻭﺟﺎﺫﺑﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﺘﺎﺑﻌﺔ‪،‬ﻭﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﱂ ﺗﻌﺪ ﺗﻘﺘﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻟﲔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻓﻴﻬﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻓﺴﻲ‬
‫ﻓﻘﻂ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﲣﻄﻰ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺭﺑﻄﻬﺎ ﲜﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻧﺬﻛﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﻴﺔ‪...‬ﺍﱁ‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﻨﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﺭﺳﻮﺍ ﻟﻌﺒﺔ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ "ﺗﺴﻮﺷﻮ ‪ "Tsu-Chu‬ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻌﺒﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺷﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﻏﺮﻳﻖ ﻗﺪ ﻣﺎﺭﺳﻮﺍ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻟﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﺸﺒﻪ ﻟﻌﺒﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ "ﺍﻳﺒﺲ ﻛﺮﻭﺱ ‪،"EpisKros‬ﻭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﻟﻌﺒﺔ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﲤﺎﺭﺱ ﺑﲔ ﻛﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺍﳋﺪﻡ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ‪ 27‬ﻻﻋﺒﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻧﺘﻘﻠﺖ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳒﻠﺘﺮﺍ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﻣﺎﻥ‪،‬ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺮﺕ ﳑﺎﺭﺳﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﳒﻠﺘﺮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻣﻨﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﻠﻚ ﺇﺩﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻋﺎﻡ ‪1314‬ﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻮﺍﺭﻉ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﲝﺠﺔ ﺃ‪‬ﺎ ﺗﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺿﺎﺀ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻗﻆ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻼﺋﻜﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻋﺎﺩﺕ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻟﻠﻤﻤﺎﺭﺳﺔ ﻣﺮﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺘﺮﺓ ﻭ ﻇﻠﺖ ﺗﺘﻄﻮﺭ ﻭﻭﺿﻌﺖ ﳍﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﻭﻗﺘﻴﺔ ﺷﻔﻬﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺑﺔ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﻭ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﰲ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻣﻦ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻭ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻼﻋﺐ‬
‫ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﳌﺰﺍﻭﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻨﻒ ﳑﺎﺭﺳﺘﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﰲ ﳏﺎﺭﺑﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﺴﺆﻭﱄ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺗﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﺑﲔ ﻟﻌﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﱯ ﻭ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺣﱴ ﻋﺎﻡ ‪1845‬ﻡ ﺣﻴﺚ ﰎ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﰲ ﻋﺎﻡ ‪1848‬ﻡ ﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﳉﻨﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻛﻤﱪﺩﺝ ﺑﻮﺿﻊ ﺃﻭﻝ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺑﺔ ﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﰲ ﻋﺎﻡ ‪1862‬ﻡ ﻗﺎﻡ "ﺍﺩﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﺮﻧﺞ" ﻧﺎﻇﺮ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺔ "ﺍﺑﻴﻨﺠﻬﺎﻡ" ﺑﺈﺻﺪﺍﺭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﻣﻦ ‪ 10‬ﺑﻨﻮﺩ ﻣﻌﺪﻻ‬
‫ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﻛﻤﱪﺩﺝ‪.‬‬
‫ﰲ ‪ 26‬ﺃﻛﺘﻮﺑﺮ ‪1863‬ﻡ ﰎ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﺃﻭﻝ ﺍﲢﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺓ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺭﲰﻲ ﻫﻮ"ﺍﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﳒﻠﺘﺮﺍ ﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ"‪.‬‬
‫ﰲ ﻋﺎﻡ ‪1871‬ﻡ ﰎ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻭ ﻫﻲ "ﻛﺎﺱ ﺍﳒﻠﺘﺮﺍ ﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ" ﻭ ﻓﺎﺯ‬
‫‪‬ﺎ ﻧﺎﺩﻱ "ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻧﺪﺭﺍﺭﺯ ‪ 0-1‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﺳﻼﺡ ﺍﳌﻬﻨﺪﺳﲔ" ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺩﻯ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺒﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ‪.‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒـﺪﻩ ﺻـﺎﱀ ﺍﻟـﻮﺣﺶ‪،‬ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑـﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﳏﻤـﺪ‪:‬ﺃﺳﺎﺳـﻴﺎﺕ ﻛـﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘـﺪﻡ‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﻋـﺎﱂ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ‪،‬ﻣﺆﺳﺴـﺔ ﳐﺘـﺎﺭ ﻟﻠﻨﺸـﺮ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪،1994،‬ﺹ‪.08‬‬
‫ﰲ ﻋﺎﻡ ‪1888‬ﻡ ﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﳒﻠﺘﺮﺍ "‪."The Football Leage‬‬
‫ﰲ ﻋﺎﻡ ‪1904‬ﻡ ﺃﻧﺸﺊ " ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﱄ ﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ"‪The Football International -‬‬
‫‪.(F.I.F.A)"Fédération Association‬‬
‫ﰲ ﻋﺎﻡ ‪1930‬ﻡ ﺃﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺃﻭﻝ ﺑﻄﻮﻟﺔ ﻟﻜﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﻮﺍﻱ ﻭ ﻓﺎﺯﺕ ﺍﺭﺟﻮﺍﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺋﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺭﺟﻨﺘﲔ)‪.(2-4‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -1-1‬ﺃﻫﻢ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺗﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﺮﺕ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﲟﺤﻄﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﻄﻮﻳﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﲢﻮﳍﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﳊﺎﱄ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ﻧﻠﺨﺺ‬
‫ﻟﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻠﺴﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﳜﻲ ﳌﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺗﻄﻮﺭ ﻟﻌﺒﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪:‬‬
‫‪ :1845‬ﻭﺿﻌﺖ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻛﻤﱪﺩﺝ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻟﻠﻌﺒﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1855‬ﺃﺳﺲ ﺃﻭ ﻧﺎﺩ ﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﱪﻳﻄﺎﻧﻴﺎ )ﻧﺎﺩﻱ ﺷﻴﻔﻴﻠﺪ ﻳﻮﻧﺎﻳﺘﺪ(‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1863‬ﺃﺳﺲ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﱪﻳﻄﺎﱐ ﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ )ﺃﻭﻝ ﺍﲢﺎﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ(‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1870‬ﲰﺢ ﳊﺎﺭﺱ ﺍﳌﺮﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﻳﺪﻳﻪ ﻟﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﻭﻣﺴﻜﻬﺎ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1875‬ﺣﺪﺩ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﻋﺎﺭﺿﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﻣﻰ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1878‬ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﻠﺖ ﺻﻔﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1880‬ﻭﺿﻌﺖ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺭﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺎﺱ ﺑﺎﻟﻴﺪﻳﻦ‪.‬‬
‫‪:1882‬ﻋﻘﺪ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﻥ ﻣﺆﲤﺮ ﺩﻭﱄ ﺿﻢ ﻣﻨﺪﻭﰊ ﺍﲢﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺑﺮﻳﻄﺎﻧﻴﺎ‪ ،‬ﺳﻜﻮﺗﻠﻨﺪﺍ‪ ،‬ﺃﻳﺮﻟﻨﺪﺍ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﻠﺰ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﻘﺮﺭ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍﺍﳌﺆﲤﺮ‬
‫ﺇﻧﺸﺎﺀ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺩﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻹﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻨﻔﻴﺬ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭﺗﻌﺪﻳﻠﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﻑ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﱄ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺴﻪ ﳍﺬﻩ‬
‫ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪:1890‬ﻃﺒﻘﺖ ﺭﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺎﺱ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1891‬ﺗﻘﺮﺭ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﺔ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﳌﺮﻣﻰ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﺮﺭ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺿﺮﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ‪.‬‬
‫‪:1895‬ﺗﻘﺮﺭ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺡ ﺑﺎﻻﺣﺘﺮﺍﻑ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ ﺻﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺶ‪،‬ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﳏﻤﺪ‪:‬ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ‪،‬ﺹ‪.08‬‬
‫‪-2‬ﺳﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ‪:‬ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ‪،‬ﻁ‪،2‬ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺔ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻟﻠﻄﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ‪،‬ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﺻﻞ‪،‬ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ‪،1987،‬ﺹ‪.11‬‬
‫‪:1904‬ﺗﺄﺳﺲ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﱄ ﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ‪ FIFA‬ﻭ ﺗﻀﻢ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﺎ ‪ 193‬ﺍﲢﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻃﲏ ﺗﺘﺠﻤﻊ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺔ‬
‫ﺍﲢﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻗﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﳉﻐﺮﺍﰲ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﻀﻴﻢ ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﺎﺕ ﻋﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﻨﻮﺍﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺨﺒﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻃﻨﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ :1907‬ﺗﺄﺳﺲ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﱪﻳﻄﺎﱐ ﻟﻠﻬﻮﺍﺓ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1916‬ﺗﻘﺮﺭ ﻓﺮﺽ ﺿﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﺧﻞ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﻳﺎﺕ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1925‬ﻭﺿﻌﺖ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺣﺪﺩﺕ ﺣﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻠﻞ )ﺃﻭﻓﺪ ﺳﺎﻳﺪ(‪.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪ :1928‬ﺍﻧﻔﺼﻠﺖ ﺑﺮﻳﻄﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﱄ ﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1930‬ﻓﺎﺯﺕ ﺍﻷﺭﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺑﻜﺄﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﺭﺟﻨﺘﲔ ‪.2-4‬‬
‫‪:1931‬ﻭﺿﻌﺖ ﻋﻘﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺭﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺎﺱ ﺑﻨﻘﻞ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻟﻠﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﲰﺢ ﳊﺎﺭﺱ ﺍﳌﺮﻣﻰ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﳜﻄﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﺧﻄﻮﺍﺕ ﺑﺪﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1934‬ﻓﺎﺯﺕ ﺇﻳﻄﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﺑﻜﺄﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‬
‫‪:1935‬ﺟﺮﺕ ﳏﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﺗﻌﻴﲔ ﺣﻜﻤﲔ ﻟﻠﻤﺒﺎﺭﺍﺓ‪.‬‬
‫‪:1937‬ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﻗﻮﺱ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ﺑﻌﺸﺮ ﻳﺎﺭﺩﺍﺕ)‪(9.15‬ﻡ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﻋﻼﻣﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1938‬ﻋﺪﻝ ﺗﺒﻮﻳﺐ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1939‬ﺗﻘﺮﺭ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺃﺭﻗﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ ﻭﺗﻮﻗﻔﺖ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﲰﻴﺔ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﳊﺮﺏ‪.‬‬
‫‪:1942‬ﺗﻘﺮﺭ ﺗﺄﺟﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ ﻟﻜﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺳﺘﻘﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﱪﺍﺯﻳﻞ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﳊﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1945‬ﺍﺳﺘﺄﻧﻔﺖ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﲰﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1946‬ﻋﺎﺩ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﱪﻳﻄﺎﱐ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﱄ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1949‬ﺃﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺃﻭﻝ ﺩﻭﺭﺓ ﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﲔ ﺩﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮ ﺍﻷﺑﻴﺾ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1950‬ﺗﻘﺮﺭ ﺇﻧﺸﺎﺀ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﺕ ﻋﺴﻜﺮﻳﺔ ﺩﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﺭﺷﻴﺪ ﻓﺮﺣﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ‪:‬ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻋﺔ ﻛﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ‪،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻀﲑ ﻟﻠﻌﺒﻮﺭ‪،‬ﻃﺒﻌﺔ‪،2،1999‬ﺹ‪.217‬‬
‫‪-2‬ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﳎﻴﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﱃ‪:‬ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪،‬ﻁ‪،2‬ﻋﻤﺎﻥ‪ ,1999،‬ﺹ‪.09‬‬
‫‪ :1953‬ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻟﻌﺒﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺑﺮﺯ ﺃﻟﻌﺎ‪‬ﺎ )ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ(‪.‬‬
‫‪:1954‬ﺃﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺴﺔ ﻟﻜﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺑﺴﻮﻳﺴﺮﺍ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭﻱ‪،‬ﺟﺮﺕ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺃﳌﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺍ‪‬ﺮ)‪.(2-3‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ :1955‬ﺩﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺃﻟﻌﺎ‪‬ﺎ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1957‬ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻧﻈﻤﺘﻬﺎ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ‪.‬‬
‫‪:1959‬ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻛﺎﺱ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﻭﰊ‪.‬‬
‫‪:1961‬ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻛﺎﺱ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﺔ ﺍﻷﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﻭﺑﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪:1962‬ﺇﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﻟﻜﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺷﺎﺭﻙ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ‪ 16‬ﻣﻨﺘﺨﺐ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺋﻲ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯﻳﻞ ﻭ ﺗﺸﻴﻜﻮﺳﻠﻮﻓﺎﻛﻴﺎ‪.1-3‬‬
‫‪ :1963‬ﺃﻭﻝ ﺩﻭﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ "ﻛﺄﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ" ﻧﻈﻤﻬﺎ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻠﺒﻨﺎﱐ ﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1964‬ﺩﻭﺭﺓ "ﻛﺄﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ" ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺗﻮﻧﺲ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1965‬ﺩﻭﺭﺓ "ﻛﺄﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ" ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻳﺖ‪.‬‬
‫‪:1966‬ﻛﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻣﻨﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳒﻠﺘﺮﺍ ﻓﺰﺕ ‪‬ﺎ ﺍﳒﻠﺘﺮﺍ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1967‬ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﰲ ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺃﻟﻌﺎ‪‬ﺎ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1969‬ﺩﻭﺭﺓ "ﻛﺄﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ" ﰲ ﻣﻜﺴﻴﻜﻮ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1974‬ﺩﻭﺭﺓ "ﻛﺄﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ" ﰲ ﻣﻴﻮﻧﻴﺦ‪.‬‬
‫‪:1982‬ﺑﻄﻮﻟﺔ ﻛﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺑﺎﺳﺒﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺄﻫﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ‪ 24‬ﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎ ﻟﻸﺩﻭﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻋﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ‪-‬ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻳﺖ‪ -‬ﻭ ﺗﻮﺝ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺨﺐ ﺍﻻﻳﻄﺎﱄ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺄﺱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﻮﺯﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﳌﺎﻧﻴﺎ)‪.(1-3‬‬
‫‪ :1986‬ﺑﻄﻮﻟﺔ ﻛﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻜﺴﻴﻚ ﻭ ﺗﺄﻫﻞ ﻟﻸﺩﻭﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻐﺮﺏ ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‬
‫ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻕ ﻭ ﻓﺎﺯ ﺑﺒﻄﻮﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﺭﺟﻨﺘﲔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1990‬ﺑﻄﻮﻟﺔ ﻛﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺑﺎﻳﻄﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻓﺎﺯ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺨﺐ ﺍﻷﳌﺎﱐ ﺿﺪ ﺍﻷﺭﺟﻨﺘﲔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺣﺴﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺩ‪ :‬ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬ﻁ‪ ،7‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻟﻠﻤﻼﻳﲔ‪ ،‬ﺑﲑﻭﺕ‪،‬ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ‪،1984،‬ﺹ‪.10-09‬‬
‫‪ :1994‬ﺑﻄﻮﻟﺔ ﻛﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﰲ ﺃﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺗﻘﺮﺭ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭﺓ ﻣﻨﻊ ﻣﺴﻚ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺎﺭﺱ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﺟﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﺎﻋﺪﺍ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﺭﺟﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ‪،‬ﻓﺎﺯﺕ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯﻳﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻳﻄﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﺑﻀﺮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻴﺢ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1998‬ﺑﻄﻮﻟﺔ ﻛﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﰲ ﻓﺮﻧﺴﺎ ﺍﺩﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳍﺪﻑ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﻭ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﲰﻲ ﻭ‬
‫ﺩﺧﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻹﺿﺎﰲ ﻓﺎﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﺠﻞ ﻳﻔﻮﺯ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ‪،‬ﻭ ﻓﺎﺯﺕ ‪‬ﺎ ﻓﺮﻧﺴﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯﻳﻞ)‪.(0-3‬‬
‫‪ :2002‬ﺑﻄﻮﻟﺔ ﻛﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﰲ ﻛﻮﺭﻳﺎ ﺍﳉﻨﻮﺑﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻭ ﰎ ﺇﻟﻐﺎﺀ ﺍﳍﺪﻑ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ‪،‬ﻓﺎﺯﺕ ‪‬ﺎ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯﻳﻞ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﳌﺎﻧﻴﺎ)‪.(0-2‬‬
‫‪ :2006‬ﺑﻄﻮﻟﺔ ﻛﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﰲ ﺃﳌﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻭ ﻓﺎﺯﺕ ‪‬ﺎ ﺍﻳﻄﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﻧﺴﺎ ﺑﻀﺮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻴﺢ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪-2-1‬ﺃﻫﻢ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺗﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺃﻱ ﺑﻠﺪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﲢﺘﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺷﻌﺒﻴﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ‪،‬ﻭ ﻫﻲ ﺗﺴﻌﻰ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺟﻞ ﺍﺣﺘﻼﻝ‬
‫ﻣﻜﺎﻧﺔ ﻣﺸﺮﻓﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺒﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻌﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻲ‪،‬ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﻣﺮﺕ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫ﲟﺤﻄﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻫﺎﻣﺔ ﰲ ﻣﺴﲑ‪‬ﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﳜﻴﺔ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﺞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‪1895):‬ﻡ‪1962-‬ﻡ(‪:‬‬‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻔﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ "ﻋﻤﺮ ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺍﻳﺲ" ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺳﺲ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﺭﲰﻲ ﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻳﺘﻤﺜﻞ‬
‫ﰲ ﻣﻮﻟﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪ ،‬ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﻘﺴﻨﻄﻴﻨﺔ‬
‫‪CSC‬‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻧﺎﺩﻱ‬
‫ﺗﺄﺳﺲ ﻗﺒﻞ ‪.1921‬‬
‫ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺲ ﻣﻮﻟﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ ﺗﺄﺳﺴﺖ ﻋﺪﺓ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﺜﻞ‪ ):‬ﻏﺎﱄ ﻣﻌﺴﻜﺮ‪،‬ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ‬
‫ﻟﻮﻫﺮﺍﻥ‪،‬ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻟﻠﺒﻠﻴﺪﺓ ﻭ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﻠﺠﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪،‬ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﺍ ﳊﺎﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻱ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎﺀﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺟﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﻀﻤﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺘﻞ ﻟﺼﺪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ‪.‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﳎﻠﺔ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺩﺙ‪:‬ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪ 118،23‬ﻣﺎﻱ ‪،1986‬ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪،‬ﺹ‪.38‬‬
‫‪-2‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭﻱ‪:‬ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ ﻓﻮﺯ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻖ‪،‬ﺟﺮﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺎﻙ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪،26‬ﻧﻮﻓﻤﱪ‪،1993‬ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪،‬ﺹ‪.23‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﶈﻘﻘﺔ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻼﺕ ﲡﻤﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫ﻣﻊ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﻌﻤﺮﻳﻦ‪،‬ﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﱄ ﺃﺻﺒﺤﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺧﲑﺓ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ ﻧﻈﺮﺍ ﻟﺘﺰﺍﻳﺪ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻳﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﺗﺘﻔﻄﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻄﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻧﺴﻴﺔ ‪،‬ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲡﺮﻯ ﺗﻌﻄﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺻﺔ‬
‫ﻷﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ ﻟﻠﺘﺠﻤﻊ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻛﻞ ﻟﻘﺎﺀ‪،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺣﺪﺛﺖ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻛﺎﺕ ﻋﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ‬
‫ﲨﻌﺖ ﻣﻮﻟﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ ﺑﻔﺮﻳﻖ "ﺳﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻭﺟﲔ" ﺑﺒﻮﻟﻮﻏﲔ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺛﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﲔ‪،‬ﳑﺎ ﺃﺩﻯ ﺑﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﲡﻤﻴﺪ ﺍﻷﻧﺸﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﰲ ‪ 11‬ﻣﺎﺭﺱ ‪ 1952‬ﲡﻨﺒﺎ ﻟﻸﺿﺮﺍﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻠﺤﻖ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﺮﻳﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﺟﺒﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﲏ ﻋﺎﻡ ‪ 1958‬ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻳﻠﻌﺐ ﺁﻧﺬﺍﻙ ﰲ ﺻﻔﻮﻑ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﺳﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﺒﺎﻥ‪،‬ﺳﻮﻓﺎﻥ‪،‬ﺭﻭﺑﺎ‪،‬ﻛﺮﳝﻮﺍ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﳝﺜﻞ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ ﰲ‬
‫ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪) :‬ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ(‪:‬‬‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺲ ﳎﻠﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﲢﺖ ﺇﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ )ﳏﻤﺪ ﻣﻌﻮﺵ(‪،‬‬
‫‪ ،‬ﻓﻤﻨﺬ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪1962‬ﻡ ﺇﱃ ‪1964‬ﻡ ﺷﺮﻉ ﰲ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺈﻧﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳍﻴﺎﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻄﺎﺕ‪،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻧﻈﻤﺖ ﺃﻭﻝ ﺑﻄﻮﻟﺔ ﻭﻃﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﻮﺳﻢ)‪1963 -1962‬ﻡ(‪،‬ﺗﻮﺝ ‪‬ﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻟﻠﺠﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻧﻈﻤﺖ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻛﺎﺱ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻬﻮﺭﻳﺔ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪ 1963‬ﻭ ﻓﺎﺯ ‪‬ﺎ ﻭﻓﺎﻕ‬
‫ﺳﻄﻴﻒ‪،‬ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻭﻝ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻟﻼﲢﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ ﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ )ﳏﻤﺪ ﻣﻌﻮﺵ(‪ ،‬ﻭﺷﻜﻞ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ‬
‫ﻭﻃﲏ ﺃﺟﺮﻯ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﺿﺪ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺨﺐ ﺍﻟﱪﺗﻐﺎﱄ ﻭﻓﺎﺯ ﻣﻨﺘﺨﺒﻨﺎ ﺑﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ )‪ 2‬ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ‪،(1‬ﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﲰﻴﺔ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻟﻌﺐ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺨﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﲏ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻟﻘﺎﺀ ﺭﲰﻲ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺨﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻧﺴﻲ ﺳﻨﺔ‪.1964‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ‪1964‬ﻡ ﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﲏ ﻗﻮﻳﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ ﺍﶈﺘﺮﻓﲔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻟﻌﺒﻮﺍ ﺿﻤﻦ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ‬
‫ﺟﺒﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﻮﻟﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ ﻭﺷﺒﺎﺏ ﺑﻠﻜﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺑﺮﺯ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻳﺔ ﺁﻧﺬﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﳍﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﰲ ﺗﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺗﻄﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻓﺎﺯ ﺷﺒﺎﺏ ﺑﻠﻜﻮﺭ ﺑﻜﺄﺱ ﺍﳌﻐﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﻣﺮﺍﺕ‬
‫‪-1‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭﻱ‪:‬ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ ﻓﻮﺯ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻖ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ‪،‬ﺹ‪.23‬‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﳎﻲﺀ ﺍﻹﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪1976‬ﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﻋﻄﻰ ﺩﻓﻌﺎ ﻗﻮﻳﺎ ﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﻭﺗﺪﺧﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻛﺎﺕ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺟﺎﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﺻﻼﺡ ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻪ ﻭﻣﻨﻪ ﺩﺧﻠﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ ﰲ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺯﺍﺩﺕ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺨﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﲏ ﲟﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﺌﺎﺗﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﳉﻬﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻨﻪ ﺟﺎﺀﺕ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ ﰲ ﻛﺄﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻟﺴﻨﺔ‬
‫‪1982‬ﻡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﻋﻄﺘﻨﺎ ﺍﳊﻤﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﺮﻓﻨﺎﻩ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ‪:‬‬‫ﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﻓﺘﺮﺓ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺗﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ ﺑﻌﺪ ‪1982‬ﻡ‪،‬ﻭ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺣﺘﻤﻴﺔ ﻟﺴﻮﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻄﻴﻂ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻴﲑ ﻭ ﺍﳌﺘﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺔ ﻭ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺼﺔ ﳌﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺘﺮﺓ ﺍﻹﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‬
‫ﺇﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﻴﺠﻴﺔ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﻬﻮﺽ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻝ ﱂ ﺗﺄﺧﺬ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ ﳕﻮﺫﺝ ﺗﺴﲑ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ‬
‫ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯﻳﻠﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻷﳌﺎﱐ ﻭﺗﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻟﺬﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ‬
‫ﻋﺎﻡ ‪1982‬ﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ)‪ 1990‬ﻭ‪2002‬ﻡ(‪:‬‬‫ﺃﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ ﺗﺪﻫﻮﺭﺍ ﺧﻄﲑﺍ ﻭﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺳﺎ ﺳﻠﺒﻴﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺑﺎﳋﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺨﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﲏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻌﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﱄ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭﻱ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻇﻬﺮ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺨﺐ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﺩﻭﺭﺓ ﻛﺄﺱ‬
‫ﺃﻣﻢ ﺇﻓﺮﻳﻘﻴﺎ ﰲ ﻋﺎﻡ ‪1992‬ﻡ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻨﻐﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﲟﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻓﺎ‪‬ﺰﻡ ﰲ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﻛﻮﺕ‬
‫ﺩﻳﻔﻮﺍﺭ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺧﻴﺐ ﺁﻣﺎﻝ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻭﻣﺘﺘﺒﻌﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :1994‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺳﻌﺔ ﻋﺸﺮ )‪ (19‬ﻟﻜﺄﺱ ﺇﻓﺮﻳﻘﻴﺎ ﻟﻸﻣﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﺑﺘﻮﻧﺲ‪ ،‬ﺃﻗﺼﻰ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺨﺐ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻃﲏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﻫﻮ ﻗﻀﻴﺔ "ﻛﺮﻭﻑ"‪ ،‬ﻻﻋﺐ ﺷﺒﻴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﺩﺭﺝ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﲰﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲨﻌﺖ‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺟﺮﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ‪ :‬ﻋﺪﺩ ‪ 20 ،1137‬ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ ‪ ،2002‬ﺹ‪.17‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ ﺑﻨﻈﲑﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻐﺎﱄ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻳﻮﻡ ‪ 10‬ﺟﺎﻧﻔﻲ ‪1993‬ﻡ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺇﻃﺎﺭ ﺗﺼﻔﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﺄﺱ ﺇﻓﺮﻳﻘﻴﺎ ﻟﻸﻣﻢ‬
‫ﺑﺘﻮﻧﺲ ‪1994‬ﻡ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﻗﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻧﻔﺪﺭﺍﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﻓﺮﻳﻘﻴﺔ ﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﻫﻮ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺇﻗﺼﺎﺀ ﺃﻭ ﺣﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺨﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﲏ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﻨﻈﻤﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ‬
‫ﺇﻗﺼﺎﺋﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺼﻔﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﺄﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻟﺴﻨﺔ ‪1994‬ﻡ ﻭ‪ 1998‬ﻭ‪ 2002‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﱄ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻻﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻳﻜﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺮﻧﺴﺎ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻭﻛﻮﺭﻳﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺗﻴﺐ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﲏ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺋﻲ ﻟﻨﻬﺎﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﻳﻦ )‪ (20‬ﻟﻜﺄﺱ ﺇﻓﺮﻳﻘﻴﺎ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪ ،1996‬ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﺗﻮﺍﺻﻠﺖ‬
‫ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﺍﳍﺰﺍﺋﻢ ﻭﺍﻹﻗﺼﺎﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺳﺮﻋﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﲢﻮﻟﺖ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺄﺳﺎﺓ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ‬
‫ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻏﻴﻨﻴﺎ ﺑﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻫﺪﻑ )‪ (01‬ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺻﻔﺮ )‪ (0‬ﻭﺑﻮﺭﻛﻴﻨﺎﻓﺴﻮ ‪‬ﺪﻓﲔ )‪ (02‬ﳍﺪﻑ )‪(01‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :2000‬ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﻭﻥ )‪ (22‬ﻟﻜﺄﺱ ﺇﻓﺮﻳﻘﻴﺎ ﺳﺠﻠﻨﺎ ﺍﻧﺴﺤﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﺘﺨﺒﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻊ‬
‫‪‬ﺎﺋﻲ ﺃﻳﻦ ﺍ‪‬ﺰﻡ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﻣﻨﺘﺨﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ‪‬ﺪﻓﲔ )‪ (02‬ﳍﺪﻑ )‪.(01‬‬
‫‪ :2002‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﻭﻥ )‪ (23‬ﻟﻜﺄﺱ ﺇﻓﺮﻳﻘﻴﺎ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﺭﺓ "ﻣﺎﱄ" ﺃﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺴﺤﺐ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﲏ ﻣﺒﻜﺮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺄﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ‪.‬‬
‫‪ :2004‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﻭﻥ )‪ (24‬ﻟﻜﺄﺱ ﺇﻓﺮﻳﻘﻴﺎ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ﺃﻳﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺴﺤﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﲏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺋﻲ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺨﺐ ﺍﳌﻐﺮﰊ ﺑﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻫﺪﺍﻑ )‪ (03‬ﳍﺪﻑ‬
‫ﻭﺍﺣﺪ )‪.(01‬‬
‫‪ :2006‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﱂ ﻳﺘﺄﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﲏ ﺇﱃ ﻛﺄﺱ ﺇﻓﺮﻳﻘﻴﺎ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺟﺮﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ‪ :‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪.17‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -3-1‬ﺍﳌﺸﺎﺭﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ ﺑﺎﻷﺭﻗﺎﻡ ﰲ ﻛﺄﺱ ﺇﻓﺮﻳﻘﻴﺎ ﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺄﺧﻮﺫﺓ ﻟﺴﻨﺔ‪:2002‬‬
‫*ﺍﺛﻨﺎ ﻋﺸﺮ )‪ (12‬ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﰲ ‪‬ﺎﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﺄﺱ ﺇﻓﺮﻳﻘﻴﺎ ﻟﻸﻣﻢ‪.‬‬
‫*ﻟﻌﺐ )‪ (47‬ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺳﺠﻞ )‪ (58‬ﻫﺪﻑ‪ ،‬ﺗﻠﻘﻰ )‪ (49‬ﻫﺪﻑ‪.‬‬
‫*ﻓﺎﺯ ﰲ )‪ (17‬ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﰲ )‪ (16‬ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍ‪‬ﺰﻡ ﰲ )‪ (04‬ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻼﺕ‪.‬‬
‫*ﻓﺎﺯ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺄﺱ ﻣﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻋﺎﻡ )‪ (1990‬ﺍﳌﻨﻈﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪.‬‬
‫*ﺍﺣﺘﻞ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ ﻣﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻋﺎﻡ )‪.(1982‬‬
‫*ﺗﺄﻫﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺋﻲ ﻣﺮﺗﲔ ﻋﺎﻡ )‪ (1996‬ﻭ)‪.(2000‬‬
‫*ﺃﻗﺼﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﲬﺲ ﻣﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻮﺍﺕ )‪،1998 ،1992 ،1986 ،1968‬‬
‫‪.(2002‬‬
‫*ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﰲ )‪ (2002‬ﻟﻠﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﲏ "ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻔﻴﻆ ﺗﺎﺳﻔﺎﻭﺕ" ﺑـ ‪ 4‬ﻫﺪﻑ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1-2‬ﻣﻼﻣﺢ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺃﺛﺒﺘﺖ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺍﺓ ﻛﺮﺓ ﻗﺪﻡ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﻋﺎﱄ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ‪ 72‬ﺇﱃ ‪ 109‬ﺗﺴﺎﺭﻉ‪« accélérations brutales ».‬‬‫ﻣﻦ ‪ 40‬ﺇﱃ ‪ 70‬ﺻﺪ ﺯﺍﺋﺪ ﺗﻐﻴﲑ ﺍﲡﺎﻩ ‪« blocages +changements de‬‬‫» ‪direction‬‬
‫‪ 6‬ﺿﺮﺑﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻘﺐ » ‪. « tacles‬‬‫‪ 13‬ﻣﺮﺍﻭﻏﺔ » ‪« dribbles‬‬‫‪ 11‬ﺿﺮﺑﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺃﺱ‪.‬‬‫‪ 30‬ﺻﺮﺍﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻛﺮﺓ» ‪« luttes sans ballon‬‬‫‪27‬ﺻﺮﺍﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺮﺓ» ‪« lutte avec ballon‬‬‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﳋﺼﻮﺹ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﺓ ﻛﻞ ‪ 43‬ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺟﺮﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ‪ :‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪.18‬‬
‫‪-Cazorla et fahri: exigences physiques et physiologiques actuelles¸ revue EPS n 273¸ sep oct. 1998 2‬‬
‫ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻥ ﻻﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ‪:‬‬
‫• ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﻭ ﻗﻮﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺟﻞ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﺟﺰﺓ ﻭ ﺣﺎﲰﺔ» ‪« brèves et décisives‬‬
‫• ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺘﻤﺘﻊ ﺑﺼﻔﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﻭﻣﺔ‪،‬ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﺘﻜﺮﺭ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﺟﺰﺓ ﻭ ﺣﺎﲰﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ -2-2‬ﻣﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1-2-2‬ﺍﳌﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﱐ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﻌﲏ ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﱐ ﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﺑﺴﻂ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺮﻳﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﻄﻰ ﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ ‪‬ﺪﻑ‬
‫ﺇﻛﺴﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﳑﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﻳﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺒﺔ‪.‬‬
‫*‪-2‬ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﱐ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﱐ ﻟﻼﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻓﺮﻋﲔ ﺭﺋﻴﺴﲔ ﳘﺎ‪:‬‬
‫*‪-1-2‬ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﱐ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ‪:‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺇﻛﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺰﻧﺔ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺃﳘﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻤﻞ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺮﺷﺎﻗﺔ ﻭ ﺍﳌﺮﻭﻧﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻭ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺒﲎ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﱐ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ‪.‬‬
‫*‪-2-2‬ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﱐ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ‪:‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺇﻛﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ)ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ( ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﺒﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬ﻭ‬
‫ﻗﺪ ﺍﲨﻊ ﺧﱪﺍﺀ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ‪‬ﺎ ﲬﺲ ﻭ ﻫﻲ"ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﻴﺔ‪-‬ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻤﻞ‪-‬ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻋﺔ‪-‬ﺍﻟﺮﺷﺎﻗﺔ‪-‬ﺍﳌﺮﻭﻧﺔ"‪.‬‬
‫‪1-Bernard Turpin: Prèparation et entrainement du footballeur¸Edition Amphora¸ paris¸novembre 2002.p24‬‬
‫‪-2‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ ﺻﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺶ‪،‬ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﳏﻤﺪ‪:‬ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ‪،‬ﺹ‪.91‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪-2-2-2‬ﺍﳌﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ‪:‬‬
‫*‪-‬ﻣﻔﻬـﻮﻡ ﺍﳌﻬـﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴـﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻫﻲ ﻛﻞ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺆﺩﻯ ‪‬ﺪﻑ ﳏﺪﺩ ﰲ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺒﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﻫﻲ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻻﳒﺎﺯ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﻳﺎﺕ‪.‬ﻭ ﻳﻬﺪﻑ ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻴـﺔ‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺃﻭ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻭ ﳏﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﺇﺗﻘﺎ‪‬ﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﻐﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﳑﻜﻦ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫*‪‬ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﻳﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺮﺓ‪ ‬‬
‫* ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺮﻳﺮ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺮﻳﺮ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﺔ ﺭﺑﻂ ﺃﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻻﻋﺒﲔ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ‪ ،‬ﺗﺴﻤﺢ ﺑﺘﻔﺎﺩﻱ ﻻﻋﱯ ﺍﳋﺼﻢ ﻭﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﻴﻞ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻌﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻔﻀﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺣﺮﻛﻲ ﳏﺪﺩ )ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﻳﺐ(‪.‬‬
‫*ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﻫﻮ ﺇﺧﻀﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﲢﺖ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺐ ﻭﺍﳍﻴﻤﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺟﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺓ ﻋـﻦ‬
‫ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﳋﺼﻢ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻠﺘﺼﺮﻑ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻇﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺗﺘﻢ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻔﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﻨﺨﻔﻀـﺔ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻔـﺎﻉ ﺃﻭ‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﺮﺗﻔﻌﺔ‪.‬‬
‫*ﺍﳉﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺮﺓ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺮﻱ ﰲ ﺧﻂ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ‪،‬ﻣﺘﻌﺮﺝ‪،‬ﻣﻨﺤﲏ‪ ،‬ﻣﺴﺘﻌﻤﻼ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻻﻣﺎﻣﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﲝﻴﺚ ﻧﺒﺤﺚ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﳉﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﻋﻦ‪:‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ ﺻﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺶ‪،‬ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﳏﻤﺪ‪:‬ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ‪،‬ﺹ‪.67‬‬
‫‪3– Bernard turpin : préparation et entrainement du footballeur, édition amphora, paris ,France, 1996, p99.‬‬
‫‪ –3‬ﺣﻨﻔﻲ ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﳐﺘﺎﺭ ‪ :‬ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﻣﺼﺮ ‪ ،1997 ،‬ﺹ ‪.54‬‬
‫ﺗﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﳋﻄﻮﺓ‪.‬‬‫ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﻞ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ)ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ(‪:‬ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺴﻦ ﺍﳉﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳚﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﻭ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ‬‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻣﺮﻓﻮﻋﺔ ﻟﻸﻣﺎﻡ‪.‬‬
‫* ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻭﻏــﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻫﻲ ﺍﳊﻔﺎﻅ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻏﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﻭ ﲪﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟـﺘﺨﻠﺺ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻭﻏﺔ ﺇﱃ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﺮﺍﻭﻏﺔ ﻟﻠﺤﻤﺎﻳﺔ ﺃﻳﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﲝﻤﺎﻳﺔ ﻛﺮﺗﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻏﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻀﺎﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳋﺼﻢ‪.‬‬‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻣﺮﺍﻭﻏﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺟﻞ ﺍﳍﺠﻮﻡ ﺃﻳﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺨﻠﺺ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻠﻴﻄﻪ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﺀ ﻫﺠﻮﻡ‪.‬‬‫*ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﻳـﺐ‪:‬‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳍﺠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻱ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﺘﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻣﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴـﺰ‬
‫ﻭﻣﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﻓﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺿﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﺗﺄﰐ ﻓﺮﺻﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺑﻌـﺪ‬
‫ﺍﶈﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﲔ ﻻﻋﺒﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﳚﺐ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺮﺭ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﺼﻮﺏ‪،‬‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﺭﻙ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻧﻮﺍﺣﻲ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻒ ﰲ ﺣﺎﺭﺱ ﻣﺮﻣﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺲ‪.‬‬
‫‪ 3-2-2‬ﺍﳌﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﳋﻄﻄﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ‪:‬‬
‫*‪-‬ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﳋﻄﻄﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﻌﲏ ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﳋﻄﻄﻲ ﺇﻛﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳋﻄﻄﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺇﺗﻘﺎ‪‬ﺎ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺮﻑ ﰲ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﻭ ﺍﳌﺘﻐﲑﺓ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺓ‪.‬‬
‫*‪-‬ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﳋﻄﻂ‪:‬ﺗﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﳋﻄﻂ ﺇﱃ ﻧﻮﻋﲔ ﳘﺎ‪:‬‬
‫*ﺍﳋﻄﻂ ﺍﳍﺠﻮﻣﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺰﺃﻳﻦ ﺭﺋﻴﺴﲔ ﳘﺎ‪":‬ﺍﳋﻄﻂ ﺍﳍﺠﻮﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ)ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺐ ﺍﳍﺠﻮﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ(‪،‬ﻭ ﺍﳋﻄﻂ ﺍﳍﺠﻮﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ"‪.‬‬
‫‪1– Bernard turpin : préparation et entrainement du footballeur, op ct, p85.‬‬
‫‪2– Bernard turpin : préparation et entrainement du footballeur, op ct, p87.‬‬
‫‪ –3‬ﺣﻨﻔﻲ ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﳐﺘﺎﺭ ‪ :‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪.106‬‬
‫*ﺍﳋﻄﻂ ﺍﻟﺪﻓﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺰﺃﻳﻦ ﺭﺋﻴﺴﲔ ﳘﺎ‪":‬ﺍﳋﻄﻂ ﺍﻟﺪﻓﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ)ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺐ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻓﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ(‪،‬ﻭ ﺍﳋﻄﻂ ﺍﻟﺪﻓﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ"‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ 4-2-2‬ﺍﳌﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ‪:‬‬
‫*‪-‬ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ " ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻋﻼﻭﻱ " ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﺗﻄﻮﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺻﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﺘﺮﻁ‬
‫ﻟﻺ‪‬ﺎﺀ ﺍﳉﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ﰲ ﺷﺮﻁ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﺎﻟﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺳﲑﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻫﺞ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻭﳏﺪﻭﺩﺓ ﻭﻣﻮﺟﻬﺔ ﳓﻮ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳜﻠﻖ ﻭﻳﻨﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﻓﻊ ﻭﺍﻻﲡﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﳚﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺮﺗﻜﺰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻗﺘﻨﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻄﻮﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﻹﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪.‬‬
‫*‪-‬ﳏﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﳚﺐ ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺷﺮ ﻟﻠﻔﺮﺩ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺩﺧﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻟﻦ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﻈﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﲑ ﺍﳌﺪﻯ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫ﻳﻮﺿﺤﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﱄ‪:‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ ﺻﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺶ‪،‬ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﳏﻤﺪ‪:‬ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ‪،‬ﺹ‪.91‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﺴﻄﻮﺳﻲ‪ :‬ﺳﺒﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻀﻤﺎﺭ ﻭﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﻧﺸﺮ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ‪ ،‬ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ‪ ،1998 ،‬ﺹ ‪.273‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﻋﺰﺕ ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﺷﻒ‪ :‬ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪ ،1991 ،‬ﺹ ‪.13-11‬‬
‫ﳏﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‬
‫ﳏﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﻓﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‬
‫ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‬
‫ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ‬
‫ﻭﺃﺳﺎﻟﻴﺒﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺪﺍﻏﻮﺟﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻌﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‬
‫ﻭﺧﺼﺎﺋﺼﻬﺎ ﺣﺴﺐ‪:‬‬
‫× ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﺭﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ‪.‬‬
‫× ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻲ‪.‬‬
‫× ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﱄ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻃﻔﻲ‪.‬‬
‫× ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺣﻲ‪.‬‬
‫× ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﺮﺭ‪.‬‬
‫× ﲡﻨﺐ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﺒﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫× ﺇﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺁﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﺣﺮﻛﻴﺔ ﻟﺘﻌﻤﻴﻤﻬﺎ ﰲ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﻓﺮﺓ‪.‬‬
‫× ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﻭﺍﳌﺘﻤﺤﻮﺭﺓ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻭﺍﳌﺒﻨﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻮﻱ‪.‬‬
‫× ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻈﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﱐ‪.‬‬
‫ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻃﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻭﺧﺼﺎﺋﺼﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺣﺴﺐ‪:‬‬
‫× ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫× ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻴﻄﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﻛﺒﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪.3‬ﳕﻮﺫﺝ ﺧﻄﺔ ﺳﻨﻮﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪:‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪-1‬ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ‪:‬ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﺪﺍﻓﻪ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﳑﻜﻦ ﻃﺒﻘﺎ ﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﻳﺎﺕ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﻳﺔ ﻟﻼﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﻳﺎﺕ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ )(‪ :‬ﳕﻮﺫﺝ ﳋﻄﺔ ﺳﻨﻮﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻀﲑ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻢ‬
‫‪ - 01‬ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻨﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﻼﻗﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺒﺎﺕ‬
‫ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻣﻲ‪ -‬ﺍﻻﻧﻀﺒﺎﻁ‪ -‬ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ‪.‬‬‫ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﰲ ﺿﺒﻂ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﰐ ﻣﻊ‬‫ﺍﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﶈﻴﻄﺔ ﺑﺎﳌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺓ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 02‬ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﻱ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻠﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻐﺮﺍﺕ )ﺍﳋﻠﻞ( ﰲ ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ‬‫ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 03‬ﲢﻀﲑ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺘﻮﻗﻌﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻮﱘ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻗﻒ‪ -‬ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﻴﺬ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﻙ ﻟﻠﻘﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬‫ﺍﳌﺘﺨﺬﺓ ﻣﻊ ﲢﻤﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 04‬ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺻﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ‬‫ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺪ ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ‪.‬‬‫ ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻜﲑ ﺑﻌﻤﻖ ﻭﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻭﻣﺮﻭﻧﺔ‪.‬‬‫‪ -‬ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﻉ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 05‬ﺭﻓﻊ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ ‪ -‬ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﺓ – ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺰ‪ -‬ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺭﺑﺎﻃﺔ ﺍﳉﺄﺵ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪.‬‬‫ﺍﶈﻴﻄﺔ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻼﺋﻤﺔ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺓ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ‪ :‬ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﰲ ﲣﻄﻴﻂ ﻭﺗﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‪،‬ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﻭﻣﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺷﻌﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻴـﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻹﺳـﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ‪،‬‬
‫‪ ،2001‬ﺹ‪.287‬‬
‫‪ - 06‬ﲢﺴﲔ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻟﺘﻨﻔﻴﺬ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻟﺘﻨﻔﻴﺬ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺑﺔ‪.‬‬‫ ﺇﺗﻘﺎﻥ ﺃﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻲ‪.‬‬‫ ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺰ ﻟﻔﺘﺮﺓ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺗﻨﻔﻴﺬ‬‫ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺑﺔ ) ﺿﺮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ (‪.‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻈﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﻟﺘﻨﻔﻴﺬ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺓ‬
‫‪ - 07‬ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺀﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻗﺪ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﺘﺮﻙ‬‫ﰲ ﺗﻨﻔﻴﺬ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ‬‫ﺗﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﻟﻠﺤﺮﻛﺔ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 08‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﰐ ﻟﻠﺤﺎﻟﺔ ‪ -‬ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﰐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻈﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻮﺗﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻼﺋﻤﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺮﺧﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﻱ ﻟﻠﻌﻀﻼﺕ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﲢﻮﻳﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺒﺎﻩ‪.‬‬‫‪ - 09‬ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻔﺎﻅ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻔﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ‬
‫ ﺍﳊﺚ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﰐ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ‪.‬‬‫‪ -‬ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺃﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺸﻴﻂ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﺼﺪﺭ‪ :‬ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ‪ :‬ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﰲ ﲣﻄﻴﻂ ﻭﺗﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ‬
‫ﻭﻣﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺷﻌﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ‪ ،2001 ،‬ﺹ‪.287‬‬
‫‪-2‬ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﺒﺎﺭﺍﺓ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﳍﺪﻑ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻼﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺓ‬
‫ﺧﻄﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﺒﺎﺭﺍﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻢ‬
‫‪ - 01‬ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺗﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ‪ -‬ﲨﻊ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﲢﻠﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻇﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺓ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺻﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﺍﻉ ﻟﻠﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺭﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻭﺣﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺺ‬‫ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ‪.‬‬
‫ﺇﻥ ﻭﺟﺪﺕ‪.‬‬
‫ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺒﺎﺕ ﺑﻜﻞ ﺩﻗﺔ ﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺓ ﻭﺗﻨﺸﻴﻂ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﻓﻊ ﻟﻼﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ‬‫‪ - 02‬ﲢﺴﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ‪ -‬ﺍﻟﱪﳎﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺎﻁ‪ ،‬ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺳﻊ ﻷﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ‬
‫ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﳋﻄﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺒﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻭﺍﳌﺸﺎﻋﺮ ﻭﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﲟﺎ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻣﻊ ﻇﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ ﳌﻮﺍﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺒﺎﺕ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﻈﺮﺓ‬‫ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺓ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﰲ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺓ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﳊﺪ ﺍﻷﻗﺼﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻹﳚﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺎﺣﺔ‪.‬‬‫ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﻴﺌﺔ ﻟﻔﺘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﳌﻬﻤﺔ )ﺿﺮﺑﺎﺕ‬‫ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ‪ -‬ﺿﺮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺔ(‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 03‬ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﱄ ﻟﻠﺘﻮﺗﺮ ﻭﺍﻻﺣﺘﻔﺎﻅ ‪ -‬ﺷﺤﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳌﻤﻜﻨﺔ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﺜﺒﺎﺗﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﻳﺎﺕ‪.‬‬
‫ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻼﺋﻤﺔ ﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ‬‫ﺍﳊﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻔﺎﻅ ﲟﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﻋﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳊﻴﻮﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﺠﻬﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﱯ ﻃﺒﻘﺎ ﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺣﺪﻭﺛﻬﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﺼﺪﺭ‪ :‬ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ‪ :‬ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﰲ ﲣﻄﻴﻂ ﻭﺗﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ‬
‫ﻭﻣﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺷﻌﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ‪ ،2001 ،‬ﺹ‪.287‬‬
‫ﺧﻼﺻـﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻛﺨﻼﺻﺔ ﳌﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺃﺻﺒﺤﺖ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺗﻄﻮﺭﺍ ﻭ ﴰﻮﻟﻴـﺔ ﻭ ﳍـﺎ ﺃﺑﻌـﺎﺩ‬
‫ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻋﺔ‪،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﻄﺖ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺣﱴ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻲ‪،‬ﻭ ﺃﺩﺧﻠﺖ ﰲ ﺑـﺮﺍﻣﺞ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﻴﺠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﳌﺔ‪،‬ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﻟﻌﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺗﺘﻨﻮﻉ ﻭ ﺗﺘﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻣـﻦ‬
‫ﺍﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﳒﺎﺯ‪.‬ﻭ ﻳﺴﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺘﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧـﺐ ﺍﻟـﱵ‬
‫ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﺇﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﻛﺮﺓ ﻗﺪﻡ ﻣﺘﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﲟﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺛﺮ‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﻼﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﲤﻬﻴـﺪ‪:‬‬
‫ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺳﻨﺘﻄﺮﻕ ﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳋﻄﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺃﻭ ﻧﻔﻲ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﺘﻤﺜﻞ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻟﲔ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﳌﻜﺎﱐ ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﳎﺘﻤﻊ ﻭ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﳌﺘﺒﻊ ‪،‬ﻭ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻦ ﰒ ﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﳉﺔ ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ‬
‫ﺍﶈﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻔﺴﲑﺍﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺎ‪‬ﺎ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻭ ﺍﳋﺮﻭﺝ ﲝﻠﻮﻝ‬
‫ﳌﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﰒ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺃﻭ ﻧﻔﻲ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺎﺕ ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﲔ ‪‬ﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﰲ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﲝﺜﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻭﺍﻷﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺴﺘﻬﺪﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﲢﻘﻴﻘﻬﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ‪" :‬ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﳌﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳍﺪﻑ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳋﻴﻂ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﺮﺋﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺸﺪ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﺣﱴ ‪‬ﺎﻳﺘﻪ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ"‪.‬‬
‫ﻫﺬﺍ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﰲ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﰎ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺇﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺧﻄﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﳌﻼﺋﻤﺘﻪ ﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻔﻲ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ‪" :‬ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﲑ ﻟﻠﻈﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻤﻲ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻫﻮ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻟﻮﺻﻒ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﻭﺳﺔ ﻭﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻫﺎ ﻛﻤﻴﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﲨﻊ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﻘﻨﻨﺔ ﻋﻦ‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﻭﺗﺼﻨﻴﻔﻬﺎ ﻭﲢﻠﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﺇﺧﻀﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻘﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻳﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﻭﺟﻴﻪ ﳏﺒﻮﺏ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ‪" :‬ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺼﺎﺀ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻈﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻮﻳﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮ‪ ،‬ﻗﺼﺪ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺼﻬﺎ ﻭﻛﺸﻒ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺒﻬﺎ ﻭﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ‬
‫‪4‬‬
‫ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮﻫﺎ ﻭﺇﳚﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻈﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳍﺎ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ‪‬ﺎ"‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﲟﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺑﺼﺪﺩ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ‪‬ﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻭﻋﻼﻗﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‬
‫ﻭﺍﳌﺘﻤﺜﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﺟﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺗﺘﺒﻊ ﺧﻄﻮﺍﺕ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍ‪‬ﻴﺪ ﻧﺸﻮﺍﰐ‪ :‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻮﻱ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،3‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﺑﲑﻭﺕ‪ ،1987 ،‬ﺹ ‪.28‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﺃﺯﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ‪ :‬ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻮﺻﻞ‪ ،1988 ،‬ﺹ ‪.42‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﺷﻔﻴﻖ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ‪-‬ﺍﳋﻄﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ‪ ،1985 ،‬ﺹ ‪.80‬‬
‫‪ -4‬ﻭﺟﻴﻪ ﳏﺒﻮﺏ ﺟﺎﺳﻢ‪ :‬ﻃﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻭﻃﺮﻕ ﺇﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ‪ ،‬ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﳌﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪ ،1995 ،‬ﺹ ‪.130‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻄﻼﻋﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻗﻤﻨﺎ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﻼﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺯﻳﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ ﴰﻠﺖ "ﺷﺮﻕ‬
‫ﻭﻭﺳﻂ" ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪ ،‬ﺃﻳﻦ ﻗﻤﻨﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﱄ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺪﺭﻳﻦ ﺑـ ‪ 20‬ﻣﺪﺭﺑﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻘﺎﺋﺺ ﻭﺗﻐﲑﺍﺕ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺋﻲ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻓﺌﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻟﺪﻳﻬﻢ ﺧﱪﺓ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺪﻯ ﻭﺿﻮﺡ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺑﺼﻔﺔ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﻴﺎﺳﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﺸﻲﺀ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻪ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺴﺒﺐ ﻏﻤﻮﺿﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﺘﺠﻮﺑﲔ ﳑﺎ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺻﻴﺎﻏﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﺿﺤﺔ ﻭﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻄﻼﻋﻴﺔ ﺗﻮﺻﻠﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ ﻧﻠﺨﺺ ﺃﳘﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺪﻯ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺘﻪ ﻹﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪.‬‬‫ ﻏﻤﻮﺽ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﺗﻄﻠﺐ ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺻﻴﺎﻏﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺇﺯﺍﻟﺔ ﺍﻹ‪‬ﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ‪.‬‬‫ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﰲ ﺑﻨﻮﺩ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﺃﺩﻯ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺬﻓﻬﺎ‪.‬‬‫ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺠﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﺃﺩﻯ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻠﻬﺎ‪.‬‬‫ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﻋﻄﺘﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻄﻼﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺍﻷﻭﱄ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﻤﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬‫ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺎﺕ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻟﻼﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﳎﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1-3‬ﳎﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﳎﺘﻤﻊ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺸﺮﻓﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﳋﱪﺓ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺴﲑ‪‬ﻢ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻻﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻫﻢ ﺍﳌﺴﺆﻭﻟﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻀﻤﻦ ﳎﺘﻤﻊ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪﻱ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﺧﺼﺎﺋﻴﻲ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﰎ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﲢﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﳋﱪﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﺸﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻳﻞ ﰲ ﺗﺪﺭﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺆﻫﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2-3‬ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪:‬‬
‫ ﰎ ﺃﺧﺬ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺣﺠﻤﻬﺎ ‪ 20‬ﻣﺪﺭﺏ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﻗﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﰎ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻫﻢ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻋﺸﻮﺍﺋﻴﺔ‪.‬‬‫ﻭﰎ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﰒ ﲨﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻤﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﺳﺒﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻼﻣﻬﺎ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﲟﺴﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﻼﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻃﻠﺒﺔ ﻭﺃﺳﺎﺗﺬﺓ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1-1-3‬ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﴰﻠﺖ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺗﺘﻮﻓﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﳋﱪﺓ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺧﺼﺎﺋﻴﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﻨﻴﲔ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ ﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ ﱂ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ‪.‬‬‫ ﱂ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﶈﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ‪.‬‬‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(06‬ﻳﺒﲔ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ "ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ" ﺣﺴﺐ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺴﻴﻠﺔ‬
‫ﺑﺮﺝ ﺑﻮ ﻋﺮﻳﺮﻳﺞ‬
‫ﺳﻄﻴﻒ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻳﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺑﺴﻜﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ‬
‫ﺑﻮﺳﻌﺎﺩﺓ‬
‫ﻣﻘﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺴﻴﻠﺔ )ﺍﻟﻮﻻﻳﺔ(‬
‫ﺃﻭﻻﺩ ﺩﺭﺍﺝ‬
‫ﲪﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻌﺔ‬
‫ﺳﻴﺪﻱ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ‬
‫ﺑﺮﻫﻮﻡ‬
‫ﺑﻦ ﺳﺮﻭﺭ‬
‫ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﱪﺝ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﻳﺔ‬
‫ﳎﺎﻧﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺔ‬
‫ﺳﻄﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﻳﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻳﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﻳﺔ‬
‫ﺻﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﻻﻥ‬
‫ﻋﲔ ﺑﺴﺎﻡ‬
‫ﺑﺴﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﻳﺔ‬
‫ﺃﻭﻻﺩ ﺟﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺳﻦ‬
‫ﺳﻴﺪﻱ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ‬
‫ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺠﻮﺑﲔ‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪ -4‬ﺃﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1-4‬ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ‪:‬‬
‫*ﻣﻦ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺋﻌﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻮﻳﺔ ﳒﺪ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻭﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺃﺩﺍﺓ ﻣﻔﻴﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻟﻠﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻘﺎﺋﻖ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﺋﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ ﻭﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﻭﺍﻻﲡﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ‪ ،‬ﻳﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ‬
‫ﻭﻳﻜﻤﻠﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻭﰲ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ "ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ )ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ( ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ"‪ ،‬ﰎ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻪ ﻟﻠﻤﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻭﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮﻩ ﺍﻗﺘﺒﺎﺳﺎ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﺒﻮﺭﺝ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﰎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺆﺷﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺪﺩ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ‬
‫ﺃﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻭﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺻﻴﺎﻏﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻟﺘﻘﻴﺲ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪،‬ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﰎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺎﻧﺔ ﺑﺂﺭﺍﺀ ﻭﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﺎﺕ ﻋﺪﺩ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ ﻭﺍﳌﺨﺘﺼﲔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‪ ،‬ﻹﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ‪‬ﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻦ ‪ 24‬ﺳﺆﺍﻝ ‪‬ﺪﻑ ﳏﺎﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺜﻼﺙ ﳏﺎﻭﺭ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﻞ ﳏﻮﺭ ﳛﻤﻞ ﻣﺆﺷﺮﺍﺕ ﰎ ﺻﻴﺎﻏﺘﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﱄ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺳﺎﻣﻲ ﻋﺮﻳﻔﺞ‪ ،‬ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ﺣﺴﲔ‪ :‬ﻣﺼﻄﻠﺢ ﰲ ﻣﻨﻬﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻭﺃﺳﺎﻟﻴﺒﻪ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،2‬ﺩﺭﺍ ﳎﺪﻭﻻﻭﻱ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪ ،‬ﻋﻤﺎﻥ‪ ،1999 ،‬ﺹ ‪.67‬‬
‫‪-2‬ﺭﺟﺎﺀ ﻭﺣﻴﺪ ﺩﻭﻳﺪﺭﻱ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﳑﺎﺭﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ‪ ،‬ﺩﻣﺸﻖ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﺭﻳﺎ‪ ،2000 ،‬ﺹ ‪.328‬‬
‫‪ -1-1-4‬ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﳏﺎﻭﺭ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ‪ :‬ﰎ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﳏﺎﻭﺭ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﱄ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ‪ :‬ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳍﺎ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﲟﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺈﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﳑﺎ ﻳﺴﻤﺢ ﺑﺎﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﳛﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺘﺔ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺗﻨﺪﺭﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﻟﻸﺭﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪،1 :‬‬
‫‪.5 ،6 ،4 ،3 ،2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ‪ :‬ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳍﺎ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﲟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﳑﺎ ﻳﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺎ ‪ ،‬ﻭﳛﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲦﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺗﻨﺪﺭﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﻟﻸﺭﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪،7 :‬‬
‫‪.14 ،13 ،11،12 ،10 ،9 ،8‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ‪ :‬ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳍﺎ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﲟﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ"ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﳛﺘﻮﻱ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺗﻨﺪﺭﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﻟﻸﺭﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪18،19 ،16،17 ،15 ،14 :‬‬
‫‪. 24 ،23 ،22 ،21، 20،‬‬
‫‪ -2-1-4‬ﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ‪ :‬ﺑﻌﺪ ﺇﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺑﻨﺎﺅﻩ ﻭﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﻹﻃﺎﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻱ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﺚ‪ ،‬ﰎ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺻﺪﻗﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ‪:‬‬
‫ﲢﻜﻴﻢ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺗﺬﺓ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺼﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻴﻢ ﲟﺜﺎﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻟﺘﺤﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﻘﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲬﺴﺔ ﺃﺳﺎﺗﺬﺓ ﳏﻜﻤﲔ‪:‬‬
‫)‪ (02‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻟﻮﻻﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻴﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭ)‪ (02‬ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺑﻮﺯﺭﻳﻌﺔ‬
‫)ﻗﺴﻢ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ(‪ ،‬ﻭﺁﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺑﺎﳌﺴﻴﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻳﺸﻬﺪ ﳍﻢ ﲟﺴﺘﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ )ﺩﻛﺘﻮﺭﺍﻩ(‬
‫ﻭﲡﺮﺑﺘﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻫﺞ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﲢﻜﻴﻢ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ‬
‫ﺑﻐﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺎﺋﺺ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪:‬‬
‫ ﺇﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﻭﺇﺯﺍﻟﺔ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ‪.‬‬‫ ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﱵ ﺍﺑﺘﻌﺪﺕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ‪.‬‬‫ ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺣﺴﺐ ﺃﳘﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺃﻭﻟﻮﻳﺘﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪.‬‬‫ ﺗﻌﻮﻳﺾ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﻔﺘﻮﺣﺔ ﺑﺄﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻐﻠﻘﺔ‪.‬‬‫‪ -2-4‬ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﺃﺩﺍﺓ ﻫﺎﻣﺔ ﰲ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮﻳﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻫﻲ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻦ "ﻟﻘﺎﺀ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻞ )ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻨﻮﺏ ﻋﻨﻪ( ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﻄﺮﺡ‬
‫ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺠﻮﺑﲔ ﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﻟﻮﺟﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺑﺘﺴﺠﻴﻞ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻤﺎﺭﺍﺕ"‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳍﺪﻑ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺴﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﺟﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﺑﺼﻔﺔ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺁﺭﺍﺋﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‬
‫"ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻗﺪ ﰎ ﻃﺮﺡ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﳌﺎ ﳜﺪﻡ ﻭﻳﺘﻔﻖ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻭﻓﺮﺿﻴﺎﺗﻪ‬
‫ﻭﳏﺎﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺣﺴﺎﻡ ﻫﺸﺎﻡ‪ :‬ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﻣﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳉﻠﻔﺔ‪ ،2007 ،‬ﺹ ‪.125‬‬
‫‪ -5‬ﳎﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1-5‬ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎﱐ‪:‬‬
‫ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﲏ "‪"C.R.S.T‬‬
‫ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻑ ﰲ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺃﻛﺘﻮﺑﺮ ‪ ،2008‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﰎ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻧﻮﻓﻤﱪ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﰎ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ ﺑﺎﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺮﺟﺎﻋﻪ ﰲ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺃﻓﺮﻳﻞ ‪ ،2009‬ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﳜﺺ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﺰﺍﻣﻨﺖ ﻣﻊ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺃﻱ ﰲ ﺃﻓﺮﻳﻞ ‪ ،2009‬ﻭﰎ ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺅﻫﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻌﺾ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺘﻮﻓﺮ ﰲ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﳋﱪﺓ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2-5‬ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﱐ‪:‬‬
‫ﺃﺟﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪ ،‬ﻭﰎ‬
‫ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻬﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺼﺼﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺒﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -6‬ﺻﻌﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻧﻘﺺ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻔﻖ ﻣﻊ ﳏﺎﻭﺭ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﻜﺘﺒﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻘﺪﺭ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﺑـ ‪ 70‬ﻛﻠﻢ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﺗﻮﺯﻉ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﻕ ﻭﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﺩ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -4‬ﺻﻌﻮﺑﺔ ﺿﺒﻂ ﻣﻮﺍﻋﻴﺪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ ‪‬ﻢ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -7‬ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫•‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺐ ﺍﳌﺌﻮﻳﺔ‪ :‬ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺐ ﺍﳌﺌﻮﻳﺔ ﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ‬
‫‪‬ﺪ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺜﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺆﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﱄ‪:‬‬
‫‪ o‬ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﺘﺒﻌﻚ ﳌﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻫﻞ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺗﻜﺮﺭ ﺍﳌﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﺔ ﻻﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ؟‬
‫ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ‪ 18 :‬ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺑـ‪ :‬ﻧﻌﻢ‬
‫‪ 02‬ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺑـ‪ :‬ﻻ‬
‫ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﺄﻟﻮﻓﺔ ﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺐ ﺍﳌﺌﻮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫= ‪% 90‬‬
‫= ‪% 10‬‬
‫•‬
‫‪100×18‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪100×02‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫=‬
‫ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺑـ‪ :‬ﻧﻌﻢ × ‪100‬‬
‫ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺑـ‪:‬ﻧﻌﻢ=‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ‬
‫ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺑـ‪ :‬ﻻ × ‪100‬‬
‫ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺑـ‪:‬ﻻ=‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ‬
‫=‬
‫ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﻑ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﻊ "ﻛﺎ‪ :"2‬ﻳﺴﻤﺢ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﺈﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﺑﲔ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ‬
‫ﺍﶈﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫)ﺕ ﺡ – ﺕ ﻥ(‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺕﻥ‬
‫ﻛﺎ = ﳎﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﺍﳌﻌﻴﺎﺭﻱ ‪0.05 = α‬‬‫ ﺩﺭﺝ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ ﻥ = ﻫـ‪ ،1-‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫـ ﲤﺜﻞ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﺌﺎﺕ‪.‬‬‫ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ‪ 5‬ﻧﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ "ﻳﺎﺗﺲ"‪.‬‬‫‪2‬‬
‫)ﺕ ﺡ ‪ -‬ﺕ ﻥ ‪(0.5 -‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‪ =2‬ﳎﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫ﺕ‪.‬ﻥ‬
‫ ﳝﺜﻞ ﻙ‪ :2‬ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ‪.‬‬‫ ﺕ ﺡ‪ :‬ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴﺔ )ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﻴﺔ(‪.‬‬‫‪ -‬ﺕ‪.‬ﻥ‪ :‬ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ )ﺍﳌﺘﻮﻗﻌﺔ(‬
‫ﻥ‬
‫ﺕﻥ=‬
‫ﻳﺘﻢ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔﻭ‪:‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﻥ‪ :‬ﳝﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﱄ )ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ( ﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ‪ :‬ﳝﺜﻞ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻟﻸﺳﺌﻠﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻳﺴﻤﺢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﺘﺤﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺃﻡ ﻻ‪،‬‬
‫ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺸﻒ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪.‬‬
‫ﳕﻮﺫﺝ ﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻛﺎ‪: 2‬‬
‫ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ‬
‫)ﺕ ﺡ‪-‬ﺕ ﻥ(‬
‫ﺕﻥ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺕﺡ‬
‫ﺕ ﻥ ﺕ ﺡ‪-‬ﺕ ﻥ‬
‫)ﺕ ﺡ‪ -‬ﺗﻦ(‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻧﻌﻢ‬
‫ﻻ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤـﻮﻉ‬
‫ﻣﺜﺎﻝ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺴﺆﺍﻝ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﺢ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎ‬
‫"ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﺘﺒﻌﻚ ﳌﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻻﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻫﻞ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﺔ ﻻﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ؟"‬
‫* ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(07‬ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﻲ ﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ "ﻛﺎ‪:"2‬‬
‫ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ‬
‫)ﺕ ﺡ‪-‬ﺕ ﻥ(‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺕﺡ‬
‫ﺕﻥ‬
‫ﺕ ﺡ‪-‬ﺕ ﻥ )ﺕ ﺡ‪ -‬ﺗﻦ(‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺕﻥ‬
‫ﻧﻌﻢ‬
‫‪18‬‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪08‬‬
‫‪36‬‬
‫‪3.6‬‬
‫ﻻ‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪08 -‬‬
‫‪36‬‬
‫‪3.6‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤـﻮﻉ‬
‫ﻛﺎ‪7.5 /2‬‬
‫ﺧﻼﺻـﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﰎ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺮﻕ ﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳋﻄﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﱐ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﺒﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭ ﰎ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﳎﺘﻤﻊ ﻭ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪ ، ،‬ﻭ ﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻨﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻌﺔ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻭ‬
‫ﲢﻮﻳﻠﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻛﻤﻴﺔ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻔﺴﲑﺍﺕ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻋﺮﺽ ﻭﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ ﺑﺎﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1-1‬ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(08‬ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ‬
‫ ﻣﺴﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ‬‫ ﺗﻘﲏ ﺳﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ‬‫ﻟﻴﺴﺎﻧﺲ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺑﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‬‫ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﶈﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ‪ -‬ﺩﺑﻠﻮﻡ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺃﻭﱃ‬‫ ﺩﺑﻠﻮﻡ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬‫ ﺩﺑﻠﻮﻡ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺛﺎﻟﺜﺔ‬‫‪ -‬ﻣﺘﺮﺑﺺ )ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ(‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫‪% 15‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫‪% 10‬‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪% 50‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫‪% 10‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪% 05‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪% 05‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪% 05‬‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤــﻮﻉ‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪100‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫‪% 15‬‬
‫‪12‬‬
‫‪% 60‬‬
‫‪05‬‬
‫‪% 25‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪100‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﳋﱪﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ‬
‫ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ‪ 05‬ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ‬‫ ﻣﻦ ‪ 05‬ﺇﱃ ‪ 10‬ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ‬‫ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ‪ 10‬ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ‬‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤــﻮﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻟﺪﻳﻬﻢ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﳒﺪ ‪ 10‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ‬
‫ﺣﺎﻣﻠﲔ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﻟﻴﺴﺎﻧﺲ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺑﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﺗﺘﺒﺎﻳﻦ ﻭﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺍ‪‬ﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ‬
‫)‪ (03‬ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪(% 15‬ﻥ ﻭﺗﻘﲏ ﺳﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ )‪ (02‬ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ ،(% 10‬ﺩﺑﻠﻮﻡ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ‬
‫ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺃﻭﱃ )‪ (02‬ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ ،(% 10‬ﺩﺑﻠﻮﻡ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ )‪ (01‬ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪(% 05‬ﻥ ﺩﺑﻠﻮﻡ‬
‫ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺛﺎﻟﺜﺔ )‪ (01‬ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ ،(% 05‬ﻣﺘﺮﺑﺺ )ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ( )‪ (01‬ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫)‪ ،(%05‬ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﳋﱪﺓ ﺗﺘﺮﺍﻭﺡ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺃﻏﻠﺒﻴﺘﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ‪ 05‬ﺇﱃ ‪ 10‬ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻌﺪﺩ ‪12‬‬
‫ﻣﺪﺭﺑﺎ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ ،(% 60‬ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺧﱪ‪‬ﻢ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ‪ 10‬ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ ﻋﺪﺩﻫﻢ ‪ 05‬ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪،(% 25‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻟﺪﻳﻬﻢ ﺧﱪﺓ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ‪ 05‬ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ ﻋﺪﺩﻫﻢ ‪ 03‬ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪.(% 15‬‬
‫ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺒﲔ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﳋﱪﺓ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺒﻴﺔ ﻭﰲ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ‬
‫ﻭﻣﺴﺎﻳﺮﺗﻪ‪ ،‬ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻮﻳﲏ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺮﰲ ﻟﻠﻤﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2-1‬ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1-2-1‬ﻋـﺮﺽ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ )‪ (01‬ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺃﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(01‬ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﺴﻴﲑﻛﻢ ﻟﻠﺤﺼﺺ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺒﻴﺔ ﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻫﻞ‬
‫ﺻﺎﺩﻓﺘﻢ ﻣﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﻛﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻋﺪﺓ؟‬
‫ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(9-1‬ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﻛﺮﻭﻳﺔ‬‫ﻭﺍﻋﺪﺓ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﻧﻌﻢ‬
‫ﻻ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫‪%0‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪3.84‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :( 01‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(01‬‬
‫‪0%‬‬
‫ﻧﻌﻢ‬
‫ﻻ‬
‫‪100%‬‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳌﺒﻴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (1-1‬ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ )‪ (01‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ‬
‫ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ) ‪ (10‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ ) ‪ ،( 3.84‬ﻭﻳﺪﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﺃﻭ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﺎﺩﻓﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﻛﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻋﺪﺓ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‬
‫ﺗﺸﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻋﺪﺍﺩﻫﻢ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﺎ ﻭﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﻗﺪﺭﺍ‪‬ﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻳﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺳﻦ ﻣﻌﲔ ﺇﱃ ﳎﺎﻝ ﲣﺼﺼﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﺎﺩﻑ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﻳﺘﺼﻔﻮﻥ ﲟﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﳑﻴﺰﺓ ﺗﺴﺘﺤﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ‪،‬ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ‪ ،‬ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ‪‬ﻤﺶ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﻭﻻ ﲢﻈﻰ ﺑﺎﻻﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﳌﺒﻜﺮ ﳑﺎ‬
‫ﻳﻬﺪﺭ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﻭﻳﻀﻴﻌﻬﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻠﻖ‪ ،‬ﻭﺣﺴﺐ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﶈﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺃﻏﻠﺐ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻛﻠﻬﻢ‬
‫)‪ (%100‬ﻳﺆﻛﺪﻭﻥ ﺃ‪‬ﻢ ﺻﺎﺩﻓﻮﺍ ﻣﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﻛﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻋﺪﺓ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﱯ ﰲ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(02‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﻘﻮﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺇﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺫﻭﻱ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(10-1‬ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺇﻗﺒﺎﳍﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‬
‫ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪16‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 80‬‬
‫‪% 15‬‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪8.3‬‬
‫‪% 00 % 05‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ ) ‪ :( 02‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(02‬‬
‫‪5% 0%‬‬
‫داﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫أﺣﯿﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎدرا‬
‫أﺑﺪا‬
‫‪80%‬‬
‫‪15%‬‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (2-1‬ﺍﳌﺒﲔ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (8.3‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻛﱪ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ‬
‫)‪ ( 7.81‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪،(0.05‬ﻭ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ)‪.(3‬ﻭ ﻫﺪﺍ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻥ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‬
‫ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ‪،‬ﲝﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ)‪ (%80‬ﺗﺆﻛﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺑﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻫﺐ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ)‪ (%15‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺿﺌﻴﻠﺔ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ‬
‫‪‬ﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﺍﻧﻄﻼﻗﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺘﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻓﻬﻢ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﳊﺼﺺ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺒﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻘﺎﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﳝﻜﻦ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ‬
‫ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﳌﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﺪﺭﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻮﻓﺮ ﳌﺴﺎﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺐ ﻭﳐﺘﻠﻒ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻣﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺘﻜﻮﻳﻨﻪ ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺧﱪﺗﻪ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺗﺘﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺀﺓ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺪﺭﺏ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‬
‫ﻳﺪﺭﻛﻮﻥ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻋﺪﺓ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺮﺟﻢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺘﻬﻢ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪.(%80‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(03‬ﰲ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻗﻴﺎﻣﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ‪‬ﺘﻤﻮﻥ‬
‫ﺑﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻪ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(11-1‬ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪07‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪06‬‬
‫‪05‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 35‬‬
‫‪% 10‬‬
‫‪% 00‬‬
‫‪% 30‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺭﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﱐ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻘﲏ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﻛﺎ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪1.7‬‬
‫‪9.49‬‬
‫‪%100 % 25‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :( 03‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(03‬‬
‫اﻟﺠﺎﻧﺐ اﻟﻤﻮرﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ‬
‫‪25%‬‬
‫‪35%‬‬
‫اﻟﺠﺎﻧﺐ اﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‬
‫اﻟﺠﺎﻧﺐ اﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ‬
‫اﻟﺠﺎﻧﺐ اﻟﺒﺪﻧﻲ‬
‫اﻟﺠﺎﻧﺐ اﻟﺘﻘﻨﻲ‬
‫‪10%‬‬
‫‪0%‬‬
‫‪30%‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪4‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺘﺒﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (3-1‬ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ‪ ،‬ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ)‪ (04‬ﺇﺫ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ) ‪ ( 1.7‬ﻭ ﻫﻲ ﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ)‪ ،(9.49‬ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﲝﻴﺚ ﳒﺪ‬
‫)‪ (%35‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﳌﻮﺭﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ ﻭ)‪ (%30‬ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﱐ ﻭ)‪(%25‬‬
‫ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﲏ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺣﲔ )‪ (%10‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻭﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﻛﻠﻲ ﳌﺪﻯ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻫﺪﺍ ﻳﱪﺯ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﳌﻮﺭﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﱐ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﲏ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻭﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻜﺎﻣﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻳﻜﻤﻞ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﻳﺘﺄﺛﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺗﻴﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺃﻏﻠﺐ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﳒﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻳﻨﺼﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ "ﺑﺪﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻮﺭﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺗﻘﻨﻴﺔ" ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ "ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ"‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻠﻖ ﻭﺣﺴﺐ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﳒﺪ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻳﲑ ﻭﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻖ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪،‬ﻭﻫﺪﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ‬
‫ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺇﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﺳﻠﻴﻢ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(04‬ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﺘﻤﺪﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻻﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﻤﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(12-1‬ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﻤﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‬
‫ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ‬
‫ﺑﻄﺎﺭﻳﺔ‬
‫ﲤﺎﺭﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻼﺕ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺗﻨﺎﻓﺴﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺩﻳﺔ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪12‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫‪04‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 60‬‬
‫‪% 10‬‬
‫‪% 20‬‬
‫‪% 10‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪3.4‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(04‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(04‬‬
‫‪0%‬‬
‫‪22%‬‬
‫ﻃﺮﯾﻘﺔ اﻟﻤﻼﺣﻈﺔ‬
‫ﺑﻄﺎرﯾﺔ اﺧﺘﺒﺎرات‬
‫ﺗﻤﺎرﯾﻦ ﺗﻨﺎﻓﺴﯿﺔ‬
‫أﺑﺪا‬
‫‪11%‬‬
‫‪67%‬‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (4-1‬ﻳﺘﺒﲔ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ ( 3.4‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ) ‪( 7.81‬‬
‫ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ ، (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ ) ‪ ، ( 03‬ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﳒﺪ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%60‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﻻﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻻ ﲣﻠﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻘﺎﺋﺺ ﻭﺳﻠﺒﻴﺎﺕ ﻋﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻛﻮ‪‬ﺎ ﲢﻮﻱ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺗﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﳒﺪ )‪ (%20‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﻤﻠﻮﻥ ﲤﺎﺭﻳﻦ ﺗﻨﺎﻓﺴﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭ)‪ (%10‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺣﲔ ﳒﺪ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺿﺌﻴﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ )‪(%10‬‬
‫ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﻭﻥ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ ﻭﻓﻌﺎﻟﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺑﻄﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ‪،‬ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﺫﻟﻚ‬
‫ﻭﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻻﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺿﻤﻦ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﳝﻜﻦ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﻤﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺗﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻭﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺩﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺘﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻠﺘﻤﺴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ‬
‫ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻧﻄﻼﻗﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺍﳌﺪﻭﻥ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﻭﺣﺴﺐ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺨﻠﺼﺔ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﻏﻠﺐ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻕ ﻭﺃﺳﺲ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻫﺪﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(05‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﺄﺧﺬﻭﻥ ﺑﻌﲔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻜﻢ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﺝ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(13-1‬ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺗﻮﻇﻴﻒ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 00‬‬
‫‪% 10‬‬
‫‪06‬‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫‪12‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪4.2‬‬
‫‪% 60 % 30‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫‪0%‬‬
‫داﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫أﺣﯿﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎدرا‬
‫أﺑﺪا‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ ) ‪ :(05‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(05‬‬
‫‪10%‬‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫‪30%‬‬
‫‪60%‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﺓ ﰱ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (5-1‬ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺣﺮﻳﺔ )‪ ،(03‬ﺇﺫ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ) ‪(4.2‬‬
‫ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ ) ‪.( 7.81‬ﻫﺪﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ‬
‫ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪،‬ﲝﻴﺚ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ)‪ (%60‬ﻻ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﲟﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪،‬ﻭ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ)‪ (%06‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺿﺌﻴﻠﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ‪‬ﺘﻢ ‪‬ﺪﺍ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺮﻕ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺫﻭﻱ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺍ‪‬ﻢ ﻭﻗﺪﺭﺍ‪‬ﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻴﻮﳍﻢ‪ ،‬ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﰲ ﻧﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ "ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ"‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ؛ ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻠﻖ ﻭﺣﺴﺐ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺨﻠﺼﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺃﻏﻠﺐ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺰﻳﺪ‬
‫ﻧﺴﺒﺘﻬﻢ ﻋﻦ )‪ (%60‬ﻭ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻳﺆﻛﺪﻭﻥ ﺃ‪‬ﻢ ﻻ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﲟﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻬﻢ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﰱ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﻭﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪،‬ﻳﱪﺯ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺟﻠﻴﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺇﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪،‬ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ‬
‫ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(06‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﺄﺧﺬﻭﻥ ﺑﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻔﺤﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﻴﺎﻣﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﳌﺮﺍﻗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(14-1‬ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻔﺤﻮﺻﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 10‬‬
‫‪% 15‬‬
‫‪04‬‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫‪11‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪2.5‬‬
‫‪% 55 % 20‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ ) ‪ :( 06‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(06‬‬
‫‪10%‬‬
‫داﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫‪15%‬‬
‫أﺣﯿﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎدرا‬
‫‪55%‬‬
‫أﺑﺪا‬
‫‪20%‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺘﺒﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳌﺪﻭﻧﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (6-1‬ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ) ‪ ( 2.5‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ‬
‫)‪ ( 7.81‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪،(0.05‬ﻭ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ)‪ ، (03‬ﻣﻌﲎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ‬
‫ﺃﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪،‬ﲝﻴﺚ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ)‪ (%55‬ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﳌﺮﺍﻗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪،‬ﻭ )‪ (%20‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭ )‪ (%15‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ‬
‫ﺍﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭ)‪ (%10‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺿﺌﻴﻠﺔ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ‪‬ﺪﺍ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳉﻴﺪ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﻌﻴﺪﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺫﺍﺗﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﲟﻌﲎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﳚﺐ ﺇﺧﻀﺎﻉ ﻛﻞ ﻧﺎﺷﺊ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻔﺤﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﲢﺖ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻤﺮﺓ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻮﻳﻦ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﲰﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺘﺴﲎ ﻟﻠﻤﺪﺭﺏ ﺍﻻﻃﻼﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ‬
‫ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﺋﻖ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﺘﺮﺿﻪ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺎﺕ ﺃﻭ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﺇﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻐﻼﳍﻢ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻋﺸﻮﺍﺋﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺗﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺃﲝﺎﺙ ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﻮﺀ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺗﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻦ )‪ (%55‬ﻳﺆﻛﺪﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺔ ﻃﺒﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﺓ ﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‬
‫ﻻ ﻳﺄﺧﺬﻭﻥ ﺑﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻔﺤﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻭ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﳒﺪ ﲢﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (01‬ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺃﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﺸﲑ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺇﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬‬
‫ﻳﺪﻓﻊ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻭﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻬﻢ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﺒﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (3-1‬ﻋﺪﻡ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (1.7‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ (9.49‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ)‪ ، (04‬ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﳌﻮﺭﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%35‬ﻭﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﱐ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫)‪ (%30‬ﻭﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﲏ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ ،(%25‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺣﲔ‬
‫ﻳﻬﻤﻠﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻭﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺒﲑ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺸﲑ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳌﺪﻭﻧﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (4-1‬ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻭ‬
‫ﻳﻌﲎ ﺩﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻏﻠﺐ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﻴﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻏﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃ‪‬ﺎ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻏﲑ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻏﻠﺐ ﺍﻷﺣﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺫﺍﺗﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺏ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﺝ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﻭﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺗﻨﺎ ﻟﻠﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (5-1‬ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ ) ‪(03‬ﻭﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ ،(0.05‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫)‪(4.2‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ ) ‪ ،(7.8‬ﻭﻣﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﻼﺻﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻻ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﺑﻌﲔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﺑﺘﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻋﻦ ﺗﺘﺒﻊ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺒﲔ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (6-1‬ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪،‬ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻤﺮﺓ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‬
‫ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻧﻄﻼﻗﺎ ﻣﻦ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ‬
‫ﻭﺍﳌﺆﻛﺪ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻧﺴﺘﻨﺘﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﲤﺜﻞ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﻻ ﺗﺒﲎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺲ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﲝﺘﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺗﺄﰐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻟﺘﻮﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ‪،‬ﻭﺗﺆﻛﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﳝﻜﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﱂ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﻖ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2-2-1‬ﻋﺮﺽ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺭﻗﻢ ‪ 02‬ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺃﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(07‬ﻫﻞ ﳛﻈﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺊ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻃﺮﻓﻜﻢ ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(15-2‬ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 10‬‬
‫‪% 10‬‬
‫‪16‬‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪6.2‬‬
‫‪% 00 % 80‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ ) ‪ :( 07‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(07‬‬
‫‪10%‬‬
‫‪0%‬‬
‫‪10%‬‬
‫داﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫أﺣﯿﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎدرا‬
‫أﺑﺪا‬
‫‪80%‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳌﺪﻭﻧﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (7-2‬ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ ، (6.2‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ ) ‪ ، (7.81‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ)‪ ، (03‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﺔ‪،‬ﲝﻴﺚ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﺒﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ)‪ (%80‬ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺇﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ‬
‫ﻛﻔﺎﻳﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪،‬ﻭ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪(%10‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﱄ ﻋﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ‬
‫ﺯﺍﺋﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﳑﺎﺛﻠﺔ )‪ (%10‬ﺘﻢ ‪‬ﻢ‪ ،‬ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻻ ﻳﻮﻟﻮﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﺎ ﻛﺒﲑﺍ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﳛﻈﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺊ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺘﺴﲎ ﻟﻠﻤﺪﺭﺏ‬
‫ﻭﺿﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺧﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻭﺇﺩﺭﺍﺟﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺗﺴﻄﲑ ﻭﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺑﺮﺍﻣﺞ ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻟﻼﺭﺗﻘﺎﺀ ﲟﺴﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﳍﻢ ﻭﲢﺴﻴﻨﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻌﺎﳉﺔ ﺍﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﱄ ﺇﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺆﺛﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﺇﻥ ﺍﻻﺑﺘﻌﺎﺩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﻜﻔﺎﻳﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﻄﻲ‬
‫ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻧﺎﻗﺼﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﱄ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻧﺎﻗﺺ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﳛﻈﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﺑﺎﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﻣﻴﻮﻻﺗﻪ ﻭﺭﻏﺒﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻪ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ‬
‫ﰲ ﺃﺩﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%80‬ﻳﺆﻛﺪﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(08‬ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﺘﺒﻌﻜﻢ ﳌﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻫﻞ ‪‬ﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﳍﻢ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(16-2‬ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 05‬‬
‫‪% 10‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫‪14‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪5.5‬‬
‫‪% 70 % 15‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(08‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(08‬‬
‫‪10%‬‬
‫داﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫‪5%‬‬
‫‪15%‬‬
‫أﺣﯿﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎدرا‬
‫أﺑﺪا‬
‫‪70%‬‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳌﱪﺯﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (8-2‬ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﺸﲑ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺇﱃ )‪ (5.5‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ‬
‫)‪ (7.81‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ)‪ ،(03‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﰲ‬
‫ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ )‪ (%70‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺇﻃﻼﻗﺎ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%15‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﺪﻳﻬﻢ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%10‬ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺿﺌﻴﻠﺔ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺐ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%05‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ‪‬ﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺿﺌﻴﻠﺔ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻗﻮﺭﻧﺖ ﺑﻨﺴﺐ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺇﻃﻼﻗﺎ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺇﳘﺎﻝ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺧﻄﺄ ﻛﺒﲑﺍ ﻭﻳﻨﺠﺮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺺ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﳉﻴﺪ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ‪‬ﺘﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺒﻴﺔ ﻭﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﳌﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﺑﺎﻟﻎ ﺍﻷﳘﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺃﻏﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%70‬ﻣﻦ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ‪ ،‬ﻻ‬
‫ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺇﻃﻼﻗﺎ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(09‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﻬﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﰲ ﺇﻃﺎﺭ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(17-2‬ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺎﻭﺭ‬
‫ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺘﻬﻢ‬
‫ﻣﻌﻬﻢ‬
‫ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ‬
‫‪14‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪% 70‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻼﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫‪04‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 10‬‬
‫‪% 20‬‬
‫ﻣﻌﻬﻢ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫‪4.13‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫‪5.99‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫ﻏﲑ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(09‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(09‬‬
‫‪10%‬‬
‫إﺟﺮاء ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻼت ﻣﻌﮭﻢ‬
‫‪20%‬‬
‫اﻟﺘﺤﺎور ﻣﻌﮭﻢ‬
‫ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺘﮭﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫‪70%‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺘﺒﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (9-2‬ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ‬
‫ﺗﺸﲑ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺇﱃ )‪ (4.13‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ (5.99‬ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ)‪ ،(02‬ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ )‪ (%70‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﺗﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻛﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻟﻼﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%20‬ﺗﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺎﻭﺭ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﺃﻣﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫)‪ (%10‬ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﺈﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻼﺕ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﻧﺴﺐ ﺿﺌﻴﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻮﺭﻧﺖ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ‬
‫ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺃﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺃﺳﻠﻮﺏ‬
‫ﻧﺎﻗﺺ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﻄﻲ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﲜﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻭﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺩﺍﺋﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﻧﺴﺘﻨﺘﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻏﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%70‬ﻻ‬
‫ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﻜﺘﻔﻮﻥ ﲟﻼﺣﻈﺘﻬﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﻘﻂ‪ ،‬ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﻗﺼـﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺆﺛﺮﺓ ﰲ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﲰﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳍﻢ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(10‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺗﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(18-2‬ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺗﻘﺮ‪‬ﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 10‬‬
‫‪% 10‬‬
‫‪04‬‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫‪12‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫‪3.4‬‬
‫‪% 60 % 20‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫‪10%‬‬
‫‪10%‬‬
‫داﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫أﺣﯿﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎدرا‬
‫أﺑﺪا‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ ‪0.05‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(10‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(10‬‬
‫‪20%‬‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫‪60%‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (10-2‬ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (3.4‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ (7.81‬ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ)‪ ،(03‬ﻭﻳﻌﲏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﺒﺎﻳﻦ ﰲ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ‬
‫ﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%60‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻷﻛﱪ ﺗﻨﻔﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%10‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺗﻘﺮﺏ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%10‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﳑﺎﺛﻠﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺆﻛﺪ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﺮﻗﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺿﺌﻴﻠﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻮﺭﻧﺖ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﻨﻔﻮﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻧﺎﻗﺼﺔ ﻭﻏﲑ ﻣﻠﻤﺔ ﲟﺨﺘﻠﻒ‬
‫ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲤﺲ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭﺟﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﺪﻳﻬﻢ‪،‬ﻫﺪﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻋﻢ‬
‫ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ)‪ (09‬ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﰲ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺘﺎﺑﻌﺘﻬﻢ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﺟﻴﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﻧﺴﺘﻨﺘﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻳﺒﻘﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﻳﻦ‬
‫ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﻳﻔﻀﻠﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺆﻛﺪﻩ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ‬
‫)‪ (09‬ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺧﻄﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﲡﻨﺒﻬﺎ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻷﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺐ‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻓﻬﺎ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(11‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﺴﺎﻋﺪﻭﻥ ﰲ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸﺎﻛﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﺘﺮﺿﻬﻢ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺪﻯ ﻣﺴﺎﳘﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﰲ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸﺎﻛﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﺘﺮﺿﻬﻢ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(19-2‬ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺇﺳﻬﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸﺎﻛﻞ‬
‫ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﺘﺮﺿﻬﻢ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪01‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 05‬‬
‫‪% 15‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫‪13‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪4.4‬‬
‫‪% 65 % 15‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(11‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(11‬‬
‫‪15%‬‬
‫‪5%‬‬
‫داﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫أﺣﯿﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎدرا‬
‫أﺑﺪا‬
‫‪15%‬‬
‫‪65%‬‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﺒﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﺤﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (11-2‬ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (4.4‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ (7.81‬ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ)‪ ،(03‬ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪،‬‬
‫ﲝﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﺪﺭ ﺑـ )‪ (%65‬ﺗﺆﻛﺪ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﰲ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸﺎﻛﻞ‬
‫ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%15‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺴﺎﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺣﻞ‬
‫ﻣﺸﺎﻛﻞ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﳑﺎﺛﻠﺔ )‪ (%15‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺴﺎﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸﺎﻛﻠﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺿﺌﻴﻠﺔ ﺟﺪﺍ‬
‫ﻣﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺑـ )‪ (%05‬ﻣﻦ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺗﺴﺎﻫﻢ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺣﻞ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﺘﺮﺿﻬﻢ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﲟﺸﺎﻛﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺎﳘﺔ ﰲ ﺣﻠﻬﺎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﻜﺲ ﺣﺘﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﱄ ﺍﻻﻃﻼﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳌﺆﺛﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﰲ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﳑﺎ‬
‫ﻳﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﺳﻠﺒﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺇﳚﺎﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺩﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ‬
‫ﺩﻗﺔ ﻭﻭﺿﻮﺡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻠﻖ ﻭﺣﺴﺐ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ‪ ،‬ﳒﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‬
‫ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺗﺎﻡ ﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺎﳌﺸﺎﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﺘﺮﺽ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪،‬ﻫﺪﺍ‬
‫ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻋﻢ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (08‬ﻭ )‪ (09‬ﻭ)‪.(10‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(12‬ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺭﺩ ﻓﻌﻠﻜﻢ ﲡﺎﻩ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻛﺎﺕ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺭﺩ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺑﺴﻠﻮﻛﺎﺕ ﻏﲑ ﺳﻮﻳﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(20-2‬ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺭﺩ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﻢ ﲡﺎﻩ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻛﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻗﻒ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ‬
‫ﻋﻨﺪﻫﺎ‬
‫ﺑﺄﺧﺼﺎﺋﻲ ﲡﺎﻫﻠﻬﺎ ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫ﻭﻣﻌﺎﳉﺘﻬﺎ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺴﻲ‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪06‬‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪14‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 30‬‬
‫‪% 00‬‬
‫‪% 70‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪4.93‬‬
‫‪5.99‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(12‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(12‬‬
‫‪30%‬‬
‫اﻟﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻋﻨﺪھﺎ وﻣﻌﺎﻟﺠﺘﮭﺎ‬
‫اﻻﺗﺼﺎل ﺑﺄﺧﺼﺎﺋﻲ ﻧﻔﺴﻲ‬
‫ﺗﺠﺎھﻠﮭﺎ‬
‫‪0%‬‬
‫‪70%‬‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (12-2‬ﻳﺘﺒﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (4.93‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ‬
‫)‪ (5.99‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪(0.05‬ﻭ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ)‪ ،(02‬ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ‬
‫ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﺆﻛﺪ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺃﻏﻠﺐ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%70‬ﲡﺎﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻛﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺗﻘﺪﺭ ﺑـ )‪ (%30‬ﺗﻮﱄ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﺎ‬
‫ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻛﺎﺕ ﻭﺗﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﺎ ﳏﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﺇﳚﺎﺩ ﻋﻼﺝ ﳍﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺧﻄﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺋﻌﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﲡﺎﻫﻞ ﺑﻌﺾ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻛﺎﺕ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻳﺔ )ﺍﻟﺴﻮﻳﺔ( ﺍﳌﺘﻜﺮﺭﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻞ "ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﳋﻮﻑ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪ‪ ،‬ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪ "...،‬ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺠﺮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺒﻼ ﺗﺄﺛﺮ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻥ ﱂ ﺗﺆﺧﺬ‬
‫ﺑﻌﲔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻛﺎﺕ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﺗﻌﺎﰿ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻷﺧﺼﺎﺋﻴﲔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‪ ،‬ﺳﺘﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻫﺪﻩ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﺳﻠﺒﺎ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺩﺍﺋﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﺣﺴﺐ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻧﺴﺘﺨﻠﺺ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ‬
‫ﻭﻫﻢ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﲡﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻛﺎﺕ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺼﺪﺭ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪،‬ﻫﺪﺍ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻳﺪﻋﻢ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ)‪ (08‬ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(13‬ﻫﻞ ﲡﺮﻭﻥ ﻓﺤﻮﺻﺎﺕ ﻧﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺈﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﺤﻮﺻﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(21-2‬ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺈﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﺤﻮﺻﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 00‬‬
‫‪% 00‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫‪18‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪% 90 % 10‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪7.81 11.4‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(13‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(13‬‬
‫‪0%‬‬
‫‪0%‬‬
‫‪10%‬‬
‫داﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫أﺣﯿﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎدرا‬
‫أﺑﺪا‬
‫‪90%‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﻮﺀ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (13-2‬ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (11.4‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ (7.81‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ)‪ ،(03‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ‬
‫ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﺆﻛﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺑـ )‪ (%90‬ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ‬
‫ﺑﺈﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﻓﺤﻮﺻﺎﺕ ﻧﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺟﺪﺍ )‪(%10‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻔﺤﻮﺻﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻎ ﺍﻷﳘﻴﺔ ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺗ‪‬ﺜﹶﻤ‪ّ‬ﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺛﲑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺳﻠﺒﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﲢﺴﲔ ﻭﺗﻄﻮﻳﺮ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﺎ ﳏﺎﻁ ﺑﻌﺪﺓ ﻣﺆﺛﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴﺔ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ‬
‫ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻓﻊ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺍﻻﻃﻼﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺜﻞ‬
‫ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺆﺛﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﻭﻓﻖ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻲ ﻧﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻤﺔ ﻋﻄﺎﺋﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﺣﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﲢﺼﻠﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺗﺎﻡ ﻟﻼﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ‬
‫ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪،‬ﻫﺪﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻋﻢ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺭﻗﻢ)‪ (08‬ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(14‬ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻜﻢ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻜﻢ ‪‬ﻢ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(22-2‬ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺯﺍﺋﺪ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 10‬‬
‫‪% 15‬‬
‫‪04‬‬
‫ﻻ‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫ﻳﻮﺟﺪ‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪11‬‬
‫‪% 55 % 20‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪2.5‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(14‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(14‬‬
‫‪10%‬‬
‫‪15%‬‬
‫زاﺋﺪ‬
‫ﻗﻠﯿﻞ‬
‫ﻋﺎدي‬
‫ﻻ ﯾﻮﺟﺪ‬
‫‪20%‬‬
‫‪55%‬‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺣﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (14-2‬ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (2.5‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ (7.81‬ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ)‪ ،(03‬ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﺖ‪ ،‬ﲝﻴﺚ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺑـ )‪ (%55‬ﺗﺆﻛﺪ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻓﻬﻢ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%20‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ‪‬ﺆﻻﺀ‪ ،‬ﺃﻣﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%15‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻓﻘﻠﻴﻼ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ‪‬ﻢ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺣﲔ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%10‬ﺘﻢ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﺯﺍﺋﺪ ‪‬ﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺿﺌﻴﻠﺔ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ‬
‫ﻣﺎ ﻗﻮﺭﻧﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﳛﺴﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻗﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻌﻠﻖ ‪‬ﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﳍﻢ ﺃﻭ ﲟﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺸﺨﺼﻴﺘﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﰒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﻭﺇﺩﺧﺎﳍﺎ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻃﺒﻌﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﺎ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺍ ‪‬ﻢ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﻧﺴﺘﺨﻠﺺ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻏﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ‬
‫ﺟﺪﻱ ﻭﺯﺍﺋﺪ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﰎ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪﻩ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ )‪.(10 ،9 ،8‬‬
‫ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ )‪ (02‬ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺃﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﺸﲑ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﻳﻦ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻳﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﲰﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﺒﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ‬
‫ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ )‪ (7-2‬ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺫﺍ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ‬
‫ﺇﺫ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (8.2‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ (7.81‬ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ)‪ ،(03‬ﲟﻌﲎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻄﻮﻥ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﺎ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺍ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺩ ﰲ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑـ‬
‫)‪ (%80‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ )‪ ،(%10‬ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ‪‬ﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫ﳑﺎﺛﻠﺔ ﳍﺎ )‪ (%10‬ﺘﻢ ﲜﺪﻳﺔ ‪‬ﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺿﺌﻴﻠﺔ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻗﻮﺭﻧﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ )‪.(%80‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﺤﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ )‪ ،(8-2‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺩﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪،‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻻ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪ ،‬ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻏﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﳘﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﺗﺄﺛﲑﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺗﻨﺎ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ ،(9-2‬ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺩﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ )‪ (02‬ﻭﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ ،(0.05‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫)‪ (4.13‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ )‪ ،(5.99‬ﻭﻣﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﻼﺻﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ‬
‫ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﻘﻂ‪ ،‬ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﺆﺍﻟﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﲔ )‪ (8-7‬ﺣﻮﻝ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﳒﺪ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ ،(10-2‬ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺗﻌﻜﺴﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻭﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻟﻠﻤﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪ ﻭﻋﻨﺎﻳﺘﻬﻢ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ )‪ (11-2‬ﺗﺸﲑ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺠﻪ ﻛﺪﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻣﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻳﻔﻀﻠﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﺘﺮﺽ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﳌﺴﺎﳘﺔ ﰲ ﺣﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺁﺧﺮ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳉﺪﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ ،(12-2‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﳒﺪ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (4.93‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ (5.99‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ)‪ ،(02‬ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﲡﺎﻫﻞ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ‬
‫ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻟﻠﺴﻠﻮﻛﺎﺕ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺼﺪﺭ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳉﺪﻱ ‪‬ﺆﻻﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺗﺸﲑ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (13-2‬ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺍﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻡ ﻟﻠﻔﺤﻮﺻﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‬
‫ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻏﻢ ﺃﳘﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﳍﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﺆﺛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺸﲑ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (14-2‬ﺍﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺩﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺗﻌﻜﺴﻬﺎ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻧﻄﻼﻗﺎ ﻣﻦ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﳌﺆﻛﺪﺓ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻥ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻻ ﳛﻈﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﻗﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ‬
‫‪‬ﺎ ﰲ ﺇﻃﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺗﺄﰐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻟﺘﻮﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ‪،‬ﻭ ﻣﺆﻛﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺍﱃ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﻳﻦ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ .‬ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ‬
‫ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﱂ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﻖ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3-2-1‬ﻋﺮﺽ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (03‬ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺃﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(15‬ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﺄﺧﺬﻭﻥ ﺑﻌﲔ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﻼﻣﺢ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻬﻢ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﲟﻼﻣﺢ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(23-3‬ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﲟﻼﻣﺢ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 00‬‬
‫‪% 00‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫‪17‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪9.9‬‬
‫‪% 85 % 15‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(15‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(15‬‬
‫‪0%‬‬
‫‪0%‬‬
‫‪15%‬‬
‫داﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫أﺣﯿﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎدرا‬
‫أﺑﺪا‬
‫‪85%‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺘﺒﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (15-13‬ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ‪ ،‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ )‪ ،(03‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (9.9‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ، (7.81‬ﻭﻳﺪﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﲟﻼﻣﺢ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ‬
‫ﺃﲨﻊ ﺃﻏﻠﺐ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ ،(%85‬ﺃﻱ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﲟﻼﻣﺢ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﳍﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻓﺌﺔ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%15‬ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ‪‬ﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺒﲎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﲟﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ‬
‫ﲰﺎﺕ ﻭﻣﻼﻣﺢ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻟﻠﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺣﻮﻝ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﺆ ﲟﺪﻯ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺔ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﲣﺼﺼﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺼﲑ ﰲ‬
‫ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﻦ ﳏﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻏﲑ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﻭﺍﺿﺤﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﳑﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﺳﻠﺒﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻧﻄﻼﻗﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻧﺴﺘﺨﻠﺺ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻏﻠﺐ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻻ ﻳﻮﻟﻮﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﺎ ﲟﻼﻣﺢ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪.(%85‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(16‬ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﺘﺒﻌﻜﻢ ﳌﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﻨﻈﺮﻭﻥ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻬﻢ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(24-3‬ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﻔﺮﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‬
‫ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 00‬‬
‫‪% 10‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫‪16‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪6.2‬‬
‫‪% 80 % 10‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﻏﲑﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(16‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(16‬‬
‫‪10%‬‬
‫‪0%‬‬
‫‪10%‬‬
‫داﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫أﺣﯿﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎدرا‬
‫أﺑﺪا‬
‫‪80%‬‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺒﲔ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (16-13‬ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ‪ ،‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ )‪ ،(03‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ‬
‫ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (6.2‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ، (7.81‬ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﺫﻟﻚ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻭﺗﺒﺎﻳﻦ ﰲ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ ،(80‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺔ )‪ (%10‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ‪‬ﺘﻢ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻭﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﻣﺎ ‪‬ﺘﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺿﺌﻴﻠﺔ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻮﺭﻧﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻻﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﻠﻌﺐ ﲰﺎ‪‬ﺎ ﺩﻭﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻓﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺗﺮﻣﻲ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺇﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﳘﻴﺔ ﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﺆﻛﺪ ﺇﻟﺰﺍﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ‪،‬‬
‫ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﰲ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻐﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺒﻜﺮ ﲜﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﻭﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻣﺞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ‪ ،‬ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ‪‬ﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (16-3‬ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﻟﻼﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﳛﺪﺩ ﻧﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ‬
‫ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺳﻠﺒﺎ ﰲ ﺩﻗﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺨﻠﺼﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻳﺘﻔﻖ ﻣﻊ‬
‫ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﻭﻳﺆﻛﺪﻫﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(17‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﲰﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(25-3‬ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﻛﺜﲑﺍ‬
‫ﻗﻠﻴﻼ ﻻ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪09‬‬
‫‪11‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 00‬‬
‫‪% 45‬‬
‫‪% 55‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪3.43‬‬
‫‪5.99‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(17‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(17‬‬
‫‪0%‬‬
‫ﻛﺜﯿﺮا‬
‫‪45%‬‬
‫ﻗﻠﯿﻼ‬
‫ﻻ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ‬
‫‪55%‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﺒﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (17-13‬ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (3.43‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(5.99‬ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ )‪ ،(02‬ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺃﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﲰﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﺆﻛﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ‬
‫ﻣﻨﻬﻢ )‪ (%55‬ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻸﻭﱃ )‪ (%45‬ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻗﻠﻴﻼ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺗﺒﺎﻳﻦ ﰲ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ ،(80‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺔ )‪ (%10‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ‪‬ﺘﻢ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻭﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ‬
‫‪‬ﺘﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺿﺌﻴﻠﺔ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻮﺭﻧﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﳝﻜﻦ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺮﻕ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﻤﻞ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺒﺎﺕ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻼﺕ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺳﻠﺒﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻱ‬
‫ﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﻪ‪ ،‬ﺑﺼﻔﺘﻪ ﻋﻀﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻋﺔ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ‬
‫‪‬ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻛﺄﺣﺪ ﺃﻫﻢ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﺴﺐ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﱪﻭﺝ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﻭﻣﻬﻢ‬
‫ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺸﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻱ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﻭﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﺟﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺑﺮﺍﻣﺞ‬
‫ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻭﺑﺮﺍﻣﺞ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺈﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻷﺧﺼﺎﺋﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺏ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻤﻜﻨﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻧﻄﻼﻗﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ‪ ،‬ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﻼﺹ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﻞ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺭﲟﺎ‬
‫ﲝﻜﻢ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺘﻮﻓﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺑﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﺧﻔﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﻻ‬
‫ﳝﻜﻦ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺼﻬﺎ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺑﲏ ﺍﻷﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(18‬ﻫﻞ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﱐ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﺮﺭ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(26-3‬ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﻛﺜﲑﺍ‬
‫ﻗﻠﻴﻼ ﻻ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪12‬‬
‫‪08‬‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 60‬‬
‫‪% 40‬‬
‫‪% 00‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪3.73‬‬
‫‪5.99‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(18‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(18‬‬
‫‪0%‬‬
‫‪40%‬‬
‫ﻛﺜﯿﺮا‬
‫ﻗﻠﯿﻼ‬
‫ﻻ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ‬
‫‪60%‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﺤﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (18-13‬ﻳﺘﺒﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (3.73‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ‬
‫ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(5.99‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ )‪ ،(02‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ‬
‫ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﱐ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ‬
‫ﺗﺆﻛﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%60‬ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﱐ ﻭﺗﺄﺛﲑﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ‪‬ﺘﻢ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻗﻞ ‪‬ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﻭﺗﺪﺭﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ‬
‫ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﺪﻟﻮﻝ ﺷﺎﺋﻊ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﳍﺎ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ‬
‫ﻛﺒﲑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﲝﻴﺚ ﺃﻥ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﺍﳌﺒﻜﺮﺓ ﻟﻨﺎﺷﺊ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﻷﺧﺺ‪ ،‬ﺧﻄﺄ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻗﺪ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺒﻼ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ‬
‫ﳌﺴﺘﻮﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﺝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ "ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ" ﰲ ﺑﺮﺍﻣﺞ ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺒﻼ ﻭﺇﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺗﺄﺛﲑﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﱯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﻣﻌﺎﱂ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﱐ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻣﻨﺬ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﳍﻢ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻧﻄﻼﻗﺎ ﳑﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ ﻳﺘﺒﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﺎﺗﺞ ﻋﻦ ﻭﻋﻲ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﲟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺛﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﱯ ﳍﺬﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﱐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺠﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﻭﻻ‬
‫ﳝﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﻤﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﲡﺎﻫﻠﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪ ،"H6‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ‬
‫ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(19‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﺬﺑﺬﺏ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺟﻲ )ﺍﻻﻛﺘﺌﺎﺑﻴﺔ( ﺍﳌﺘﻜﺮﺭ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﻣﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﻛﺘﺌﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(27-3‬ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﻛﺘﺌﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑـﺔ‬
‫ﺑﺸﻜﻞ‬
‫ﻛﺒﲑ‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻗﻠﻴﻼ ﻻ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫‪17‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 00‬‬
‫‪% 15‬‬
‫‪% 85‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪8.23‬‬
‫‪5.99‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(19‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(19‬‬
‫‪15%‬‬
‫‪0%‬‬
‫ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺒﯿﺮ‬
‫ﻗﻠﯿﻼ‬
‫ﻻ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ‬
‫‪85%‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺒﲔ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (19-13‬ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (8.23‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(5.99‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ )‪ ،(02‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﲏ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺃﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﻴﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%85‬ﺇﱃ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﺎﺛﲑ‬
‫ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺬﺑﺬﺏ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺟﻲ )ﺍﻻﻛﺘﺌﺎﺑﻴﺔ( ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ‬
‫ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑـ )‪ ،(%15‬ﻗﻠﻴﻼ ﻣﺎ ‪‬ﺘﻢ ‪‬ﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺟﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺗﺴﺎﻫﻢ‬
‫ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺒﲑ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺃﺩﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﺫﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﺒﲑ‬
‫ﻭﳜﻔﻖ ﰲ ﺗﺄﺩﻳﺔ ﻣﻬﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺗﻘﻠﺒﻪ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺳﻠﺒﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻏﺒﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺯ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻓﻌﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﳒﺎﺯ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻠﻖ ﻧﺪﺭﻙ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﻭﺑﺎﻷﺧﺺ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﰲ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﻣﺸﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ‬
‫ﻛﺮﻭﻳﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘـﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎ‪ ،‬ﻧﺴﺘﺨﻠﺺ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺇﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺠﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺟﻲ‬
‫)ﺍﻻﻛﺘﺌﺎﺑﻴﺔ( ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻘﺺ ﰲ ﺇﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ‬
‫ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺳﻠﺒﺎ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻱ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺒﻼ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ‬
‫ﻳﺘﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻣﻊ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﻭﻳﺆﻛﺪﻫﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(20‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﺣﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻳﻊ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﺮﺭﺓ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ( ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(28-3‬ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑـﺔ‬
‫ﺑﺸﻜﻞ‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻗﻠﻴﻼ ﻻ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫ﻛﺒﲑ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪08‬‬
‫‪12‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 00‬‬
‫‪% 40‬‬
‫‪% 60‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪3.73‬‬
‫‪5.99‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﻏﲑﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(20‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(20‬‬
‫‪0%‬‬
‫ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺒﯿﺮ‬
‫‪40%‬‬
‫ﻗﻠﯿﻼ‬
‫ﻻ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ‬
‫‪60%‬‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺟﺎﺀﺕ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (20-13‬ﺩﺍﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ ،(3.73‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪،(5.99‬‬
‫ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ )‪ ،(02‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﰲ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺣﻮﻝ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﺣﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻳﻊ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪،‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ )‪ (%60‬ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ )‪ (%40‬ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﲰﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺐ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﻋﺪﻭﺍﱐ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ‬
‫ﻳﻜﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﲢﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ‪ ،‬ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺳﻠﺒﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻻﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﺃﺩﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻄﺮﻗﻨﺎ ﰲ ﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (18-3‬ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﺄﺛﲑﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪،‬‬
‫ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﳚﺰﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺆﻭﻟﲔ ﻋﻦ ﻧﺎﺷﺊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺬﻩ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﳍﺎﻣﺔ ﰲ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻷ‪‬ﻢ ﺛﺮﻭﺓ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳﻂ‬
‫ﻓﻴﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﳚﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﻧﺴﺘﻨﺘﺞ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺭﲟﺎ ﻷ‪‬ﺎ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﱐ ﻭﻳﺼﺎﺣﺒﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻷﺣﻴﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻛﺴﻠﻮﻙ‬
‫ﻋﺪﻭﺍﱐ ﻣﻼﺣﻆ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ "‪،"H0‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻦ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﻭﻏﲑ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(21‬ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﺘﺒﻌﻜﻢ ﳌﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﻮﱄ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺭﺑﻂ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(29-3‬ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪15‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 75‬‬
‫‪% 15‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪6.9‬‬
‫‪% 00 % 10‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﻏﲑﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(21‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(21‬‬
‫‪0%‬‬
‫‪10%‬‬
‫‪15%‬‬
‫داﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫أﺣﯿﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎدرا‬
‫أﺑﺪا‬
‫‪75%‬‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﺒﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (21-03‬ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (6.9‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ (7.81‬ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ )‪ ،(02‬ﻭﻳﻌﲏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﰲ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺋﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ‬
‫ﻣﻨﻬﻢ )‪ (%75‬ﺗﺆﻛﺪ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪(%15‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ‪‬ﺘﻢ ‪‬ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﻣﻘﺪﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺑـ )‪ (%10‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ‪‬ﺘﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪،‬‬
‫ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻟﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻜﺎﻙ ﺑﺰﻣﻼﺋﻪ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺇﻃﺎﺭ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺗﻨﺎﻓﺴﻲ‪ ،‬ﻳﺆﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﲤﺎﺳﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺛﲑ ﺍﻹﳚﺎﰊ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ "ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ" ﻛﻮ‪‬ﺎ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺔ ﰲ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ‪ ،‬ﻭﺟﺐ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺎ ﻣﻨﺬ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﺍﳌﺒﻜﺮ ﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻌﻮﻳﺪ ﻭﺗﺪﺭﻳﺐ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻣﺞ ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﳍﻢ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻓﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺃﻣﺮ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﻭﺃﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻫﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻧﻄﻼﻗﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺭﲟﺎ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻭﻋﻲ ﻭﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻟﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺇﱃ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﻭﻗﻮﺓ ﺗﻔﺎﳘﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪ "H0‬ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(22‬ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﺘﺒﻌﻜﻢ ﳌﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﺄﺧﺬﻭﻥ ﺑﻌﲔ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﳍﺪﻭﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﳍﺪﻭﺀ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(30-3‬ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﳍﺪﻭﺀ ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪14‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 70‬‬
‫‪% 15‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪5.7‬‬
‫‪% 00 % 15‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﻏﲑﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(22‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(22‬‬
‫‪0%‬‬
‫داﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫‪15%‬‬
‫أﺣﯿﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎدرا‬
‫أﺑﺪا‬
‫‪15%‬‬
‫‪70%‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺘﺒﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (22-03‬ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (5.7‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ (7.81‬ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ )‪ ،(03‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻥ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺋﻢ‬
‫ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﳍﺪﻭﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ )‪ (%70‬ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺋﻢ ‪‬ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫)‪ (%15‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ‪‬ﺘﻢ ‪‬ﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﳑﺎﺛﻠﺔ )‪ (%15‬ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ‪‬ﺘﻢ ‪‬ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺭﺑﻂ ﲰﺔ ﺍﳍﺪﻭﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﺘﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﻓﻜﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﳍﺪﻭﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻀﺐ‬
‫ﺃﻣﺮ ﺇﳚﺎﰊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻭﻟﻪ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﺑﺎﻟﻎ ﺍﻷﳘﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻜﺜﲑﺍ‬
‫ﻣﺎ ﻧﺮﻯ ﺧﺴﺎﺭﺓ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪ ﻟﻼﻋﺒﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ ﻣﻊ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﳍﺪﻭﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻻﻋﺒﻴﻬﺎ ﻛﺒﲑ‪ ،‬ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺬﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺑﺎﻷﺧﺺ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﻮﻳﻦ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ‪ ،‬ﻧﺴﺘﻨﺘﺞ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﳍﺪﻭﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﻭﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﱵ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ "ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ" ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﺁﺧﺮ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪ "H0‬ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻦ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺗﺎﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(23‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻭﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻠﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(31-3‬ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑـﺔ‬
‫ﺑﺸﻜﻞ‬
‫ﻛﺒﲑ‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻗﻠﻴﻼ ﻻ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪14‬‬
‫‪04‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 70‬‬
‫‪% 20‬‬
‫‪% 10‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪4.13‬‬
‫‪5.99‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﻏﲑﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(23‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(23‬‬
‫‪10%‬‬
‫‪20%‬‬
‫ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺒﯿﺮ‬
‫ﻗﻠﯿﻼ‬
‫ﻻ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ‬
‫‪70%‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺟﻠﻴﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (23-3‬ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ ،(4.13‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ‬
‫)‪ ،(5.99‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ )‪ ،(02‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ‬
‫ﺃﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻠﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺸﲑ ﺃﻏﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%70‬ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺛﲑ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ )‪ (%20‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﳍﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺿﺌﻴﻠﺔ‬
‫)‪ (%10‬ﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻮﱄ ﳍﺎ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺑﺄﻥ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻟﻌﺒﺔ ﲨﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﺗﺘﻄﻠﺐ ﺗﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻭﺗﻜﺎﻓﻞ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺯ‪ ،‬ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻠﻚ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺿﻤﻦ ﻧﺮﺟﺴﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﺳﻠﺒﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺩﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻭﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻓﺮﻳﻘﻪ‪ ،‬ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺃﺧﺬ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺑﻌﲔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﳌﺒﻜﺮ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻫﺐ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺑﺮﺍﻣﺞ ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﳍﻢ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻧﻄﻼﻗﺎ ﳑﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ‪ ،‬ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻭﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻠﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ‪ ،‬ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (21-3‬ﺣﻮﻝ ﲰﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺪﺭﻙ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺏ ﺃﻥ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻧﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻠﻚ ﰲ ﻟﻌﺒﺔ ﲨﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬‬
‫ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺳﻠﺒﺎ ﰲ ﻣﺮﺩﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻨﻪ ﻳﺘﺄﻛﺪ ﻣﺮﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪ "H0‬ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(24‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﺣﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﳋﻮﻑ ﻭﺳﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﺒﺎﻙ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬‬
‫ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ "ﺍﻟﻀﺒﻂ" ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(32-3‬ﳝﺜﻞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ‬
‫"ﺍﻟﻀﺒﻂ" ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑـﺔ‬
‫ﺑﺸﻜﻞ‬
‫ﻛﺒﲑ‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻗﻠﻴﻼ ﻻ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪02‬‬
‫‪05‬‬
‫‪13‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫‪% 10‬‬
‫‪% 25‬‬
‫‪% 65‬‬
‫‪%100‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫‪3.23‬‬
‫‪5.99‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫‪0.05‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(24‬ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(24‬‬
‫‪10%‬‬
‫ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺒﯿﺮ ‪25%‬‬
‫ﻗﻠﯿﻼ‬
‫ﻻ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ‬
‫‪65%‬‬
‫‪03‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻳﺘﺒﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳌﺪﻭﻧﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (24-3‬ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ ،(3.23‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ‬
‫)‪ ،(5.99‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ )‪ ،(03‬ﻭﻳﻌﲏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﰲ‬
‫ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺗﺄﺛﺮ ﲰﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ "ﺍﻟﻀﺒﻂ" ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪،‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﺷﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺑـ )‪ (%65‬ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‬
‫)‪ (%25‬ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺿﺌﻴﻠﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﻣﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺑـ )‪ (%10‬ﺗﺆﻛﺪ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻄﺮﻕ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﳋﻮﻑ ﻭﺳﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﺒﺎﻙ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻻﻋﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﺳﻠﺒﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺩﺍﺋﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻌﺒﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻟﻌﺒﺔ ﺗﺘﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﱐ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺗﺘﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﳋﻮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﺼﻢ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﳚﺰﻡ ﺍﻷﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟﻐﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻼﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻀﺒﻂ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﻣﺸﻮﺍﺭﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﻄﻮﻳﺮ‬
‫ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺭﻓﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻧﻄﻼﻗﺎ ﳑﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ‪ ،‬ﻧﺴﺘﻨﺘﺞ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ "ﺍﻟﻀﺒﻂ" ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻏﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﳘﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﰲ ﻟﻌﺒﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﻷﺧﺺ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﻭﻋﻲ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺄﳘﻴﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻮﻓﺮ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﻫﺬﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﺒﲎ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻴﻄﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻛﺪﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪.(07‬‬
‫ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ )‪ (03‬ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺃﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﺸﲑ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﲢﻈﻰ ﺑﺎﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﺒﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ )‪ (15-3‬ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‬
‫ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (9.9‬ﻭﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺃﻛﱪ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ (7.81‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ )‪،(03‬‬
‫ﲟﻌﲎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻻ ﻳﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﺎ ﻛﺒﲑﺍ ﲟﻼﻣﺢ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺆﻛﺪﻩ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺔ )‪ ،(%85‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ )‪ (%15‬ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺖ ‪‬ﺘﻢ‬
‫ﲟﻼﻣﺢ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺸﲑ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ )‪ (16-3‬ﺇﱃ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (8.2‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ‬
‫)‪ (7.81‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ )‪ ،(03‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻥ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﻴﺔ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%80‬ﻻ ﻳﻨﻈﺮﻭﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺗﻨﺎ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (17-3‬ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ )‪ (03‬ﻭﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫)‪ (3.43‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(5.99‬ﻭﻣﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻛﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ‬
‫ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﺴﱯ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﺩﻧﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻟﻠﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪"H0‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻠﺔ "‪ "H1‬ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﳒﺪ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ ،(18-3‬ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺗﻌﻜﺴﻬﺎ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻭﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺭﲟﺎ ﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺐ‪.‬‬
‫ﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (19-3‬ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻔﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻻ ﻳﻌﲑﻭﻥ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﺎ ﻟﻠﺘﻘﻠﺐ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺟﻲ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ‬
‫ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﻛﺘﺌﺎﺑﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻌﻜﺴﻪ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ ،(%85‬ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﳛﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻠﺔ‬
‫"‪."H1‬‬
‫ﻭﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ "‪ ،(20-3‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ‬
‫ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻔﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺭﲟﺎ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﱐ ﻭﻭﻋﻲ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﳌﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﳛﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪ "H0‬ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺗﺸﲑ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ ،(21-3‬ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ )‪ (0.05‬ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ )‪ (03‬ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺍﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻟﻠﻌﺒﺔ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻳﺘﻄﻠﺐ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻼﻋﺒﲔ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺒﲑ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺪ ﳚﺰﻡ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪ "H0‬ﲢﻘﻘﺖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺸﲑ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (21-3‬ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﻻﻝ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻔﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‬
‫ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﳍﺪﻭﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ‬
‫ﺭﲟﺎ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻭﺗﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻣﻊ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﲰﺔ "ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ" ﻭ"ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ" ﻭﺗﺄﺛﲑ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﲢﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪."H0‬‬
‫ﻭﺑﲔ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (23-3‬ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻝ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺗﻌﻜﺴﻪ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻭﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻠﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲢﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪ "H0‬ﺑﺄﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ‬
‫ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺗﺄﰐ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳉﺪﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (24-3‬ﻣﺆﻛﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺗﺒﲔ‬
‫ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ "ﺍﻟﻀﺒﻂ" ﺃﻭ "ﺍﻟﻜﻒ" ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺗﺄﰐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺩﺍﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲢﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻠﺔ "‪."H1‬‬
‫ﺍﻧﻄﻼﻗﺎ ﻣﻦ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺍﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳌﺆﻛﺪﺓ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻥ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﲢﻈﻰ ﺑﺎﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻳﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﻳﻬﻤﻠﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺭﲟﺎ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺑﺄﳘﻴﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻭﺗﺄﺛﲑﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟﻎ ﺍﻷﳘﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﲝﻜﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻣﺆﻫﻼ‪‬ﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﱯ‪،‬‬
‫ﺃﻭ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺗﻮﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻻﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﰲ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺋﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻴﻄﺔ ‪-‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﰎ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪﻩ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎ‪ -‬ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﻜﺲ ﺇﳘﺎﳍﻢ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ ﻱ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺎﺕ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1-2‬ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻀﻤﻮ‪‬ﺎ ﺃﻥ‪ :‬ﺇﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻳﺪﻓﻊ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ"‬
‫ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻮﺿﺤﻬﺎ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﱄ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻞ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(33‬ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ "ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻳﺪﻓﻊ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ"‬
‫ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻳﲑ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(01‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(02‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‬
‫‪%‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻧﻌﻢ‬
‫‪100‬‬
‫‪-‬ﻻ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫‪80‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫‪15‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫‪05‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ‬
‫‪35‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ - (03‬ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﱐ‬
‫‪30‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﲏ‬
‫‪25‬‬
‫‪4.51‬‬
‫‪8.3‬‬
‫‪1.07‬‬
‫‪3.84‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪9.49‬‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(04‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(05‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(06‬‬
‫ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ‬
‫‪60‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺑﻄﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﲤﺎﺭﻳﻦ ﺗﻨﺎﻓﺴﻴﺔ‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻼﺕ ﻭﺩﻳﺔ‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫‪30‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪60‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫‪15‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪55‬‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫‪65‬‬
‫‪3.4‬‬
‫‪4.2‬‬
‫‪2.5‬‬
‫‪4.91‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪7.428‬‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻓﻤﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (01‬ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻏﻠﺐ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺃﻭ ﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪(%100‬‬
‫ﻳﺆﻛﺪﻭﻥ ﺃ‪‬ﻢ ﺻﺎﺩﻓﻮﺍ ﻣﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﻛﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻭﻋﺪﺓ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺸﻮﺍﺭﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﱯ ﰲ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ‬
‫ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ (4.51) 2‬ﺯﻫﻲ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻙ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(3.84‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻭﺩﻭﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ‬
‫ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻝ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺗﺪﻋﻢ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻭﺗﺆﻛﺪﻫﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (02‬ﻳﺴﲑ ﺃﻏﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻴﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ ،(%80‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺗﻘﺪﺭ ﺑـ )‪ (%15‬ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺿﺌﻴﻠﺔ‬
‫ﺟﺪﺍ ﺗﻘﺪﺭ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%05‬ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺃ‪‬ﻢ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺭﲟﺎ ﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ‬
‫ﺍﻹﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﻓﺮﺓ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﻛﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻟﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﺧﲑﺓ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﺘﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺀﺓ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (8.3‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(7.81‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪ ،"H0‬ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻫﺐ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ )‪ (03‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﺒﲔ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻳﺮﻛﺰﻭﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ‬
‫"ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴﺔ" ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﳘﺎﻝ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ "ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ"‪،‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﳒﺪ )‪ (%35‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭ)‪ (%30‬ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﱐ ﻭ)‪(%25‬‬
‫ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﲏ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺣﲔ )‪ (%10‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻟﻼﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ‬
‫ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (1.7‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ‬
‫)‪ ،(9.49‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﲢﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪."H0‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (04‬ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻏﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﻭﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﳒﺪ )‪ (%60‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﺗﻌﺘﻤﺪ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%20‬ﻳﺴﺘﻌﻤﻠﻮﻥ ﲤﺎﺭﻳﻦ ﺗﻨﺎﻓﺴﻴﺔ ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪(%10‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻳﻠﺠﺆﻭﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﺩﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﳑﺎﺛﻠﺔ )‪ (%10‬ﺗﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻄﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ‪،‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (3.4‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(7.81‬ﳑﺎ‬
‫ﻳﻌﲏ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﳚﺰﻡ ﻭﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﲢﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ‬
‫"‪ ،"H0‬ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﱄ ﻋﺪﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (05‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺃﻏﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%60‬ﺃ‪‬ﻢ ﻻ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﲟﺒﺪﺃ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%30‬ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ‪‬ﺘﻢ ‪‬ﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫)‪ (%10‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ‪‬ﺘﻢ‪ ،‬ﲝﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (4.2‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(7.81‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﲢﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ‬
‫"‪."H0‬‬
‫ﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (06‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺷﺎﺭﺕ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺑـ )‪ (%55‬ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﳌﺮﺍﻗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%20‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﻣﺎ ‪‬ﺘﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%15‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ‪‬ﺘﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭ)‪ (%10‬ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ‪‬ﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ‬
‫ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (2.5‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(7.81‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ‬
‫ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﲢﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪."H0‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺗﻨﺎ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﱂ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫)‪ ،(%65‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (3.893‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ‬
‫)‪ ،(7.428‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﱄ ﱂ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻠﺔ‬
‫"‪ "H1‬ﻭﲢﻘﻘﺖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪ ،"H0‬ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ‬
‫ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2-2‬ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻟﻘﺪ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺿﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﻳﻦ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻳﺴﺎﻋﺪ‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﲰﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻮﺿﺤﻬﺎ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﱄ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(34‬ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ "ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﻳﻦ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻳﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﲰﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻳﲑ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(07‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(08‬‬
‫‪%‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫‪80‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫‪05‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫‪15‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪70‬‬
‫ ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻼﺕ‬‫ﻣﻌﻬﻢ‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ - (09‬ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺎﻭﺭ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(10‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺘﻬﻢ ﻋﻦ‬‫ﺑﻌﺪ‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪60‬‬
‫‪6.2‬‬
‫‪5.5‬‬
‫‪4.13‬‬
‫‪3.4‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪5.99‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫‪05‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫‪15‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫‪15‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪65‬‬
‫ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﺎ‬‫ﻭﻣﻌﺎﳉﺘﻬﺎ‬
‫‪30‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ - (12‬ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﺄﺧﺼﺎﺋﻲ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺴﺎﱐ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(11‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(13‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(14‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﲡﺎﻫﻠﻬﺎ‬
‫‪70‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪90‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺯﺍﺋﺪ‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻗﻠﻴﻞ‬
‫‪15‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻋﺎﺩﻱ‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ‬
‫‪55‬‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫‪63.75‬‬
‫‪4.4‬‬
‫‪4.93‬‬
‫‪11.4‬‬
‫‪2.5‬‬
‫‪5.30‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪5.99‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪7.355‬‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻓﻤﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (07‬ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻏﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﻨﻴﺔ )‪ (%80‬ﻻ ﻳﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻭﻋﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%10‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﳑﺎﺛﻠﺔ ﺃﻱ )‪ (%10‬ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﺯﺍﺋﺪ ‪‬ﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (6.2‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(7.81‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ‬
‫ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺗﺆﻛﺪ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺇﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﻔﺎﻳﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (08‬ﺗﺸﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ )‪ (%70‬ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%15‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ‪‬ﺘﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺑـ‬
‫)‪ (%10‬ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ‪‬ﺘﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺿﺌﻴﻠﺔ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺗﻘﺪﺭ ﺑـ )‪ (%05‬ﺘﻢ ‪‬ﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺭﲟﺎ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺀﺓ ﺍﳌﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﳌﺆﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﳍﻢ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫)‪ (5.5‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(7.81‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﺆﻛﺪﺓ ﲢﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪ "H0‬ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺇﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﻳﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﻗﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (09‬ﳒﺪ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%70‬ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺘﻘﺮﺑﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%20‬ﺗﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺎﻭﺭ‬
‫ﻣﻌﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺣﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﳒﺪ‬
‫ﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%10‬ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﺈﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻼﺕ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (4.13‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ‬
‫ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(5.99‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲢﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪."H0‬‬
‫ﻭﺗﺸﲑ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (10‬ﺇﱃ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%60‬ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻘﺮﺑﻮﻥ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%20‬ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻘﺮﺑﻮﻥ ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%10‬ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻳﺘﻘﺮﺑﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﳑﺎﺛﻠﺔ ﺗﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫)‪ (3.4‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(7.81‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ‬
‫"‪ "H0‬ﲢﻘﻘﺖ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﳒﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (11‬ﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%65‬ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻻ ﻳﺘﺪﺧﻠﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸﺎﻛﻞ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%15‬ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺪﺧﻠﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﳑﺎﺛﻠﺔ ﺃﻱ‬
‫)‪ (%15‬ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺪﺧﻠﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﳒﺪ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%05‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺿﺌﻴﻠﺔ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻳﺴﺎﻋﺪﻭﻥ ﰲ ﺣﻞ‬
‫ﻣﺸﺎﻛﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (4.4‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ‬
‫ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(7.81‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺪﻝ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲢﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪."H0‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺸﲑ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (12‬ﺇﱃ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%70‬ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻳﺘﺠﺎﻫﻠﻮﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻛﺎﺕ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%30‬ﻳﺘﻮﻗﻔﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﺎ ﳏﺎﻭﻟﲔ‬
‫ﻓﻬﻤﻬﺎ ﻭﻣﻌﺎﳉﺘﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺇﳚﺎﰊ ﻭﻟﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﰲ ﺇﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﻭﺍﺿﺤﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (4.93‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ )‪ ،(5.99‬ﳑﺎ‬
‫ﻳﻌﲏ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﲢﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪."H0‬‬
‫ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (13‬ﳒﺪ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺗﻘﺪﺭ ﺑـ )‪ (%90‬ﻻ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺈﺟﺮﺍﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺤﻮﺻﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%10‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ‪‬ﺘﻢ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ‬
‫ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (11.4‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(7.81‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺗﻌﻜﺲ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻡ ﻟﻼﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺗﻨﺎ ﻟﻠﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ ،(14‬ﳒﺪ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%55‬ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻻ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ‬
‫ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%20‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫)‪ (%15‬ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ‪ ،‬ﺃﻣﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%10‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮ ﻭﺯﺍﺋﺪ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (2.5‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ‬
‫)‪ ،(7.81‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲢﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪."H0‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺗﻨﺎ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﱂ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫)‪ ،(%70‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (5.557‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ‬
‫)‪ ،(7.355‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﱄ ﺗﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻠﺔ "‪"H1‬‬
‫ﻭﻧﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪ "H0‬ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﻳﻦ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﻗﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﲰﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺎ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3-2‬ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻟﻘﺪ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺿﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﲢﻈﻰ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(35‬ﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﺔ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‬
‫"ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻳﲑ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫‪%‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫‪15‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪85‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪80‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻛﺜﲑﺍ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ - (17‬ﻗﻠﻴﻼ‬
‫‪45‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(15‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(16‬‬
‫ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‬
‫‪ -‬ﻻ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ‬
‫‪55‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻛﺜﲑﺍ‬
‫‪60‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ - (18‬ﻗﻠﻴﻼ‬
‫‪40‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻻ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺒﲑ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ - (19‬ﻗﻠﻴﻼ‬
‫ ﻻ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ‬‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ - (20‬ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺒﲑ‬
‫‪15‬‬
‫‪9.9‬‬
‫‪6.2‬‬
‫‪3.43‬‬
‫‪3.73‬‬
‫‪8.23‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪5.99‬‬
‫‪5.99‬‬
‫‪5.99‬‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫‪85‬‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪3.73‬‬
‫‪5.99‬‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(21‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(22‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻗﻠﻴﻼ‬
‫‪40‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻻ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ‬
‫‪60‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫‪75‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫‪15‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫‪70‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫‪15‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫‪15‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪00‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺒﲑ‬
‫‪70‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ - (23‬ﻗﻠﻴﻼ‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﻻ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪ -‬ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺒﲑ‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ - (24‬ﻗﻠﻴﻼ‬
‫ ﻻ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ‬‫ﺍ‪‬ﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫‪25‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪5.7‬‬
‫‪7.81‬‬
‫‪4.13‬‬
‫‪5.99‬‬
‫‪4.13‬‬
‫‪5.99‬‬
‫‪3.23‬‬
‫ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫‪65‬‬
‫‪70.50‬‬
‫‪5.24‬‬
‫‪6.718‬‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻓﻤﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (15‬ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﺃﻏﻠﺐ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ ،(%85‬ﻻ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﲟﻼﻣﺢ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%15‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ‪‬ﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ‪،‬‬
‫ﲝﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (9.9‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(7.81‬ﳑﺎ‬
‫ﻳﻌﲏ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺆﻛﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻠﺔ "‪ "H1‬ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ ،(16‬ﻳﺸﲑ ﺃﻏﻠﺐ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%80‬ﺇﱃ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%10‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻨﻈﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻗﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﳑﺎﺛﻠﺔ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ‪‬ﻢ ‪‬ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻗﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ‬
‫ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (6.2‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(7.81‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻋﺪﻡ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﲢﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﻳﺔ "‪."H0‬‬
‫ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ ،(17‬ﺗﺸﲑ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%55‬ﻣﻦ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﲰﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺑـ )‪ (%45‬ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (3.43‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(5.99‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻠﺔ "‪ ،"H1‬ﻭﲢﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪ ،"H0‬ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ ،(18‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺃﻏﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%60‬ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺛﲑ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﱐ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%40‬ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﻭﻳﺎ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (3.73‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(5.99‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪ ،"H0‬ﻭﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻠﺔ "‪."H1‬‬
‫ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ ،(19‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺷﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ )‪ (%85‬ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ‬
‫ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﻛﺘﺌﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﺬﺑﺬﺏ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺟﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%15‬ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ‬
‫ﻗﻠﻴﻼ ‪‬ﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ‪ ،‬ﲝﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (8.23‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ‬
‫ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(5.99‬ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻠﺔ "‪."H1‬‬
‫ﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ ،(20‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%60‬ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﲰﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%40‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻧﻮﻋﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻸﻭﱃ ﺃﺷﺎﺭﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺗﺄﺛﲑﺍ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺃﻭ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪(3.73‬‬
‫ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(5.99‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﳛﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪ "H0‬ﻭﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻠﺔ "‪."H1‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ ،(21‬ﻳﺘﺒﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪(%75‬‬
‫‪‬ﺘﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%15‬ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ‪‬ﺘﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫)‪ (%10‬ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄ‪‬ﺎ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ‪‬ﺘﻢ ‪‬ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (6.9‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(7.81‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﲢﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪ "H0‬ﻭﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻠﺔ "‪."H1‬‬
‫ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ ،(22‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺷﺎﺭﺕ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%70‬ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳍﺪﻭﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%15‬ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ‬
‫‪‬ﺘﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﳑﺎﺛﻠﺔ )‪ (%15‬ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ‪‬ﺘﻢ‪ ،‬ﲝﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (5.7‬ﻭﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(7.81‬ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻠﺔ "‪ "H1‬ﻭﳛﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪."H0‬‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ ،(23‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺷﺎﺭﺕ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ )‪ (%70‬ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺛﲑ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ‬
‫ﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻭﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻠﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%20‬ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‬
‫ﺗﺄﺛﺮ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﺃﻗﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺑـ )‪ (%10‬ﻻ ‪‬ﺘﻢ ‪‬ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (4.13‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ‬
‫)‪ ،(5.99‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ "‪ "H0‬ﻭﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻠﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ ،(24‬ﳒﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%65‬ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻻ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ‬
‫ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻀﺒﻂ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%25‬ﺘﻢ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺒﲑ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫)‪ (%10‬ﺘﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺎ ‪‬ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (3.23‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ‬
‫ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(5.99‬ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ‬
‫ﲢﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪ "H0‬ﻭﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻠﺔ "‪."H1‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻟﻦ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫)‪ ،(%70.5‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ )‪ (5.718‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ‬
‫ﺗﺒﻠﻎ )‪ ،(6.718‬ﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﺤﺔ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﱄ ﻧﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ "‪ "H0‬ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﲢﻈﻰ ﺑﺎﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﻨﻔﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻠﺔ "‪."H1‬‬
‫‪ -4-2‬ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ :(36‬ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺻﻴﺎﻏﺘﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪%‬‬
‫ ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻳﺪﻓﻊ ﺑﺎﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﱂ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﻖ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ"‬
‫‪65‬‬
‫ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﻳﻦ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻳﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﲰﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ‪‬ﺎ ﱂ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﻖ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫‪70‬‬
‫ ﻻ ﲢﻈﻰ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ‬‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﱂ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﻖ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫‪70.5‬‬
‫ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﻟﻼﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‬‫"ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﱂ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﻖ‬
‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪68.5‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﳉﺪﻭﻝ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﺢ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﻧﺴﺘﻨﺘﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﱂ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪(%68.5‬‬
‫ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﱂ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ ،(%65‬ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫)‪ (%70‬ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪.(%70.5‬‬
‫ﺧﻼﺻـﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﲤﻜﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﲟﺨﺘﻠﻒ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﺟﺮﻳﺖ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﻔﺴﲑﻫﺎ ﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺃﻫﻢ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ‬
‫ﺍﻟﱵ ﲤﺲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳋﺮﻭﺝ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺟﺎﺕ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﺔ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻭﺿﺤﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻭﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﳏﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﱪﺯ ﻟﻨﺎ‬
‫ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻣﺜﻞ "ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻴﻮﻻﺕ ﻭﺍﻻﲡﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﻭﲰﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ"‪.‬‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﰎ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺎﺕ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺐ ﺍﳌﺌﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﻭﻛﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍ‪‬ﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﻭﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﺍﳌﻌﻴﺎﺭﻱ‬
‫ﻭﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﺻﻠﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻨﺴﺐ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﱂ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ (%65‬ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﱂ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪(%70‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﱂ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ )‪ ،(%70.5‬ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﱂ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫)‪ (%68.5‬ﻫﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻓﺴﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‬
‫"ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺒﲏ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺘﺒﻌﻪ ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﺿﺤﺔ ﻭﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺑﺮﺍﻣﺞ ﻟﻺﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻟﺘﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﻄﻮﻳﺮ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺛﲑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺃﺩﺍﺋﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﺒﻠﻲ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺧﻠﺼﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ‪‬ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﳉﺪﻱ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﺎ ﻭﳏﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﻓﻬﻢ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳌﺆﺛﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ‬
‫ﻭﰲ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻪ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ‪:‬‬
‫ﻛﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺘﻨﺘﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺗﺒﲎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﺕ "ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﺮﻛﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ "....‬ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻭﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﺿﺤﺔ ﻭﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻭﻣﺪﻯ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺘﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻧﺸﺎﻁ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺠﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺪﺭﰊ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﻲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﲟﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﻏﲑﺍ ﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﺑﺘﻌﺎﺩﻫﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺑﻄﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﲟﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻋﻬﺎ "ﺑﺪﻧﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻣﻬﺎﺭﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻧﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪ "...‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻔﻘﺪ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻃﺎﺑﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻖ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﻱ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻭﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﺎﻗﺼﺔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻀﻔﻲ ﻃﺎﺑﻊ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺸﻮﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻻﺣﻈﻨﺎ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﺇﻋﻄﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻀﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻐﻤﻮﺽ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﻳﻌﺮﻗﻞ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻠﻌﺐ ﺩﻭﺭﺍ ﻫﺎﻣﺎ ﻭﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ‬
‫ﻧﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻻﺣﻈﻨﺎ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺯﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺒﲏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺘﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﺿﺤﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﺟﻪ ﰲ ﺑﺮﻣﺞ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ‪‬ﺬﻩ‬
‫ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﻣﺞ ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﰎ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﻏﻴﺎ‪‬ﺎ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﺗﺎﻡ ﰲ‬
‫ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﻣﺞ ﺍﳌﺴﻄﺮﺓ ﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﻼﺻﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻠﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻛﻠﻪ ﺇﳘﺎﻝ ﻟﻠﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ "ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ‬
‫ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ" ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻮﺻﻠﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻏﻠﺐ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‬
‫ﻳﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺭﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻠﻌﺐ ﺩﻭﺭﺍ ﻫﺎﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻗﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﰎ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪﻩ ﰲ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺧﺎﲤـﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻟﻘﺪ ﻗﻤﻨﺎ ﺑﺈﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﳌﻜﺎﻧﺔ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﳌﻮﻫﻮﰊ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺒﻌﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﲟﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻫﺬﺍ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻮﺻﻠﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺃﻏﻠﺐ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻕ ﻏﲑ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺑﺪﺀﺍ ﺑﺎﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻴﻄﺔ‪ ،‬ﰒ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﻎ ﺍﻷﳘﻴﺔ ﻭﻟﻪ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ‬
‫ﻛﺒﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ ﻧﺎﻗﺼﺔ ﻭﻏﲑ‬
‫ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﺳﻠﺒﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﳌﺆﺛﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‬
‫ﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ "ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻗﺘﺮﺍﺣﺎﺕ ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻗﺘﺮﺍﺡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﲏ ﻟﻠﻤﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﺧﺎﺹ ﺑﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻭﳎﺎﻻﺕ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﻪ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﰲ‬‫ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺒﺎﺕ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺑﻄﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻧﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ‬‫ﻛﻲ ﺗﺘﻼﺀﻡ ﻭﻣﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎ‪‬ﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﺭ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍ‪‬ﺎﻝ ﻟﻸﺧﺼﺎﺋﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ ﻟﻠﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﰲ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻓﺮﻕ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‬‫ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺘﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻦ ﻣﺒﻜﺮﺓ‪.‬‬
‫ ﻭﺿﻊ ﳉﺎﻥ ﺗﻔﺘﻴﺶ ﺗﻌﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ‪.‬‬‫ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﺕ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﻮﲰﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﺒﺎﺩﻝ‬‫ﺍﳋﱪﺍﺕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﳊﺮﺹ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ‬‫ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪﻳﻦ ﲟﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ‬‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﱪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺒﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ‪،‬‬‫ﻭﺗﻜﻴﻴﻔﻬﺎ ﻭﻓﻖ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ‬
‫ﺃ‪ -‬ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ v‬ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﺭ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ‪.‬‬
‫‪ v‬ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ‪:‬‬
‫‪ v‬ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ‪:‬‬
‫‪ .1‬ﺁﻥ ﺗﺎﻳﻠﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ‪:‬ﻣﺪﺧﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﺗﺮﲨﺔ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﲰﻌﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،2‬ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ‪،‬ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﺪ‪ ،‬ﺩﻣﺸﻖ‪،‬‬
‫ﺳﻮﺭﻳﺎ‪.1996 ،‬‬
‫‪ .2‬ﺁﻥ ﺗﺎﻳﻠﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ‪،‬ﺗﺮﲨﺔ ﻋﻴﺴـﻰ ﲰﻌﺎﻥ‪،‬ﻣـﺪﺧﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻠـﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪،‬ﺍﳉـﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ‪،‬ﻣﻨﺸـﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﺔ‪،‬ﺩﻣﺸﻖ‪،‬ﺳﻮﺭﻳﺎ‪.1996،‬‬
‫ـﺮ‬
‫ـﺎﺕ‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜـ‬
‫ـﺎﻫﻴﻢ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻘـ‬
‫ـﻲ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻔـ‬
‫ـﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿـ‬
‫ـﻢ ﺍﻟـ‬
‫ـﺎﺩﺉ ﻋﻠـ‬
‫ـﻮﺯﻱ‪:‬ﻣﺒـ‬
‫ـﲔ ﻓـ‬
‫ـﺪ ﺍﻣـ‬
‫‪ .3‬ﺃﲪـ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪،‬ﻣﺼﺮ‪.2003،‬‬
‫‪ .4‬ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﺴﻄﻮﺳﻲ‪ :‬ﺳﺒﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻀﻤﺎﺭ ﻭﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﻧﺸﺮ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ‪ ،‬ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ‪.1998 ،‬‬
‫‪ .5‬ﺃﲪﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ‪ :‬ﺍﻷﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻁ‪،4‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﻴﺔ‪،‬ﺇﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ‪،‬ﻣﺼﺮ‪.1987 ،‬‬
‫‪ .6‬ﺃﲪﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ‪:‬ﺃﺳﺲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ‪،‬ﻁ‪ ،3‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﻴﺔ‪،‬ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ‪،‬ﻣﺼﺮ‪.2000،‬‬
‫‪ .7‬ﺃﲪﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ‪:‬ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﳉﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ‪،‬ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻳﺦ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻳﺖ‪.1996،‬‬
‫‪.8‬‬
‫‪.9‬‬
‫‪.10‬‬
‫‪.11‬‬
‫ﺃﺳﺎﻣﺔ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺭﺍﺗﺐ‪ :‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻘﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،2‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪.1997 ،‬‬
‫ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻋﺼﻤﺖ ﻣﻄﺎﻭﻉ‪ :‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭ ﺃﳘﻴﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻨﺎ‪،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ )ﺝ‪.‬ﻡ‪.‬ﻉ( ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪.1981 ،‬‬
‫ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻭﺟﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ‪:‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻲ‪،‬ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻜﺘﺎﺏ‪،‬ﻣﺼﺮ‪.2002،‬‬
‫ﺇﺧﻼﺹ ﳏﻤﺪ‪ ،‬ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﺣﺴﲔ ﺑﺎﻫﻲ‪ :‬ﻃﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻟﻠﻨﺸـﺮ‪،‬‬
‫‪.2000‬‬
‫‪ .12‬ﺑﺪﺭ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺒﺎﱐ‪ :‬ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ‪-‬ﺗﻄﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺧﺼﺎﺏ ﺣﱴ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻫﻘﺔ‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﺍﻗﲔ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ‬
‫ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪ ،‬ﺍﳉﺎﺑﺮﻳﺔ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻳﺖ‪.2000 ،‬‬
‫‪ .13‬ﺗﻮﻣﺎ ﺟﻮﺭﺝ ﺧﻮﺭﻱ‪:‬ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻬﺎ‪-‬ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻬﺎ ﻭ ﻋﻼﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻌﻠﻢ‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺍﳌﺆﺳﺴﺔ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺍﺳـﺎﺕ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪،‬ﺑﲑﻭﺕ‪1996،‬‬
‫‪ .14‬ﺟﺎﺑﺮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻤﻴﺪ ﺟﺎﺑﺮ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ‪:‬ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻀﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪.1985،‬‬
‫‪ .15‬ﺣﺴﺎﻡ ﻫﺸﺎﻡ‪ :‬ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﻣﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳉﻠﻔﺔ‪.2007 ،‬‬
‫‪ .16‬ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ‪ :‬ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﰲ ﲣﻄﻴﻂ ﻭﺗﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‪،‬ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﻭﻣﻄﺒﻌـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺷﻌﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ‪.2001 ،‬‬
‫‪ .17‬ﺣﺴﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺩ‪ :‬ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬ﻁ‪ ،7‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻟﻠﻤﻼﻳﲔ‪ ،‬ﺑﲑﻭﺕ‪،‬ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ‪.1984،‬‬
‫‪ .18‬ﺣﻨﻔﻲ ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﳐﺘﺎﺭ ‪ :‬ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﻣﺼﺮ ‪.1997 ،‬‬
‫‪ .19‬ﺭﺟﺎﺀ ﻭﺣﻴﺪ ﺩﻭﻳﺪﺭﻱ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﳑﺎﺭﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌـﺮﰊ‪ ،‬ﺩﻣﺸـﻖ‪،‬‬
‫ﺳﻮﺭﻳﺎ‪.2000 ،‬‬
‫‪ .20‬ﺭﺷﻴﺪ ﻓﺮﺣﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ‪:‬ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻋﺔ ﻛﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ‪،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻀﲑ ﻟﻠﻌﺒﻮﺭ‪،‬ﻃﺒﻌﺔ‪.1999.‬‬
‫‪ .21‬ﺭﻛﺲ ﻧﺎﻳﺖ‪،‬ﻣﺮﺟﺮﻳﺖ ﻧﺎﻳﺖ‪ :‬ﺍﳌﺪﺧﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ‪،‬ﺗﻌﺮﻳﺐ ﺩﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻋﺒـﺪ ﺍﻟﻌـﺎﱄ ﺍﳉﺴـﻤﺎﱐ‬
‫‪،‬ﻁ‪،2‬ﺍﳌﺆﺳﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ‪،‬ﺑﲑﻭﺕ‪.1993 ،‬‬
‫‪ .22‬ﺭﻳﺴﺎﻥ ﺧﺮﻳﺒﻂ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺭﲪﺔ ﳏﻤﺪ‪ :‬ﻃﺮﻕ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻟﻠﻤﻼﻳﲔ‪.1990 ،‬‬
‫‪ .23‬ﺯﻛﻲ ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﻔـﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳـﺎﺿﻲ )ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ‪-‬ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴـﺔ‪-‬ﺍﻟﺮﻋﺎﻳﺔ(‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳـﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻄﺒﺎﻋـﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸـﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪.2006 ،‬‬
‫‪ .24‬ﺯﻳﻨﺐ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺷﻘﲑ‪ :‬ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﻮﻗﲔ ﻭﺍﳌﺘﻤﻴﺰﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻀﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﺔ‪.1998 ،‬‬
‫‪ .25‬ﺳﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ‪:‬ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ‪،‬ﻁ‪،2‬ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺔ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘـﺎﺏ ﻟﻠﻄﺒﺎﻋـﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﺸـﺮ‪،‬ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺻﻞ‪،‬ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ‪.1987،‬‬
‫‪ .26‬ﺳﺎﻣﻲ ﻋﺮﻳﻔﺞ‪ ،‬ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ﺣﺴﲔ‪ :‬ﻣﺼﻄﻠﺢ ﰲ ﻣﻨﻬﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻭﺃﺳﺎﻟﻴﺒﻪ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،2‬ﺩﺭﺍ ﳎـﺪﻭﻻﻭﻱ ﻟﻠﻨﺸـﺮ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪ ،‬ﻋﻤﺎﻥ‪.1999 ،‬‬
‫‪ .27‬ﺳﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ‪ :‬ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﰲ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﻮﻗﲔ –ﲝﻮﺙ ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺆﲤﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻟﺮﻋﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻔـﻮﻗﲔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻢ‪ ،‬ﻣﺼﺮ‪.1991 ،‬‬
‫‪.28‬‬
‫‪.29‬‬
‫‪.30‬‬
‫‪.31‬‬
‫ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺣﺴﲏ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﺓ‪ :‬ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﻮﻗﲔ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪ ،‬ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻥ‪.2000 ،‬‬
‫ﺳﻴﺪ ﲪﺪ ﻏﻨﻴﻢ‪ :‬ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻀﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪.1975 ،‬‬
‫ﺳﻴﺪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻏﻨﻴﻢ‪:‬ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ‪،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪.1983 ،‬‬
‫ﺻﺎﱀ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻫﺮﻱ‪،‬ﻭﻫﻴﺐ ﳎﻴـﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﻴﺴـﻲ‪ :‬ﻋﻠـﻢ ﺍﻟـﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻌـﺎﻡ‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﻨـﺪﻱ ﻟﻠﻨﺸـﺮ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪،‬ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻥ‪.1999،‬‬
‫‪ .32‬ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻲ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﺎﱐ‪ :‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻮﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﻠﻮﻡ‪،‬ﺑﲑﻭﺕ‪،‬ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ‪،‬‬
‫‪.1994‬‬
‫‪ .33‬ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺍﺟـﺔ‪:‬ﺍﻟﻘﻴـﺎﺱ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻘـﻮﱘ ﰲ ﻋﻠـﻢ ﺍﻟـﻨﻔﺲ‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻴـﺎﺯﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴـﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺸـﺮ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪،‬ﻋﻤﺎﻥ‪.1997،‬‬
‫‪ .34‬ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍ‪‬ﻴﺪ ﻧﺸﻮﺍﰐ‪ :‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻮﻱ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،3‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﺑﲑﻭﺕ‪.1987 ،‬‬
‫‪ .35‬ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﻟﺒﻴﺐ ﻓﺮﺍﺝ ﻭ ﺍﲪﺪ ﺯﻛﻲ ﳏﻤﺪ‪:‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻲ‪،‬ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻀﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﺔ‪.1967،‬‬
‫‪ .36‬ﻋﺰﺕ ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﺷﻒ‪ :‬ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪.1991 ،‬‬
‫‪ .37‬ﻋﻠﻲ ﳛﻴﺎ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻮﺭﻱ ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺔ ‪ ،‬ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪.1971 ،1‬‬
‫‪ .38‬ﻋﻤﺮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻋﺒﺶ‪ :‬ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪.2001 ،‬‬
‫‪ .39‬ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍ‪‬ﺪ‪ ،‬ﲨﺎﻱ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻜﻲ‪ :‬ﲣﻄﻴﻂ ﺑﺮﺍﻣﺞ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﻭﺗﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﻋﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﰲ ﻛـﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘـﺪﻡ‪،‬‬
‫ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ‪ ،‬ﻣﺼﺮ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪.1997 ،‬‬
‫‪ .40‬ﻓﺆﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﻬﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪ‪ :‬ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﻤﻮ‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ ‪.1956 ،‬‬
‫‪ .41‬ﻓﺆﺍﺩ ﻧﺼﺤﻲ‪ :‬ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﻭﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ‪.1980 ،‬‬
‫‪ .42‬ﻗﺎﺳﻢ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻗﺎﺳﻢ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﰲ ﺃﻟﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻴﺪﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﺍﳌﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﻨﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴـﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿـﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ‪.1978 ،‬‬
‫‪ .43‬ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺩﺳﻮﻗﻲ‪:‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻓﻖ‪،‬ﻁ‪ ،3‬ﻣﺼﺮ‪.1985 ،‬‬
‫‪ .44‬ﻣﺎﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺷﻴﻐﻞ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻱ‪ ،‬ﺗﺮﲨﺔ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺳﻨﻴﻢ ﺭﻓﻌﺖ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻀﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻣﺼﺮ‪ ،‬ﺩﻭﻥ ﺳﻨﺔ ﻧﺸﺮ‪.‬‬
‫‪ .45‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﺃﺯﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ‪ :‬ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻮﺻﻞ‪.1988 ،‬‬
‫‪ .46‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺎﺯﻡ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ‪:‬ﺃﺳﺲ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍ ﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﻓﺎﺀ ﻟـﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﺎﻋـﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸـﺮ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ‪.2005 ،‬‬
‫‪ .47‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻋﻼﻭﻱ‪ :‬ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻋﺔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﻜﺘـﺎﺏ ﻟﻠﻨﺸـﺮ‪ ،‬ﻣﺼـﺮ‪،‬‬
‫‪.1998‬‬
‫‪ .48‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻋﻼﻭﻱ‪:‬ﻣﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪،‬ﻁ‪،5‬ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪.2006،‬‬
‫‪ .49‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻋﻼﻭﻱ‪:‬ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻋﺔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴـﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺿـﻴﲔ‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﻣﺮﻛـﺰ ﺍﻟﻜﺘـﺎﺏ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ‪،‬ﻣﺼـﺮ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪.1998،‬‬
‫‪ .50‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻋﻼﻭﻱ‪ ،‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﻧﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺭﺿﻮﺍﻥ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻭﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿـﻲ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪،2‬‬
‫ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪.1988 ،‬‬
‫‪ .51‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﺷﻔﻴﻖ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ‪-‬ﺍﳋﻄﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ‪.1985 ،‬‬
‫‪ .52‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ ﺻﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺶ‪،‬ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﳏﻤﺪ‪:‬ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ‪،‬ﻣﺆﺳﺴـﺔ ﳐﺘـﺎﺭ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪.1994،‬‬
‫‪ .53‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﻟﻄﻔﻲ ﻃﻪ‪ :‬ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﲔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪.2002 ،‬‬
‫‪ .54‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﺯﻳﺪﺍﻥ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﻄﻔﻞ ﻭ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻫﻖ ﻭ ﺃﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪،‬‬
‫‪.1972‬‬
‫‪ .55‬ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﻋﻨﺎﻥ‪ :‬ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴـﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴـﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴــﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳـﺎﺿﻴــﺔ )ﻧﻈﺮﻳــﺔ ﻭﺗﻄﺒﻴــﻖ‪-‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﻳﺐ(‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪.1995 ،‬‬
‫‪ .56‬ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﲪﺎﺩ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ‪ ،‬ﲣﻄﻴﻂ ﻭﺗﻄﺒﻴـﻖ ﻭﻗﻴـﺎﺩﺓ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،2‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜـﺮ ﺍﻟﻌـﺮﰊ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪.2001،‬‬
‫‪ .57‬ﻣﻔﱵ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﲪﺎﺩ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﻠﺠﻨﺴﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻮﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻫﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﻁ‪ ،1‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪،‬‬
‫‪.1996‬‬
‫‪ .58‬ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﳎﻴﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﱃ‪:‬ﺍﻹﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪،‬ﻁ‪،2‬ﻋﻤﺎﻥ‪.1999،‬‬
‫‪ .59‬ﻧﺒﻴﻞ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ‪:‬ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺼﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻹﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ)ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ‪-‬ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ‪-‬ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ‪-‬ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻓـﻖ‪-‬ﺍﻻﺿـﻄﺮﺍﺑﺎﺕ‪-‬‬
‫ﺍﻹﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻼﺝ(‪،‬ﻁ‪،1‬ﺍﻳﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ‪.2004 ،‬‬
‫‪ .60‬ﻧﺰﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻟﺐ‪ :‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ‪ ،‬ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ‪.1993 ،‬‬
‫‪ .61‬ﻫﺪﻯ ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻤـﺪ ﺍﳋﻀـﺮﻱ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜـﺔ ﻻﻧﺘﻘـﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺣـﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻜﺘﺒـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪.2004 ،‬‬
‫‪ .62‬ﻭﺟﻴﻪ ﳏﺒﻮﺏ ﺟﺎﺳﻢ‪ :‬ﻃﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻭﻃﺮﻕ ﺇﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ‪ ،‬ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﳌﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋـﺮ‪،‬‬
‫‪.1995‬‬
‫‪ v‬ﺍ‪‬ﻼﺕ ﻭﺍﳉﺮﺍﺋﺪ‪:‬‬
‫‪ .63‬ﺟﺮﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ‪ :‬ﻋﺪﺩ ‪ 20 ،1137‬ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ ‪.2002‬‬
‫‪ .64‬ﻓﻴﺼﻞ ﻋﻴﺎﺵ‪ :‬ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﺍ‪‬ﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺜﻘﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻋﺪﺩ ‪ ،02‬ﻣﺴﺘﻐﺎﱎ‪.1997 ،‬‬
‫‪ .65‬ﳎﻠﺔ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺩﺙ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪ 118،23‬ﻣﺎﻱ ‪،1986‬ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪.‬‬
‫‪ .66‬ﳏﻤﺪ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭﻱ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻳﺔ ﻓﻮﺯ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻖ‪،‬ﺟﺮﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺎﻙ‪،‬ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪،26‬ﻧﻮﻓﻤﱪ‪،1993‬ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪.‬‬
‫‪ .67‬ﻣﻴﺨﺎﺋﻴﻞ ﻣﻌﻮﺽ‪ :‬ﻗﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺻﺤﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ‪ ،‬ﳎﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﻟﻠﻨﺸـﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴـﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿـﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻐﺎﱎ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪ ،01‬ﺩﻳﺴﻤﱪ ‪.2001‬‬
‫‪ v‬ﺍﳌﺬﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﺋﻞ‪:‬‬
‫‪ .68‬ﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ‪ :‬ﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﻋﻼﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻃﺮﻭﺣﺔ ﻣﺎﺟﺴـﺘﲑ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‪1996 ،‬‬
‫‪ .69‬ﺃﲪﺪ ﻋﺮﰊ ﻋﻨﺎﻥ‪ :‬ﺍﻹﳒﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﻼﻋﱯ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﰲ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﻭﻋﻼﻗﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺩﻛﺘـﻮﺭﺍﻩ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻣﻮﺳﻜﻮ‪.1984 ،‬‬
‫ ﺩﺭﺍﺳـﺔ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻧﻴـﺔ ﻋﻠـﻰ‬،‫ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‬:‫ ﻋﺼﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ‬.70
،‫ ﺍﻹﺳـﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ‬،‫ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺒﻨﲔ‬،‫ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺩﻛﺘﻮﺭﺍﻩ‬،‫ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻼﻛﻢ‬
.1979
:‫ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺒﻴﺔ‬-‫ﺏ‬
:‫ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ‬v
71. AKRAMOV: sélection et préparation des jeunes footballeur, o.p.u, Alger, 1990.
72. Bernard turpin : préparation et entrainement du footballeur, édition amphora, paris ,France,
1996.
73. Bernard Turpin: Prèparation et entrainement du footballeur¸Edition Amphora¸
paris¸novembre 2002.
74. Cazorla et fahri: exigences physiques et physiologiques actuelles¸ revue EPS n 273¸ sep oct.
198.
75. EDGAR. H: Méthodologie d'Entraînement, Edition Vigot, Paris, 1985.
76. Erwin H: Entraînement sportif des enfants, Imprimé en France, Edition vigot, 1987.
77. ERWIN H: Entraînement sportif des entfans, Imprimé en France, Edition V
78. Jean-Pierre Rolland:l’évaluation de la personnalité(le modèle en cinq facteurs)¸pierre
mardaga éditeur¸Belgique¸2004.
79. Jürgen Weineck: Manuel d'entraînement, 4e édition révisée et augmentée, vigot.
80. Richard B, Alderman (r): Manuel de psychologie du sport, Ed vigot,1983,Paris.
81. Richard Mon Peti: Problème lier à la détection des talons en sport, Edition vigot, 1989.
82. Sage. G: An asseessement of personality profiles and withim intercollegiate athletes from
differents sport. c(ed), psychology of sports may field, publishing company 1976.
‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ‬
‫ﻣﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺑﺴﻴﺪﻱ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ‪-‬ﺯﺭﺍﻟﺪﺓ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﻪ ﻟﻠﻤﺪﺭﺑﲔ ﻭ ﺧﱪﺍﺀ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﰲ ﺇﻃﺎﺭ ﺍﳒﺎﺯ ﻣﺬﻛﺮﺓ ﻣﺎﺟﺴﺘﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘـﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿـﻲ ﺑﻌﻨـﻮﺍﻥ"ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤـﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺴـﻤﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ"ﻛﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ" ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ"‪.‬‬
‫ﻧﻀﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻳﺪﻳﻜﻢ ﻫﺪﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺟﲔ ﻣﻨﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺑﻐﺮﺽ ﺇﻓﺎﺩﺗﻨﺎ ﰲ ﲨﻊ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣـﺎﺕ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﺒﺤﺜﻨﺎ ﻫﺪﺍ ﻭ ﳓﻴﻄﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺪﻟﻮﻥ ‪‬ﺎ ﻻ ﺗﺴـﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﺇﻻ‬
‫ﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﻫﺎﻣﺔ‪ /‬ﻳﺮﺟﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﺟﻴﺪ ﻣﻊ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺇﺷﺎﺭﺓ )‪ (Χ‬ﰲ ﺍﳋﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳـﺒﺔ‬
‫ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﻛﻞ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺧﲑ ﻟﻜﻢ ﻣﲏ ﺟﺰﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎﻥ‪.‬‬
‫ﲢﺖ ﺇﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ‪/‬‬
‫ﺑﻦ ﺗﻮﻣﻲ ﻧﺎﺻﺮ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ‪/‬‬
‫ﺷﺮﻳﻔﻲ ﺣﻠﻴﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﺴﻴﲑ ﻛﻢ ﻟﻠﺤﺼﺺ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺒﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﻫﻞ ﺻﺎﺩﻓﺘﻢ ﺗﻼﻣﻴﺬ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ؟‬
‫ﻻ‬
‫ﻧﻌﻢ‬
‫‪ -2‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﻘﻮﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ؟‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫‪ -3‬ﰲ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻗﻴﺎﻣﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ‪‬ﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺭﻓﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻘﲏ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺪﱐ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ‬
‫‪ -4‬ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﺘﻤﺪﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ؟‬
‫ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ‬
‫ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﺑﻄﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫ﲤﺎﺭﻳﻦ ﻭﺃﻟﻌﺎﺏ ﺗﻨﺎﻓﺴﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻼﺕ ﲡﺮﻳﺒﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ‬
‫‪ -5‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﺄﺧﺬﻭﻥ ﺑﻌﲔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻜﻢ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ؟‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪ -6‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﺄﺧﺬﻭﻥ ﺑﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻔﺤﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﻴﺎﻣﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ؟‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪ -7‬ﻫﻞ ﳛﻈﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺊ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻓﻜﻢ ؟‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪ -8‬ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﺘﺒﻌﻜﻢ ﳌﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻫﻞ ‪‬ﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﳍﻢ؟‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪ -9‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ؟‬
‫ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻼﺕ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺎﻭﺭ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ‬
‫ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺘﻬﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ‬
‫‪ -10‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﺘﺒﻊ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ ؟‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪ -11‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﺴﺎﻋﺪﻭﻥ ﰲ ﻣﺸﺎﻛﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﺘﺮﺿﻬﻢ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ؟‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪ -12‬ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺭﺩ ﻓﻌﻠﻜﻢ ﺍﲡﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻛﺎﺕ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﻳﺔ "ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺫﺓ" ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﺎ ﻭﻣﻌﺎﳉﺘﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﺄﺧﺼﺎﺋﻲ ﻧﻔﺲ‬
‫ﲡﺎﻫﻠﻬﺎ‬
‫‪ -13‬ﻫﻞ ﲡﺮﻭﻥ ﻓﺤﻮﺻﺎﺕ ﻧﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ؟‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪ -14‬ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻜﻢ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻜﻢ ‪‬ﻢ ؟‬
‫ﺯﺍﺋـﺪ‬
‫ﻗﻠﻴـﻞ‬
‫ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ‬
‫ﻋـﺎﺩﻱ‬
‫‪ -15‬ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﺄﺧﺬﻭﻥ ﺑﻌﲔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﻼﻣﺢ‬
‫ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻬﻢ؟‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪ -16‬ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﺘﺒﻌﻜﻢ ﳌﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﻨﻈﺮﻭﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ‬
‫ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻬﻢ؟‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪ -17‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﺄﺧﺬﻭﻥ ﺑﻌﲔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻜﻢ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺷﺌﲔ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺑﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ؟‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫‪ -18‬ﻫﻞ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﱐ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﺮﺭ ﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ؟‬
‫ﻛﺜـﲑﺍ‬
‫ﻗﻠﻴـﻼ‬
‫ﻻ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ‬
‫‪ -19‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﺬﺑﺬﺏ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺟﻲ )ﺍﻻﻛﺘﺌﺎﺑﻴﺔ( ﺍﳌﺘﻜﺮﺭ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ؟‬
‫ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺒﲑ‬
‫ﻻ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ‬
‫ﻗﻠﻴـﻼ‬
‫‪ -20‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﺣﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻳﻊ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﺮﺭﺓ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﺎﺭﺓ( ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ؟‬
‫ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺒﲑ‬
‫ﻻ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ‬
‫ﻗﻠﻴـﻼ‬
‫‪ -21‬ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﺘﺒﻌﻜﻢ ﳌﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﻮﱄ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﺎ ﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺭﺑﻂ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ؟‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫‪ -22‬ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﺘﺒﻌﻜﻢ ﳌﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﰊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻫﻞ ﺗﺄﺧﺬﻭﻥ ﺑﻌﲔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﳍﺪﻭﺀ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﻫﻮﺏ؟‬
‫ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ‬
‫ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ‬
‫‪ -23‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻭﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻠﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ؟‬
‫ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺒﲑ‬
‫ﻗﻠﻴـﻼ‬
‫ﻻ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ‬
‫‪ -24‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﺣﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﳋﻮﻑ ﻭﺳﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﺒﺎﻙ )ﺍﻟﻜﻒ "ﺍﻟﻀﺒﻂ"( ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﰲ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻪ؟‬
‫ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺒﲑ‬
‫ﻗﻠﻴـﻼ‬
‫ﻻ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ‬
Téléchargement